If Gushing over Magical Girls is in violation of site policies, this is as well. It's a revenge-rape porn flick with the MC victimizing numerous underage characters.

i'm pretty sure Redo has been discussed here already?

ETA: Yeah we've already discussed Redo, consensus was to purge only the Light Novel adaptation for pedopandering concerns.

Edited by worldwidewoomy on Apr 19th 2024 at 12:08:44 PM

Stan GaruKaru for clear skin

If the OP doesn't bring any new arguments to the table, this thread should be closed.

As I recall, the main sticking point was one of the Hero's Slave Harem being canonically twelve according to the source novels (not the adaptations, underline). Keeping the adaptations was rationalized by the fact the characters' ages aren't actually mentioned in them and the character in question doesn't "look" underage.

I disagreed with the "keep" call then, and I disagree with it now.

Edited by StarSword on Apr 19th 2024 at 3:02:34 PM

I mean, mentioned age and young appearance are both very relevant when it comes to determining if something is pedopandering. If the character in question has their age intentionally obscured, it seems like they were trying to do the opposite in the adaptation. I think it can still skate by, though this work is very borderline. At the time my main concern was actually Keyaru's age thanks to the time travel stuff.

Of course, new arguments are necessary here.

Edited by WarJay77 on Apr 19th 2024 at 3:05:18 PM

Current Project: Incorruptible Pure Pureness

Didn't this anime was discussed before ?

Yeah, linked above.

Current Project: Incorruptible Pure Pureness

Unless OP can provide new arguments that weren't used in the linked discussion, I suggest just locking with no need to vote.

TroperWall / WikiMagic Cleanup

Yeah, we already went through this a year earlier and that was one of the most debated things on CV discussions topping 153 comments (discounting 2012 and earlier discussions). We are not going through this again unless OP has a decent argument about Redo of Healer.

MB Pending | MB Drafts | MB Dates

We're doing this again?

Not sure how relevant my vote is, but after reading the old forum thread I suppose I'll "vote"

[x] Keep the anime, leave the former literature article cut.

Further, your affiant sayeth naught.

Gonna go with a tentative keep, given that this case has already been settled in the past and there's no new evidence regarding it as of now. Though I could be swayed to cut if new evidence arrives.

Edited by jlvs200s on Apr 20th 2024 at 9:37:26 PM

"Stand Proud, Sukuna, you are strong" | He/Him

Yeah. My vote is "we do not need to dig this up again."

I despise hypocrisy, unless of course it is my own.

Okay, so looking at the votes so far-

---

@Pixie_Knight: Reevaluate
@StarSword, @WarJay77: More information needed
@animuacid, @Fighteer, @Mrph1 (inasmuch as a mod-hat post is a "vote"), @Amonimus, @Siegfried1337, @Ramidel, and I: Dismiss
@jlvs200s: Tentative keep

---

That sound about right?

---

post-post edit: Well, I refreshed my page before I posted it and saw the latest mod hat post. Mrph is quick

Edited by Floater on Apr 20th 2024 at 4:00:56 AM

Further, your affiant sayeth naught.

i wasn't involved in the actuall discussion, but i'm also voting to dismiss unless any new information is brought up. it's been evaulated already and the problem material was already cut from the wiki because of it.

Stan GaruKaru for clear skin

+1 to leave this one alone.

keep

Am I that troper? Maybe, maybe not, the world will never know.

Dismiss the case, until new evidence on why the page should not stay is given.

Edited by callmeamuffin on Apr 21st 2024 at 1:49:51 AM

Come play Character Uplift Game!

Updated vote count

@Pixie_Knight: Reevaluate (1 vote)
@StarSword: Cut (1 vote)
@animuacid, @Fighteer, @Mrph1 (inasmuch as a mod-hat post is a "vote"), @Amonimus, @Siegfried1337, @Ramidel, @worldwidewoomy, @Willbyr, @opal6561, @callmeamuffin, @WarJay77 and I: Dismiss (12 votes)
@jlvs200s: Tentative keep (1 vote)

---

Consensus does seem pretty clear from this, but Mrph said the thread would be open for another day, so I'll let the mods handle whatever needs doing.

---

and Updated.

Edited by Floater on Apr 21st 2024 at 11:20:02 AM

Further, your affiant sayeth naught.

Eh? I'm voting to keep. I was just reiterating my point from last time, to clarify what it was that I had personally been concerned over. But with no other arguments...

Current Project: Incorruptible Pure Pureness

My vote was to cut everything, and it still is.