The example is also too recent, as Genre-Killer requires at least a ten year waiting period since the genre was "killed".
I believe the waiting period is from the release of the work or year of the event, not the genre itself being killed.
Anyway, should I make an "arguable examples" cleanup?
TRS Queue | Works That Require Cleanup of Complaining | Troper WallI feel like if a genre was "killed" but revived less than a decade later, it defeats the point of having a ten-year waiting period for that to be kosher. (I know this is still derailing the intended point of the thread.)
Edited by MorganWick on May 19th 2021 at 4:14:54 AM
I'll cut the example for the reasons mentioned by both of you and also for Examples Are Not Arguable.
I'll ask again though. Should I start a cleanup thread for "arguable" examples?
TRS Queue | Works That Require Cleanup of Complaining | Troper WallLess a question of "should you?" and more "do you want to?" But in, like, 100% of cases, the "arguably" and/or the entire entry can be deleted. I wouldn't bother discussing myself.
Good point. I won't do the cleanup.
TRS Queue | Works That Require Cleanup of Complaining | Troper Wall
While doing wick cleaning for the TRS for Genre-Killer, I came across this example on Milli Vanilli:
As is known, Examples Are Not Arguable, so this example can probably go.
But is there a cleanup for this kind of thing? I feel like some examples presented as "arguable" might be legit, but just need to be rewritten, while some shouldn't. Should I start an "arguable examples" cleanup over in Long-Term?
(Note that the odd title is because I was going to ask this in ATT, but I decided to ask here to get some feedback on a potential cleanup.)
Edited by themayorofsimpleton on May 18th 2021 at 4:34:45 AM
TRS Queue | Works That Require Cleanup of Complaining | Troper Wall