#2: Dec 12th 2015 at 1:43:04 AM
I am concerned that such a namespace would attract a lot of misuse. Deconstruction is a frequently misused concept.
"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard Feynman
TuefelHundenIV
Night Clerk of the Apacalypse.
from Doomsday Facility Corner Store.
Since: Aug, 2009
Relationship Status: I'd need a PowerPoint presentation
#3: Dec 12th 2015 at 7:23:20 AM
I am with Septimus on this. On the surface it seems like an interesting or a good idea but given the habits of editors as a whole that might not last very long.
Who watches the watchmen?
KJMackley
Since: Jan, 2001
#4: Dec 13th 2015 at 8:56:59 PM
It seems more like a Just For Fun forum post than something that needs an entire namespace devoted to it.
WhatArtThee
Since: Oct, 2015
#5: Jan 17th 2016 at 9:53:49 AM
I think this would be a cool idea for a Just For Fun Page.
Just another day in the life of Jimmy Nutrin
Total posts: 5
I think it would be interesting if the wiki had a section and/or namespace dedicated to deconstructions, similar to the existing Playing With namespace. Tropers could write a short description of what a work of fiction would be like if it was deconstructed. For example: