For reasons I don't quite know, Pokemon Go is only being released in Japan soon right after the USA release and other countries. The country has issued a fore-warning to people interested in getting it.
Pokemon go was made by Niantic, an Amercian company, owned by google, using rights purchased from Nintendo.
Releasing in the States first makes sense once you realize that.
edited 21st Jul '16 8:48:37 AM by Imca
Yeah it's a US company and the original idea for it was that April fools day thing done by Google Earth.
And then there's the disastrous server issues Niantic has had.
Granted, major server issues aren't alien to players of Japanese free to play mobile games, but seeing how Nintendo likes to play it safe, it seems plausible that they would wait and see whether the back end improves.
That, and finalizing whatever that McDonald's collaboration was.
I have disagreed with her a lot, but comparing her to republicans and propagandists of dictatorships is really low. - An idiot@ Ogodei:
The Yakzua are also involved in more legitimate side of Japanese porn — and indeed, Japanese entertainment in general.
Keep Rolling OnThe Yakuza seem to basically be the government in a lot of cases, going by this thread.
After WWII, the emerging Japanese government made some questionable deals with the yakuza in an effort to get crime organized. In some ways, it worked. In many others, it didn't.
They are cracking down on them in some ways, however. For example, the yakuza bosses are now legally liable for everything their underlings do. You can sure as hell bet that cut down on murders and other violent crimes.
Kyoto pushes to retrieve share of Imperial action to honor deep cultural roots
Those who traced their aristocratic lineage back to ancient times convinced themselves the Emperor was merely “visiting” Edo, and would one day return to his true home. The Emperor himself reportedly said he would return to Kyoto someday. But his departure also drained Kyoto of wealthy merchants, skilled craftsmen and artists, and intellectuals, all of whom followed him to Edo, now present-day Tokyo.
Within a few decades, Kyoto was considered a stagnant backwater by a Japan that was racing to catch up with the West. But Kyoto never really gave up hoping that at least some members of the Imperial family would one day “come home.”
Now, nearly a century and a half after the Meiji Restoration, during which the capital became Tokyo, Kyoto, a major international tourism mecca, is once again pressing its case for relocating part of the Imperial family there under the guise of a project local officials dub the “twin capitals” system, part of a larger vision for 2040 that top city and prefectural officials, as well as leading members of Kyoto’s business community, are supporting.
The 2040 vision, revealed three years ago, includes the usual large-scale, bureaucratically managed construction and real estate projects with lofty names and vague goals that bureaucrats, politicians and their financial supporters in the construction and real estate sectors always love.
It also emphasizes municipal support for the development of renewable-energy technology to generate electricity locally and make Kyoto nuclear-free by 2040.
But another key goal is to further emphasize Kyoto’s role as an internationally recognized city of Japanese culture.
One of the ways Kyoto wants to do this is through its “twin capitals” concept, in which Kyoto would become Japan’s official historical cultural capital and Tokyo would be remain its political and economic capital. That would mean moving members of the Imperial family to Kyoto.
“As Kyoto has become the center of Japanese culture, Kyoto is the most appropriate city for Imperial family members to live in,” Kyoto Mayor Daisaku Kadokawa said in 2013.
Other Kyoto officials insist that the reasons for the move are not only historical or cultural but also practical.
“The twin capitals concept was born of the desire to have members of the Imperial family live not only in Tokyo, but also in Kyoto for the safety, security and prosperity of the Imperial household in the midst of a Japan that is dangerously over-concentrated in Tokyo,” Kyoto Gov. Keiji Yamada said in the report.
Yuichi Ishizawa, a prefectural official involved with the project, said while efforts have continued since 2013 to achieve the twin capitals goal, none of the basic questions has been answered, including which members of the Imperial family might be persuaded to move and, most importantly, what their roles in Kyoto would be.
Since 2013, an advisory panel consisting of Kyoto-based academics and others has met to discuss issues related to the twin capitals concept.
The panel has suggested the royals might participate in Kyoto’s traditional cultural events, including festivals, as well as international conferences, and meet with foreign VI Ps visiting the region. It’s also been proposed that their transfers to Kyoto be conducted gradually, starting with facilities that allow long-term stays of a week or month to be made for certain events before settling them in Kyoto permanently.
What Kyoto wishes, however, would require approval from both the Diet and the Imperial Household Agency.
Last July, Kenta Izumi, a Lower House member from Kyoto, raised the twin capitals concept in the Diet and called for more royal ceremonies to be conducted in Kyoto, although he did not specifically call for any member of the Imperial family to move there.
In his reply, Chief Cabinet Secretary Yoshihide Suga merely said the government was aware Kyoto was pursing the twin capitals concept but did not dismiss it out of hand.
Behind the scenes, Kyoto politicians and business leaders continue to quietly lobby the central government on the issue. Recent reports that Emperor Akihito may abdicate in a few years may also affect the debate in coming months, although how, exactly, is unclear.
Given Kyoto’s long history as the home of the Imperial family and Japan’s historical and cultural traditions, its political leaders are unlikely to abandon their quest to have some of the royals “return,” regardless of what the prime minister or the Diet of the moment might decide to do.
There's been an attack at a facility for the disabled. Fifteen people are dead and more are injured.
edited 25th Jul '16 3:36:29 PM by AlleyOop
More than the sarin gas attacks in the Tokyo subway in 95.
edited 25th Jul '16 3:56:57 PM by majoraoftime
That seriously does not help the sad state of the disabled in Japan... sigh.
Apparently it was a former employee, who turned himself in. Looks like a workplace rampage.
Politics is the skilled use of blunt objects.How do you manage that many killed and injured with a knife rampage?
If the victims were physically/mentally impaired and incapable of fighting back, and trusted the individual in question because they were familiar with him...
Fuck...
Politics is the skilled use of blunt objects.Does Japan have the death penalty? I'm not advocating for or against in this case. I'm just wondering because he turned himself in. Coming to his senses after some rage or temporary insanity? Feeling guilty? Hoping for a less severe punishment? I can't think of any other case where somebody went on a rampage like that and then turned himself in, they always seem to go out in a blaze of glory. Is him turning himself in a Japanese culture thing, or a personal thing?
Knife attacks can get just as deadly as gun ones, even against victims able to fight back it is not unheard of to have more then 20 victims.
And yes, we do have the death penelty, via hanging.
Could be coming to his senses, could be trying to confess out of a weird sense of honour, could even be full nuts and not think what he did was wrong.
“And the Bunny nails it!” ~ Gabrael “If the UN can get through a day without everyone strangling everyone else so can we.” ~ CyranI see the report and thought, another massacre again? At first I thought this was another terror attack by IS but it turns out to be in Japan and the perp had either issues or is clearly bigoted against people with disabilities, which in sadly, many of his victims were.
I just hope that guy face his crimes.
When organizations of people with disabilities see this report, I would think they would NOT be pleased. At all.
edited 25th Jul '16 6:15:43 PM by general_tiu
The guy used to work at the facility, it was problem an issue related to his employment, mixed with mental illness of some sort.
I would think that this case would have to result in a death sentence, life imprisonment or indefinite detention due to mental illness. He'll never walk free again.
Politics is the skilled use of blunt objects.him turning himself in does sound very Japanese. I do think there is a precedent for it, having to do with the culture's group/harmony focus, and not causing too much of a public disturbance with your issues, which I think murder apparently falls under?
I'm afraid I can't explain myself, sir. Because I am not myself, you see?Indeed, I prefer that he gets either a life sentence or gets executed.
edited 25th Jul '16 6:23:24 PM by general_tiu
If you didn't wanna cause a public disturbance you wouldn't murder in the first place.
He allegedly said that he wanted to kill every disabled person in the world. So yeah, he's a bigot.
Now if he does get the death penalty, I want it to be done by a disabled person, just for the pure irony.
It makes me feel like going to Japan just to give all the artists a hug.