Every once in a while, I go back and archive binge it. When it's good, it's amazing. Unfortunately, most of the time, it's really esoteric humor.
I'll take this cupcake... AND EAT IT!
And then sometimes, it's hardly intended to be funny at all. Which can be fine, too, even when they're not my cup of tea. Hey, if somebody else enjoys them... I know I've contributed things that have been misses for others, but I hope I entertain some people with at least some of mine. (Just as I am entertained by contributors both more and less prolific than I.)
How — and when — do you tell a philosophy it's adopted? What do you do when it wants to meet its birth adherents?
No longer a forum herald
And then sometimes, someone responds to a post over a year old. (Not that you don't have a valid point, but do try to read timestamps before posting, and make it clear you are intentionally necroing.)
With that out of the way...yeah, it's not exactly for everyone. The original Garfield Minus Garfield makes sense in comparison, but in the words of Bill Watterson, this is just "weirdness for weirdness' sake, and doesn't hold up very well".
Expergiscēre cras, medior quam hodie. (Awaken tomorrow, better than today.)
I'll take this cupcake... AND EAT IT!
Okay, I'll make it clear here: I posted with the full knowledge that the previous post was over a year old, having refreshed myself on the actual rules regarding such.
How — and when — do you tell a philosophy it's adopted? What do you do when it wants to meet its birth adherents?
Square Root of Minus Garfield. Garfield remixes. Anyone read it? I think it's hit and miss, but the hits are quite funny.
http://www.mezzacotta.net/garfield/