Follow TV Tropes

Following

Does Not Illustrate: Evil Twin

Go To

theAdeptRogue iRidescence Since: Nov, 2011 Relationship Status: Having tea with Cthulhu
iRidescence
#1: Feb 4th 2014 at 1:45:15 AM

Either a JAFAAC or this, but all I see in the page image is an evil-looking frog, with no indication that it has a twin.

I currently have nothing to suggest though

rodneyAnonymous Sophisticated as Hell from empty space Since: Aug, 2010
#2: Feb 4th 2014 at 1:53:59 AM

It's on the "per admin request" special cases list.

Becky: Who are you? The Mysterious Stranger: An angel. Huck: What's your name? The Mysterious Stranger: Satan.
treelo Since: Jun, 2010
#3: Feb 4th 2014 at 2:25:19 AM

I still don't care for the pic even a little because it demonstrates little (and scared the bejesus out of me the first time I saw it) but admin fiats don't need to make sense and in this case, it's not a good call IMO.

edited 4th Feb '14 2:27:10 AM by treelo

Rethkir A Trusted Friend in Science and Ponies from the gap between dimensions Since: Mar, 2013
#4: Feb 4th 2014 at 3:47:31 AM

I don't care for it either. It's just an evil Kermit. No indication that it's a twin.

Image Source. Please update whenever an image is changed.
SeptimusHeap from Switzerland (Edited uphill both ways) Relationship Status: Mu
#5: Feb 4th 2014 at 3:57:05 AM

Also, the older thread where the admin request was stated.

"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard Feynman
treelo Since: Jun, 2010
#6: Feb 4th 2014 at 4:13:05 AM

Well, that was stupid. I mean, I know he's admin but come on, it's classic JAFAAC and tells nothing, don't see why this pic was so good he needed to enforce it being there though it breaks our own guidelines. Sometimes the admin should have a better reason than "everyone knows who regular Kermit is" or at least consider the fact it's simply not a good image by the conventions for images we've set no matter how fond he might be of it.

edited 4th Feb '14 4:15:08 AM by treelo

AnotherDuck No, the other one. from Stockholm Since: Jul, 2012 Relationship Status: Mu
No, the other one.
JapaneseTeeth Existence Weighed Against Nonbeing from Meinong's jungle Since: Jan, 2001 Relationship Status: Mu
Existence Weighed Against Nonbeing
#8: Feb 4th 2014 at 6:33:26 AM

At the very least, do you think we could get regular Kermit next to the evil one?

Reaction Image Repository
Willbyr Hi (Y2K) Relationship Status: With my statistically significant other
Hi
#9: Feb 4th 2014 at 7:00:09 AM

[up][up] Go ahead and install the better-quality version, just make sure to put that in the edit reason. As for the problems with the pic violating some of our guidelines...well, occasionally we have to accept that things won't always play nice.

treelo Since: Jun, 2010
#10: Feb 4th 2014 at 7:31:57 AM

[up] I find that silly but hey, them's the rules.

edited 4th Feb '14 7:32:39 AM by treelo

AnotherDuck No, the other one. from Stockholm Since: Jul, 2012 Relationship Status: Mu
No, the other one.
lexicon Since: May, 2012
#12: Feb 4th 2014 at 12:12:40 PM

In the last discussion Eddie basically said that he didn't want regular Kermit next to him so there's no reason to have this discussion. Although I do like the image in the last discussion of the girls.

treelo Since: Jun, 2010
#13: Feb 4th 2014 at 12:17:27 PM

I still believe he's wrong and a touch petty to enforce it in such a way and I did like that image too.

edited 4th Feb '14 12:18:04 PM by treelo

Paktra Since: Sep, 2013
#14: Feb 4th 2014 at 2:34:06 PM

I quite like the current, but I do see the concern over it.

And yes, what if Glorious Leader demands it, and forbids using both?..... Shall I not be permitted from mating them in like fashion, my Masters?

edited 4th Feb '14 2:34:52 PM by Paktra

Willbyr Hi (Y2K) Relationship Status: With my statistically significant other
Hi
#15: Feb 4th 2014 at 6:58:30 PM

Alright, we're done here. Locking up.

Add Post

Total posts: 15
Top