Suggestion: Breast Attack

...such as, pray tell?

Torso, stomach, and to some extent, movement and perspective, and how it's illustrated.

I'm sorry, I still don't understand.

And it looks like it, so the art style reinforces the tone of the scene rather than detracts from it. That's what makes a style good or bad; this trope doesn't really involve tone, though, and the context is unimportant, so the stylistic choices are less important.

edited 11th Apr '13 12:15:14 PM by Noaqiyeum

For the record, the source manga has very nice artwork that generally isn't that cartoony-looking. IIRC the suggestion is meant to be a slapstick moment.

You're defining its style as more realistic than it really is intended to be, which naturally brings out a lot of supposed flaws. Take the stomachs, for instance. You say it's a flaw because they're drawn incorrectly. However, that assumes the artist didn't design them like that intentionally because of the style used. Does that make more sense?

Quality-wise, I think the Change 123 is worse, since the pixelation is much more obvious, due to being black-to-white. It also doesn't actually show the attack, but rather implies it through common conventions. Still obvious, but less so than actually showing the trope, like the current.

edited 11th Apr '13 12:45:38 PM by AnotherDuck

What about the purple nurple linked in the comics section?

That's a good one. I don't think it's an improvement, but I do think it's better than the Change123 one.

edited 11th Apr '13 8:03:05 PM by AnotherDuck

Ummmm...what about her getting slapped in the boob is hard to see?

How do you translate "still obvious" to "hard to see"?

Going off this line: "It also doesn't actually show the attack, but rather implies it through common conventions." This isn't Design Elements 201.

Eh, fuck it, it was worth a shot. Locking up.

edited 11th Apr '13 8:25:48 PM by Willbyr