Perpetually Confused
Snogging? Kissing? Cuddling or pretty much any G-rated description of romance? And if the "Map shows shoes of people even when they don't have feet or aren't human or aren't touching the ground" this adds all the more possibilities: Someone carrying a pet in their arms, two people sleeping on bunkbeds... God knows what else...
Furthermore, the feet moving aren't much an indication, since according to an earlier post, the map shows feet even to things that dont have feet/have more than two so clearly the feet movements are not representative of what is going on.
My point is, jumping to "They are clearly having sex" is a bit of a leap in logic. Could be anything.
edited 27th Jan '13 9:16:17 PM by Ghilz
I am having a much eaiser time picturing sex position that would leave feet placed like that than I am picturing innocent positions. Having one person's legs _around_ the other's like that would be uncomfortable, and unnessisary if the other party was not trying to get crotch-access. If they were simply kissing the legs would more likely be threaded (or not even that close).
Hi
Clock is set. Since I started this one and it went the way I suspected it would, I'm good to close this unless someone has a new idea.
Other than a Visual Pun, can't see a reason to continue this.
"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard Feynman
Hi
Clock's up; locking for inactivity. No action is to be taken based on this thread.
I think that just raises questions. If they don't actually touch the floor, the feet aren't really all that indicative of how they're actually positioned, in which case what's actually going on is more or less what you want to be going on. So, they could be playing hide and seek, or they could be playing hide and seek.
Check out my fanfiction!