Follow TV Tropes

Following

Star Trek Into Darkness

Go To

maxwellelvis Mad Scientist Wannabe from undisclosed location Since: Oct, 2009 Relationship Status: In my bunk
Mad Scientist Wannabe
#2: Sep 10th 2012 at 1:28:49 PM

What a stupid reason to make such a stupid title.

Of course, don't you know anything about ALCHEMY?!- Twin clones of Ivan the Great
korpse_man Since: Dec, 2009
#3: Sep 10th 2012 at 1:42:17 PM

So that's a thing...

What I would like to know is will they being 'going boldly' on their 5 year mission, or constantly nipping from the edge of the universe and Back to Earth in a Afternoon? Plus the ya know, the political machinations of the destruction of Vulcan, the Romulans on the war path and a increasingly militant Star-fleet.

SpaceJawa UTINNI! from Right Here Since: Jan, 2001
UTINNI!
#4: Sep 10th 2012 at 2:30:47 PM

I don't buy the explanation for the lack of a colon. Especially considering you've got both Star Trek: The Next Generation and Star Trek: Deep Space Nine on the TV side and, if I'm not mistaken, about all the movies from the old series had colons in the middle of them.

JRPictures Since: Nov, 2010
#5: Sep 10th 2012 at 10:16:14 PM

The title sounds ok. I'll still be seeing it.

SgtRicko Since: Jul, 2009
#6: Sep 10th 2012 at 11:45:08 PM

I'll definatley be seeing it. Just gotta keep reminding myself that it's an alternate universe, and that it only superficially resembles the original series, or else I'm gonna end up ripping it apart over inconsistencies.tongue

KJMackley Since: Jan, 2001
#7: Sep 11th 2012 at 1:01:04 AM

People are already comparing it to Attack Of The Clones for being a disappointing title in a beloved franchise. Maybe they are trying to distance themselves from the main series using the colon format. Maybe the third movie will be Go On A Star Trek. We don't know anything more about what's going on with the movie and thus it might end up an okay movie but this reveal is not a promising start.

edited 11th Sep '12 1:02:07 AM by KJMackley

Drakyndra Her with the hat from Somewhere Since: Jan, 2001
Her with the hat
#8: Sep 11th 2012 at 2:55:14 AM

I want there to be a colon. :(

The owner of this account is temporarily unavailable. Please leave your number and call again later.
GeekCodeRed Did you know this section has a character limit? from A, A, B, B, A Since: Sep, 2010 Relationship Status: TV Tropes ruined my love life
Did you know this section has a character limit?
#9: Sep 11th 2012 at 9:11:17 AM

Well, Dark Of The Moon sounded shitty, yet was quite enjoyable. Though if the Star Trek Curse still lives, then this movie's fucked.

They do have medals for almost, and they're called silver!
odadune Since: Apr, 2012
#10: Sep 11th 2012 at 9:26:16 AM

"The odd-numbered are lousy, even-numbered are good" curse? Into Darkness would be number twelve, if you count all the Star Trek movies made.

GeekCodeRed Did you know this section has a character limit? from A, A, B, B, A Since: Sep, 2010 Relationship Status: TV Tropes ruined my love life
Did you know this section has a character limit?
#11: Sep 11th 2012 at 9:36:10 AM

Yes, but the curse seemingly reversed at Number 10, which was even and bad. Number 11 was odd and good.

They do have medals for almost, and they're called silver!
imadinosaur Since: Oct, 2011
#12: Sep 11th 2012 at 10:07:33 AM

The Star Trek reboot was the worst of the Star Trek films, so would it follow that this will be the best Star Trek film?

edited 11th Sep '12 10:07:48 AM by imadinosaur

Violence is the last refuge of the incompetent.
JRPictures Since: Nov, 2010
#13: Sep 11th 2012 at 2:02:11 PM

[up] The problem with that right there is that a small group of people share that same opinion. Hell that's the first time I've seen anyone say that the reboot is the worst film of the series.

Kostya (Unlucky Thirteen)
#14: Sep 11th 2012 at 2:14:48 PM

I thought the fifth or first were generally considered the worst.

[up][up]Of the ones I've seen I thought the reboot was one of the better ones.

imadinosaur Since: Oct, 2011
#15: Sep 11th 2012 at 5:24:13 PM

The reboot missed the whole point of Star Trek: it was a flashy effects and explosions (and LENS FLARE), with no sense of wonder.

They defeat a black hole not through any clever solution, but by shooting it a lot.

Violence is the last refuge of the incompetent.
Deboss I see the Awesomeness. from Awesomeville Texas Since: Aug, 2009
I see the Awesomeness.
#16: Sep 11th 2012 at 6:27:54 PM

Star Trek rarely seemed to use clever solutions in favor of flinging sciency sounding words together.

Fight smart, not fair.
SpaceJawa UTINNI! from Right Here Since: Jan, 2001
UTINNI!
#17: Sep 11th 2012 at 10:00:55 PM

[up][up] Where was the 'sense of wonder' with Wrath of Kahn? Or First Contact?

Swish Long Live the King Since: Jan, 2001
Long Live the King
#18: Sep 11th 2012 at 10:17:21 PM

[up]You can't demand a "sense of wonder" in the good movies... Because those tend to be the uninteresting parts.

Take the entirety of The Motion Picture, or about half of Search for Spock, for example...

KJMackley Since: Jan, 2001
#19: Sep 11th 2012 at 10:25:38 PM

The Genesis Cave/Planet in Wrath of Khan and the Vulcan landfall in First Contact were both filled with a great sense of wonder and astonishment. In comparison the only comparable scene in Abrams Trek was the reveal of the Enterprise herself, which is a mandatory establishing shot anyway.

I enjoyed the '09 movie as a fun sci-fi action movie but as something embodying the core themes of what Star Trek is about it was lacking.

ZeroPotential Since: Jun, 2010
#20: Sep 12th 2012 at 4:24:00 AM

Yeah, the 09 movie was rather lacking on the "boldly going where no man has gone before" part.

SpaceJawa UTINNI! from Right Here Since: Jan, 2001
UTINNI!
#21: Sep 12th 2012 at 9:40:15 AM

[up] Wouldn't be the first movie to boldly go where everyone has been before.

What was the line from First Contact? "Does anyone remember when when used to be explorers?" Something like that.

resetlocksley Shut up! from Alone in the dark Since: May, 2012 Relationship Status: Only knew I loved her when I let her go
Shut up!
#22: Sep 12th 2012 at 10:51:01 AM

“There's no word that comes after the colon after Star Trek that's cool,” Lindelof told MTV. “Not that Star Trek: Insurrection or First Contact aren't good titles, it's just that everything that people are turned off about when it comes to Trek is represented by the colon.”

What the frell does that even mean? I really don't see how the colon is what turns everyone off of Star Trek. Also, if you don't think any of the words after the colon are "cool", wouldn't the solution be to find a word that is?

"Star Trek Into Darkness" sounds more like a sentence than a title, at least to me.

Fear is a superpower.
TamH70 Since: Nov, 2011 Relationship Status: Faithful to 2D
#23: Sep 12th 2012 at 10:51:51 AM

It doesn't even make a good acronym.

Ronnie Respect the Red Right Hand from Surrounded by Idiots Since: Jan, 2001
Respect the Red Right Hand
#24: Sep 12th 2012 at 12:53:11 PM

The reasoning is the most illogical thing I've read today, and that's saying something, because today I've read a fanfic where the Onceler is a guy with a vagina, and one where the mustache is the Lorax's erogenous zone.

Cider The Final ECW Champion from Not New York Since: May, 2009 Relationship Status: They can't hide forever. We've got satellites.
The Final ECW Champion
#25: Sep 12th 2012 at 12:55:01 PM

Acronyms are for pussies overrated.

Modified Ura-nage, Torture Rack

Total posts: 876
Top