Follow TV Tropes

Following

The NASA Curiosity Rover on Mars

Go To

QuestionMarc Since: Oct, 2011 Relationship Status: Having tea with Cthulhu
#301: Dec 3rd 2012 at 7:02:07 PM

[up] You mean "there"? Their =/= there.

Anyway, I'd be surprised if there's life on Europa. I mean, yeah, there's water, but they must have next to zero energy going through the ice.

It would cool if there was life there tho, if only for the fact that it'll be nothing like the life on earth.

Nohbody "In distress", my ass. from Somewhere in Dixie Since: Jan, 2001 Relationship Status: Mu
"In distress", my ass.
Gaunt88 from Australia Since: Jan, 2001 Relationship Status: 700 wives and 300 concubines
#303: Dec 3rd 2012 at 7:05:35 PM

I think the prevailing theory is that they could get energy from geothermal heat.

edited 3rd Dec '12 7:06:00 PM by Gaunt88

DeviantBraeburn Wandering Jew from Dysfunctional California Since: Aug, 2012
Wandering Jew
#304: Dec 3rd 2012 at 7:10:45 PM

Guys, we found the aliens. NASA was just shooting at the wrong planet

Everything is Possible. But some things are more Probable than others. JEBAGEDDON 2016
Kostya (Unlucky Thirteen)
#305: Dec 3rd 2012 at 7:27:06 PM

I'm undecided on whether or not life exists in other planets in our solar system. I'd like to think it does but it's not going to be planetary raiders or something. We'd have found them by now unless they're insanely good at hiding.

Joesolo Indiana Solo Since: Dec, 2010 Relationship Status: watch?v=dQw4w9WgXcQ
Indiana Solo
#306: Dec 3rd 2012 at 7:53:10 PM

yes I meant there. im tried...

I'm baaaaaaack
KnightofLsama Since: Sep, 2010
#307: Dec 4th 2012 at 12:32:48 AM

[up][up]

Mars and our Moon are really the only planets that we've been able to study extensively. Mercury and Venus are just too hostile to for probes to last long, though that does preclude much chance for life (though Mercury's recently probed Vales of Eternal Night do provide for a remote probability).

But the outer planets and their moons are completely different kettles of fish. Jupiter and Saturn are on such a scale that humans can't really comprehend. If there really are aliens floating in the deeper atmosphere beneath the cloud tops it would be searching for a needle in a haystack of haystacks. Not to mention we've never probed beneath Europa's icy shell and we've only just started to get information back on Titan's methane seas.

AceofSpades Since: Apr, 2009 Relationship Status: Showing feelings of an almost human nature
#308: Dec 4th 2012 at 12:38:22 AM

While on Mercury, I once read this article about how building energy sources/a dyson sphere would involve dismantling Mercury, as well as significant chunks of the asteroid belt. The author apparently felt this would be necessary to gather the energy to terraform Mars and make traveling from here to there a practical thing to do.

Kind of crazy to think about. And well... that would make Pluto no longer the unluckiest object in our solar system.

Euodiachloris Since: Oct, 2010
#309: Dec 4th 2012 at 4:17:21 AM

[up]Sedna, Eris, Makemake et al would argue that Pluto is a prima donna of a dwarf planet... the lucky dog. wink And, I think I saw Ceres sulking somewhere, poor dear, so she was not up to commenting... She might come out of her shell in a few years, though. wink

edited 4th Dec '12 4:20:06 AM by Euodiachloris

tricksterson Never Trust from Behind you with an icepick Since: Apr, 2009 Relationship Status: Above such petty unnecessities
Never Trust
#310: Dec 4th 2012 at 8:06:57 AM

Semi-apropos, maybe this should be retitled "The Space Thread"? I think we could use one.

edited 4th Dec '12 8:07:30 AM by tricksterson

Trump delenda est
QuestionMarc Since: Oct, 2011 Relationship Status: Having tea with Cthulhu
#311: Dec 4th 2012 at 8:27:01 AM

I second that idea, the flow of news specific to Curiosity is drying out and space is awesome.

We could use a space thread.

Colonial1.1 Since: Apr, 2010
#312: Dec 4th 2012 at 8:29:10 AM

Sorry, couldn't resist.

I third that motion.

edited 4th Dec '12 8:29:24 AM by Colonial1.1

Greenmantle V from Greater Wessex, Britannia Since: Feb, 2010 Relationship Status: Hiding
V
#313: Dec 5th 2012 at 3:40:25 AM

Nasa to send new rover to Mars in 2020: To save costs, it will be based on the Curiosity, even using spare parts from the current Rover.

Keep Rolling On
DeMarquis Since: Feb, 2010
#314: Dec 5th 2012 at 8:54:13 AM

I hope this one, at least, will look for life.

Joesolo Indiana Solo Since: Dec, 2010 Relationship Status: watch?v=dQw4w9WgXcQ
Indiana Solo
#315: Dec 5th 2012 at 12:56:20 PM

[up][up] Might as well. if it's not broke don't fix it and all that.

I'm baaaaaaack
Euodiachloris Since: Oct, 2010
#316: Dec 5th 2012 at 1:30:51 PM

[up]Agreed: and, Curiosity is, currently, doing a good job bringing wonderful rashers of bacon home. No need to change the shopper, but maybe to tweak the shopping list, rather. wink

edited 5th Dec '12 1:32:39 PM by Euodiachloris

DeMarquis Since: Feb, 2010
#317: Dec 8th 2012 at 2:45:58 PM

Disagree, actually. Curiosity isn't equiped to look for organic activity.

KnightofLsama Since: Sep, 2010
#318: Dec 8th 2012 at 3:39:10 PM

[up] That's essentially what they're talking about. Using the Curiosity design but just changing the instrument suite.

DeMarquis Since: Feb, 2010
#319: Dec 8th 2012 at 6:28:37 PM

Oh. To me, that's the part of the design that matters.

Joesolo Indiana Solo Since: Dec, 2010 Relationship Status: watch?v=dQw4w9WgXcQ
Indiana Solo
#320: Dec 8th 2012 at 6:53:48 PM

well, the "design" is basically the base of it. The equipment is what it does from that base. kinda like how we've got A1 abrams, and then we've got the bridge-carrier things, engineering vehicles, and a mine clearer based off of it.

I'm baaaaaaack
BestOf FABRICATI DIEM, PVNC! from Finland Since: Oct, 2010 Relationship Status: Falling within your bell curve
FABRICATI DIEM, PVNC!
#321: Dec 8th 2012 at 7:18:21 PM

There was some talk before about turning this discussion into a general space thread. At the time I didn't see enough posts about it that I could say there was a consensus, but I was asked to make a call about it so I'd like to hear what you guys think about it.

Should this thread become a general thread for space-related stuff, or should it remain focused on Curiosity?

My vote goes for keeping this the Curiosity thread, and making a new thread for general discussion about space.

I've got this thread on my watchlist so I should see your replies in a reasonable timeframe. I'll probably give the thread a couple of days to decide.

Quod gratis asseritur, gratis negatur.
Joesolo Indiana Solo Since: Dec, 2010 Relationship Status: watch?v=dQw4w9WgXcQ
Indiana Solo
#322: Dec 8th 2012 at 7:22:43 PM

Actually, I was about to start a General space thread the other day but my battery started dying. I think we could use one.

I'm baaaaaaack
DeMarquis Since: Feb, 2010
#323: Dec 8th 2012 at 7:35:32 PM

Dedicate this thread to Mars and science. That way, Curiosity discussions still have a home where they won't get lost. Then start a new thread on space science generally.

QuestionMarc Since: Oct, 2011 Relationship Status: Having tea with Cthulhu
#324: Dec 8th 2012 at 8:12:35 PM

[up] & [up][up] Is this forking really necessary though? I mean, Mars is in space and all, I don't see why we would need two different threads when one subject include the other.

Joesolo Indiana Solo Since: Dec, 2010 Relationship Status: watch?v=dQw4w9WgXcQ
Indiana Solo
#325: Dec 8th 2012 at 8:23:32 PM

The same reason theres a Minecraft thread and a Minecraft Mods thread. One may be just a smaller part of the other, but it's popular enough that it completely hijacks the main discussion too often.

I'm baaaaaaack

Total posts: 435
Top