Follow TV Tropes

Following

Ambiguous Name: Senseless Sacrifice

Go To

Deadlock Clock: Aug 13th 2012 at 11:59:00 PM
Larkmarn Since: Nov, 2010 Relationship Status: Hello, I love you
#1: Jun 27th 2012 at 8:05:56 AM

The Senseless Sacrifice page's title does nothing to differentiate it from the very different Stupid Sacrifice. Various suggestions like "Vain Sacrifice" or "Downer Sacrifice" are offered in the discussion page.

Found a Youtube Channel with political stances you want to share? Hop on over to this page and add them.
abk0100 Since: Aug, 2011
#2: Jun 27th 2012 at 8:19:29 AM

Looking through the examples, there does seem to be some misuse for Stupid Sacrifice.

  • In the characters ending, Xianghua of Soul Calibur does this in the fourth game, senselessly holding on to Kilik as he sacrifices himself to neutralize both Soul Edge and Soul Calibur. He was going to die, with nothing that could have been done without another characters interference, and there was no reason beyond suicidal devotion for Xianghua to go as well. What a senseless waste of human life...

and

  • MS Saga, a Gundam spinoff RPG, has Gavanger make a Senseless Sacrifice fairly early in the game by trying to hold off the Psyco Gundam on his own while the rest of the party escapes. The "senseless" part comes in when you realize that even the best MS you have available at the time wouldn't have been much more than a speed bump to Psyco Gundam. The situation is deliberately Gundam-Troperiffic, paying homage to the franchise's long and glorious history of similar sacrifices.

The rest of the examples tend to use the word "senseless" as a synonym for "vain."

so, not a bad idea

edited 27th Jun '12 8:20:16 AM by abk0100

Routerie Since: Oct, 2011
Feather7603 Devil's Advocate from Yggdrasil Since: Dec, 2011
#4: Jun 27th 2012 at 11:07:28 AM

If people are misinterpreting the title, and confusing it with another similar trope, I think it's a good idea to rename.

I think it would be better to use idiom in vain rather than just vain (Sacrifice In Vain rather than Vain Sacrifice), as that makes it clear which definition of the word is used. Doing it for any prideful reason implies there may be another choice, in which case it falls under Stupid Sacrifice.

Useless Sacrifice would also work.

The Internet misuses, abuses, and overuses everything.
ccoa Ravenous Sophovore from the Sleeping Giant Since: Jan, 2001
Ravenous Sophovore
#5: Aug 10th 2012 at 8:11:17 AM

Clocking due to lack of activity.

Waiting on a TRS slot? Finishing off one of these cleaning efforts will usually open one up.
Routerie Since: Oct, 2011
#6: Aug 10th 2012 at 10:58:58 PM

"Stupid" and "senseless" are very bad at conveying meaning. I recommend "needless" and "futile" respectively.

Xtifr World's Toughest Milkman Since: Jan, 2001 Relationship Status: Having tea with Cthulhu
World's Toughest Milkman
#8: Aug 11th 2012 at 2:27:28 PM

I agree that Vain Sacrifice or Sacrifice In Vain is probably the most idiomatically correct name. (I think Senseless Sacrifice is probably also a common idiom, but I agree that it's ambiguous, and since we have another common idiom we can use instead, I think it's worth switching.)

Speaking words of fandom: let it squee, let it squee.
ccoa Ravenous Sophovore from the Sleeping Giant Since: Jan, 2001
Ravenous Sophovore
#9: Aug 14th 2012 at 7:23:27 AM

Crowner hooked to thread.

Please holler for crowners in the future, thanks.

Waiting on a TRS slot? Finishing off one of these cleaning efforts will usually open one up.
Xtifr World's Toughest Milkman Since: Jan, 2001 Relationship Status: Having tea with Cthulhu
World's Toughest Milkman
#10: Aug 14th 2012 at 2:52:01 PM

Before voting one way or the other, I'd really like to see a more concrete demonstration of misuse. With 472 wicks and 64 inbounds, I think that we really need to see more than two examples.

Speaking words of fandom: let it squee, let it squee.
AnotherDuck No, the other one. from Stockholm Since: Jul, 2012 Relationship Status: Mu
No, the other one.
#11: Aug 14th 2012 at 6:04:29 PM

[up]I'm currently voting no for that reason. If there's no demonstrated misuse, and the name isn't too bad in itself, I can't really support a rename.

edited 15th Aug '12 8:28:26 AM by AnotherDuck

Check out my fanfiction!
Xtifr World's Toughest Milkman Since: Jan, 2001 Relationship Status: Having tea with Cthulhu
World's Toughest Milkman
#12: Aug 15th 2012 at 12:35:32 AM

[up]I assume that's a conditional no, and that you'd be willing to change it to yes if someone performs a wick check and demonstrates substantial misuse?

Speaking words of fandom: let it squee, let it squee.
AnotherDuck No, the other one. from Stockholm Since: Jul, 2012 Relationship Status: Mu
No, the other one.
#13: Aug 15th 2012 at 8:28:55 AM

As long as the misuse is enough to sway my vote, yes.

Check out my fanfiction!
lu127 Paper Master from 異界 Since: Sep, 2011 Relationship Status: Crazy Cat Lady
#14: Sep 15th 2012 at 11:17:35 PM

Calling crowner. Lack of consensus to rename.

"If you aren't him, then you apparently got your brain from the same discount retailer, so..." - Fighteer
lu127 Paper Master from 異界 Since: Sep, 2011 Relationship Status: Crazy Cat Lady
#15: Oct 1st 2012 at 1:26:05 PM

And locking.

"If you aren't him, then you apparently got your brain from the same discount retailer, so..." - Fighteer
Add Post

SingleProposition: SenselessSacrifice
11th Aug '12 6:46:54 AM

Crown Description:

Vote up for yes, down for no.

Total posts: 15
Top