The more I visit TRS, the more I think that the wiki needs a whole overhaul where categorization is concerned.
I see the Awesomeness.
Preeeeeeety much. It's exacerbated by the wiki having grown naturally.
Anyway, tag fixed.
I don't think it's a genre, but I do think it's a trope in presentation.
Fight smart, not fair.
Lord of Castamere
![[up]](https://static.tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pub/smiles/arrow_up.png "[up]"){kind=icon}
Agreed. And the wiki should make the differences between audience reaction articles, tropes, useful notes and such more noticeable.
edited 3rd Jun '12 10:47:23 PM by Anfauglith
Instead, I have learned a horrible truth of existence...some stories have no meaning.
You're right that this isn't a genre, and I don't actually see anything on the page to indicate that it is. Is the problem that it's on the genres index?
The Other Troper
Well I took it off that index.
I'm on the internet. My arguments are invalid.
It's not really a trope, either. A 3D gimmick shot, which we don't have a page for, is a trope, but that's a problem with the wiki in general (Blu-ray also isn't a trope, for instance), not just this page.
I guess Useful Note makes the most sense?
The Other Troper
It's a visual style. Just because it uses extra tech does not make not a trope.
I'm on the internet. My arguments are invalid.
It's not a useful note. The useful note pages for this already exist.
It's not a genre, because it's a format. See this index (which it's already on).
Ravenous Sophovore
Clocking due to lack of activity.
Waiting on a TRS slot? Finishing off one of these cleaning efforts will usually open one up.
It's off the genres index. That's good enough.
Not much else to say here, it seems.
"If you aren't him, then you apparently got your brain from the same discount retailer, so..." - Fighteer
3-D movie is not a genre. It's either a medium or a useful note about the technology used. (I lean toward the former.)