Follow TV Tropes

Following

Should people be made to take at least a basic psychology class?

Go To

0dd1 Just awesome like that from Nowhere Land Since: Sep, 2009
Just awesome like that
#1: May 25th 2012 at 11:53:24 AM

Far too often do I see people judging people for things that have simple psychological explanations, or ridiculing people who have mental disorders (everything from the more common major depression to more obscure disorders such as Body Dysmorphic Disorder), and much of it comes out of a lack of understanding. Similarly, media portrayals of mental disorders and even psychology in general only further wrongly-held stereotypes about them.

I personally feel that since I began studying psychology, I've grown more of an understanding about how people act (though obviously nobody can ever fully understand), and I feel that if everyone was required to at least be given a crash course in psychology they'd be greatly cured of a lot of ignorance they might hold in this regard. What do y'all think?

Insert witty and clever quip here. My page, as the database hates my handle.
Carciofus Is that cake frosting? from Alpha Tucanae I Since: May, 2010
Is that cake frosting?
#2: May 25th 2012 at 12:09:51 PM

Might be a good idea, but I don't know enough psychology to be able to comment further. What should such a course contain?

edited 25th May '12 12:10:39 PM by Carciofus

But they seem to know where they are going, the ones who walk away from Omelas.
Barkey Since: Feb, 2010 Relationship Status: [TOP SECRET]
#3: May 25th 2012 at 12:16:36 PM

I'm against it to be honest, because all I need is for American youths to get ten times crazier because they suddenly all develop interns syndrome. God knows they self-diagnose themselves with every fucking mental condition under the sun as it is. All we need is for them to learn about more things for them to webMD the symptoms of so they can say they have them.

I was a psych major in college when I first enrolled. I like psychology, and I always enjoyed the classes I took, but there's a certain intelligence and level of understanding that is required. It isn't knowledge we should arm every freshman in high school with.

edited 25th May '12 12:21:59 PM by Barkey

Muramasan13 Since: Nov, 2009 Relationship Status: Not war
#4: May 25th 2012 at 12:32:19 PM

Barkey, I was going to say something along the lines of that. More specifically: when would we teach them? Many seniors in high school aren't mature enough for this kind of thing, even waatered-down, and college isn't mandatory.

Don't get the wrong idea, though. I'd love for there to be fewer misinformed, unsympathetic, "pull-yourself-up-by-your-bootstraps" types.

edited 25th May '12 12:33:39 PM by Muramasan13

Smile for me!
RadicalTaoist scratching at .8, just hopin' from the #GUniverse Since: Jan, 2001
scratching at .8, just hopin'
#5: May 25th 2012 at 12:37:08 PM

Elementary school.

No, don't teach them psychology per se. But introduce the fundamental attribution error and fixation (not those terms) in grade school. There's a bunch of psych which, practically applied, would be fun and useful to kids.

Share it so that people can get into this conversation, 'cause we're not the only ones who think like this.
Carciofus Is that cake frosting? from Alpha Tucanae I Since: May, 2010
Is that cake frosting?
#6: May 25th 2012 at 12:41:12 PM

Also, something about popular psychology misconceptions might be useful. Basic stuff like "schizophrenia is not multiple personality disorder".

Plus, one thing that I think would need work is removing the stigma of requiring psychological or psychiatric help. Statistically, more than a few students will need it in the future; and they might be more willing to get it if they did not have this sort of overreaching idea that going to the psych is for loonies. tongue

edited 25th May '12 12:41:28 PM by Carciofus

But they seem to know where they are going, the ones who walk away from Omelas.
RadicalTaoist scratching at .8, just hopin' from the #GUniverse Since: Jan, 2001
scratching at .8, just hopin'
#7: May 25th 2012 at 12:42:14 PM

That's also something to address while they're young.

That said, I'm leaning more towards cultural rather than curricular changes here...

Share it so that people can get into this conversation, 'cause we're not the only ones who think like this.
Michael So that's what this does Since: Jan, 2001 Relationship Status: Drift compatible
So that's what this does
#8: May 25th 2012 at 12:47:00 PM

No. It is my experience that psychologists tend to look for mental causes for everything and overlook the obvious physical explanations. We need a mix of approaches.

Far better to teach scientific method. Let people look at studies and assess their worth themselves instead of just taking something at face value because a scientist said it.

pvtnum11 OMG NO NOSECONES from Kerbin low orbit Since: Nov, 2009 Relationship Status: We finish each other's sandwiches
OMG NO NOSECONES
#9: May 25th 2012 at 2:43:31 PM

^ Agree with your second point very much. Teach them to think, to love learning. Everything else stems from that.

Trying to drill down to "should people be made to take at least a basic X class" will leave you with a huge amount of basic stuff to learn. Some theoretical, some pratical.

Happiness is zero-gee with a sinus cold.
Sandor from London/Cambridge Since: Oct, 2009
#10: May 25th 2012 at 2:58:42 PM

Far better to teach scientific method. Let people look at studies and assess their worth themselves instead of just taking something at face value because a scientist said it.

If we're going that direction, just teach them philosophy.

The ability to work through ideas and concepts in a logical fashion is the underpinning of literally everything.

"When you cut your finger, I do not bleed." Response of a man who lived on the outskirts of a concentration camp.
breadloaf Since: Oct, 2010
#11: May 25th 2012 at 3:03:18 PM

Well I was thinking this would be more along the lines of a university degree, but requiring it is a bit extreme. It doesn't fit in to most people's education, only some, so it's more like giving people a choice between several subjects they want to learn.

Inhopelessguy Since: Apr, 2011
#12: May 25th 2012 at 3:05:22 PM

I suppose one doesn't need to know straight-up Psychology. I think adding a 'psychology' component in say, citizenship or a civics class may help. We could teach it (at least, in England + Wales) as a component of PSHE.

ohsointocats from The Sand Wastes Since: Oct, 2011 Relationship Status: Showing feelings of an almost human nature
#13: May 25th 2012 at 3:18:33 PM

Probably most of mental disorders stuff should be in a health class. How screwed up most health classes are is another story, though.

Then again I do think students should take a basic logic class.

Vellup I have balls. from America Since: Mar, 2011 Relationship Status: The Skitty to my Wailord
I have balls.
#14: May 25th 2012 at 4:07:20 PM

Quite honestly, I don't think this is much of a top priority issue. At least in the U.S., I'd rather see some work done on our lower tier history classes than on something as oblique as this.

They never travel alone.
Muramasan13 Since: Nov, 2009 Relationship Status: Not war
#15: May 25th 2012 at 4:21:53 PM

Hiya, Vellup. You are clearly not someone with a severe mental disorder or mental illness, and probably not someone with friends or family who do. You may not have been around when I dropped this statistic previously, but two-thirds of all people who kill themselves in the US had a depressive disorder. Depressive disorders which are usually highly responsive to simple treatments, but are not taken seriously and/or diagnosed. That's twenty thousand lives annually. Many more live in reality made hell, drained of the strength to kill themselves. All told, nineteen million people in the US are diagnosed with depression, and countless more suffer undiagnosed, untreated, and frequently mocked.

So, no. It is highly relevant to many, many people.

[down] Well, being the most common mental illness and highly misunderstood by a lot of people, it's a good place to start.

edited 25th May '12 4:24:44 PM by Muramasan13

Smile for me!
Barkey Since: Feb, 2010 Relationship Status: [TOP SECRET]
#16: May 25th 2012 at 4:23:07 PM

I don't think "Depression 101" is the point of teaching psychology to kids.

HiddenFacedMatt Avatars may be subject to change without notice. Since: Jul, 2011
Avatars may be subject to change without notice.
#17: May 25th 2012 at 4:29:55 PM

Don't get the wrong idea, though. I'd love for there to be fewer misinformed, unsympathetic, "pull-yourself-up-by-your-bootstraps" types.
The problem with this isn't so much not having heard what psychologists have to say, so much as not believing it. So, making them take a psychology course isn't necessarily going to change their mind. If anything, it might create backlash. Have you seen how often the "brainwashing" label gets thrown around even without it being required?

"The Daily Show has to be right 100% of the time; FOX News only has to be right once." - Jon Stewart
Muramasan13 Since: Nov, 2009 Relationship Status: Not war
#18: May 25th 2012 at 4:39:07 PM

In my limited experience, it isn't disbelieving what the psychologists have to say, it's creating a culture of not "needing" them- and thus never hearing from the psychologists in the first place. Those suffering are ignored or told they don't exist, which frequently leads to denial on their part. Thus, professionals are underinvolved, and mental illness goes underdiagnosed and undertreated.

edited 25th May '12 4:40:34 PM by Muramasan13

Smile for me!
InverurieJones '80s TV Action Hero from North of the Wall. Since: Jan, 2010 Relationship Status: And they all lived happily ever after <3
'80s TV Action Hero
#19: May 25th 2012 at 5:09:17 PM

A whole class devoted to the alleged science of Psychology?

Short of 'media studies' or 'sports science' I can't think of a bigger waste of educational resources.

edited 25th May '12 5:11:12 PM by InverurieJones

'All he needs is for somebody to throw handgrenades at him for the rest of his life...'
breadloaf Since: Oct, 2010
#20: May 25th 2012 at 5:12:57 PM

I think the issue with the mass amount of mental disorders in America has to do with poverty and income gap, not the lack of teaching about psychology. It's not like Nepal has one of the lowest rates of mental illness because of psychology education.

Psychology education is useful, in general use, and generally speaking more information learned is better but I wouldn't put it on the priority list above certain other aspects when America is lagging in basics like math and science.

edited 25th May '12 5:13:08 PM by breadloaf

HiddenFacedMatt Avatars may be subject to change without notice. Since: Jul, 2011
Avatars may be subject to change without notice.
#21: May 25th 2012 at 5:22:11 PM

[up] Psychology is a science, though... or did you just mean more economically practical sciences like physics and chemistry?

"The Daily Show has to be right 100% of the time; FOX News only has to be right once." - Jon Stewart
Barkey Since: Feb, 2010 Relationship Status: [TOP SECRET]
#22: May 25th 2012 at 5:34:50 PM

I think he's basically saying that he thinks Psychology is BS, since it's a "soft" science.

Inhopelessguy Since: Apr, 2011
#23: May 25th 2012 at 5:37:07 PM

-sigh-

That's why basic Psychology classes are needed. Calling it BS is equating it to something like Media Studies. It's a real science, and it has practical applications. I'm not sure that you know... society would exist without individuals. And psychology, is the study of what makes said individuals tick.

Deboss I see the Awesomeness. from Awesomeville Texas Since: Aug, 2009
I see the Awesomeness.
#24: May 25th 2012 at 9:01:25 PM

No, a formal logic class would have the most benefit.

Fight smart, not fair.
ohsointocats from The Sand Wastes Since: Oct, 2011 Relationship Status: Showing feelings of an almost human nature
#25: May 25th 2012 at 9:09:16 PM

Me and Deboss agree on something?

Well that's it. Apocalypse imminent. I'm not even going to bother to find a bunker.


Total posts: 52
Top