Follow TV Tropes

Following

Will video game prices go up again this coming generation?

Go To

Meophist from Toronto, Canada Since: May, 2010
#1: May 1st 2012 at 9:45:18 PM

I'm talking about the Wii U/PS 4/Next X Box generation. Will the $70 game become standard?

I certainly hope not, but I can't say it won't happen. Publishers have been employing a variety of methods to try to get more than the standard $60 per game so it wouldn't surprise me if they end up simply selling it for $70 at retail. There is the question of how consumers will react to the price.

I think we may be nearing the breaking point. There's a good amount of pressure from games that ask for less up-front, which may get prices for other games back down. Alternatively, it may gobble up the cheaper games and end up pushing the more expensive games to be even more expensive.

At this point, I'm not sure what the future would hold. I want to see what everybody's opinion on the matter is.

Helpful Scripts and Stylesheets here.
RocketDude Face Time from AZ, United States Since: May, 2009
Face Time
#2: May 1st 2012 at 9:51:56 PM

Oh hey, Meophist, long time, no see.

Anyways, I kinda expect them to for the AAA games, given the walking price gouge that is Mass Effect 3, but at the same time, I can see Free-To-Play games growing in popularity.

I don't know if there will be a middle ground. Granted, I'm mostly speaking from a PC gaming perspective.

"Hipsters: the most dangerous gang in the US." - Pacific Mackerel
BadWolf21 The Fastest Man Alive Since: May, 2010
The Fastest Man Alive
#3: May 1st 2012 at 9:53:42 PM

With Nintendo's upcoming plan for simultaneous retail/digital releases, I don't think game prices (or at least their game prices) will jump up to more than $60. Digital prices will likely be slightly lower than retail, so retail will need to stay competitive.

burnpsy Since: Sep, 2010
#4: May 1st 2012 at 9:58:46 PM

[up]Nintendo's digital prices have been confirmed to be identical to their physical ones - any lower prices will come from retail.

In any event, I'd like to think that the major companies can tell that consumers have limits.

edited 1st May '12 9:59:08 PM by burnpsy

AzureSeas Since: Jan, 2011
#5: May 1st 2012 at 10:08:02 PM

Given that companies have other avenues for revenue, like dlc and collector's editions, I think prices will stay constant for now.

SgtRicko Since: Jul, 2009
#6: May 1st 2012 at 10:23:37 PM

Doubtful. A lot of publishers and designers actually want the price tag to either stay the same or even be lowered as a means of attracting more purchases. The only ones asking for a price tag increase are probably the shareholders, or the few game designers who require larger price tags due to extra perhiperals/equipment.

burnpsy Since: Sep, 2010
#7: May 1st 2012 at 10:27:38 PM

Something that would be interesting is adopting the Japanese game pricing model, in which each individual game is priced differently by the publisher. It would likely help in finding that ideal price point for games.

#8: May 1st 2012 at 10:35:52 PM

Meh, I'm a PC gamer and PC games will never go over $40.

<><
RocketDude Face Time from AZ, United States Since: May, 2009
Face Time
#9: May 1st 2012 at 10:56:12 PM

^Well, they kinda have, but the only examples I can think of are AAA-budget games already on consoles, so yeah.

"Hipsters: the most dangerous gang in the US." - Pacific Mackerel
BearyScary Since: Sep, 2010 Relationship Status: [TOP SECRET]
#10: May 1st 2012 at 11:13:49 PM

They better not go up, since so many people are already on the edge of financial ruin. If games get any more expensive, people will wait for the prices to go down, leading to more used games sales, which all of the companies love.

There's also the fact that pieces that are already in the game are being sold as DLC instead. Do publishers really want to foster any more bad blood?

I liked it better when Questionable Casting was called WTH Casting Agency
MrDolomite Since: Feb, 2010
#11: May 2nd 2012 at 12:18:47 AM

[up]If someone is on the edge of poverty, they should probably prioritize other purchases before video games.

burnpsy Since: Sep, 2010
#12: May 2nd 2012 at 12:21:18 AM

[up]Yeah, I've never understood that argument.

"But what if I can't afford them?"

Then you shouldn't be getting leisure items in the first place.

Talby Since: Jun, 2009
#13: May 2nd 2012 at 12:42:37 AM

Man cannot live by bread alone.

burnpsy Since: Sep, 2010
#14: May 2nd 2012 at 12:47:02 AM

Fair, but there are a plethora of cheaper options than retail games.

Meophist from Toronto, Canada Since: May, 2010
#15: May 2nd 2012 at 12:56:26 AM

Something I would like to note: I've been seeing a number of rumours that the upcoming X Box system as well as the PS 4 may block used games. There is now technology that can be used in upcoming consoles where they may make you scan a chip that comes with the game with the console before playing it which locks the game with the console. This can make it so that the game cannot be played except on that specific console and can be done without connecting online. I don't know if they'll implement something like this, but if they're serious about blocking used game sales and the rumours are true...

In any case, what I'm saying is that it may become impossible for consumers to retaliate by buying used more often. This is assuming all three major console manufacturers go through with this, which I find unlikely.

Helpful Scripts and Stylesheets here.
burnpsy Since: Sep, 2010
#16: May 2nd 2012 at 1:06:57 AM

I highly doubt Nintendo will do it. And since Nintendo won't do it, people who don't want to deal with that have the additional option of going to Wii U if Nintendo gets a good library together off the bat, which they're saying they intend to do. If that's what ends up happening, then chances are the generation gets called in favour of Nintendo unless Nintendo lacks really big games.

I don't know about Microsoft, but I'd like to think Sony isn't that stupid. And if Sony doesn't do it, Microsoft would be shooting themselves in the leg by doing it. Unless both announce simultaneously that they're doing that, neither will for that very reason.

It's like a game of chicken.

edited 2nd May '12 1:08:28 AM by burnpsy

MrDolomite Since: Feb, 2010
#17: May 2nd 2012 at 1:33:35 AM

I think I've brought this up before, but locking out used games doesn't really affect me personally, as I don't think I've bought used for several years.

That said, I don't think we'll see used game lock outs at any point in this coming generation.

burnpsy Since: Sep, 2010
#18: May 2nd 2012 at 1:36:30 AM

[up]I only buy used for out-of-print titles, and I go after a lot of those.

Sabbo from Australia Since: Jan, 2001 Relationship Status: Coming soon to theaters
#19: May 2nd 2012 at 1:45:31 AM

Americans have some of the cheapest video game prices in the world, so stop complaining.

burnpsy Since: Sep, 2010
#20: May 2nd 2012 at 1:58:27 AM

[up]Cheapest, but still expensive.

TBQH, the prices need to go down everywhere. At least the Australian government is calling out a portion of the market (the download market) on their pricing.

PippingFool Eclipse the Moon from A Floridian Prison Since: Oct, 2009 Relationship Status: I get a feeling so complicated...
Eclipse the Moon
#21: May 2nd 2012 at 5:26:19 AM

[up]

Retail is still 100 freaking dollars for a 1st Party or Triple A title here...

I'm having to learn to pay the price
DiurnalBrocolli Something... from Somewhere... Since: Apr, 2012 Relationship Status: Wishfully thinking
Something...
#22: May 2nd 2012 at 6:52:46 AM

I highly doubt game prices will go up. It's not like in the days of the SNES where a new game was about $59.95... Those were the days you pretty much got games for birthdays/holidays/good report cards...

Just floating around...
hnd03 Parasol Star Memories from [REDACTED] Since: Jun, 2009
Parasol Star Memories
#23: May 2nd 2012 at 10:22:58 AM

Wait, games for grades?

Man, I never got anything for all A's beyond "Good job"

So. Let's all pause for a moment to smell what the Rock was, is, and forever will be... cooking.—Cave Johnson
Reflextion from a post-sanity world (Time Abyss) Relationship Status: What's love got to do with it?
#24: May 2nd 2012 at 10:25:44 AM

[up] Lucky for you. All I ever got for 'A's was "Why wasn't it an A+?"

And my parents wonder why I dwell on the negative so much.

DiurnalBrocolli Something... from Somewhere... Since: Apr, 2012 Relationship Status: Wishfully thinking
Something...
#25: May 2nd 2012 at 1:00:30 PM

To be honest, I never really was a straight A student. I bought the "Good Report Card" up as an example. One game I remember I got for having some good enough grades I was so excited for, the day I got it... It's a bit embarrassing to be honest. (And kinda gross, I bet you guys wouldn't want to hear it...)

Just floating around...

Total posts: 44
Top