The Place for Purging Porn and Pedo-Pandering (AKA P5 flag evaluations)

All the Roomates things are just furry porn.

Fanfic.Roomates 2009 was cut. It's there if you look at the list of cut works in the Decisions and Announcements thread.

Caligula was cut pre-5P. It was also one of the things appealed, but I don't think it's been looked at yet.

edited 9th Jun '12 7:59:41 PM by Nocturna

I've looked at enough of it. We also voted to cut one of the versions, there's a bunch of these things apparently.

Hm, I guess it's safe to cut, then?

There are two major webcomics called Roommates on this wiki. One of them, Webcomic.Roommates 2007 is about multiple literature, film, and musical theater characters becoming roommates. The other one, Webcomic.Roommates 2009, is the NSFW Furry Bara comic, which is the one that was cut before under Fanfic/, and will probably get the axe again under Webcomic/. Once the latter webcomic's gone, we'll need to create a new Webcomic.Roommates page for the former webcomic, redirect the 2007 page to that page, and then send the disambiguation page to the cutlist.

edited 9th Jun '12 8:26:41 PM by TwoGunAngel

I believe Shima has already called that one as being exempt from cutting. It's a mainstream novel series that didn't start out porn-y, became porn-y, and has been moving away from its porniness.

That same reasoning would apply to Gor, except it hasn't moved away.

The thing about Gor is that we can trope the non-porny parts. Just like anything else that isn't a porno.

This has happened to more than one work. Like the Valis series. It started off as a typical Magical Girl-based series, but later just had porn/ecchi stuff made. However, the regular games are a-okay to have a page on.

True, but in the case for Gor, wouldn't that be limiting the scope to just covering the first couple books?

Yep, Komodin.

Works for any other series.

@ Martello Jeez, sorry if this website got on your nerve. I don't like any of the stuff that got flagged, and most people have been reasonable. We do want to get rid of nasty stuff, but not all Anime is "pedoshit".

If he was serious about leaving, I nominate tdgoodrich 1 as a replacement P5 member. I don't want to torture myself looking for the real nasty stuff, and he's done a good job so far reviewing stuff.

Could we please drop the Martello stuff and move on?

I'm sure the Mods will figure out a new P5 member, which is the only thing besides the actual content violation and rules to discuss.

I don't believe the mods take nominations.

I'd sign up for P5, but I don't have the time/attention span for that. I told Komo I'd look up Build Tiger, and, considering I like kemono bara in general, it's pretty weird that I stopped at the first few pages (still can't make heads or tails of whether it was PWP or PWP).

That's funny, I wrote the closure for Sankaku Complex, but it didn't register. Instead, there are two different San-Com instances in the "resolved" CVR list.

That was because Sankaku was reviewed twice, voted to Example Sectionectomy and lock on the first major review, and voted to cut outright in the second. This is probably the first major page to get two reviews with two different outcomes, and apparently the code for the CVR thing is only recognizing the first one.

edited 9th Jun '12 11:20:38 PM by TwoGunAngel

Not the first one. Monster Girl Encyclopedia got double-reviewed too.

What was the verdict on that one?

I think that's the reason why stuff can get flagged again even if it's been reviewed. In both these cases (Monster Girl and Sankaku), the P5 overlooked the really nasty stuff on those sites and once we found out they were re-reviewed and cut quickly.

Good riddance to Sankaku Complex. That site is really fucked up.

edited 9th Jun '12 11:25:11 PM by KrazyKopter

In order:

1keep

2cut

3redirect to bleached underpants version

edited 9th Jun '12 11:25:04 PM by Shadis

Cut, note some examples in the whole "monster girls" in general stuff. I forget where some of it was mentioned.

When a work has been cut, do we delete any mention of it from the wiki, or just make it so the title doesn't redlink anywhere?

I don't think we ever got a definitive answer on that. I believe the most common ruling is that examples should be deleted, but page images can remain, but without links (so long as the image itself doesn't break the rules).

And what about tropes for reviewers? (example: Cinema Snob reviews the cut "Caligula" and exhibits a trope when reviewing it)

edited 9th Jun '12 11:53:29 PM by MrAHR

The discussion has been going on here, and is pending an answer.

I think either option is viable so long as we apply it fairly. I personally lean on removing the mention and having a "clean agreement to disagree" approach, so long as we don't deny that we're making a sacrifice.