Pic is fine imo. I don't see what the problem is.
That pic seems to show a piece of food from somewhere that is called food (and it might be to someone) but most definitively doesn't look eatable.
I am not sure what the rules are about No Real Life Examples Please and image policy, but I don't think that his is serious enough to warrant a pull.
Keep
"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard Feynman
Zzzzzzzzzz
Unilaterally making a page "No Real Life Examples, Please", without discussion is frowned on, Starman.
Doing so, and then using the fact that it's a "No Real Life Examples Please" page as a reason to ask for a pull of the page image smacks of rules lawyering.
...if you don’t love you’re dead, and if you do, they’ll kill you for it.
It wasn't an unilateral decision, Madrugada; it was discussed from here
forward.
However, I stick that the image is no trouble as for now.
"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard Feynman
Hi
Keep Until Better Image Suggested...it certainly works, but I'd prefer to have a pic from a work.
Let's don't waste any more time on this.
Goal: Clear, Concise and Witty
Real Life example on a page that should not have one. It's subjective.
I'm not crazy, I just don't give a darn!