I think it's alright.
Considering that, in real life, a lot of issues relating to non-gender-normality get squashed under one blanket (The acronym "LGBT" itself is proof enough of this), I think it's fine, too.
"Proto-Indo-European makes the damnedest words related. It's great. It's the Kevin Bacon of etymology." ~MadrugadaCool. Might put me at ease a bit more if some actual trans folks dropped in with their opinion.
Always touching and looking. Piss off.Go to the LGBT thread in yackfest, then.
Read my stories!I see no problem with it and I'm trans, but I also use the word fag as another word for idiot.
edited 15th Jan '12 2:03:51 PM by Vyctorian
Rarely active, try DA/Tumblr Avatar by pippanaffie.deviantart.comI give you, for your viewing pleasure, Inari Okami. Real Life version, thanks to Shinto. Depends what mood s/he's in.
EDIT: typical fox. Why have one shape when at least 5 will do? If RL can do it, I don't see why you can't.
edited 15th Jan '12 2:21:17 PM by Euodiachloris
I'll keep it short. I'm working on this thing with a pretty big raster of gods (of all kinds). One of them (well, it manifests as a twin entity, but you get the idea) is the god of, as I put it, "anybody that isn't cis-gendered". So that includes transgendered, transsexual, all the trans folks, basically. Is that offensive, putting them all in one basket like that and slapping a deity on them? This seemed like the right place to ask (but to be honest, I haven't slept in a day or so, so my judgemental skills might not be at their best right now).
edited 10th Jan '12 4:06:23 AM by MisterAlways
Always touching and looking. Piss off.