Follow TV Tropes

Following

Don't we already have that one? (page action crowner): Obvious Judas

Go To

Kernigh Since: Sep, 2012
#26: Nov 19th 2012 at 10:33:38 AM

I rewrote the definition of Obvious Judas. The crowner says to "tighten up the definition" but I am not sure how to tighten the definition, so I might not have tightened it enough.

I have not yet deleted any examples. There is at least one example to delete: Edmund Pevensie (The Lion The Witch And The Wardrobe) no longer fits the trope. Edmund is literally an obvious Judas, but the writer describes Edmund's meeting with the Witch (in chapters 4 and 5), and admits that Edmund and Lucy are moving to opposite sides of the Narnia conflict. In the Obvious Judas trope, "the writer has shown no evidence that he plans to turn evil."

Pig_catapult Hurler of Swine from Knee-deep in Nightmare Fuel Since: Jan, 2001 Relationship Status: You cannot grasp the true form
Hurler of Swine
#27: Nov 20th 2012 at 7:29:00 PM

I think we need to take that part out. It's terrible. If a traitor is Obvious, then the author MUST have actually left, you know, at least some manner of heavyhanded foreshadowing, unless the definition of "obvious" has changed lately to something like "completely out of left field" or "only obvious to Seers".

edited 20th Nov '12 7:32:14 PM by Pig_catapult

nrjxll Since: Nov, 2010 Relationship Status: Not war
#28: Nov 20th 2012 at 8:18:56 PM

[up]I think that's a bit much. "Evidence" is just the wrong way of putting it - it's more like "the author hasn't explicitly said the character will turn traitor".

Pig_catapult Hurler of Swine from Knee-deep in Nightmare Fuel Since: Jan, 2001 Relationship Status: You cannot grasp the true form
Hurler of Swine
#29: Nov 20th 2012 at 8:57:42 PM

I think that'd qualify as The Reveal, wouldn't it? Wait, reread your post. That. . . seems like pretty poor form Word of God-wise. How often does an author actively spoil like that?

edited 20th Nov '12 9:00:11 PM by Pig_catapult

nrjxll Since: Nov, 2010 Relationship Status: Not war
#30: Nov 20th 2012 at 10:37:44 PM

Not very, but as Kernigh indicates, it clearly happens sometimes.

(And personally, if a character is "obviously" anything, I think it's preferable in some cases for the author to go ahead and "spoil" it then it is to try and keep the reader in so-called suspense over it).

Pig_catapult Hurler of Swine from Knee-deep in Nightmare Fuel Since: Jan, 2001 Relationship Status: You cannot grasp the true form
Hurler of Swine
#31: Nov 21st 2012 at 1:25:41 PM

Ah, yeah, I can see that. I'd probably up and say it, too, if the fandom had already figured it out and wouldn't stop asking.

edited 21st Nov '12 1:26:02 PM by Pig_catapult

SeptimusHeap from Switzerland (Edited uphill both ways) Relationship Status: Mu
#32: Jan 4th 2013 at 7:31:29 AM

Ok, I've cleaned up the wicks and examples (moving bad ones to discussion) according to the revised description. Unless someone wants to re-rewrite the description, we should be done here.

To any Naruto fan in passage: I removed it because it doesn't sound quite obvious. Please readd it if you have a better written form of it.

"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard Feynman
Add Post

PageAction: ObviousJudas
5th Apr '12 7:58:44 AM

Crown Description:

What would be the best way to fix the page?

Total posts: 32
Top