2 Questions about Rape

Still if your under 12 you cannot be charged for anything, ever. Probably committed for evaluation but not legally responsible.

Is using "Julian Assange is a Hillary butt plug" an acceptable signature quote?

Bleh... in the US we would probably throw him in the mental ward, which is basically the same thing...

I am now known as Flyboy.

Not that I don´t agree with you, but why a mental ward? Some adult rapists can and have commited their crimes without suffering from a single mental disorder. why should a child be any different?

"Contests fought between two masters are decided instantly. An invisible battle is now raging between the two of them." Lulu vs Schneizel

I didn't say they didn't deserve prison, but that's probably what the court system would do. It's really hard to get a kid tried as an adult, as I understand it. It's not necessarily as hard to get them committed instead...

I am now known as Flyboy.

There really isn't.

I don't see how I can rebut you without upsetting mods however. Just accept that men can be easily immobilised and an immobilised person can be forced to orgasm. It needn't leave a mark. Physically, anyway. Psychologically, it's a shitty thing to go through.

edited 23rd Aug '11 3:30:08 PM by Michael

Not the same person.

I did the same thing while reading the thread, somehow.

Look, you can't make me speak in a logical, coherent, intelligent bananna.

I don't see it matters who is making the claims. It's sadly easy for a woman to achieve, but common wisdom holds that it is not.

It matters because the person you were yelling at didn't actually claim anything of the sort, at least not to my read.

edited 23rd Aug '11 3:54:53 PM by deathjavu

Look, you can't make me speak in a logical, coherent, intelligent bananna.

He claimed the existence of an obstacle that doesn't exist. *shrug*

I know there's precedent for #1, since I heard about a 12-year-old boy who was suspected of raping a senior citizen, but I have no idea how it turned out. Has anyone else heard of that case?

That's Feo . . . He's a disgusting, mysoginistic, paedophilic asshat who moonlights as a shitty writer—Something Awful

I was being a bit more lighthearted there than you seem to have picked up on. There's no need to interpret a little humor as a personal challenge .

They never travel alone.

With regards to #2: There are stories (urban legends or real, not certain) of women using GHB on guys to get knocked up. I don't fully understand the mechanics of date rape drugs, TBH. Is it, for example, possible to coax an erection out of a guy who is half-unconscious? No idea.

edited 23rd Aug '11 4:43:51 PM by ForlornDreamer

Probably. It's just a biological reaction to stimulus, after all. The right touch should bring things to attention...

I am now known as Flyboy.

Well, the existence of wet dreams proves that men can be aroused in their sleep, so I would guess the answer is yes.

Be not afraid...

Not just probably, it is certain. Erections are not always voluntary.

You can likely also cause an erection by sexually stimulating the male in other ways, for example stimulating his prostate through the wall of his rectum.

EDIT: Holy shit I just said something creepy on OTC. Please euthanize me.

edited 23rd Aug '11 7:33:45 PM by annebeeche

Banned entirely for telling FE that he was being rude and not contributing to the discussion. I shall watch down from the goon heavens.

Yeah... whoa... I didn't think I'd see stuff like that on this board.

(I jest, I jest. Well, not really, that's pretty strange, but I mean the second part).

I am now known as Flyboy.

This theard is get awfully creepy guys

hashtagsarestupid

We've had creepier, I think.

Be not afraid...

...it's a thread about whether a child would be prosecuted for raping an adult and whether a man who was raped by a woman would have to pay child support.

If you're honestly surprised, I have no sympathy.

edited 23rd Aug '11 7:56:58 PM by USAF713

I am now known as Flyboy.

Yes but it's some how gotten more creeepy..er

hashtagsarestupid

I think we've pretty much covered the OP's questions, though. Any follow-up? If not, I'm inclined to lock this before it goes to stupid places.

A brighter future for a darker age.

To answer the OP, that's a yes on both counts

hashtagsarestupid

I remember reading a case of a man who donated spern to a clinic, being sued by the woman who used it for child support. I don't remember who won the court case, or even if it's been decided.

Or do it while they're asleep, not everyone wakes up.

I think you're over-focusing a little bit - joint locks, choking holds, or anything that will give them enough time to immobilize their victim.

Nope. You have a link?

Unless the incapacitating agent has a side effect of lowering the blood flow or neural sensitivity. A good example is alcohol; too much impedes sexual action because it depresses the nervous system, so there's not enough stimulation for the guy to keep it up.

More than that, there are documented cases of men having intercourse without ever waking up. One guy was found not guilty for rape after two different ex-girlfriends testified that he'd had sex with them, in his sleep, without ever waking up, and his accuser was a woman that he apparently did the same thing with after a party.

edited 24th Aug '11 8:30:08 AM by BlueNinja0

That’s the epitome of privilege right there, not considering armed nazis a threat to your life. - Silasw

Sperm donors who donate to a licensed fertility clinic, sperm bank or whatever are legally protected and cannot be sued for paternity or made to pay child support.

However, if you make a private sperm donation, any agreement between donor and recipient is invalid when it comes to child support. There was at least one case of a man who donated to a lesbian friend being later sued for child support by the state when the woman and child applied for public assistance, and losing. That the woman had signed an agreement that the man was not legally the father and not liable for child support held no weight in court.

Of course, the woman could claim not to know who the father was and it would be more moral, in that instance, to not divulge the name — but entirely possible that she thought that their agreement would be valid.

A brighter future for a darker age.

Morven: This article is the case I was thinking of. The man had agreed to donate through a clinic for the woman, who decided after giving birth to sue him for child support. He won the case on appeal (though I only remember reading the original article about the lawsuit being filed). Though he wasn't an anonymous donor, he did so under the understanding that his rights would be the same as any other donor.

That’s the epitome of privilege right there, not considering armed nazis a threat to your life. - Silasw