I'm against splitting. Practically speaking, it will not result in clear examples, I think. I think editors will be confused what examples go where.
Oppression anywhere is a threat to democracy everywhere.In that case, I suggest a rename to Friendly, Playful Dolphin. Perhaps custom-titled as "Friendly, Playful Dolphin" (assuming we still do custom titles) so as to better reflect having both traits.
They're not intrinsically linked; as I said before, one can have one trait and not the other; but they generally correspond, so we need a title reflecting that they are both present.
"The Daily Show has to be right 100% of the time; FOX News only has to be right once." - Jon StewartBump... should we set up a crowner?
"The Daily Show has to be right 100% of the time; FOX News only has to be right once." - Jon StewartYeah, put a renaming crowner. I support that name.
Oppression anywhere is a threat to democracy everywhere.Holler sent.
"The Daily Show has to be right 100% of the time; FOX News only has to be right once." - Jon StewartBlank alt titles crowner hooked.
And yes, we still use custom titles, and there are no plans to remove this feature in the foreseeable future.
Welcome To TV Tropes | How To Write An Example | Text-Formatting Rules | List Of Shows That Need Summary | TV Tropes Forum | Know The StaffThat's good to know.
Bumping for more votes...
"The Daily Show has to be right 100% of the time; FOX News only has to be right once." - Jon StewartBumping again.
"Friendly, Playful Dolphin" seems to be ahead of "Friendly, Playful Dolphin" by 6 points. Should we go with it or wait a little longer? If the latter, how much longer?
edited 8th Jan '12 12:51:30 PM by HiddenFacedMatt
"The Daily Show has to be right 100% of the time; FOX News only has to be right once." - Jon StewartIt's now ahead by 8 points...
"The Daily Show has to be right 100% of the time; FOX News only has to be right once." - Jon StewartCalling the crowner at 7 (yeas:7 nays:0) in favor of Friendly, Playful Dolphin.
Do the work.
...if you don’t love you’re dead, and if you do, they’ll kill you for it.OK, I did the following:
1. Created Friendly, Playful Dolphin and gave it a page type and the text from Playful Dolphin.
2. Left notices on the thread and Renamed Tropes.
3. Moved the wicks, except for Beanie Babies because honestly I don't think that's a real example. I left it for others to judge.
4. Re-redirected Friendly Dolphin
5. Put the YKTTW link on the discussion page.
Aside from that one wick, I don't think there's anything else to do. There're no discussions or subpages that I can see. It just needs a confirmation that I did it right and then making the old page a redirect.
edited 27th Jan '12 5:13:28 PM by ArcadesSabboth
Oppression anywhere is a threat to democracy everywhere.You did a good job and you did everything right. I removed the bad wick. I agree it's not an example. Thank you for your hard work. Give yourself a pat on the back.
Reality is that, which when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away. -Philip K. Dick
Crown Description:
Hidden Face Matt, the two are NOT "two separate things" as they work out in the trope. They are intrinsically linked. Now, perhaps the name needs to be be changed to "Friendly Playful Dolphin" but what is needed is not yet another trope split which will result in two identical lists of examples.
Splitting this would be like splitting Cute Bruiser into a two tropes called Cute Character and Bruiser Character. Tropes are not always single point one dimensional things. Having multiple factors come together to create a three dimensional archetype can make a single coherent trope.
edited 30th Dec '11 5:45:33 PM by Auxdarastrix