Lurker
#2: Jul 5th 2011 at 2:50:32 PM
Fixed the link.
And yeah, the Real Life section does not look like a good idea seeing as we've already got major politicians on there, which looks like a violation of the Rule Of Cautious Editing Judgement. I'd say cut it.
Zzzzzzzzzz
#3: Jul 5th 2011 at 2:51:38 PM
No. Cut it.
...if you don’t love you’re dead, and if you do, they’ll kill you for it.
captainpat
Since: Sep, 2010
#4: Jul 5th 2011 at 5:31:40 PM
done.
A real life section would just amount to mud slinging.
Total posts: 4
I've just edited some quite bad natter from several examples on Upper-Class Twit, and it strikes me that it is questionable whether it needs Real Life examples. The section as it stands seems to be a magnet for natter, includes dubious examples (neither Buddha nor Alastair Crowley were stupid enough to really fit the description) and Take That! s against celebrities people don't like. I think we should consider cutting the section and asking for no Real Life examples.
EDIT: Sorry, I've managed to link to a non-existent page above, but the link in this post is correct.
edited 5th Jul '11 2:39:41 PM by captainbrass2
"Well, it's a lifestyle"