Follow TV Tropes

Following

Iranian Power Struggle Gone Insane

Go To

SavageHeathen Pro-Freedom Fanatic from Somewhere Since: Feb, 2011
Pro-Freedom Fanatic
#51: May 20th 2011 at 3:18:14 AM

The interesting development is that Ahmadinejad's planned successor is quite openly about "fuck Shariah". That's why Ahmadinejad, even though he deserves to hang for the electoral fraud and the repression, is the lesser evil.

Still, Ahmadinejad is not a smart plotter. If he planned to reduce the clerics to irrelevance, he should have offered a coalition government to the secularists and have moved openly against Khamenei back a few years ago. By oppressing the revolt, he made sure the secularists would never trust him.

Can't anybody just assassinate Khamenei and cause the islamic system to implode?

edited 20th May '11 3:39:32 AM by SavageHeathen

You exist because we allow it and you will end because we demand it.
JoseB from NL Since: Jan, 2001
#52: May 20th 2011 at 4:33:45 AM

Assassinating Kamenei won't cause the theocracy to implode. Far from it — There are defined successors that, although they may jostle and backstab each other to become top dog, have a common interest in keeping the system running, because they are the main beneficiaries from it.

You would need basically a complete wipeout of almost everybody in the higher echelons of the regime.

GLUUUURK!
RadicalTaoist scratching at .8, just hopin' from the #GUniverse Since: Jan, 2001
scratching at .8, just hopin'
FFShinra Beware the Crazy Man. from Ivalice, apparently Since: Jan, 2001 Relationship Status: Too sexy for my shirt
Beware the Crazy Man.
#54: May 20th 2011 at 2:52:05 PM

Wiping out the theocracy or wiping out the Dinner Jacket's dictatorship won't solve anything. For all their faults, both sides play into the psyche of the Iranian people. One promotes Shiism among a religious population in a world of Sunnis, and the other invokes nationalism in a very proud people. The problem is really one of power corrupts and magnatude. The best way then would be for the reformists to gain power and subsequently have them reduce the power of the other two factions.

Outright destruction would only strengthen the hand of facism or fundamentalism. Moderating them on the other hand will subvert their excesses.

Final Fantasy, Foreign Policy, and Bollywood. Helluva combo, that...
ZeiqthePyro from La Florida Since: Dec, 2009
#55: May 21st 2011 at 7:14:36 PM

^^^^

Kamenei is replaceable. He lacks the personal magnetism and clerical credentials of Khomeini and was basically given the job entirely because he was an unspectacular middleman. Plus, besides the Supreme leader you have the Guardian Council, the Assembly of Religious Experts, and the Expediency Council, all of which are controlled by the Shiite Clerics. To get rid of Iran's theocracy, you'd need a revolution.

edited 21st May '11 7:16:00 PM by ZeiqthePyro

Needs Caffeine
TuefelHundenIV Night Clerk of the Apacalypse. from Doomsday Facility Corner Store. Since: Aug, 2009 Relationship Status: I'd need a PowerPoint presentation
Night Clerk of the Apacalypse.
#56: May 21st 2011 at 7:41:02 PM

I believe Shinra has highlighted nicely an excellent solution.

Who watches the watchmen?
Add Post

Total posts: 56
Top