Follow TV Tropes

Following

Duplicate of Sub Trope?: Internal Subtrope

Go To

DragonQuestZ The Other Troper from Somewhere in California Since: Jan, 2001
The Other Troper
#1: May 4th 2011 at 3:06:33 AM

It looks like it to me, but what do you guys think? Is it distinct from Sub-Trope, or should we merge them?

I'm on the internet. My arguments are invalid.
nrjxll Since: Nov, 2010 Relationship Status: Not war
#2: May 4th 2011 at 2:38:12 PM

Whoa. How meta.

I don't see why we would need to merge them, offhand. What's its wick count?

DragonQuestZ The Other Troper from Somewhere in California Since: Jan, 2001
The Other Troper
#3: May 4th 2011 at 2:58:40 PM

You can see on the button below the link. But why wouldn't you see merging them? What is the distinction here?

I'm on the internet. My arguments are invalid.
Discar Since: Jun, 2009
#4: May 4th 2011 at 3:51:34 PM

I don't see any reason not to just cut it; it only has 11 wicks, and it seems to be a complete duplicate.

WackyMeetsPractical My teacher's a panda from Texas Since: Oct, 2009
My teacher's a panda
#5: May 4th 2011 at 3:55:03 PM

Isn't the difference that Sub-Trope gets it's own page while an Internal Sub Trope is just a sub category but is left on the same page as the super trope? It's a soft split instead of a hard split.

Madrugada Zzzzzzzzzz Since: Jan, 2001 Relationship Status: In season
Zzzzzzzzzz
#6: May 4th 2011 at 4:30:56 PM

^ That's the way I read it.

...if you don’t love you’re dead, and if you do, they’ll kill you for it.
nrjxll Since: Nov, 2010 Relationship Status: Not war
#7: May 4th 2011 at 4:32:39 PM

I'm convinced. Make Internal Subtrope an internal subtrope of Sub-Trope.

DragonQuestZ The Other Troper from Somewhere in California Since: Jan, 2001
The Other Troper
#8: May 4th 2011 at 5:37:24 PM

If that's the difference, then it would be less confusing to call it something like Soft Split Sub Trope, or something that makes it clear it's on the same page.

I'm on the internet. My arguments are invalid.
FastEddie Since: Apr, 2004
#9: May 4th 2011 at 5:39:46 PM

It's another one of those YKTTW "canned messages" which have never been anything but a pain.

Goal: Clear, Concise and Witty
WackyMeetsPractical My teacher's a panda from Texas Since: Oct, 2009
My teacher's a panda
#10: May 4th 2011 at 5:42:45 PM

[up][up] Isn't that what the "Internal" is for? It means "Inside", as in "A subtrope contained inside the main trope's page."

DragonQuestZ The Other Troper from Somewhere in California Since: Jan, 2001
The Other Troper
#11: May 4th 2011 at 6:05:05 PM

[up]A Sub-Trope is internal to the parameters of its Super-Trope, which is why I was confused.

But if it's a canned message, wouldn't Yes We Do Have This One cover that?

I'm on the internet. My arguments are invalid.
Xzenu Since: Apr, 2010
#12: May 5th 2011 at 1:08:06 AM

An Internal Subtrope is often a soft split, but not always. It can also be a distinction for a redirect that is more limited then the main title.

It can be used as a "canned message", but it can also be used to point out the distinction.

So, in conclusion: Pretty much all soft splits are covered by Internal Subtrope, and the same goes for redirects-that-are-more-specific-than-the-main-title.

I recvcomend keeping it as it is. Or, if anyone bothers, expand it into becoming an index.

Add Post

Total posts: 12
Top