It'd have to be a really young Jeebs... considering that the plot's confirmed to be about time travel.
Long live Cinematech. FC:0259-0435-4987For all we know about Jeebs, he could have looked the exact same all of those years ago.
The production of this film sounds disastrous. I think the first film is great, and kind of enjoy the second one in spite of its mediocrity, but I'm worried this will go horribly wrong.
Can't be any worse than what happened with Brolin's Jonah Hex.
More Buscemi at http://forum.reelsociety.com/starts crying uncontrollably
Theres sex and death and human grime in monochrome for one thin dime and at least the trains all run on time but they dont go anywhere.I loved both the originals, can't wait to see where they take this for the third.
Tommy Lee Jones and Will Smith are still in this right? If so then I have a good expectation for this one, I really enjoyed their interaction in the first two movies.
They started filming when only a third of the script was written!
There are going to be problems.
Yes, Jones and Smith are returning. However, Josh Brolin will be playing Jones's character for most of the film since they are in the 1960's.
More Buscemi at http://forum.reelsociety.com/Is Smith going to get his son to play him in the 60s??
That would be awesome!
With Josh Brolin onboard, does this mean there'll be No Country for Old Men in Black?
I couldn't resist...
^^I don't think J was even born in the 60s. They could easily have J go back in time and team up with a young Agent K.
Why do I get the feeling the animated Men in Black series tackled an episode like this?
Because they kinda did. Except J used some alien device to become so smart he was immune to the bad guy locking away the original MIB agents.
^^^That's the plot. J goes back in time and teams up with a young K.
edited 8th Apr '11 2:38:06 PM by nomuru2d
Long live Cinematech. FC:0259-0435-4987Looking forward to Emma Thompson in a blazer and tie. Mrowr.
..but seriously now. Men in Black III? MIB2 was a pale reflection of the original, and the first was only a success because Tommy Lee went off the rails and start ad-libbing every scene. This is not a strong foundation for a trilogy.
edited 8th Apr '11 2:41:41 PM by johnnyfog
I'm a skeptical squirrelWhat was so bad about Men In Black 2? I had fun watching it, and it was interesting to see the switched dynamics.
Inspirational quote against powerful image of nature.That was a fun idea, until they ditched it.
The second one didn't do much to justify its existence. Instead of K cracking wise, it's Will Smith. If I wanted that, I'd pop in my vhs of Wild Wild West (which incidentally is still better than MIB II).
I'm a skeptical squirrelJemaine is the villain, so I'm excited.
"Weird doors open. People fall into things."And what was so bad about Wild Wild West? Maybe if you liked the original it was a poor adaption, but it was still funny and enjoyable.
Too many good films are panned.
Inspirational quote against powerful image of nature.I don't feel one way or the other about WWW, it's essentially just Men In Black Goes West. But I place it higher than MIB 2. Did you miss my point?
I'm a skeptical squirrelWild Wild West was AWFUL.
Walked by an on location shoot for Men in Black 3 on 8th ave. It was shooting in one of those dingy Times Square T-shirt-and-electronics stores.
Wanna bet Jeebs is the owner?
Jonah Falcon