Man pleads guilty to duping moms into abusing kids.

wow, talk about camwhoring.....

I love how he said it's for therapy.....I mean For Science!!

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20110301/ap_on_re_us/us_fake_psychologist_sex_abuse

WHASSUP....... ....with lolis!

Three thoughts:

1) That man deserves to be where he is.

2) Those women aren't what I call... bright.

3) Those kids need some serious help.

The thing about making witty signature lines is that it first needs to actually be witty.

Wow, that's... different. I really don't know what to think in regards to the mothers.

It's funny as in some cultures the nanny or mother jerking off their children is considered a good idea, to get them to fall asleep..... (French Royalty, as an example used to do this).

Wonder how the Yahoo! E-stoner commenters would react @ that xD

WHASSUP....... ....with lolis!

Basically what Usht said, with the addition of

4) Dalton St. Clair? Seriously?

edited 1st Mar '11 10:20:12 AM by Sivartis

♭What.

Uh. Why would you think that that was a good idea.

[1] This facsimile operated in part by synAC.

AFAIK those are run-down neighborhoods around Detroit.

WHASSUP....... ....with lolis!

Those women...

How damned retarded can a person be? And this guy got away with it for over a year?

Wow. I can't recall the last time I've been surprised by the depths of human stupidity.

Hmm... not to bash on women, but I've seen dumber.

Just search "water broke" on Yahoo Answers.

Actually, just search Yahoo Answers for non-gender related stupidity.

The thing about making witty signature lines is that it first needs to actually be witty.

Yahoo Answers doesn't count. It is itself.

[1] This facsimile operated in part by synAC.

Fair enough, but do you people consider it fair what's happening to those mothers, stupid or not? Would you consider it the case that they did it voluntarily or that they were manipulated in a manner that they could not have foreseen in certain cases?

The thing about making witty signature lines is that it first needs to actually be witty.

Reminds me of the time when someone convinced employees at a fast food restaurant to strip search a costumer over the phone.

edited 1st Mar '11 11:08:17 AM by storyyeller

Blind Final Fantasy 6 Let's Play

^^ I'm not particularly disposed to cut slack to the mothers, it's the children I'm worried about.

"Why don't you write books people can read?"-Nora Joyce, to her husband James

It's not fair, the dude is to blame given he managed to con and manipulate them so well.

re. Yahoo Answers, how much of those are trolls?

WHASSUP....... ....with lolis!

Unless the mothers show evidence of mental disability or have been living under a rock the past 20 years, I think it's reasonable to assume they knew about child sexual abuse. I'd say both the mothers and this fake psychiatrist should be held criminally responsible for the children's abuse, and the children should be placed in someone else's care.

If I'm asking for advice on a story idea, don't tell me it can't be done.

Agreed; I'm not seeing the mothers as innocent. You don't perform sexual acts on your kid because somebody on the Internet tells you to. (Well, obviously you do, but you know what I mean.) The guy was a manipulator, but the mothers as adults/parents should be held responsible too, unless mental disability was a factor (and it can't have been for all of them).

"Why don't you write books people can read?"-Nora Joyce, to her husband James

Seriously, what the heck!?

How can those mothers be so moronic? It's clear Demnik isn't the only guilty part here, I mean really, no one does that to their child unless they already wanted to do it and wanted assurance, or they were under a death threat of some sort.

The Blog The Art

I don't think the penalties associated with child pornography are necessarily fair in the first place. I mean, for instance, teenagers engaged in sexting or a guy with hentai on his computer are not in the same galaxy of "threat to society" as someone who, with no outside manipulation, takes it upon themselves to film themselves fucking a child. So I suppose this case would be a subset of that. These mothers have demonstrated sufficiently poor judgment to make them unfit parents, and the punitive system would be remiss in ignoring any harm their stupidity may have wrought, but I don't consider them sexual predators.

How could mothers be this stupid?

edited 1st Mar '11 11:18:40 PM by Zolnier

Life's Gonna Suck When You Grow Up... But Is It That Great Now?... Also I'm Skylark2 now.

Fixed that for you

WHASSUP....... ....with lolis!

My own wording suffices.

edited 1st Mar '11 6:59:33 PM by Tongpu

Seriously, how could anyone be convienced to do that without some form of mental imapirment? And they didn't get supicious when he wanted footage?

Life's Gonna Suck When You Grow Up... But Is It That Great Now?... Also I'm Skylark2 now.

And this is why you don't use one source for all your "advice". If these women had asked others what they thought of this person's advice, they would probably had figured out that the advice he was giving probably wasn't the best.

♥♥II'GSJQGDvhhMKOmXunSrogZliLHGKVMhGVmNhBzGUPiXLYki'GRQhBITqQrrOIJKNWiXKO♥♥

Given that he'd been doing this for over a year, I think this whole incident lends credence to my argument in the "What would you do in this murder case?" thread.

I'm convinced that our modern day analogues to ancient scholars are comedians. -0dd1