Follow TV Tropes

Following

History YMMV / TheCatInTheHat

Go To

OR

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* CultClassic: The film is so deranged and weird, it has attracted more than a few genuine fans over the years. There truly is no film like it, so some fans have come to view it as a surrealist masterpiece.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* MisaimedMarketing: The marketing and tie-in merchandise aside from the trailers averted the dirty jokes showcased throughout the film.

to:

* MisaimedMarketing: MisaimedMerchandising: The marketing and tie-in merchandise aside from the trailers averted the dirty jokes showcased throughout the film.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* AdaptationDisplacement: In some countries where the book and the animated special aren't well-known [[NoExportForYou and/or were never published]], many viewers were introduced to The Cat in the Hat by this movie.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Nick is a separate character altogether.


* CommonKnowledge: The boy, being the narrator, is not named in the book. His names, "Conrad" in the movie and "Nick" in the animated series, is purely an [[NamedByTheAdaptation invention]] of the live action film. He is [[NoNameGiven not given a name in the books]].

to:

* CommonKnowledge: The boy, being the narrator, is not named in the book. His names, name "Conrad" in the movie and "Nick" in the animated series, is purely an [[NamedByTheAdaptation invention]] of the live action film. He is [[NoNameGiven not given a name in the books]].film.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* EpilepticTrees

to:

* EpilepticTreesEpilepticTrees:



** Conrad might be a destructive sociopath, but you can’t help but feel bad for him, since his mom’s boyfriend verbally abuses him behind her back and towards the end of the film, he nearly loses his sister and actually decides to willingly accept responsibility for wrecking the house.

to:

** Conrad might be a destructive sociopath, but you can’t can't help but feel bad for him, since his mom’s mom's boyfriend verbally abuses him behind her back and towards the end of the film, he nearly loses his sister and actually decides to willingly accept responsibility for wrecking the house.



** Many of the scenes involving glaringly obvious and dated CGI (i.e. the Things running around the house and the "Mother of All Messes") can qualify as this.

to:

** Many of the scenes involving glaringly obvious and dated CGI (i.e. , the Things running around the house and the "Mother of All Messes") can qualify as this.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* CantUnHearIt: Millennials ironically, or for the legit fans of the film, unironically, like to read the Cat's lines from the book in the voice of Creator/MikeMyers.
* CriticalBacklash: The movie was ''widely'' hated upon its release. However, similar to what happened with ''WesternAnimation/BeeMovie'', it later found popularity in the late 2010s as an internet meme. As a result, many people who've decided to WatchItForTheMeme have said that the film's visual style and humor manage to hold well on their own merits, despite it not being a good adaptation of the book.

to:

* CantUnHearIt: Millennials ironically, Legit or for the legit ironic fans of the film, unironically, like to read the Cat's lines from the book in the voice of Creator/MikeMyers.
* CriticalBacklash: The movie was ''widely'' hated upon its release. However, similar to what happened with ''WesternAnimation/BeeMovie'', it later found popularity in the late 2010s as an internet meme. As a result, many people who've decided to WatchItForTheMeme have said that the film's visual style and humor manage to hold well on their own merits, despite it generally agreed that it's not being a good adaptation of the book.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** Not to mention the band's rendition of the Beatles "Getting Better", which accompanies the Cat's cleaning routine towards the end of the film.

Added: 617

Changed: 182

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* CommonKnowledge: The boy is not named "Conrad" in the book. The name is purely an [[NamedByTheAdaptation invention]] of the live action film. He is [[NoNameGiven not given a name in the books]].

to:

* CommonKnowledge: The boy boy, being the narrator, is not named in the book. His names, "Conrad" in the book. The name movie and "Nick" in the animated series, is purely an [[NamedByTheAdaptation invention]] of the live action film. He is [[NoNameGiven not given a name in the books]].



* {{Squick}}: Larry sneezing into his hands while covered in slime. [[ItMakesSenseInContext Yeah...]]

to:

* {{Squick}}: Larry Quinn has multiple moments that cause this reaction:
** Although his true nature is hinted at when he steals food from the Walden family and burping in the kids' faces, his BalloonBelly pops out of his girdle once he's inside his house, and he removes his dentures. Both are close-up shots, and it seems like [[FatSlob the film just wants you to know *how* gross he is]].
** Once he finishes his phone call with Joan snitching on Conrad, he's picking his belly button in a sense of accomplishment and farting.
** Falling out of a pipe in the Walden house covered in a weird purple slime, and
sneezing into his hands while covered in slime.once Joan rejects him. [[ItMakesSenseInContext Yeah...]]

Added: 452

Changed: 49

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* FranchiseOriginalSin: The live-action movie is frequently decried for, among its many other faults, following the original book only in ''very'' BroadStrokes. This adaptation actually doesn't follow it very closely either though, which is especially a contrast from the other animated Dr. Seuss specials. It just happened this didn't have any of the other glaring issues the movie had (crass adult humor, the fact it wasn't animated, UnintentionalUncannyValley visual effects, and virtually no focus) to bring it down along with it, and as much as it deviated from the source, it still kept true to the Seuss spirit. The latter point was helped no doubt by Ted Geisel himself being involved with its production.

to:

* FranchiseOriginalSin: The live-action movie is frequently decried for, among its many other faults, following the original book only in ''very'' BroadStrokes. This adaptation actually doesn't follow it very closely either though, which is especially a contrast from the other animated Dr. Seuss specials. It just happened this didn't have any of the other glaring issues the movie had (crass adult humor, the fact it wasn't animated, UnintentionalUncannyValley visual effects, and virtually no focus) focus, among others) to bring it down along with it, and as much as it deviated from the source, it still kept true to the Seuss spirit. The latter point was helped no doubt by Ted Geisel himself being involved with its production.



* SoOkayItsAverage: Some opinions on this movie. As an adaptation, it's not exactly something Dr. Seuss would be proud of (In fact, his Estate was pretty livid over it and prohibited any other live action films of his works). On its own however, it's at worst a little boring and has at least a few jokes which land.

to:

* SoOkayItsAverage: Some opinions on this movie. As an adaptation, it's not exactly something Dr. Seuss would be proud of (In fact, his Estate was pretty livid over it and prohibited any other live action films of his works).works since). On its own however, it's at worst a little boring and has at least a few jokes which land.


Added DiffLines:

* VillainHasAPoint: Although Larry is a selfish and manipulative hypocrite, his dislike of the children's attitudes is not unjustified at the start of the film. Conrad is a destructive rule breaker who doesn't respect his mother and borders on psychopathic behaviour. Sally is an irritating control freak who [[TeachersPet constantly sucks up to parental figures]], and though Larry's BrutalHonesty with her about this is harsh, it's not without merit.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* MagnificentBastard: [[TricksterMentor The Cat in the Hat]] himself is a mischievous prankster who intends to teach Sally and Conrad a lesson about how to have fun. Entering their house, he immediately causes as much damage as he possibly can with his "fun", concluding by wheeling in a locked box and telling Conrad not to open it. When Conrad breaks the lock anyway, the Cat brings the children on a dangerous adventure, even having them drive on a busy highway and ultimately traversing through the "[[EldritchLocation The Mother of All Messes]]", the horrifying and broken version of their house. After they fix the lock, it's revealed that the Cat planned out everything on their journey, purposefully telling Conrad not to open the lock because [[BatmanGambit he knew that would make Conrad want to do it]]. With the kids having learned their lesson, the Cat returns to fix up the damages he caused, departing from the children as a friend.

to:

* MagnificentBastard: [[TricksterMentor The Cat in the Hat]] himself is a mischievous prankster who intends to teach Sally and Conrad a lesson about how to have fun. Entering their house, he immediately causes as much damage as he possibly can with his "fun", concluding by wheeling in a locked box and telling Conrad not to open it. When Conrad breaks the lock anyway, the Cat brings the children on a dangerous adventure, even having them drive on a busy highway and ultimately traversing through the "[[EldritchLocation The Mother of All Messes]]", the horrifying and broken version of their house. After they fix the lock, it's revealed that the Cat planned out everything on their journey, [[ReversePsychology purposefully telling Conrad not to open the lock lock]] because [[BatmanGambit he knew that would make Conrad want to do it]]. With the kids having learned their lesson, the Cat returns to fix up the damages he caused, departing from the children as a friend.

Added: 668

Changed: 1105

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* PopularityPolynomial: Was well-received when it first came out, but fell somewhat into obscurity in the 80s and 90s, overshadowed by the animated version of ''WesternAnimation/HowTheGrinchStoleChristmas'' (and, to a lesser extent, ''Literature/TheLorax''). In 2003 it got a DVD release to cash in on the live-action version, and was widely regarded as a ''far'' superior adaptation by comparison.

to:

* PopularityPolynomial: Was well-received when it first came out, but fell somewhat into obscurity in the 80s and 90s, overshadowed by the animated version of ''WesternAnimation/HowTheGrinchStoleChristmas'' (and, to a lesser extent, ''Literature/TheLorax'').''WesternAnimation/{{The Lorax|1972}}''). In 2003 it got a DVD release to cash in on the live-action version, and was widely regarded as a ''far'' superior adaptation by comparison.



* QuestionableCasting: The film got lots of flak for casting Creator/MikeMyers as the Cat (after Creator/TimAllen left the film) due to his track record of humor being inappropriate for the typical age demographic of Creator/DrSeuss readers (although he was notable as another kids' icon, Franchise/{{Shrek}}); both he and director Creator/BoWelch were legally forced into the film due to Universal being angry over Myers cancelling a movie adaptation of ''Series/{{S|aturdayNightLive}}prockets''. Unfortunately, many of the fears from parents ended up being realized once the film came out. Even Audrey Giesel herself objected to Myers' role as the titular character.



** An odd case with the Cat himself. While many consider the makeup to be UnintentionalUncannyValley, it at least looks somewhat faithful to the Cat's appearance in the book, similar to the Grinch in ''Film/HowTheGrinchStoleChristmas''. However, unlike the Grinch, in which the makeup was known to be extremely uncomfortable for Jim Carrey, who practiced stress-relief techniques to focus on his role, there are several moments throughout the movie where Mike Myers visibly struggles with the extreme discomfort of his costume, which really hurts the authenticity of his performance and makeup. Not helping matters is you can easily see where the costume ends and Myers' actual face begins.

to:

** An odd case with the Cat himself. While many consider the makeup to be UnintentionalUncannyValley, it at least looks somewhat faithful to the Cat's appearance in the book, similar to the Grinch in ''Film/HowTheGrinchStoleChristmas''.''Film/HowTheGrinchStoleChristmas2000''. However, unlike the Grinch, in which the makeup was known to be extremely uncomfortable for Jim Carrey, who practiced stress-relief techniques to focus on his role, there are several moments throughout the movie where Mike Myers visibly struggles with the extreme discomfort of his costume, which really hurts the authenticity of his performance and makeup. Not helping matters is you can easily see where the costume ends and Myers' actual face begins.



* WTHCastingAgency: The film got lots of flak for casting Creator/MikeMyers as the Cat (after Creator/TimAllen left the film) due to his track record of humor being inappropriate for the typical age demographic of Creator/DrSeuss readers (although he was notable as another kids' icon, Franchise/{{Shrek}}); both he and director Creator/BoWelch were legally forced into the film due to Universal being angry over Myers cancelling a movie adaptation of ''Series/{{S|aturdayNightLive}}prockets''. Unfortunately, many of the fears from parents ended up being realized once the film came out. Even Audrey Giesel herself objected to Myers' role as the titular character.
* WTHCostumingDepartment: Even the world of Creator/DrSeuss could not find a home for The Cat as brought to life by Mike Myers, whose suit and makeup made for some hardcore UnintentionalUncannyValley and pales to [[Film/HowTheGrinchStoleChristmas the Grinch's]] design when donned by Creator/JimCarrey.

to:

* WTHCastingAgency: The film got lots of flak for casting Creator/MikeMyers as the Cat (after Creator/TimAllen left the film) due to his track record of humor being inappropriate for the typical age demographic of Creator/DrSeuss readers (although he was notable as another kids' icon, Franchise/{{Shrek}}); both he and director Creator/BoWelch were legally forced into the film due to Universal being angry over Myers cancelling a movie adaptation of ''Series/{{S|aturdayNightLive}}prockets''. Unfortunately, many of the fears from parents ended up being realized once the film came out. Even Audrey Giesel herself objected to Myers' role as the titular character.
* WTHCostumingDepartment: Even the world of Creator/DrSeuss could not find a home for The Cat as brought to life by Mike Myers, whose suit and makeup made for some hardcore UnintentionalUncannyValley and pales to [[Film/HowTheGrinchStoleChristmas [[Film/HowTheGrinchStoleChristmas2000 the Grinch's]] design when donned by Creator/JimCarrey.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* WTHCastingAgency: The film got lots of flak for casting Creator/MikeMyers as the Cat (after Creator/TimAllen left the film) due to his track record of humor being inappropriate for the typical age demographic of Creator/DrSeuss readers (although he was notable as another kids' icon, WesternAnimation/{{Shrek}}); both he and director Creator/BoWelch were legally forced into the film due to Universal being angry over Myers cancelling a movie adaptation of ''Series/{{S|aturdayNightLive}}prockets''. Unfortunately, many of the fears from parents ended up being realized once the film came out. Even Audrey Giesel herself objected to Myers' role as the titular character.

to:

* WTHCastingAgency: The film got lots of flak for casting Creator/MikeMyers as the Cat (after Creator/TimAllen left the film) due to his track record of humor being inappropriate for the typical age demographic of Creator/DrSeuss readers (although he was notable as another kids' icon, WesternAnimation/{{Shrek}}); Franchise/{{Shrek}}); both he and director Creator/BoWelch were legally forced into the film due to Universal being angry over Myers cancelling a movie adaptation of ''Series/{{S|aturdayNightLive}}prockets''. Unfortunately, many of the fears from parents ended up being realized once the film came out. Even Audrey Giesel herself objected to Myers' role as the titular character.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** The whole "Rave" scene as the group are running away from Lawrence - featuring a cameo from Creator/ParisHilton of all people.
** The scene where Mrs. Kwan watches a brawl break out in the ''Taiwanese parliament''. [[MindScrew What the hell?]]

to:

** The whole "Rave" scene as the group are running away from Lawrence - featuring a cameo from Creator/ParisHilton of all people.
Creator/ParisHilton.
** The scene where Mrs. Kwan watches a brawl break out in the ''Taiwanese parliament''. [[MindScrew What the hell?]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* SugarWiki/AwesomeMusic: "Calculatus Eliminatus". Never has a song about vandalism been so much fun.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:


* MemeticMutation: In the WebAnimation/{{YouTube Poop}}s that have been made out of this, Krinklebine's "Outrageous!" is often repeated for humorous effect.

to:

* MemeticMutation: In the WebAnimation/{{YouTube {{YouTube Poop}}s that have been made out of this, Krinklebine's "Outrageous!" is often repeated for humorous effect.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* CantUnHearIt: Millennials ironically, or for some Gen Z fans of the film, unironically, like to read the Cat's lines from the book in the voice of Creator/MikeMyers.

to:

* CantUnHearIt: Millennials ironically, or for some Gen Z the legit fans of the film, unironically, like to read the Cat's lines from the book in the voice of Creator/MikeMyers.

Top