%% Image restored per Image Pickin' thread: http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/posts.php?discussion=1465792852098810600
%% Please do not replace or remove without starting a new thread.
[[quoteright:350:[[Webcomic/{{Subnormality}} http://static.tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pub/images/jerks_5320.png]]]]
[[caption-width-right:350: Adjusted to represent viewer perception!]]

->''"One bad apple spoils the whole barrel."''
-->-- Commonly used idiom when it comes to a person's perception of a group upon seeing its Vocal Minority.

When it comes to fans of certain things, there are many people who are sane, down-to-earth individuals; individuals who understand that if they talk about a subject and the other person isn't interested, they'll change the subject. These people know how to keep their hobbies under control; how to differentiate between reality and their interests.

Unfortunately, these people aren't news. That's because Weird Is Interesting - Like any other program on television, the news has to be ''interesting'' or else people won't watch it. Why talk to an individual who works in an office and occasionally picks up a copy of ''Comicbook/{{Spider-Man}}'' when you can talk to the 300-pound guy who spent $7000 on his exact replica of a [[Franchise/{{Batman}} Scarecrow]] costume?

The problem is that because only the weirdos get interviewed, this causes non-fans to believe they're all like that; that all comic fans are [[StrawFan clones of the Comic Book Guy]] from ''WesternAnimation/TheSimpsons'', for example. This is also the main reason why people would hate something just because of its fanbase. It's like the old saying: "The squeaky wheel gets the grease".

Not just limited to ComicBooks, this phenomenon extends to other hobbyists, other groups and races as well. Although there can be odd immunities: compare how your average American treats a guy in a [[Franchise/StarTrek Spock]] costume versus how he treats a guy with his face painted in team colors.

Sadly, this concept serves very well for ChewbaccaDefense. Someone complain about you doing something wrong? Stigmatize them as a Vocal Minority – you instantly prove they are wrong and make it look like everything is alright and everyone agrees with you on this, and complainers delude themselves thinking otherwise. That's [[AdHominem Argumentum ad hominem]], but what is more important – [[HarsherInHindsight history tends to avert this entirely]]; i.e the mere fact that someone complains ''really'' hard means something is going very, very wrong. The poem [[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_they_came%E2%80%A6 “First they came…”]] by Martin Niemöller is all about supporting this point of view. [[GodwinsLaw It’s about Nazis]]. Specifically it's about how groups unhappy with Hitler's rise of power (like communists or trade unionists) were considered a Vocal Minority so no one really cared about their persecution and imprisonment. [[DownerEnding You know what happened next.]]

Due to the nature of this trope, many fandom-related tropes are induced solely by this. The only members of a fandom who vocalize their opinion are the ones who feel so strongly about their opinion that they feel the need to vocalize it. TheScrappy, the EnsembleDarkhorse, the FanDumb, the HateDumb, FanPreferredCouple, etc., are all based on what is commented on by the VocalMinority. So, characters like Scrappy Doo and films like ''Film/TransformersRevengeOfTheFallen'' both sound like the spawn of Satan when described by people on the internet, but usually have a much more positive description via Word of Mouth (in other words, asking someone on the internet about the two will get long winded rants, asking a guy on the street will get much more praise than on the internet). So, Scrappy Doo and [[CreatorsPet Wesley Crusher]] could've very well been fairly well liked by the silent majority. However, just because they're the Minority, ''doesn't'' mean they're a small group: In large fandoms, the minority could number in the thousands. As such, sometimes you actually do need to pay attention to them; while blindly kowtowing to their protests and demands is obviously a stupid and often harmful idea, there are plenty of times where they ''may'' actually be onto something even if it isn't phrased in the most polite or reasonable manner, though it does require extensive analysis to see if this really is the case. Finding out where the line is has become much harder in the internet age. As a brief example it is not uncommon for certain websites to feature one stance as it's view of "normality" when chances are you'd get a very different answer if you ask someone on the street. In these cases the "majority" to those sites themselves are "vocal minorities" to the larger degree. This is more than likely the cause why there are some things you may see every day on the internet, yet next to never see brought up in day to day life.

This trope can occur in multiplayer internet games of nearly all types. One example would be an MMORPG in which most people can see that a given class or ability is overpowered compared to others, sometimes to the degree of being a GameBreaker. If the creators try to remedy the imbalance, the most dedicated players (many of whom have been using the imbalance) may dominate the bulletin boards and insist that the changes are highly unfair. On occasion, the players will be polled on the topic and if that happens, it's not unusual for those who object to be found to be no more than a Vocal Minority.

This is a major reason why PanderingToTheBase can be so problematic; even if the other pitfalls are discounted, the writers may only be serving a small but vocal minority. A BrokenBase rises when two groups of Vocal Minority members have opposing opinions hitting against one another. Contrast with SilentMajority. See also StopBeingStereotypical.
%% Admin notice: No real life examples on this one please. There are just too many to list. It's best to say that this applies to all groups and races. If examples are re-added to this page, they should be limited to in-universe only.