Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 5 (click to see context) from:
** Initially, Geordi thinks Bochra's rank is commodore being informed that he's a centurion. On ''Series/StarTrekPicard'', Geordi holds the rank of commodore.
to:
** Initially, Geordi thinks Bochra's rank is commodore before being informed that he's a centurion. On ''Series/StarTrekPicard'', Geordi holds the rank of commodore.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* HarsherInHindsight: While holding him hostage, Bochra tells Geordi "You can be sarcastic now, but in a few millennia, when humans are extinct and the Romulan Empire spans the galaxy...". [[Film/StarTrek2009 In about]] [[Series/StarTrekPicard 20 years]], it'll be the Romulans that are almost extinct and their empire shattered.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 4 (click to see context) from:
** Geordi initially believes Bochra's rank is commodore being informed that he's a centurion. On ''Series/StarTrekPicard'', Geordi holds the rank of commodore.
to:
** Initially, Geordi initially believes thinks Bochra's rank is commodore being informed that he's a centurion. On ''Series/StarTrekPicard'', Geordi holds the rank of commodore.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 2 (click to see context) from:
* HilariousInHindsight: Geordi emphatically tells Bochra [[Film/AttackOfTheClones that he doesn't like sand]].
to:
* HilariousInHindsight: HilariousInHindsight:
** Geordi emphatically tells Bochra [[Film/AttackOfTheClones that he doesn't likesand]].sand]].
** Geordi initially believes Bochra's rank is commodore being informed that he's a centurion. On ''Series/StarTrekPicard'', Geordi holds the rank of commodore.
** Geordi emphatically tells Bochra [[Film/AttackOfTheClones that he doesn't like
** Geordi initially believes Bochra's rank is commodore being informed that he's a centurion. On ''Series/StarTrekPicard'', Geordi holds the rank of commodore.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 1 (click to see context) from:
* AlternateCharacterInterpretation: It's possible that Patahk only told Worf that he'd rather die than receive his blood as an act of empty defiance. We'll never really know if he, like Bochra, would have decided not to throw his life away on principle if actually offered the treatment.
to:
* AlternateCharacterInterpretation: AlternativeCharacterInterpretation: It's possible that Patahk only told Worf that he'd rather die than receive his blood as an act of empty defiance. We'll never really know if he, like Bochra, would have decided not to throw his life away on principle if actually offered the treatment.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* HilariousInHindsight: Geordi emphatically tells Bochra [[Film/AttackOfTheClones that he doesn't like sand]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* AlternateCharacterInterpretation: It's possible that Patahk only told Worf that he'd rather die than receive his blood as an act of empty defiance. We'll never really know if he, like Bochra, would have decided not to throw his life away on principle if actually offered the treatment.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Moving to headscratchers
Deleted line(s) 1,2 (click to see context) :
* FridgeLogic: One plot point is that the ''Enterprise'' is unable to leave orbit in order to rendezvous with Tomalak at the neutral zone, since Geordi is still on the planet's surface. But, why not just separate the ship? Riker can hang around on the saucer section to pick up Geordi (and Bochra) while Picard takes the stardrive section to meet Tomalak.
** A potential answer is that the Romulans theoretically know that saucer separation is something that makes the stardrive section far more effective in combat. Thus leaving the civilians behind and racing towards the Neutral Zone in a ship that has now apparently taken a combat stance could be an equally bad diplomatic move.
** A potential answer is that the Romulans theoretically know that saucer separation is something that makes the stardrive section far more effective in combat. Thus leaving the civilians behind and racing towards the Neutral Zone in a ship that has now apparently taken a combat stance could be an equally bad diplomatic move.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Worf is clearly not trying to "honor" the Romulan in any regard.
Deleted line(s) 1 (click to see context) :
* AlternateCharacterInterpretation: Worf telling Picard he would donate his blood to save Patahk if Picard ordered it, then refusing when Picard ''asks'' him of it. Was Worf stubbornly refusing to save the life of his enemy and loyally letting his captain know he would still do it if he had to? Or was Worf trying to balance honoring Patahk's wishes (to die rather than accept Klingon blood) with his desire to save him, and he was trying to convince Picard to give the order as a way out?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 3 (click to see context) from:
** A potential answer is that the Romulans theoretically know that saucer separation is something that makes the stardrive section far more effective in combat. Thus leaving the civilians behind and racing towards the Neutral Zone in a ship that has now apparently taken a combat stance could be an equally bad diplomatic move.
to:
** A potential answer is that the Romulans theoretically know that saucer separation is something that makes the stardrive section far more effective in combat. Thus leaving the civilians behind and racing towards the Neutral Zone in a ship that has now apparently taken a combat stance could be an equally bad diplomatic move.move.
* InformedWrongness: While Worf's moral stand on giving blood is debatable (and debating it is the point of the episode, supposedly), where this trope comes in is that all the focus is on his decision, ignoring that Patahk had already refused treatment. The episode turns a blind eye to the immorality of forcing someone to accept a medical treatment they don't want to instead focus on Worf's racial enmity.
* InformedWrongness: While Worf's moral stand on giving blood is debatable (and debating it is the point of the episode, supposedly), where this trope comes in is that all the focus is on his decision, ignoring that Patahk had already refused treatment. The episode turns a blind eye to the immorality of forcing someone to accept a medical treatment they don't want to instead focus on Worf's racial enmity.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* AlternateCharacterInterpretation: Worf telling Picard he would donate his blood to save Patahk if Picard ordered it, then refusing when Picard ''asks'' him of it. Was Worf stubbornly refusing to save the life of his enemy and loyally letting his captain know he would still do it if he had to? Or was Worf trying to balance honoring Patahk's wishes (to die rather than accept Klingon blood) with his desire to save him, and he was trying to convince Picard to give the order as a way out?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 1 (click to see context) from:
* FridgeLogic: One plot point is that the ''Enterprise'' is unable to leave orbit in order to rendezvous with Tomalak at the neutral zone, since Geordi is still on the planet's surface. But, why not just separate the ship? Riker can hang around on the saucer section to pick up Geordi (and Bochra) while Picard takes the stardrive section to meet Tomalak.
to:
* FridgeLogic: One plot point is that the ''Enterprise'' is unable to leave orbit in order to rendezvous with Tomalak at the neutral zone, since Geordi is still on the planet's surface. But, why not just separate the ship? Riker can hang around on the saucer section to pick up Geordi (and Bochra) while Picard takes the stardrive section to meet Tomalak.Tomalak.
** A potential answer is that the Romulans theoretically know that saucer separation is something that makes the stardrive section far more effective in combat. Thus leaving the civilians behind and racing towards the Neutral Zone in a ship that has now apparently taken a combat stance could be an equally bad diplomatic move.
** A potential answer is that the Romulans theoretically know that saucer separation is something that makes the stardrive section far more effective in combat. Thus leaving the civilians behind and racing towards the Neutral Zone in a ship that has now apparently taken a combat stance could be an equally bad diplomatic move.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 1 (click to see context) from:
* FridgeLogic: One plot point is that the Enterprise is unable to leave orbit in order to rendezvous with Tomalak at the neutral zone, since Geordi is still on the planet's surface. But, why not just separate the ship? Riker can hang around on the saucer section to pick up Geordi (and Bochra) while Picard takes the stardrive section to meet Tomalak.
to:
* FridgeLogic: One plot point is that the Enterprise ''Enterprise'' is unable to leave orbit in order to rendezvous with Tomalak at the neutral zone, since Geordi is still on the planet's surface. But, why not just separate the ship? Riker can hang around on the saucer section to pick up Geordi (and Bochra) while Picard takes the stardrive section to meet Tomalak.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* FridgeLogic: One plot point is that the Enterprise is unable to leave orbit in order to rendezvous with Tomalak at the neutral zone, since Geordi is still on the planet's surface. But, why not just separate the ship? Riker can hang around on the saucer section to pick up Geordi (and Bochra) while Picard takes the stardrive section to meet Tomalak.
