Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* BrokenAesop: The episode insists that the casualties on both sides could've been avoided if they had all just trusted each other. However, Sisko invokes the runabout crew (who were destroyed the moment Kilana's Jem'Hadar arrived), and T'Lor and Muñiz (killed and mortally wounded, respectively, before any negotiations had begun). It may be taken, however, that Sisko at least partially meant that the second Jem'Hadar ship opening fire upon arrival (and the Jem'Hadar warriors assaulting the crew on the ground) had soured any potential negotiations afterward.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
adding Aluminum Christmas Trees
Added DiffLines:
* AluminumChristmasTrees: Muñiz is skeptical when O'Brien talks about mountains in Ireland. Presumably all the mountains that are in Ireland in the 20th Century, such as Carrauntoohil and Knocknapeasta, will still be there in the 24th Century.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
changed to deliberate values dissonance
Changed line(s) 4,5 (click to see context) from:
* {{Tearjerker}}: Much of the episode.
* ValuesDissonance: O'Brien believes in holding on to hope and assuring a dying crewman he's going to make it long after it's obvious he's not. Worf's view is that deaths from combat are simply a fact of life, and they should all be honest about it so that the injured can ready himself for his death.
* ValuesDissonance: O'Brien believes in holding on to hope and assuring a dying crewman he's going to make it long after it's obvious he's not. Worf's view is that deaths from combat are simply a fact of life, and they should all be honest about it so that the injured can ready himself for his death.
to:
* {{Tearjerker}}: Much of the episode.
* ValuesDissonance: O'Brien believes in holding on to hope and assuring a dying crewman he's going to make it long after it's obvious he's not. Worf's view is that deaths from combat are simply a fact of life, and they should all be honest about it so that the injured can ready himself for his death.episode.
* ValuesDissonance: O'Brien believes in holding on to hope and assuring a dying crewman he's going to make it long after it's obvious he's not. Worf's view is that deaths from combat are simply a fact of life, and they should all be honest about it so that the injured can ready himself for his death.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 4 (click to see context) from:
* {{Tearjerker}}: Much of the episode.
to:
* {{Tearjerker}}: Much of the episode.episode.
* ValuesDissonance: O'Brien believes in holding on to hope and assuring a dying crewman he's going to make it long after it's obvious he's not. Worf's view is that deaths from combat are simply a fact of life, and they should all be honest about it so that the injured can ready himself for his death.
* ValuesDissonance: O'Brien believes in holding on to hope and assuring a dying crewman he's going to make it long after it's obvious he's not. Worf's view is that deaths from combat are simply a fact of life, and they should all be honest about it so that the injured can ready himself for his death.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
** It's also worth noting that this [[Recap/StarTrekTheNextGenerationS7E14LowerDecks wouldn't be the first time Worf has made up a Klingon practice for the sake of a colleague]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
** Given the funeral that T'Kuvma holds for a fallen comrade in the pilot episode of ''Series/StarTrekDiscovery'', it's also possible that some Klingon houses might practice something similar to ''ak'voh'', even if most others don't.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 1 (click to see context) from:
* AlternativeCharacterInterpretation: With previous episodes having indicated that Klingons saw dead bodies as nothing more than empty shells (and would presumably see no point in holding vigil over a corpse), some believe that Worf realised how much of a {{jerkass}} he had been towards O'Brien and the dying Muniz, and made up the ak'voh so that he'd have an excuse to join O'Brien in mourning and make up for his earlier actions.
to:
* AlternativeCharacterInterpretation: With previous episodes having indicated that Klingons saw dead bodies as nothing more than empty shells (and would presumably see no point in holding vigil over a corpse), some believe that Worf realised how much of a {{jerkass}} he had been towards O'Brien and the dying Muniz, Muñiz, and made up the ak'voh ''ak'voh'' so that he'd have an excuse to join O'Brien in mourning and make up for his earlier actions.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 1 (click to see context) from:
* AlternativeCharacterInterpretation: With previous episodes having indicated that Klingons saw dead bodies as nothing more than empty shells (and would presumably see no point in holding vigil over a corpse), some believe that Worf realised how much of a {{jerkass}} he had been towards O'Brien and the dying Muniz, and made up the ak'voh so that he'd have an excuse to join O'Brien in mourning and make up for his earler actions.
to:
* AlternativeCharacterInterpretation: With previous episodes having indicated that Klingons saw dead bodies as nothing more than empty shells (and would presumably see no point in holding vigil over a corpse), some believe that Worf realised how much of a {{jerkass}} he had been towards O'Brien and the dying Muniz, and made up the ak'voh so that he'd have an excuse to join O'Brien in mourning and make up for his earler earlier actions.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* AlternativeCharacterInterpretation: With previous episodes having indicated that Klingons saw dead bodies as nothing more than empty shells (and would presumably see no point in holding vigil over a corpse), some believe that Worf realised how much of a {{jerkass}} he had been towards O'Brien and the dying Muniz, and made up the ak'voh so that he'd have an excuse to join O'Brien in mourning and make up for his earler actions.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 1 (click to see context) from:
* WhatCouldHaveBeen: As with "The Search," the creative staff intended to bring back Eris, but her actress was unavailable.
to:
* WhatCouldHaveBeen: As with "The Search," {{Tearjerker}}: Much of the creative staff intended to bring back Eris, but her actress was unavailable.episode.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* WhatCouldHaveBeen: As with "The Search," the creative staff intended to bring back Eris, but her actress was unavailable.
