Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 9 (click to see context) from:
* ValuesDissonance: To a cynical modern audience, the President's refusal to use letters from his mistress to blackmail General Scott into aborting the coup to keep his own hands and conscience clean looks dangerously irresponsible, especially when the stakes are nothing less than the future of American democracy. For that matter, the idea that a right-wing authoritarian's followers would abandon him in the face of a personal scandal at odds with traditional morality seems almost laughable in the aftermath of ''decades'' of right-wing politicians holding onto power and influence despite even juicier and more repulsive sexual improprieties.
to:
* ValuesDissonance: To a cynical modern audience, the President's refusal to use letters from his mistress to blackmail General Scott into aborting the coup to keep his own hands and conscience clean looks dangerously irresponsible, especially when the stakes are nothing less than the future of American democracy. For that matter, the idea that a right-wing authoritarian's followers would abandon him in the face of a personal scandal at odds with traditional morality seems almost laughable in the aftermath of ''decades'' of right-wing politicians holding onto power and influence despite even juicier and more repulsive sexual improprieties.improprieties, thanks to a base too animated by their hatred of other political sectors and identities to care whether or not their own leaders adhere to the standards they want imposed on others.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* ValuesDissonance: To a cynical modern audience, the President's refusal to use letters from his mistress to blackmail General Scott into aborting the coup to keep his own hands and conscience clean looks dangerously irresponsible, especially when the stakes are nothing less than the future of American democracy. For that matter, the idea that a right-wing authoritarian's followers would abandon him in the face of a personal scandal at odds with traditional morality seems almost laughable in the aftermath of ''decades'' of right-wing politicians holding onto power and influence despite even juicier and more repulsive sexual improprieties.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 7 (click to see context) from:
* HarsherInHindsight: The motivating event for Scott's coup attempt is that President Lyman has just signed a treaty with the Soviets abolishing both nations' nuclear arsenals, the act provoking fury among some sectors of the American public due to suspicions that the Soviets would cheat. In 1987, as Reagan and Gorbachev were deep in negotiations over the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces Treaty, the two began talking about going farther, and abolishing all their nuclear weapons, with both Reagan and Gorbachev in favor of the move. However, both of them were savvy enough to know that full abolition would be an impossible sell in either nation, as hardliners in both countries would suspect trickery from the other and would work to block or derail any such treaty.
to:
* HarsherInHindsight: The motivating event for Scott's coup attempt is that President Lyman has just signed a treaty with the Soviets abolishing both nations' nuclear arsenals, the act provoking fury among some sectors of the American public due to suspicions that the Soviets would cheat. In 1987, as Reagan UsefulNotes/RonaldReagan and Gorbachev UsefulNotes/MikhailGorbachev were deep in negotiations over the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces Treaty, the two began talking about going farther, and abolishing all their nuclear weapons, with both Reagan and Gorbachev in favor of the move. However, both of them were savvy enough to know that full abolition would be an impossible sell in either nation, as hardliners in both countries would suspect trickery from the other and would work to block or derail any such treaty.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* HarsherInHindsight: The motivating event for Scott's coup attempt is that President Lyman has just signed a treaty with the Soviets abolishing both nations' nuclear arsenals, the act provoking fury among some sectors of the American public due to suspicions that the Soviets would cheat. In 1987, as Reagan and Gorbachev were deep in negotiations over the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces Treaty, the two began talking about going farther, and abolishing all their nuclear weapons, with both Reagan and Gorbachev in favor of the move. However, both of them were savvy enough to know that full abolition would be an impossible sell in either nation, as hardliners in both countries would suspect trickery from the other and would work to block or derail any such treaty.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
%% Administrivia/ZeroContextExample entries are not allowed on wiki pages. All such entries have been commented out. Add context to the entries before uncommenting them.
Changed line(s) 2,5 (click to see context) from:
* CrowningMomentOfAwesome:
** When Senator Prentice is trying to buttonhole Colonel Casey, he responds:
-->'''Prentice:''' But you make me think that fruit salad on your chest is for neutrality, evasiveness and fence-straddling.
-->'''Casey:''' On the contrary, they're standard awards for cocktail courage and dinner-table heroism. [[DeadpanSnarker I thought you'd invented them.]]
** When Senator Prentice is trying to buttonhole Colonel Casey, he responds:
-->'''Prentice:''' But you make me think that fruit salad on your chest is for neutrality, evasiveness and fence-straddling.
-->'''Casey:''' On the contrary, they're standard awards for cocktail courage and dinner-table heroism. [[DeadpanSnarker I thought you'd invented them.]]
to:
**
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 1 (click to see context) from:
* AlternativeCharacterInterpretation: General James M. Scott - power hungry dictator waiting to happen, or WellIntentiondExtremist? Reportedly it was the latter interpretation that had to be evoked in order to get BurtLancaster to sign on.
to:
* AlternativeCharacterInterpretation: General James M. Scott - power hungry dictator waiting to happen, or WellIntentiondExtremist? WellIntentionedExtremist? Reportedly it was the latter interpretation that had to be evoked in order to get BurtLancaster Creator/BurtLancaster to sign on.
Changed line(s) 7,8 (click to see context) from:
-----
to:
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Just expanding the page
Added DiffLines:
* AlternativeCharacterInterpretation: General James M. Scott - power hungry dictator waiting to happen, or WellIntentiondExtremist? Reportedly it was the latter interpretation that had to be evoked in order to get BurtLancaster to sign on.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
unfortunate implications need citations.
Changed line(s) 6 (click to see context) from:
* UnfortunateImplications: Early in the novel, Colonel Casey propositions his wife by saying, "If you were more woman and we had more time, this might be a pretty good afternoon for rape." [[{{Squick}} Sheesh.]]
to:
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 6 (click to see context) from:
* UnfortunateImplications: Early in the novel, Colonel Casey propostions his wife by saying, "If you were more woman and we had more time, this might be a pretty good afternoon for rape." [[{{Squick}} Sheesh.]]
to:
* UnfortunateImplications: Early in the novel, Colonel Casey propostions propositions his wife by saying, "If you were more woman and we had more time, this might be a pretty good afternoon for rape." [[{{Squick}} Sheesh.]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 2 (click to see context) from:
** When Senator Prentice is trying to buttonhole him, he responds:
to:
** When Senator Prentice is trying to buttonhole him, Colonel Casey, he responds:
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 2 (click to see context) from:
** Also, a smaller one earlier in the film. When Senator Prentice is trying to buttonhole him, he responds:
to:
** Also, a smaller one earlier in the film. When Senator Prentice is trying to buttonhole him, he responds:
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Removed, as it\'s in the film tropes list already.
Deleted line(s) 2,3 (click to see context) :
** Casey's ShutUpHannibal moment.
-->'''Casey:''' Yes, I know who Judas was. He was a man I worked for and admired until he disgraced the four stars on his uniform.
-->'''Casey:''' Yes, I know who Judas was. He was a man I worked for and admired until he disgraced the four stars on his uniform.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
-->'''Casey:''' Yes, I know who Judas was. He was a man I worked for and admired until he disgraced the four stars on his uniform.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 5 (click to see context) from:
--->'''Casey:''' On the contrary, they're standard awards for cocktail courage and dinner-table heroism. [[DeadpanSnarker I thought you'd invented them.]]
to:
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 1 (click to see context) from:
* CrowningMomentOfAwesome: Casey's ShutUpHannibal moment.
to:
* CrowningMomentOfAwesome: CrowningMomentOfAwesome:
** Casey's ShutUpHannibalmoment.moment.
** Also, a smaller one earlier in the film. When Senator Prentice is trying to buttonhole him, he responds:
-->'''Prentice:''' But you make me think that fruit salad on your chest is for neutrality, evasiveness and fence-straddling.
--->'''Casey:''' On the contrary, they're standard awards for cocktail courage and dinner-table heroism. [[DeadpanSnarker I thought you'd invented them.]]
** Casey's ShutUpHannibal
** Also, a smaller one earlier in the film. When Senator Prentice is trying to buttonhole him, he responds:
-->'''Prentice:''' But you make me think that fruit salad on your chest is for neutrality, evasiveness and fence-straddling.
--->'''Casey:''' On the contrary, they're standard awards for cocktail courage and dinner-table heroism. [[DeadpanSnarker I thought you'd invented them.]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 1,3 (click to see context) from:
CrowningMomentOfAwesome: Casey's ShutUpHannibal moment.
OneSceneWonder: John Houseman as one of the coup-plotters. It was his first appearance before the camera after years of working on the production side of the business.
OneSceneWonder: John Houseman as one of the coup-plotters. It was his first appearance before the camera after years of working on the production side of the business.
to:
* CrowningMomentOfAwesome: Casey's ShutUpHannibal moment.
moment.
* OneSceneWonder: John Houseman as one of the coup-plotters. It was his first appearance before the camera after years of working on the production side of thebusiness.business.
* UnfortunateImplications: Early in the novel, Colonel Casey propostions his wife by saying, "If you were more woman and we had more time, this might be a pretty good afternoon for rape." [[{{Squick}} Sheesh.]]
* OneSceneWonder: John Houseman as one of the coup-plotters. It was his first appearance before the camera after years of working on the production side of the
* UnfortunateImplications: Early in the novel, Colonel Casey propostions his wife by saying, "If you were more woman and we had more time, this might be a pretty good afternoon for rape." [[{{Squick}} Sheesh.]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 2 (click to see context) from:
* OneSceneWonder: John Houseman as one of the coup-plotters. It was his first appearance before the camera after years of working on the production side of the business.
to:
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* OneSceneWonder: John Houseman as one of the coup-plotters. It was his first appearance before the camera after years of working on the production side of the business.