Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Changed line(s) 7 (click to see context) from:
* RelationshipWritingFumble: A lot of Natalie and Pete's interactions can give off some PuppyLove-esc romantic vibes, like for example [[LongingLook there's Pete staring at her for a good long while]] in their first scene together, him feeling her hair after she falls out of the tree and a few times she appears to lock eyes with him. Then there's her admitting [[PleaseDontLeaveMe she doesn't want him to leave]] which catches his attention. Again, this was largely unintentional.
to:
* RelationshipWritingFumble: PlatonicWritingRomanticReading: A lot of Natalie and Pete's interactions can give off some PuppyLove-esc PuppyLove-esque romantic vibes, like for example [[LongingLook there's Pete staring at her for a good long while]] in their first scene together, him feeling her hair after she falls out of the tree and a few times she appears to lock eyes with him. Then there's her admitting [[PleaseDontLeaveMe she doesn't want him to leave]] which catches his attention. Again, this was largely unintentional.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* RemadeAndImproved: This film is a remake of [[Film/PetesDragon1977 an obscure Disney musical film from 1977]] that is considered both {{Narm}}: The Movie and SoOkayItsAverage and was made by a little-known (albeit acclaimed) director. The remake, however, made $143.7 million on a $43 million budget and was well-liked by both critics and audiences, more so than the original.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 3 (click to see context) from:
* BrokenBase: Elliot's design, which forgoes looking like a conventional dragon and more like what could be described as a furry half-dragon/half-polar bear hybrid. While a number of people think it looks nice, numerous others (especially fans of [[Film/PetesDragon1977 the original movie]]) were expecting something that looked more like...well...a dragon, and think 2016 Elliot's design strays just a bit too far from his design from the 1977 film. The director's justifications of the design amounting to "[[ReptilesAreAbhorrent Reptilian dragons can't be cute and cuddly]]" aren't helping either.
to:
* BrokenBase: Elliot's design, which forgoes looking like a conventional dragon and more like what could be described as a furry half-dragon/half-polar bear hybrid. While a number of people think it looks nice, numerous others (especially fans of [[Film/PetesDragon1977 the original movie]]) were expecting something that looked more like...well...a dragon, and think 2016 Elliot's design strays just a bit too far from his design from the 1977 film. The director's justifications of the design amounting to "[[ReptilesAreAbhorrent Reptilian dragons can't be cute and cuddly]]" aren't helping either.either, especially due to ''WesternAnimation/HowToTrainYourDragon'' and its downright UglyCute portrayal of dragons.
Added DiffLines:
* HilariousInHindsight: Bryce Dallas Howard isn't new to dealing with [[Film/JurassicWorld big powerful creatures]], though fortunately this time they don't try to eat her.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Changed line(s) 2 (click to see context) from:
* AwesomeMusic: [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I2lVEiwKVFM "Something Wild"]], with violin accompaniment by LindseyStirling.
to:
* AwesomeMusic: [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I2lVEiwKVFM SugarWiki/AwesomeMusic: [[https://youtu.be/I2lVEiwKVFM "Something Wild"]], with violin accompaniment by LindseyStirling.Music/LindseyStirling.
Changed line(s) 4,5 (click to see context) from:
* CrowningMomentOfAwesome: When Elliot uses his [[spoiler: fire breath]] in the climax. It's both awesome and [[NightmareFuel terrifying.]]
* HeReallyCanAct: Many have noted how effective Bryce Dallas Howard was at playing a fundamentally decent adoptive mother figure.
* HeReallyCanAct: Many have noted how effective Bryce Dallas Howard was at playing a fundamentally decent adoptive mother figure.
to:
* CrowningMomentOfAwesome: SugarWiki/HeReallyCanAct: Many have noted how effective Bryce Dallas Howard was at playing a fundamentally decent adoptive mother figure.
* SugarWiki/MomentOfAwesome: When Elliot uses his[[spoiler: fire [[spoiler:fire breath]] in the climax. It's both awesome and [[NightmareFuel terrifying.]]
* HeReallyCanAct: Many have noted how effective Bryce Dallas Howard was at playing a fundamentally decent adoptive mother figure.]]
* SugarWiki/MomentOfAwesome: When Elliot uses his
* HeReallyCanAct: Many have noted how effective Bryce Dallas Howard was at playing a fundamentally decent adoptive mother figure.
Changed line(s) 7 (click to see context) from:
* VisualEffectsOfAwesome: Elliot looks ''amazing''. Then again, it is [[Creator/{{WETA}} Weta Digital]], what more would you expect? They used one of [[Film/TheHobbitTheDesolationOfSmaug Smaug's]] original designs and modified it for Elliot.
to:
* VisualEffectsOfAwesome: SugarWiki/VisualEffectsOfAwesome: Elliot looks ''amazing''. Then again, it is [[Creator/{{WETA}} Weta Digital]], what more would you expect? They used one of [[Film/TheHobbitTheDesolationOfSmaug Smaug's]] original designs and modified it for Elliot.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added line(s) 6 (click to see context) :
* HeReallyCanAct: Many have noted how effective Bryce Dallas Howard was at playing a fundamentally decent adoptive mother figure.
Deleted line(s) 6 (click to see context) :
* She Really Can Act: Many have noted how effective Bryce Dallas Howard was at playing a fundamentally decent adoptive mother figure.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* She Really Can Act: Many have noted how effective Bryce Dallas Howard was at playing a fundamentally decent adoptive mother figure.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 1 (click to see context) from:
* AndYouThoughtItWouldFail: A remake of [[Film/PetesDragon1977 an obscure Disney musical film from 1977]] that is considered {Narm}}: The Movie and from a little known (albeit acclaimed) director. The film, however, made $143.7 million on a $43 million budget and was well liked by critics and audiences.
to:
* AndYouThoughtItWouldFail: A remake of [[Film/PetesDragon1977 an obscure Disney musical film from 1977]] that is considered {Narm}}: {{Narm}}: The Movie and from a little known (albeit acclaimed) director. The film, however, made $143.7 million on a $43 million budget and was well liked by critics and audiences.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Even Better Sequel would require the movie to be a sequel, not a remake. Some Anvils Need To Be Dropped would need to need to demonstrate that A: It is Anvilicious and B: The fact that it is anvilicious improves the story.
Changed line(s) 1 (click to see context) from:
* AndYouThoughtItWouldFail: A remake of [[Film/PetesDragon1977 an obscure Disney musical film from 1977]] that is considered [[Main/{{Narm}} Narm:]] [[Main/TheMovie The Movie]] and from a little known (albeit acclaimed) director. The film, however, made $143.7 million on a $43 million budget and was well liked by critics and audiences.
to:
* AndYouThoughtItWouldFail: A remake of [[Film/PetesDragon1977 an obscure Disney musical film from 1977]] that is considered [[Main/{{Narm}} Narm:]] [[Main/TheMovie {Narm}}: The Movie]] Movie and from a little known (albeit acclaimed) director. The film, however, made $143.7 million on a $43 million budget and was well liked by critics and audiences.
Changed line(s) 5,7 (click to see context) from:
* EvenBetterSequel: Is widely regarded as being far better then the original.
* RelationshipWritingFumble: A lot of Natalie and Pete's interactions can give off some PuppyLove-esc romantic vibes, like for example [[Main/LongingLook there's Pete staring at her for a good long while]] in their first scene together, him feeling her hair after she falls out of the tree and a few times she appears to lock eyes with him. Then there's her admitting [[Main/PleaseDontLeaveMe she doesn't want him to leave]] which catches his attention. Again, this was largely unintentional.
* SomeAnvilsNeedToBeDropped: The movie delivers pro-environmentalism messages, with a very light touch.
* RelationshipWritingFumble: A lot of Natalie and Pete's interactions can give off some PuppyLove-esc romantic vibes, like for example [[Main/LongingLook there's Pete staring at her for a good long while]] in their first scene together, him feeling her hair after she falls out of the tree and a few times she appears to lock eyes with him. Then there's her admitting [[Main/PleaseDontLeaveMe she doesn't want him to leave]] which catches his attention. Again, this was largely unintentional.
* SomeAnvilsNeedToBeDropped: The movie delivers pro-environmentalism messages, with a very light touch.
to:
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 1 (click to see context) from:
* AndYouThoughtItWouldFail: A remake of an obscure Disney musical film from 1977 that is considered [[Main/{{Narm}} Narm:]] [[Main/TheMovie The Movie]] and from a little known (albeit acclaimed) director. The film, however, made $143.7 million on a $43 million budget and was well liked by critics and audiences.
to:
* AndYouThoughtItWouldFail: A remake of [[Film/PetesDragon1977 an obscure Disney musical film from 1977 1977]] that is considered [[Main/{{Narm}} Narm:]] [[Main/TheMovie The Movie]] and from a little known (albeit acclaimed) director. The film, however, made $143.7 million on a $43 million budget and was well liked by critics and audiences.
Added DiffLines:
* EvenBetterSequel: Is widely regarded as being far better then the original.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* AndYouThoughtItWouldFail: A remake of an obscure Disney musical film from 1977 that is considered [[Main/{{Narm}} Narm:]] [[Main/TheMovie The Movie]] and from a little known (albeit acclaimed) director. The film, however, made $143.7 million on a $43 million budget and was well liked by critics and audiences.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* CrowningMomentOfAwesome: When Elliot uses his [[spoiler: fire breath]] in the climax. It's both awesome and [[NightmareFuel terrifying.]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 5 (click to see context) from:
* VisualEffectsOfAwesome: Elliot looks ''amazing''. Then again, it is [[Creator/{{WETA}} Weta Digital]], what more would you expect? They used one of [[TheHobbitTheDesolationOfSmaug Smaug's]] original designs and modified it for Elliot.
to:
* VisualEffectsOfAwesome: Elliot looks ''amazing''. Then again, it is [[Creator/{{WETA}} Weta Digital]], what more would you expect? They used one of [[TheHobbitTheDesolationOfSmaug [[Film/TheHobbitTheDesolationOfSmaug Smaug's]] original designs and modified it for Elliot.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 5 (click to see context) from:
* VisualEffectsOfAwesome: Elliot looks ''amazing''. Then again, it is [[Creator/{{WETA}} Weta Digital]], what more would you expect?
to:
* VisualEffectsOfAwesome: Elliot looks ''amazing''. Then again, it is [[Creator/{{WETA}} Weta Digital]], what more would you expect?expect? They used one of [[TheHobbitTheDesolationOfSmaug Smaug's]] original designs and modified it for Elliot.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* AwesomeMusic: [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I2lVEiwKVFM "Something Wild"]], with violin accompaniment by LindseyStirling.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 3 (click to see context) from:
* SomeAnvilsNeedToBeDropped: Surprisingly averted. The movie uses a very light touch with its pro-environmentalism messages.
to:
* SomeAnvilsNeedToBeDropped: Surprisingly averted. The movie uses a very light touch with its delivers pro-environmentalism messages.messages, with a very light touch.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Someone's leaning too far towards one side of the base...
Changed line(s) 1 (click to see context) from:
* BrokenBase: Elliot's design, which forgoes looking like a conventional dragon and more like what could be described as a furry half-dragon/half-polar bear hybrid. While a number of people think it looks nice, numerous others (especially fans of [[Film/PetesDragon1977 the original movie]]) were expecting something that looked more like...well...a dragon, and think 2016 Elliot's design strays just a bit too far from his more appealing design from the 1977 film. The director's justifications of the design amounting to "[[ReptilesAreAbhorrent Reptilian dragons can't be cute and cuddly]]" aren't helping either.
to:
* BrokenBase: Elliot's design, which forgoes looking like a conventional dragon and more like what could be described as a furry half-dragon/half-polar bear hybrid. While a number of people think it looks nice, numerous others (especially fans of [[Film/PetesDragon1977 the original movie]]) were expecting something that looked more like...well...a dragon, and think 2016 Elliot's design strays just a bit too far from his more appealing design from the 1977 film. The director's justifications of the design amounting to "[[ReptilesAreAbhorrent Reptilian dragons can't be cute and cuddly]]" aren't helping either.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 2 (click to see context) from:
* RelationshipWritingFumble: A lot of Natalie and Pete's interactions can give off some PuppyLove-esc romantic vibes, like for example [[Main/LongingLook there's Pete staring at her for a good long while]] in their first scene together, him feeling her hair after she falls out of the tree and a few times she appears to lock eyes with him. Then there's her going "I don't want you to leave" which catches his attention. Again, this was largely unintentional.
to:
* RelationshipWritingFumble: A lot of Natalie and Pete's interactions can give off some PuppyLove-esc romantic vibes, like for example [[Main/LongingLook there's Pete staring at her for a good long while]] in their first scene together, him feeling her hair after she falls out of the tree and a few times she appears to lock eyes with him. Then there's her going "I don't admitting [[Main/PleaseDontLeaveMe she doesn't want you him to leave" leave]] which catches his attention. Again, this was largely unintentional.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 4 (click to see context) from:
* VisualEffectsOfAwesome: Elliot looks ''amazing''. Then again, it is [[Creator/{{WETA}} WetaDigital]], what more would you expect?
to:
* VisualEffectsOfAwesome: Elliot looks ''amazing''. Then again, it is [[Creator/{{WETA}} WetaDigital]], Weta Digital]], what more would you expect?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 4 (click to see context) from:
* VisualEffectsOfAwesome: Elliot looks ''amazing''. Then again, it is Creator/WetaDigital, what more would you expect?
to:
* VisualEffectsOfAwesome: Elliot looks ''amazing''. Then again, it is Creator/WetaDigital, [[Creator/{{WETA}} WetaDigital]], what more would you expect?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* RelationshipWritingFumble: A lot of Natalie and Pete's interactions can give off some PuppyLove-esc romantic vibes, like for example [[Main/LongingLook there's Pete staring at her for a good long while]] in their first scene together, him feeling her hair after she falls out of the tree and a few times she appears to lock eyes with him. Then there's her going "I don't want you to leave" which catches his attention. Again, this was largely unintentional.
Added DiffLines:
* VisualEffectsOfAwesome: Elliot looks ''amazing''. Then again, it is Creator/WetaDigital, what more would you expect?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* SomeAnvilsNeedToBeDropped: Surprisingly averted. The movie uses a very light touch with its pro-environmentalism messages.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* BrokenBase: Elliot's design, which forgoes looking like a conventional dragon and more like what could be described as a furry half-dragon/half-polar bear hybrid. While a number of people think it looks nice, numerous others (especially fans of [[Film/PetesDragon1977 the original movie]]) were expecting something that looked more like...well...a dragon, and think 2016 Elliot's design strays just a bit too far from his more appealing design from the 1977 film. The director's justifications of the design amounting to "[[ReptilesAreAbhorrent Reptilian dragons can't be cute and cuddly]]" aren't helping either.
----
----
