Follow TV Tropes

Following

History YMMV / PeepAndTheBigWideWorld

Go To

OR

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Actually, it was a lid of some kind.


** "Door Tour": Peep is having a perfectly nice morning. Quack runs up and plants the idea in his head that his can needs a door, then disappears for most of the rest of the episode to decorate his hat with the fish. Peep spends a great deal of timing running to and from trying to get a good door, and actually manages to get one. (A frisbee with some mud as a hinge) Then Quack returns, gets ''very'' sad when he realizes that he can't see Peep through the door, and then convinces Peep that he doesn't need a door after all and then when Peep reminds him that the door was his idea, Quack declares that it wasn't what he ''meant''...dismantles the door, and the episode treats ''his hat looking ridiculous'' as the biggest issue.

to:

** "Door Tour": Peep is having a perfectly nice morning. Quack runs up and plants the idea in his head that his can needs a door, then disappears for most of the rest of the episode to decorate his hat with the fish. Peep spends a great deal of timing running to and from trying to get a good door, and actually manages to get one. (A frisbee small lid with some mud as a hinge) Then Quack returns, gets ''very'' sad when he realizes that he can't see Peep through the door, and then convinces Peep that he doesn't need a door after all and then when Peep reminds him that the door was his idea, Quack declares that it wasn't what he ''meant''...dismantles the door, and the episode treats ''his hat looking ridiculous'' as the biggest issue.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* OlderThanTheyThink: While this was the only TV show they had, Peep and his two friends as characters predate the show by several decades. They were first introduced in an animated short creator Kaj Pindal made in 1962 called “The Peep Show”. The short was remade in 1988 with the same title as the TV series. In both incarnations the character designs are near identical to those of the TV series, though the former was in black and white.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* AdaptionDisplacement: ''Nobody'' knows that the 2004 cartoon was based on the 1988 animated short film of the same name, which ''[[RuleOfThree in turn]]'' [[RuleOfThree was based on]] the short animated film ''The Peep Show'' from 1962, which is also extremely obscure.

to:

* AdaptionDisplacement: ''Nobody'' knows AdaptationDisplacement: Very few people know that the 2004 cartoon was based on the 1988 animated short film of the same name, which ''[[RuleOfThree in turn]]'' [[RuleOfThree was based on]] the short animated film ''The Peep Show'' from 1962, which is also extremely obscure.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Peep looking sad is not scary


* NightmareFuel:
** In "Stormy Weather," at one point, we see [[https://static.tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pub/images/peep_crying.png a gloomy-looking Peep staring right into the camera]], accompanied with 10-note gloomy minor key music!
** In "Quack's Tracks," Peep and Chirp are trapped near paw prints that have four toes. We all know that cats have four toes, and what they do to birds. [[https://static.tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pub/images/tom_slasher_smile.png Tom's Slasher Smile]] does not help.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Renamed one trope.


* AdaptionDisplacement: ''Nobody'' knows that the 2004 cartoon was based on the 1988 animated short film of the same name, which ''[[RuleofThree in turn]]'' [[RuleofThree was based on]] the short animated film ''The Peep Show'' from 1962, which is also extremely obscure.

to:

* AdaptionDisplacement: ''Nobody'' knows that the 2004 cartoon was based on the 1988 animated short film of the same name, which ''[[RuleofThree ''[[RuleOfThree in turn]]'' [[RuleofThree [[RuleOfThree was based on]] the short animated film ''The Peep Show'' from 1962, which is also extremely obscure.



** In "Stormy Weather," at one point, we see [[https://static.tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pub/images/peep_crying.png a gloomy-looking Peep staring right into the camera,]] accompanied with 10-note gloomy minor key music!
** In "Quack's Tracks," Peep and Chirp are trapped near paw prints that have four toes. We all know that cats have four toes, and what they do to birds. [[https://static.tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pub/images/tom_slasher_smile.png Tom's SlasherSmile]] does not help.

to:

** In "Stormy Weather," at one point, we see [[https://static.tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pub/images/peep_crying.png a gloomy-looking Peep staring right into the camera,]] camera]], accompanied with 10-note gloomy minor key music!
** In "Quack's Tracks," Peep and Chirp are trapped near paw prints that have four toes. We all know that cats have four toes, and what they do to birds. [[https://static.tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pub/images/tom_slasher_smile.png Tom's SlasherSmile]] Slasher Smile]] does not help.



* SugarWiki/SheReallyCanAct: Amanda Soha really manages to convey poor Chirp’s misery in part 2 “The Sounds of Silence”.

to:

* SugarWiki/SheReallyCanAct: [[SugarWiki/HeReallyCanAct She Really Can Act]]: Amanda Soha really manages to convey poor Chirp’s misery in part 2 “The Sounds of Silence”.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Too general.


* {{Wangst}}: Quack often acts like this.
* WhatAnIdiot: Beaver Boy has tons of these moments. Quack also qualifies to a lesser extent, but that is more due to genuine ignorance of how certain things work.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* HilariousInHindsight / MemeticMutation: In "A Peep of a Different Color", Peep covers himself in red paint. Quack doesn't recognize him and calls him [[VideoGame/AmongUs a red imposter]].

to:

* HilariousInHindsight / MemeticMutation: HilariousInHindsight: In "A Peep of a Different Color", Peep covers himself in red paint. Quack doesn't recognize him and calls him [[VideoGame/AmongUs a red imposter]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* TheyWastedAPerfectlyGoodPlot: “Chirp Flies The Coop” would have been a much better episode if Chirp had actually been able to fly in it, as it would have made her decision to stay with Peep and Quack entirely her own and not in part due to the fact that her inability to fly inconvenienced the robin.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* UnintentionallySympathetic: Chirp in "Sounds of Silence". While she could have more calmly dealt with Quack's interruptions and would have minimized her own suffering as well, Quack was being genuinely obnoxious and as the robin equivalent as a five year old girl, she can be forgiven for having trouble clearly communicating her issues to him. It doesn't help that the ultimate moral of the episode boils down to "Chirp needs Quack to carry her through puddles, so she should put up with him, warts and all." In other words, Quack gets to be annoying as he wants because Chirp needs him. In the end, it’s a bit of a DownerEnding for Chirp.
** While not portrayed as ''sympathetic'', per say, Quack's liberal pushing around of [[ExtremeDoormat Peep]] is heavily played for laughs, perhaps a bit more so then some viewers are comfortable with. And Quack never faces any consequences for this, while poor Peep silently puts up with it all. Quack ''tries'' to boss Chirp around as well, but she actually shows initiative to stand up for herself-Peep's just to nice to even think about trying it.

to:

* UnintentionallySympathetic: Chirp in "Sounds of Silence". While she could have more calmly dealt with Quack's interruptions and would have minimized her own suffering as well, Quack was being genuinely obnoxious and as the robin equivalent as a five year old girl, she can be forgiven for having trouble clearly communicating her issues to him. It doesn't help that the ultimate moral of the episode boils down to "Chirp needs Quack to carry her through puddles, so she should put up with him, warts and all." In other words, Quack gets to be annoying as he wants because Chirp needs him. In the end, it’s a bit of a DownerEnding for Chirp.
poor Chirp.
** While not portrayed as ''sympathetic'', per say, Quack's liberal pushing bossing around of [[ExtremeDoormat Peep]] (aside from the above example, Chirp rarely puts up with Quack) is heavily played for laughs, something that occurs pretty regularly, perhaps a bit more so then some viewers are comfortable with. And Peep, being passive and almost never aggressive, most often goes along with Quack’s bossy requests, although sometimes when Quack never faces any consequences for this, while poor goes too far with his bossiness, Peep silently puts up with it all. Quack ''tries'' to boss Chirp around as well, but she actually shows initiative to stand up for herself-Peep's just to nice to even think about trying it.will politely decline or suggest a different solution.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* HilariousInHindsight: In "A Peep of a Different Color", Peep covers himself in red paint. Quack doesn't recognize him and calls him [[VideoGame/AmongUs a red imposter]].

to:

* HilariousInHindsight: HilariousInHindsight / MemeticMutation: In "A Peep of a Different Color", Peep covers himself in red paint. Quack doesn't recognize him and calls him [[VideoGame/AmongUs a red imposter]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* UnintentionallySympathetic: Chirp in "Sounds of Silence". while she could have more calmly dealt with Quack's interruptions and would have minimized her own suffering as well, Quack was being genuinely obnoxious and as the robin equivalent as a five year old girl, she can be forgiven for having trouble clearly communicating her issues to him. It doesn't help that the ultimate moral of the episode boils down to "Chirp needs Quack to carry her through puddles, so she should put up with him, warts and all." In other words, Quack gets to be annoying as he wants because Chirp needs him. In the end, it’s a bit of a DownerEnding for Chirp.

to:

* UnintentionallySympathetic: Chirp in "Sounds of Silence". while While she could have more calmly dealt with Quack's interruptions and would have minimized her own suffering as well, Quack was being genuinely obnoxious and as the robin equivalent as a five year old girl, she can be forgiven for having trouble clearly communicating her issues to him. It doesn't help that the ultimate moral of the episode boils down to "Chirp needs Quack to carry her through puddles, so she should put up with him, warts and all." In other words, Quack gets to be annoying as he wants because Chirp needs him. In the end, it’s a bit of a DownerEnding for Chirp.



* UnintentionallyUnsympathetic: "Sounds of Silence" is a good example of BothSidesHaveAPoint: On one hand, Quack isn't trying to bother Chirp, and Chirp's irritation at him is expressed unconstructively, as she yells at him inresponse to Quack's disruptions. But on the other hand, we're shown how Quack acts in a genuinely disruptive manner: Thus, ideally Chirp would learn to explain to Quack what the problem is instead of just lashing out, and Quack would learn to be more self-aware of when he's bothering her. The problem is that only Quack's side of the argument is validated. ''Chirp'' is shown as in the wrong for simply ''liking'' the peace that comes as a result of Quack deciding not to speak until Chirp begs him to-And even ''Peep'' is only shown as feeling sorry for Quack-when she lashes out at Quack in Part 2, it's him of all characters [[note]]Who is normally completely neutral in Chirp and Quack's arguments[[/note]] tells her she hurt Quack's feelings, and nobody ever once acknowledges that Quack's behavior, unintentional and InnocentlyInsensitive as it may be, is equally hurtful in its own way.
** "Door Tour": Peep is having a perfectly nice morning. Quack runs up and plants the idea in his head that his can needs a door, then disappears for most of the rest of the episode to decorate his hat with the fish. Peep spends a great deal of timing running to and from trying to get a good door, and actually manages to get one. (A frisbee with some mud as a hinge) Then Quack returns, gets ''very'' sad when he realizes that he can't see Peep through the door, and then convinces Peep that he doesn't need a door after all and then when Peep reminds him that the door was his idea, Quack declares that it wasn't what ''meant''...dismantles the door, and the episode treats ''his hat looking ridiculous'' as the biggest issue.

to:

* UnintentionallyUnsympathetic: "Sounds of Silence" is a good example of BothSidesHaveAPoint: On one hand, Quack isn't trying to bother Chirp, and Chirp's irritation at him is expressed unconstructively, as she yells at him inresponse in response to Quack's disruptions. But on the other hand, we're shown how Quack acts in a genuinely disruptive manner: Thus, ideally Chirp would learn to explain to Quack what the problem is instead of just lashing out, and Quack would learn to be more self-aware of when he's bothering her. The problem is that only Quack's side of the argument is validated. ''Chirp'' is shown as in the wrong for simply ''liking'' the peace that comes as a result of Quack deciding not to speak until Chirp begs him to-And to. And even ''Peep'' is only shown as feeling sorry for Quack-when she Chirp lashes out at Quack in Part 2, it's him of all characters [[note]]Who is normally completely neutral in Chirp and Quack's arguments[[/note]] who tells her she hurt Quack's feelings, and nobody ever once acknowledges that Quack's behavior, unintentional and InnocentlyInsensitive as it may be, is equally hurtful in its own way.
** "Door Tour": Peep is having a perfectly nice morning. Quack runs up and plants the idea in his head that his can needs a door, then disappears for most of the rest of the episode to decorate his hat with the fish. Peep spends a great deal of timing running to and from trying to get a good door, and actually manages to get one. (A frisbee with some mud as a hinge) Then Quack returns, gets ''very'' sad when he realizes that he can't see Peep through the door, and then convinces Peep that he doesn't need a door after all and then when Peep reminds him that the door was his idea, Quack declares that it wasn't what he ''meant''...dismantles the door, and the episode treats ''his hat looking ridiculous'' as the biggest issue.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* SheCanReallyAct: Amanda Soha really manages to convey poor Chirp’s misery in part 2 “The Sounds of Silence”.

to:

* SheCanReallyAct: SugarWiki/SheReallyCanAct: Amanda Soha really manages to convey poor Chirp’s misery in part 2 “The Sounds of Silence”.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* DracoInLeatherPants: As mentioned below, Quack is well loved by the fandom, largely because he makes a lot of the shows funny moments by being a ditzy, self absorbed jerk. As a result of said humor, a lot of people gives him a passed for said jerkish/unsavory moments, particularly the part where his main schtick is vocally and sincerely [[FantasticRacism believing that his species (ducks) are superior]] [[DoesThisRemindYouOfAnything to all other species in every aspect]] and getting defensive/condescending when the other animals question this.

to:

* DracoInLeatherPants: As mentioned below, Quack is well loved by the fandom, largely because he makes a lot of the shows funny moments by being a ditzy, self absorbed jerk. As a result of said humor, a lot of people gives him a passed pass for said jerkish/unsavory moments, particularly the part where his main schtick is vocally and sincerely [[FantasticRacism believing that his species (ducks) are superior]] [[DoesThisRemindYouOfAnything to all other species in every aspect]] and getting defensive/condescending when the other animals question this.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* SheCanReallyAct: Amanda Soha really manages to convey poor Chirp’s misery in part 2 “The Sounds of Silence”.

Changed: 33

Removed: 141

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Cutting NCE plus fixing some stuff


* SheCanReallyAct: Amanda Soha really manages to convey poor Chirp’s misery in part 2 “The Sounds of Silence”.



* UnintentionallyUnsympathetic: "Sounds of Silence" is a good example of BothSidesHaveAPoint: On one hand, Quack isn't trying to bother Chirp, and Chirp's irritation at him is expressed unconstructively, as she yells at him inresponse to Quack's disruptions. But on the other hand, we're shown how Quack acts in a genuinely disruptive manner: Thus, ideally Chirp would learn to explain to Quack what the problem is instead of just lashing out, and Quack would learn to be more self-aware of when he's bothering her. The problem is that only Quack's side of the argument is validated. ''Chirp'' is shown as in the wrong for simply ''liking'' the peace that comes as a result of Quack deciding not to speak until Chirp begs him to-And even ''Peep'' is only shown as feeling sorry for Quack-when she lashes out at Quack in Part 2, it's him of all characters [[note]]Who is normally completely neutral in Chirp and Quack's arguments[[\note]] tells her she hurt Quack's feelings, and nobody ever once acknowledges that Quack's behavior, unintentional and InnocentlyInsensitive as it may be, is equally hurtful in its own way.
** "Door Tour": Peep is having a perfectly nice morning. Quack runs up and plants the idea in his head that his can needs a door, then disappears for most of the rest of the episode to decorate his hat with the fish. Peep spends a great deal of timing running to and fro trying to get a good door, and actually manages to get one. (A frisbee with some mud as a hinge) Then Quack returns, gets ''very'' sad when he realizes that he can't see Peep through the door, and then convinces Peep that he doesn't need a door afterall-and then when Peep reminds him that the door was his idea, Quack declares that it wasn't what ''meant''...dismantles the door, and the episode treats ''his hat looking ridiculous'' as the biggest issue.

to:

* UnintentionallyUnsympathetic: "Sounds of Silence" is a good example of BothSidesHaveAPoint: On one hand, Quack isn't trying to bother Chirp, and Chirp's irritation at him is expressed unconstructively, as she yells at him inresponse to Quack's disruptions. But on the other hand, we're shown how Quack acts in a genuinely disruptive manner: Thus, ideally Chirp would learn to explain to Quack what the problem is instead of just lashing out, and Quack would learn to be more self-aware of when he's bothering her. The problem is that only Quack's side of the argument is validated. ''Chirp'' is shown as in the wrong for simply ''liking'' the peace that comes as a result of Quack deciding not to speak until Chirp begs him to-And even ''Peep'' is only shown as feeling sorry for Quack-when she lashes out at Quack in Part 2, it's him of all characters [[note]]Who is normally completely neutral in Chirp and Quack's arguments[[\note]] arguments[[/note]] tells her she hurt Quack's feelings, and nobody ever once acknowledges that Quack's behavior, unintentional and InnocentlyInsensitive as it may be, is equally hurtful in its own way.
** "Door Tour": Peep is having a perfectly nice morning. Quack runs up and plants the idea in his head that his can needs a door, then disappears for most of the rest of the episode to decorate his hat with the fish. Peep spends a great deal of timing running to and fro from trying to get a good door, and actually manages to get one. (A frisbee with some mud as a hinge) Then Quack returns, gets ''very'' sad when he realizes that he can't see Peep through the door, and then convinces Peep that he doesn't need a door afterall-and after all and then when Peep reminds him that the door was his idea, Quack declares that it wasn't what ''meant''...dismantles the door, and the episode treats ''his hat looking ridiculous'' as the biggest issue.



* {{Wangst}}:
** Quack often acts like this.

to:

* {{Wangst}}:
**
{{Wangst}}: Quack often acts like this.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* SheCanReallyAct: Amanda Soha really manages to convey poor Chirp’s misery in part 2 “The Sounds of Silence”.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* TheyChangedItNowItSucks: Chirp’s voice being made higher-pitched in season 4 wasn’t received well by some fans.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* HilariousInHindsight: In "A Peep of a Different Color", Peep covers himself in red paint. Quack doesn't recognize him and calls him [[VideoGame/AmongUs a red imposter]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** In "The Sounds of Silence, part 2", [[OnlySaneMan Chirp]] of all characters goes into this, complaining that she doesn't want to walk through a puddle to the point that Quack has to carry her out of it. However, she’s far from unsympathetic in the episode.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* SeasonalRot: Seasons 4 and 5 are sometimes seen as this due to Amanda Soha using a much higher voice for Chirp, and Peep going through two cases of TheOtherDarrin.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* {{Moe}}: Peep. Just...''Peep.''

to:

* {{Moe}}: Peep. Just...''Peep.''Peep and Chirp.



* UnintentionallySympathetic: Chirp in "Sounds of Silence" while she could have handled the Quack's interruptions ''a lot'' better, and would have minimized her own suffering as well, Quack was being genuinely obnoxious and as the robin equivalent as a five year old girl, she can be forgiven for having trouble clearly communicating her issues to him. It doesn't help that the ultimate moral of the episode boils down to "Chirp needs Quack to carry her through puddles, so she should put up with him, warts and all." In other words, Quack gets to be annoying as he wants because Chirp needs him. In the end, everything's back to normal, but with Chirp struggling to tolerate Quack and Quack not accomodating Chirp in the slightest.

to:

* UnintentionallySympathetic: Chirp in "Sounds of Silence" Silence". while she could have handled the more calmly dealt with Quack's interruptions ''a lot'' better, and would have minimized her own suffering as well, Quack was being genuinely obnoxious and as the robin equivalent as a five year old girl, she can be forgiven for having trouble clearly communicating her issues to him. It doesn't help that the ultimate moral of the episode boils down to "Chirp needs Quack to carry her through puddles, so she should put up with him, warts and all." In other words, Quack gets to be annoying as he wants because Chirp needs him. In the end, everything's back to normal, but with Chirp struggling to tolerate Quack and Quack not accomodating Chirp in the slightest.it’s a bit of a DownerEnding for Chirp.



* UnintentionallyUnsympathetic: "Sounds of Silence" is a good example of BothSidesHaveAPoint: On one hand, Quack isn't trying to bother Chirp, and Chirp's irritation at him is expressed unconstructively; all she does is yell and insult in response to Quack's disruptions. But on the other hand, we're shown how Quack acts in a genuinely disruptive manner: Thus, ideally Chirp would learn to explain to Quack what the problem is instead of just lashing out, and Quack would learn to be more self-aware of when he's bothering her. The problem is that only Quack's side of the argument is validated. ''Chirp'' is shown as in the wrong for simply ''liking'' the peace that comes as a result of Quack deciding not to speak until Chirp begs him to-And even ''Peep'' is only shown as feeling sorry for Quack-when she lashes out at Quack in Part 2, it's him of all characters [[note]]Who is normally completely neutral in Chirp and Quack's arguments[[\note]] who calls her out for hurting Quack's feelings, and nobody ever once acknowledges that Quack's behavior, unintentional and InnocentlyInsensitive as it may be, is equally hurtful in its own way.

to:

* UnintentionallyUnsympathetic: "Sounds of Silence" is a good example of BothSidesHaveAPoint: On one hand, Quack isn't trying to bother Chirp, and Chirp's irritation at him is expressed unconstructively; all unconstructively, as she does is yell and insult in response yells at him inresponse to Quack's disruptions. But on the other hand, we're shown how Quack acts in a genuinely disruptive manner: Thus, ideally Chirp would learn to explain to Quack what the problem is instead of just lashing out, and Quack would learn to be more self-aware of when he's bothering her. The problem is that only Quack's side of the argument is validated. ''Chirp'' is shown as in the wrong for simply ''liking'' the peace that comes as a result of Quack deciding not to speak until Chirp begs him to-And even ''Peep'' is only shown as feeling sorry for Quack-when she lashes out at Quack in Part 2, it's him of all characters [[note]]Who is normally completely neutral in Chirp and Quack's arguments[[\note]] who calls tells her out for hurting she hurt Quack's feelings, and nobody ever once acknowledges that Quack's behavior, unintentional and InnocentlyInsensitive as it may be, is equally hurtful in its own way.



** In "The Sounds of Silence, part 2", [[OnlySaneMan Chirp]] of all characters goes into this, complaining that she doesn't want to walk through a puddle to the point that Quack has to carry her out of it.

to:

** In "The Sounds of Silence, part 2", [[OnlySaneMan Chirp]] of all characters goes into this, complaining that she doesn't want to walk through a puddle to the point that Quack has to carry her out of it. However, she’s far from unsympathetic in the episode.

Added: 3055

Removed: 3055

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Alphabetizing examples.


* UnintentionallySympathetic: Chirp in "Sounds of Silence" while she could have handled the Quack's interruptions ''a lot'' better, and would have minimized her own suffering as well, Quack was being genuinely obnoxious and as the robin equivalent as a five year old girl, she can be forgiven for having trouble clearly communicating her issues to him. It doesn't help that the ultimate moral of the episode boils down to "Chirp needs Quack to carry her through puddles, so she should put up with him, warts and all." In other words, Quack gets to be annoying as he wants because Chirp needs him. In the end, everything's back to normal, but with Chirp struggling to tolerate Quack and Quack not accomodating Chirp in the slightest.
** While not portrayed as ''sympathetic'', per say, Quack's liberal pushing around of [[ExtremeDoormat Peep]] is heavily played for laughs, perhaps a bit more so then some viewers are comfortable with. And Quack never faces any consequences for this, while poor Peep silently puts up with it all. Quack ''tries'' to boss Chirp around as well, but she actually shows initiative to stand up for herself-Peep's just to nice to even think about trying it.
* UnintentionallyUnsympathetic: "Sounds of Silence" is a good example of BothSidesHaveAPoint: On one hand, Quack isn't trying to bother Chirp, and Chirp's irritation at him is expressed unconstructively; all she does is yell and insult in response to Quack's disruptions. But on the other hand, we're shown how Quack acts in a genuinely disruptive manner: Thus, ideally Chirp would learn to explain to Quack what the problem is instead of just lashing out, and Quack would learn to be more self-aware of when he's bothering her. The problem is that only Quack's side of the argument is validated. ''Chirp'' is shown as in the wrong for simply ''liking'' the peace that comes as a result of Quack deciding not to speak until Chirp begs him to-And even ''Peep'' is only shown as feeling sorry for Quack-when she lashes out at Quack in Part 2, it's him of all characters [[note]]Who is normally completely neutral in Chirp and Quack's arguments[[\note]] who calls her out for hurting Quack's feelings, and nobody ever once acknowledges that Quack's behavior, unintentional and InnocentlyInsensitive as it may be, is equally hurtful in its own way.
** "Door Tour": Peep is having a perfectly nice morning. Quack runs up and plants the idea in his head that his can needs a door, then disappears for most of the rest of the episode to decorate his hat with the fish. Peep spends a great deal of timing running to and fro trying to get a good door, and actually manages to get one. (A frisbee with some mud as a hinge) Then Quack returns, gets ''very'' sad when he realizes that he can't see Peep through the door, and then convinces Peep that he doesn't need a door afterall-and then when Peep reminds him that the door was his idea, Quack declares that it wasn't what ''meant''...dismantles the door, and the episode treats ''his hat looking ridiculous'' as the biggest issue.



* UnintentionallySympathetic: Chirp in "Sounds of Silence" while she could have handled the Quack's interruptions ''a lot'' better, and would have minimized her own suffering as well, Quack was being genuinely obnoxious and as the robin equivalent as a five year old girl, she can be forgiven for having trouble clearly communicating her issues to him. It doesn't help that the ultimate moral of the episode boils down to "Chirp needs Quack to carry her through puddles, so she should put up with him, warts and all." In other words, Quack gets to be annoying as he wants because Chirp needs him. In the end, everything's back to normal, but with Chirp struggling to tolerate Quack and Quack not accomodating Chirp in the slightest.
** While not portrayed as ''sympathetic'', per say, Quack's liberal pushing around of [[ExtremeDoormat Peep]] is heavily played for laughs, perhaps a bit more so then some viewers are comfortable with. And Quack never faces any consequences for this, while poor Peep silently puts up with it all. Quack ''tries'' to boss Chirp around as well, but she actually shows initiative to stand up for herself-Peep's just to nice to even think about trying it.
* UnintentionallyUnsympathetic: "Sounds of Silence" is a good example of BothSidesHaveAPoint: On one hand, Quack isn't trying to bother Chirp, and Chirp's irritation at him is expressed unconstructively; all she does is yell and insult in response to Quack's disruptions. But on the other hand, we're shown how Quack acts in a genuinely disruptive manner: Thus, ideally Chirp would learn to explain to Quack what the problem is instead of just lashing out, and Quack would learn to be more self-aware of when he's bothering her. The problem is that only Quack's side of the argument is validated. ''Chirp'' is shown as in the wrong for simply ''liking'' the peace that comes as a result of Quack deciding not to speak until Chirp begs him to-And even ''Peep'' is only shown as feeling sorry for Quack-when she lashes out at Quack in Part 2, it's him of all characters [[note]]Who is normally completely neutral in Chirp and Quack's arguments[[\note]] who calls her out for hurting Quack's feelings, and nobody ever once acknowledges that Quack's behavior, unintentional and InnocentlyInsensitive as it may be, is equally hurtful in its own way.
** "Door Tour": Peep is having a perfectly nice morning. Quack runs up and plants the idea in his head that his can needs a door, then disappears for most of the rest of the episode to decorate his hat with the fish. Peep spends a great deal of timing running to and fro trying to get a good door, and actually manages to get one. (A frisbee with some mud as a hinge) Then Quack returns, gets ''very'' sad when he realizes that he can't see Peep through the door, and then convinces Peep that he doesn't need a door afterall-and then when Peep reminds him that the door was his idea, Quack declares that it wasn't what ''meant''...dismantles the door, and the episode treats ''his hat looking ridiculous'' as the biggest issue.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* UnintentionallyUnsympathetic: "Sounds of Silence" is a good example of BothSidesHaveAPoint: On one hand, Quack isn't trying to bother Chirp, and Chirp's irritation at him is expressed unconstructively; all she does is yell and insult in response to Quack's disruptions. But on the other hand, we're shown how Quack acts in a genuinely disruptive manner: Thus, ideally Chirp would learn to explain to Quack what the problem is instead of just lashing out, and Quack would learn to be more self-aware of when he's bothering her. The problem is that only Quack's side of the argument is validated. ''Chirp'' is shown as in the wrong for simply ''liking'' the peace that comes as a result of Quack deciding not to speak until Chirp begs him to-And even ''Peep'' is only shown as feeling sorry for Quack-when she lashes out at Quack in Part 2, it's him of all characters[[note]]Who is normally completely neutral in Chirp and Quack's arguments [[\note]] of all characters calls her out for hurting Quack's feelings, and nobody ever once acknowledges that Quack's behavior, unintentional and InnocentlyInsensitive as it may be, is equally hurtful in its own way.

to:

* UnintentionallyUnsympathetic: "Sounds of Silence" is a good example of BothSidesHaveAPoint: On one hand, Quack isn't trying to bother Chirp, and Chirp's irritation at him is expressed unconstructively; all she does is yell and insult in response to Quack's disruptions. But on the other hand, we're shown how Quack acts in a genuinely disruptive manner: Thus, ideally Chirp would learn to explain to Quack what the problem is instead of just lashing out, and Quack would learn to be more self-aware of when he's bothering her. The problem is that only Quack's side of the argument is validated. ''Chirp'' is shown as in the wrong for simply ''liking'' the peace that comes as a result of Quack deciding not to speak until Chirp begs him to-And even ''Peep'' is only shown as feeling sorry for Quack-when she lashes out at Quack in Part 2, it's him of all characters[[note]]Who characters [[note]]Who is normally completely neutral in Chirp and Quack's arguments [[\note]] of all characters arguments[[\note]] who calls her out for hurting Quack's feelings, and nobody ever once acknowledges that Quack's behavior, unintentional and InnocentlyInsensitive as it may be, is equally hurtful in its own way.

Top