Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* RetroactiveRecognition: Creator/PaulGiamatti plays a hotel worker whom Julianne shares a cigarette with at one point.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 8 (click to see context) from:
* UnintentionallyUnsympathetic: Julianne isn't supposed to be sympathetic as the VillainProtagonist, but she gets a MyGodWhatHaveIDone moment by the third act and try to redeem herself. Considering how thorough she is in trying to wreck the wedding, it's really hard to tell between people whether or not the redemption was truly earned. The fact that both victims of her schemes forgive her helps, though. ----
to:
* UnintentionallyUnsympathetic: Julianne isn't supposed to be sympathetic as the VillainProtagonist, but she gets a MyGodWhatHaveIDone moment by the third act and try to redeem herself. Considering how thorough she is in trying to wreck the wedding, it's really hard to tell between people whether or not the redemption was truly earned. The fact that both victims of her schemes forgive her helps, though. ----
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 8,9 (click to see context) from:
* UnintentionallyUnsympathetic: Julianne isn't supposed to be sympathetic as the VillainProtagonist, but she gets a MyGodWhatHaveIDone moment by the third act and try to redeem herself. Considering how thorough she is in trying to wreck the wedding, it's really hard to tell between people whether or not the redemption was truly earned.
----
----
to:
* UnintentionallyUnsympathetic: Julianne isn't supposed to be sympathetic as the VillainProtagonist, but she gets a MyGodWhatHaveIDone moment by the third act and try to redeem herself. Considering how thorough she is in trying to wreck the wedding, it's really hard to tell between people whether or not the redemption was truly earned.
earned. The fact that both victims of her schemes forgive her helps, though. ----
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 7 (click to see context) from:
* EnsembleDarkhorse: Creator/RupertEverett steals the show as George.
to:
* EnsembleDarkhorse: Creator/RupertEverett steals the show as George.George, being a genuinely nice and moral figure and [[OnlySaneMan voice of reason]] and for getting many of the film's best lines.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 2,5 (click to see context) from:
** While the film doesn't pull any punches on how bad Julianne is, [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FZT8ix-lfXs&list=PL5CC44F2C10A8415C&index=3 the gang of Cracked's After Hours]] are quick to point out that Michael is probably no better. He's keeping his young fiance from finishing college, spends a lot of time with Julianne alone where it seems like he's flirting, and acts very jealous and possessive of Julianne when he believes George is her boyfriend.
*** Michael also invites his ex to his wedding (a poor move in itself), and gives her about 24 hours notice to attend.
** Was Julianne really in love with Michael or was she just upset at losing her back-up plan/best friend? Note that until Michael told her he was engaged, she was actually ''fearing'' that he was going to propose because she didn't really want to marry him but was afraid of breaking his heart and destroying their friendship.
* AwardSnub: He made both the Globes and Bafta, but many wished Creator/RupertEverett went all the way to an Oscar nomination.
*** Michael also invites his ex to his wedding (a poor move in itself), and gives her about 24 hours notice to attend.
** Was Julianne really in love with Michael or was she just upset at losing her back-up plan/best friend? Note that until Michael told her he was engaged, she was actually ''fearing'' that he was going to propose because she didn't really want to marry him but was afraid of breaking his heart and destroying their friendship.
* AwardSnub: He made both the Globes and Bafta, but many wished Creator/RupertEverett went all the way to an Oscar nomination.
to:
** While the film doesn't pull any pulls no punches on how bad Julianne is, being the VillainProtagonist, [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FZT8ix-lfXs&list=PL5CC44F2C10A8415C&index=3 the gang of Cracked's After Hours]] are quick to point out that Michael is probably no isn't much better. He's keeping his young fiance from finishing college, spends a lot of time with Julianne alone where it seems like he's flirting, and acts very jealous and possessive of Julianne when he believes George is her boyfriend.
*** Michael also invites his ex to his wedding (apoor move faux pas in itself), and gives her about 24 hours notice to attend.
** Was Julianne really in love withMichael or Michael, as she claimed she was? Or was she just upset at losing her back-up plan/best friend? plan to be married to somebody? Note that until Michael told her he was engaged, she Julianne was actually ''fearing'' that he was going to propose because she didn't really want to marry him but was afraid of breaking his heart and destroying their friendship.
heart.
* AwardSnub: He made both the Globes andBafta, BAFTA, but many wished Creator/RupertEverett went all the way to an Oscar nomination.
*** Michael also invites his ex to his wedding (a
** Was Julianne really in love with
* AwardSnub: He made both the Globes and
Changed line(s) 8 (click to see context) from:
* UnintentionallyUnsympathetic: Julianne is supposed to have a MyGodWhatHaveIDone moment by the third act and try to redeem herself... considering how thorough she is in trying to wreck the wedding, it's really hard to tell between people whether or not the redemption was truly earned.
to:
* UnintentionallyUnsympathetic: Julianne is isn't supposed to have be sympathetic as the VillainProtagonist, but she gets a MyGodWhatHaveIDone moment by the third act and try to redeem herself... considering herself. Considering how thorough she is in trying to wreck the wedding, it's really hard to tell between people whether or not the redemption was truly earned.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Deleted line(s) 1 (click to see context) :
* AccidentalAesop: Women with gay friends don't need a physically fulfilling relationship to be happy; their PetHomosexual will be more than willing to be their pseudo-boyfriends, plus ''they'' (the gay guys) are supposed to have no lives of their own, just for the sake of their {{fag hag}}s.[[note]]Blame focus testing for this one, the original ending had Julianne meet a new guy implying she'll at least get something out of the deal. But the audience didn't like it.[[/note]]
Changed line(s) 8 (click to see context) from:
* EnsembleDarkhorse: Creator/RupertEverett steals the show as PetHomosexual George.
to:
* EnsembleDarkhorse: Creator/RupertEverett steals the show as PetHomosexual George.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 4 (click to see context) from:
** Michael also invites his ex to his wedding (a poor move in itself), and gives her about 24 hours notice to attend.
to:
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 4 (click to see context) from:
** Michael also invites his ex to his wedding (A poor move in itself) and gives her about 24 hours notice to attend.
to:
** Michael also invites his ex to his wedding (A (a poor move in itself) itself), and gives her about 24 hours notice to attend.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
** Michael also invites his ex to his wedding (A poor move in itself) and gives her about 24 hours notice to attend.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 5 (click to see context) from:
* He made both the Globes and Bafta, but many wished Creator/RupertEverett went all the way to an Oscar nomination for his scene stealing work.
to:
* AwardSnub: He made both the Globes and Bafta, but many wished Creator/RupertEverett went all the way to an Oscar nomination for his scene stealing work.nomination.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* He made both the Globes and Bafta, but many wished Creator/RupertEverett went all the way to an Oscar nomination for his scene stealing work.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added line(s) 6 (click to see context) :
* AccidentalAesop: Women with gay friends don't need a physically fulfilling relationship to be happy; their PetHomosexual will be more than willing to be their pseudo-boyfriends, plus ''they'' (the gay guys) are supposed to have no lives of their own, just for the sake of their {{fag hag}}s.[[note]]Blame focus testing for this one, the original ending had Julianne meet a new guy implying she'll at least get something out of the deal. But the audience didn't like it.[[/note]]
Deleted line(s) 6 (click to see context) :
* FamilyUnfriendlyAesop: Women with gay friends don't need a physically fulfilling relationship to be happy; their PetHomosexual will be more than willing to be their pseudo-boyfriends, plus ''they'' (the gay guys) are supposed to have no lives of their own, just for the sake of their {{fag hag}}s.[[note]]Blame focus testing for this one, the original ending had Julianne meet a new guy implying she'll at least get something out of the deal. But the audience didn't like it.[[/note]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Single bullet points are against formatting policy; either merge if it's just one example or put both examples on bullet points.
Changed line(s) 1 (click to see context) from:
* AlternateCharacterInterpretation: While the film doesn't pull any punches on how bad Julianne is, [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FZT8ix-lfXs&list=PL5CC44F2C10A8415C&index=3 the gang of Cracked's After Hours]] are quick to point out that Michael is probably no better. He's keeping his young fiance from finishing college, spends a lot of time with Julianne alone where it seems like he's flirting, and acts very jealous and possessive of Julianne when he believes George is her boyfriend.
to:
* AlternateCharacterInterpretation: AlternateCharacterInterpretation:
** While the film doesn't pull any punches on how bad Julianne is, [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FZT8ix-lfXs&list=PL5CC44F2C10A8415C&index=3 the gang of Cracked's After Hours]] are quick to point out that Michael is probably no better. He's keeping his young fiance from finishing college, spends a lot of time with Julianne alone where it seems like he's flirting, and acts very jealous and possessive of Julianne when he believes George is her boyfriend.
** While the film doesn't pull any punches on how bad Julianne is, [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FZT8ix-lfXs&list=PL5CC44F2C10A8415C&index=3 the gang of Cracked's After Hours]] are quick to point out that Michael is probably no better. He's keeping his young fiance from finishing college, spends a lot of time with Julianne alone where it seems like he's flirting, and acts very jealous and possessive of Julianne when he believes George is her boyfriend.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 4 (click to see context) from:
* EnsembleDarkhorse: Rupert Everett steals the show as PetHomosexual George.
to:
* EnsembleDarkhorse: Rupert Everett Creator/RupertEverett steals the show as PetHomosexual George.
Changed line(s) 6 (click to see context) from:
* UnintentionallyUnsympathetic: Julianne is supposed to have a MyGodWhatHaveIDone moment by the third act and try to redeem herself... considering how thorough she is in trying to wreck the wedding, it's really hard to tell between people whether or not the redemption was truly earned.
to:
* UnintentionallyUnsympathetic: Julianne is supposed to have a MyGodWhatHaveIDone moment by the third act and try to redeem herself... considering how thorough she is in trying to wreck the wedding, it's really hard to tell between people whether or not the redemption was truly earned.earned.
----
----
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
** Was Julianne really in love with Michael or was she just upset at losing her back-up plan/best friend? Note that until Michael told her he was engaged, she was actually ''fearing'' that he was going to propose because she didn't really want to marry him but was afraid of breaking his heart and destroying their friendship.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* EsotericHappyEnding: Julianne, Michael and Kimberly will probably have very strained relations here on out; not only is it likely that the married couple will never truly trust her again (especially in Kim's case), but as displayed in AlternateCharacterInterpretation, Michael comes off as emotionally abusive towards his wife and she really doesn't seem likely to stand up to him or defend herself.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 3 (click to see context) from:
* FamilyUnfriendlyAesop: Women with gay friends don't need a physically fulfilling relationship to be happy; their PetHomosexual will be more than willing to be their pseudo-boyfriends, plus ''they'' (the gay guys) are supposed to have no lives of their own, just for the sake of their {{fag hag}}s.[[note]]Blame focus testing for this one, the original ending had Julianne meet a new guy implying she'll at least get something out of the deal. But the audience didn't like it.[[/note]]
to:
* FamilyUnfriendlyAesop: Women with gay friends don't need a physically fulfilling relationship to be happy; their PetHomosexual will be more than willing to be their pseudo-boyfriends, plus ''they'' (the gay guys) are supposed to have no lives of their own, just for the sake of their {{fag hag}}s.[[note]]Blame focus testing for this one, the original ending had Julianne meet a new guy implying she'll at least get something out of the deal. But the audience didn't like it.[[/note]][[/note]]
* UnintentionallyUnsympathetic: Julianne is supposed to have a MyGodWhatHaveIDone moment by the third act and try to redeem herself... considering how thorough she is in trying to wreck the wedding, it's really hard to tell between people whether or not the redemption was truly earned.
* UnintentionallyUnsympathetic: Julianne is supposed to have a MyGodWhatHaveIDone moment by the third act and try to redeem herself... considering how thorough she is in trying to wreck the wedding, it's really hard to tell between people whether or not the redemption was truly earned.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 1 (click to see context) from:
* AlternateCharacterInterpretation: While the film doesn't pull any punches on how bad Julianne is, [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FZT8ix-lfXs&list=PL5CC44F2C10A8415C&index=3 the gang of Cracked's After Hours]] are quick to point out that Michael is no better. He's keeping his young fiance from finishing college, spends a lot of time with Julianne alone where it seems like he's flirting, and acts very jealous and possessive of Julianne when he believes George is her boyfriend.
to:
* AlternateCharacterInterpretation: While the film doesn't pull any punches on how bad Julianne is, [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FZT8ix-lfXs&list=PL5CC44F2C10A8415C&index=3 the gang of Cracked's After Hours]] are quick to point out that Michael is probably no better. He's keeping his young fiance from finishing college, spends a lot of time with Julianne alone where it seems like he's flirting, and acts very jealous and possessive of Julianne when he believes George is her boyfriend.
Changed line(s) 3 (click to see context) from:
* FamilyUnfriendlyAesop: Ladies, you don't need a physically fulfilling relationship to be happy; your PetHomosexual is more than willing to be your pseudo-boyfriend.[[note]]Blame focus testing for this one, the original ending had Julianne meet a new guy implying she'll at least get something out of the deal. But the audience didn't like it.[[/note]]
to:
* FamilyUnfriendlyAesop: Ladies, you Women with gay friends don't need a physically fulfilling relationship to be happy; your their PetHomosexual is will be more than willing to be your pseudo-boyfriend.their pseudo-boyfriends, plus ''they'' (the gay guys) are supposed to have no lives of their own, just for the sake of their {{fag hag}}s.[[note]]Blame focus testing for this one, the original ending had Julianne meet a new guy implying she'll at least get something out of the deal. But the audience didn't like it.[[/note]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added line(s) 2 (click to see context) :
* AlternateCharacterInterpretation: While the film doesn't pull any punches on how bad Julianne is, [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FZT8ix-lfXs&list=PL5CC44F2C10A8415C&index=3 the gang of Cracked's After Hours]] are quick to point out that Michael is no better. He's keeping his young fiance from finishing college, spends a lot of time with Julianne alone where it seems like he's flirting, and acts very jealous and possessive of Julianne when he believes George is her boyfriend.
Changed line(s) 2 (click to see context) from:
* FamilyUnfriendlyAesop: Ladies, you don't need a physically fulfilling relationship to be happy; your PetHomosexual is more than willing to be your pseudo-boyfriend.[[note]]Blame focus testing for this one, the original ending had Julianne meet a new guy implying she'll at least get something out of the deal. But the audience didn't like it.[[/note]]
to:
* FamilyUnfriendlyAesop: Ladies, you don't need a physically fulfilling relationship to be happy; your PetHomosexual is more than willing to be your pseudo-boyfriend.[[note]]Blame focus testing for this one, the original ending had Julianne meet a new guy implying she'll at least get something out of the deal. But the audience didn't like it.[[/note]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 2 (click to see context) from:
* FamilyUnfriendlyAesop: Ladies, you don't need a physically fulfilling relationship to be happy; your PetHomosexual is more than willing to be your pseudo-boyfriend.
to:
* FamilyUnfriendlyAesop: Ladies, you don't need a physically fulfilling relationship to be happy; your PetHomosexual is more than willing to be your pseudo-boyfriend.[[note]]Blame focus testing for this one, the original ending had Julianne meet a new guy implying she'll at least get something out of the deal. But the audience didn't like it.[[/note]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
unfortunate implications need citations.
Deleted line(s) 3 (click to see context) :
* UnfortunateImplications: George, a homosexual, has the role of being Julliane's fake-boyfriend so she can hook up with a straight man. However, he tells her that his idea is stupid and is proven right. He comes off as a BeleagueredAssistant in that he has a life of his own, including a partner. He was only going to make a brief swing by Chicago to check up on her, because he had to go to "this thing" at Werner's parents' house in the Hamptons, but decides to stay when he sees the depth of the mayhem unfolding.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Trimmed the Unfortunate Implications because it was natter and complaining. What does \"white\" have to do anything about this movie?
Changed line(s) 2,3 (click to see context) from:
* UnfortunateImplications: You're a gay guy in a romantic comedy? You ONLY exist to hook up your white straight girl friend with the boy of her dreams, even if you think the whole deal is freaking stupid and you're actually right!
** In fairness, George is cast as a BeleagueredAssistant in that he actually has a life of his own, including a partner. One of the funnier scenes in the movie has him and his partner Werner hosting a dinner party while Julianne is calling from Chicago, frantically shrieking a message into his answering machine. He was also only going to make a brief swing by Chicago to check up on her, because he had to go to "this thing" at Werner's parents' house in the Hamptons. But decides to stay when he sees the depth of the mayhem unfolding.
** In fairness, George is cast as a BeleagueredAssistant in that he actually has a life of his own, including a partner. One of the funnier scenes in the movie has him and his partner Werner hosting a dinner party while Julianne is calling from Chicago, frantically shrieking a message into his answering machine. He was also only going to make a brief swing by Chicago to check up on her, because he had to go to "this thing" at Werner's parents' house in the Hamptons. But decides to stay when he sees the depth of the mayhem unfolding.
to:
* FamilyUnfriendlyAesop: Ladies, you don't need a physically fulfilling relationship to be happy; your PetHomosexual is more than willing to be your pseudo-boyfriend.
* UnfortunateImplications:You're George, a gay guy in a romantic comedy? You ONLY exist to homosexual, has the role of being Julliane's fake-boyfriend so she can hook up your white with a straight girl friend with the boy of man. However, he tells her dreams, even if you think the whole deal that his idea is freaking stupid and you're actually right!
** In fairness, Georgeis cast proven right. He comes off as a BeleagueredAssistant in that he actually has a life of his own, including a partner. One of the funnier scenes in the movie has him and his partner Werner hosting a dinner party while Julianne is calling from Chicago, frantically shrieking a message into his answering machine. He was also only going to make a brief swing by Chicago to check up on her, because he had to go to "this thing" at Werner's parents' house in the Hamptons. But Hamptons, but decides to stay when he sees the depth of the mayhem unfolding.
* UnfortunateImplications:
** In fairness, George
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
natter
Changed line(s) 3,4 (click to see context) from:
** In fairness, George is cast as a BeleagueredAssistant in that he actually has a life of his own, including a partner. One of the funnier scenes in the movie has him and his partner Werner hosting a dinner party while Julianne is calling from Chicago, frantically shrieking a message into his answering machine. He was also only going to make a brief swing by Chicago to check up on her, because he had to go to "this thing" at Werner's parents' house in the Hamptons. But decides to stay when he sees the depth of the mayhem unfolding.
** For a truly unfortunate depiction of gays in a romantic comedy, check out ''Film/ValentinesDay'' instead.
** For a truly unfortunate depiction of gays in a romantic comedy, check out ''Film/ValentinesDay'' instead.
to:
** In fairness, George is cast as a BeleagueredAssistant in that he actually has a life of his own, including a partner. One of the funnier scenes in the movie has him and his partner Werner hosting a dinner party while Julianne is calling from Chicago, frantically shrieking a message into his answering machine. He was also only going to make a brief swing by Chicago to check up on her, because he had to go to "this thing" at Werner's parents' house in the Hamptons. But decides to stay when he sees the depth of the mayhem unfolding.
** For a truly unfortunate depiction of gays in a romantic comedy, check out ''Film/ValentinesDay'' instead.unfolding.
** For a truly unfortunate depiction of gays in a romantic comedy, check out ''Film/ValentinesDay'' instead.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 2 (click to see context) from:
* UnfortunateImplications: You're a gay guy in a romantic comedy? You ONLY exist to hook up your white straight girl friend with the boy of her dreams, even if you think the whole deal is freaking stupid and you're actually right!
to:
* UnfortunateImplications: You're a gay guy in a romantic comedy? You ONLY exist to hook up your white straight girl friend with the boy of her dreams, even if you think the whole deal is freaking stupid and you're actually right!right!
** In fairness, George is cast as a BeleagueredAssistant in that he actually has a life of his own, including a partner. One of the funnier scenes in the movie has him and his partner Werner hosting a dinner party while Julianne is calling from Chicago, frantically shrieking a message into his answering machine. He was also only going to make a brief swing by Chicago to check up on her, because he had to go to "this thing" at Werner's parents' house in the Hamptons. But decides to stay when he sees the depth of the mayhem unfolding.
** For a truly unfortunate depiction of gays in a romantic comedy, check out ''Film/ValentinesDay'' instead.
** In fairness, George is cast as a BeleagueredAssistant in that he actually has a life of his own, including a partner. One of the funnier scenes in the movie has him and his partner Werner hosting a dinner party while Julianne is calling from Chicago, frantically shrieking a message into his answering machine. He was also only going to make a brief swing by Chicago to check up on her, because he had to go to "this thing" at Werner's parents' house in the Hamptons. But decides to stay when he sees the depth of the mayhem unfolding.
** For a truly unfortunate depiction of gays in a romantic comedy, check out ''Film/ValentinesDay'' instead.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
trivia
Changed line(s) 2,6 (click to see context) from:
* HeyItsThatGuy / RetroactiveRecognition:
** [[MalcolmInTheMiddle Francis]] is the Best Man.
** [[DharmaAndGreg Kitty Montgomery]]/[[Series/{{Castle}} Martha Rodgers]] is the mother of the bride.
** [[SpinalTap Derek Small]]/[[WesternAnimation/TheSimpsons Mr Burns]] writes and reads erotic literature.
** Creator/PaulGiamatti is a bellboy at the hotel.
** [[MalcolmInTheMiddle Francis]] is the Best Man.
** [[DharmaAndGreg Kitty Montgomery]]/[[Series/{{Castle}} Martha Rodgers]] is the mother of the bride.
** [[SpinalTap Derek Small]]/[[WesternAnimation/TheSimpsons Mr Burns]] writes and reads erotic literature.
** Creator/PaulGiamatti is a bellboy at the hotel.
to:
* HeyItsThatGuy / RetroactiveRecognition:
** [[MalcolmInTheMiddle Francis]] isUnfortunateImplications: You're a gay guy in a romantic comedy? You ONLY exist to hook up your white straight girl friend with the Best Man.
** [[DharmaAndGreg Kitty Montgomery]]/[[Series/{{Castle}} Martha Rodgers]] isboy of her dreams, even if you think the mother of the bride.
** [[SpinalTap Derek Small]]/[[WesternAnimation/TheSimpsons Mr Burns]] writeswhole deal is freaking stupid and reads erotic literature.
** Creator/PaulGiamatti is a bellboy at the hotel.you're actually right!
** [[MalcolmInTheMiddle Francis]] is
** [[DharmaAndGreg Kitty Montgomery]]/[[Series/{{Castle}} Martha Rodgers]] is
** [[SpinalTap Derek Small]]/[[WesternAnimation/TheSimpsons Mr Burns]] writes
** Creator/PaulGiamatti is a bellboy at the hotel.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Namespace
Changed line(s) 6 (click to see context) from:
** PaulGiamatti is a bellboy at the hotel.
to:
** PaulGiamatti Creator/PaulGiamatti is a bellboy at the hotel.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 6 (click to see context) from:
** Paul Giamatti is a bellboy at the hotel.
to:
** Paul Giamatti PaulGiamatti is a bellboy at the hotel.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 5 (click to see context) from:
** [[SpinalTap Derek Small]]/[[WesternAnimation/TheSimpsons Mr Burns]] writes and reads erotic literature.
to:
** [[SpinalTap Derek Small]]/[[WesternAnimation/TheSimpsons Mr Burns]] writes and reads erotic literature.literature.
** Paul Giamatti is a bellboy at the hotel.
** Paul Giamatti is a bellboy at the hotel.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* EnsembleDarkhorse: Rupert Everett steals the show as PetHomosexual George.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 3,4 (click to see context) from:
** [[DharmaAndGreg Kitty Montgomery]]/[[{{Castle}} Martha Rodgers]] is the mother of the bride.
** [[SpinalTap Derek Small]]/[[TheSimpsons Mr Burns]] writes and reads erotic literature.
** [[SpinalTap Derek Small]]/[[TheSimpsons Mr Burns]] writes and reads erotic literature.
to:
** [[DharmaAndGreg Kitty Montgomery]]/[[{{Castle}} Montgomery]]/[[Series/{{Castle}} Martha Rodgers]] is the mother of the bride.
** [[SpinalTap DerekSmall]]/[[TheSimpsons Small]]/[[WesternAnimation/TheSimpsons Mr Burns]] writes and reads erotic literature.
** [[SpinalTap Derek