Follow TV Tropes

Following

History YMMV / MagnusChaseAndTheGodsOfAsgard

Go To

OR

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* HilariousInHindsight: Turns out the Franchise/{{Riordanverse}} wouldn't be the last Myth/ClassicalMythology-based series [[VideoGame/GodOfWar to make the shift]] to Myth/NorseMythology.

Changed: 1503

Removed: 1537

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
If it doesn't fit here, it would be Natter


** While not as drastic as many examples of this trope, Magnus's behaviour within the first couple chapters has drawn some contention.

to:

** While not as drastic as many examples of this trope, Magnus's behaviour within the first couple chapters has drawn some contention. Early in the first book, Magnus justifies his stealing from people better-off than him, by arguing that they're rich and wealthy and so they can afford to give up a few of their nice things for his well-being. He then proceeds to go live in what amounts to the world's greatest five-star hotel where his every whim is catered to at no cost to himself. His entry into the Hotel Valhalla is supposedly justified due to how he died a hero's death, but the people he saved on the bridge were only in danger because Magnus himself was there, and the fact that he did actually die was almost completely inconsequential to the rest of the story. Some feel that the book is implying that the homeless are entitled to and should all be given high-class accommodations, even at the expense of others, just for the fact that they're homeless (that being said, Magnus isn't necessarily presented as being in the right when he mentions stealing from others). Some also feel that Magnus is only homeless by choice, as he has living relatives that he could stay with but deliberately chooses not to go to them for help. Others feel that he really didn't have a choice, since his mother had explicitly warned him to stay away from Randolph, and while Annabeth and her parents probably would've been happy to take him in, Magnus hadn't had any contact with them in years, didn't know where they lived, and as it happens, they were hundreds of miles away; it would have been immensely difficult for him to contact them.



* UnintentionallyUnsympathetic: Early in the first book, Magnus justifies his stealing from people better-off than him, by arguing that they're rich and wealthy and so they can afford to give up a few of their nice things for his well-being. He then proceeds to go live in what amounts to the world's greatest five-star hotel where his every whim is catered to at no cost to himself. His entry into the Hotel Valhalla is supposedly justified due to how he died a hero's death, but the people he saved on the bridge were only in danger because Magnus himself was there, and the fact that he did actually die was almost completely inconsequential to the rest of the story. Some feel that the book is implying that the homeless are entitled to and should all be given high-class accommodations, even at the expense of others, just for the fact that they're homeless (that being said, Magnus isn't necessarily presented as being in the right when he mentions stealing from others).
** Some also feel that Magnus is only homeless by choice, as he has living relatives that he could stay with but deliberately chooses not to go to them for help. Others feel that he really didn't have a choice, since his mother had explicitly warned him to stay away from Randolph, and while Annabeth and her parents probably would've been happy to take him in, Magnus hadn't had any contact with them in years, didn't know where they lived, and as it happens, they were hundreds of miles away; it would have been immensely difficult for him to contact them.

Added: 602

Removed: 607

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Added example(s)


*** On one hand, his sudden tangent on how common homelessness on transgender people (like Alex) followed by his distaste for Valhalla's luau for being "cultural-appropration"-ey seems to come out of nowhere. Some feel this is a bit of an AuthorTract and that, while [[DontShootTheMessage Magnus is totally right about how often transgender teenagers are often homeless, his tone makes him seem almost condescending]]. On the other hand, some feel that the message about homeless transgender teenagers absolutely needs to be said, or that his sudden mention of Cultural Appropriation was a secret TakeThat.


Added DiffLines:

* DontShootTheMessage: On one hand, his sudden tangent on how common homelessness on transgender people (like Alex) followed by his distaste for Valhalla's luau for being "cultural-appropration"-ey seems to come out of nowhere. Some feel this is a bit of an AuthorTract and that, while Magnus is totally right about how often transgender teenagers are often homeless, his tone makes him seem almost condescending. On the other hand, some feel that the message about homeless transgender teenagers absolutely needs to be said, or that his sudden mention of Cultural Appropriation was a secret TakeThat.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Too one sided as written.


** The implication (even if it isn't true) that the Norse gods might be creations of Allah didn't sit right with some fans. Outside of the fact that Norse worshipers do still exist and it is extremely disrespectful to them, to say the least, the Percy Jackson series had always taken a hands off approach to the actual religious nature of the Gods, and stuck to the fun fantasy aspect. The fact that the Gods themselves gave some support to the idea just makes things worse.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* HarsherInHindsight: Not only is Thor explicitly contrasted with his Franchise/MarvelCinematicUniverse counterpart when first introduced, but he's depicted as slovenly, unhygienic, and kind of a couch potato (albeit both badass and goodhearted). Come ''Film/AvengersEndgame'' however, [[spoiler: that version of Thor has ''also'' become a slovenly, fat, unhygienic gaming couch potato...out of depression for failing to stop Thanos]].

to:

* HarsherInHindsight: Not only is Thor explicitly contrasted with his Franchise/MarvelCinematicUniverse counterpart when first introduced, but he's depicted as slovenly, unhygienic, and kind of a couch potato (albeit both badass and goodhearted). Come ''Film/AvengersEndgame'' however, [[spoiler: that version of Thor has ''also'' become a slovenly, fat, unhygienic gaming couch potato...potato out of depression for failing to stop Thanos]].

Changed: 232

Removed: 232

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** The way that the Norse
gods are portrayed has caused contention due to being played more for comedy. While some like this and appreciate that they stand out from the JerkassGods of previous works, others wish that they would be taken a bit more seriously.

to:

** The way that the Norse
Norse gods are portrayed has caused contention due to being played more for comedy. While some like this and appreciate that they stand out from the JerkassGods of previous works, others wish that they would be taken a bit more seriously.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** samirah's arranged marriage is also a source of contention. Some like the representation while others see it as gross and even grooming

to:

** samirah's Samirah's arranged marriage is also a source of contention. Some like the representation while others see it as gross and even grooming

Added: 257

Changed: 252

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** The way that the Norse gods are portrayed has caused contention due to being played more for comedy. While some like this and appreciate that they stand out from the JerkassGods of previous works, others wish that they would be taken a bit more seriously.

to:

** samirah's arranged marriage is also a source of contention. Some like the representation while others see it as gross and even grooming
** The way that the Norse Norse
gods are portrayed has caused contention due to being played more for comedy. While some like this and appreciate that they stand out from the JerkassGods of previous works, others wish that they would be taken a bit more seriously.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* NeverLiveItDown: Despite Alex Fierro's development in the third book, most detractors are more likely to remember them as being a mean anvilicous jerk in the second book who threatened everyone who referred to them by the wrong pronoun. Even among their supporters there are those who believe that their actions were extreme and harsh.

to:

* NeverLiveItDown: Despite Alex Fierro's development in the third book, most detractors are more likely to remember them her as being a mean anvilicous jerk in the second book who threatened everyone who referred to them her by the wrong pronoun. Even among their supporters there are those who believe that their his actions were extreme and harsh.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Requires Word Of God confirmation


* AuthorsSavingThrow:
** Readers were surprised by Magnus' mild cursing in the first book, which many felt was uncharacteristic for Riordan. Come book two, not a single "dammit" appears, though the Hel/hell joke is kept due to RuleOfFunny.
** TJ, Gunderson, and Mallory were practically billed as main characters, yet they were offscreen for most of the first two books when Sam, Blitzen, and Hearthstone took the role of main supporting characters. The third book has them joining the main four, along with Alex, sharing backstories, and fighting alongside him.
** Alex doesn't go as {{Anvilicious}} with his/her gender fluidity in the third book.

Added: 558

Changed: 201

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* UnintentionallyUnsympathetic: Early in the first book, Magnus justifies his stealing from people better-off than him, by arguing that they're rich and wealthy and so they can afford to give up a few of their nice things for his well-being. He then proceeds to go live in what amounts to the world's greatest five-star hotel where his every whim is catered to at no cost to himself. His entry into the Hotel Valhalla is supposedly justified due to how he died a hero's death, but the people he saved on the bridge were only in danger because Magnus himself was there, and the fact that he did actually die was almost completely inconsequential to the rest of the story. Overall, it seems as though the book is implying that the homeless are entitled to and should all be given high-class accommodations, even at the expense of others, just for the fact that they're homeless. What makes it worse is that Magnus is only homeless ''by choice'', as he has living relatives that he could stay with but deliberately chooses not to go to them for help.

to:

* UnintentionallyUnsympathetic: Early in the first book, Magnus justifies his stealing from people better-off than him, by arguing that they're rich and wealthy and so they can afford to give up a few of their nice things for his well-being. He then proceeds to go live in what amounts to the world's greatest five-star hotel where his every whim is catered to at no cost to himself. His entry into the Hotel Valhalla is supposedly justified due to how he died a hero's death, but the people he saved on the bridge were only in danger because Magnus himself was there, and the fact that he did actually die was almost completely inconsequential to the rest of the story. Overall, it seems as though Some feel that the book is implying that the homeless are entitled to and should all be given high-class accommodations, even at the expense of others, just for the fact that they're homeless. What makes it worse is homeless (that being said, Magnus isn't necessarily presented as being in the right when he mentions stealing from others).
** Some also feel
that Magnus is only homeless ''by choice'', by choice, as he has living relatives that he could stay with but deliberately chooses not to go to them for help.help. Others feel that he really didn't have a choice, since his mother had explicitly warned him to stay away from Randolph, and while Annabeth and her parents probably would've been happy to take him in, Magnus hadn't had any contact with them in years, didn't know where they lived, and as it happens, they were hundreds of miles away; it would have been immensely difficult for him to contact them.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* CompleteMonster: from ''The Sword of Summer'':

to:

* CompleteMonster: from The BigBadDuumvirate of ''The Sword of Summer'':

Added: 1769

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Approved by the thread.

Added DiffLines:

*CompleteMonster: from ''The Sword of Summer'':
** [[PersonOfMassDestruction Surt]], lord of the Fire Giants who also appears in ''9 from the Nine Worlds''' "I Play with Fire", seeks to [[OmnicidalManiac bathe the entirety of the Nine Realms in flames]] and despises the god Frey for his compassionate, healing nature. Previously responsible for the Great Chicago Fire, Surt causes explosions throughout Boston as he hunts Magnus, threatening to incinerate nearby civilians if he isn't given the Sword of Summer and eventually killing the demigod with molten asphalt. Despite being weakened by their fight, Surt confronts Magnus and his friends again on the island of Lyngvi, slaying the Valkyrie Gunilla and attempting to claim the sword once more so he can free Fenris Wolf, start Ragnarok, and finally kill Frey before burning down all of existence.
** [[SavageWolves Fenris Wolf]], the monstrous son of Loki, was forced to be restrained by the Aesir due to the danger presented by his savage nature. Managing to loosen his bonds over the years, the Wolf causes havoc throughout the Nine Realms using his far-reaching CompellingVoice, manipulating events to secure his freedom. When confronted, Fenris Wolf gloats that he had Magnus's mother killed so he would become strong enough to retrieve the Sword of Summer--additionally noting that he ate Blitzen's father and countless other adventurers--in an effort to enrage the group so they will come closer to his confined circle and be devoured. Acting as the mastermind behind Surt's plan to claim the Sword of Summer, Fenris Wolf hopes for the blade to be used to cut away his remaining bonds, despite knowing full well that [[BeastOfTheApocalypse his release will usher]] in [[TheEndOfTheWorldAsWeKnowIt Ragnarok]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** . The way that the Norse gods are portrayed has caused contention due to them being portrayed as too much comedic relief. While some enjoy this others would've preferred them to be a bit more serious

to:

** . ** The way that the Norse gods are portrayed has caused contention due to them being portrayed as too much comedic relief. played more for comedy. While some enjoy like this and appreciate that they stand out from the JerkassGods of previous works, others would've preferred them to wish that they would be taken a bit more seriousseriously.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

**. The way that the Norse gods are portrayed has caused contention due to them being portrayed as too much comedic relief. While some enjoy this others would've preferred them to be a bit more serious
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Top