Follow TV Tropes

Following

History YMMV / LifeOfPi

Go To

OR

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* VisualEffectsOfAwesome: For the film, RhythmAndHues[[note]]with MovingPictureCompany and a few other studios[[/note]] developed some truly phenomenal animation and visual effects, which won them the Oscar for Best Visual Effects.

to:

* VisualEffectsOfAwesome: For the film, RhythmAndHues[[note]]with MovingPictureCompany Creator/MovingPictureCompany and a few other studios[[/note]] developed some truly phenomenal animation and visual effects, which won them the Oscar for Best Visual Effects.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
WMG. Also, it pretty much implies God is parasaitic and uncaring...which, while I\'m fine with that, is probably not what you were trying to convey


** Except the story is about our voyage with God, [[spoiler: Richard Parker is Pi's animal side, but he's also God. When Pi grapples with the fact that even after all this time of caring and treating for Richard Parker, the tiger still doesn't turn to look at him - acknowledge him, it's about man's relationship with God. He's big and frightening, powerful and ancient - strong and his attachment is elusive. BUT, God was there. There with him the whole time, even if he leaves without looking back.]]

Removed: 1061

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
These aren\'t YMMV. Moving.


* ArtisticLicenseReligion: {{UsefulNotes/Agnosticism}} is not about being unable to choose which "side" to be on; it's a lot more complicated than that.
** The "moral" doesn't work if you take the situation in the book as a "The Lady Or The Tiger" situation, where the "right" answer depends entirely on what you decide to go with and there is no real "right" or "wrong" answer. Or your answer could be that despite the story "forcing the reader to realize how awful doubt is" and wanting them to pick a side, there really is no way to know which answer is the right one - which is like agnosticism. It's not about doubt or indecisiveness for some, it's [[TakeAThirdOption deciding that there is no way for you to know]] which choice is true, and accepting that.



* BrokenAesop: Agnostics are asked at the end if they can still hold on to that belief or lack thereof after hearing the story. Except, it's a novel. It's entirely possible to accept that God exists in this fictional world, and not have that affect your actual belief regarding the real world at all.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Moving this didn\'t turn out well.

Added DiffLines:

* ArtisticLicenseReligion: {{UsefulNotes/Agnosticism}} is not about being unable to choose which "side" to be on; it's a lot more complicated than that.
** The "moral" doesn't work if you take the situation in the book as a "The Lady Or The Tiger" situation, where the "right" answer depends entirely on what you decide to go with and there is no real "right" or "wrong" answer. Or your answer could be that despite the story "forcing the reader to realize how awful doubt is" and wanting them to pick a side, there really is no way to know which answer is the right one - which is like agnosticism. It's not about doubt or indecisiveness for some, it's [[TakeAThirdOption deciding that there is no way for you to know]] which choice is true, and accepting that.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** Except the story is about our voyage with God, [[spoiler: Richard Parker is Pi's animal side, but he's also God. When Pi grapples with the fact that even after all this time of caring and treating for Richard Parker, the tiger still doesn't turn to look at him - acknowledge him, it's about man's relationship with God. He's big and frightening, powerful and ancient - strong and his attachment is elusive. BUT, God was there. There with him the whole time, even if he leaves without looking back.]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* VisualEffectsOfAwesome: For the film, RhythmAndHues developed some truly phenomenal animation and visual effects, which won them the Oscar for Best Visual Effects.

to:

* VisualEffectsOfAwesome: For the film, RhythmAndHues RhythmAndHues[[note]]with MovingPictureCompany and a few other studios[[/note]] developed some truly phenomenal animation and visual effects, which won them the Oscar for Best Visual Effects.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* BrokenAesop: Agnostics are asked at the end if they can still hold on to that belief or lack thereof after hearing the story. Except, it's a novel. It's entirely possible to accept that God exists in this fictional world, and not have that affect your actual belief regarding the real world at all.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* AwardSnub: Actually an award ''speech'' snub: the visual effects team were planning to include a statement about the hard times many special effects companies are going through, even as their work is being used more than ever, but were cut off by the ''{{Jaws}}'' theme. This led to a hundreds-strong protest.

to:

* AwardSnub: Actually an award ''speech'' snub: the visual effects team were planning to include a statement about the hard times many special effects companies are going through, even as their work is being used more than ever, but were cut off by the ''{{Jaws}}'' ''{{Film/Jaws}}'' theme. This led to a hundreds-strong protest.

Added: 128

Removed: 768

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Averted by the film itself, which took home more Oscars than any other film released that year - ''including'' the OscarBait.



* YouFailReligiousStudiesForever: {{UsefulNotes/Agnosticism}} is not about being unable to choose which "side" to be on. It's a lot more complicated than that.
** The "moral" doesn't work if you take the situation in the book as a "The Lady Or The Tiger" situation, where the "right" answer depends entirely on what you decide to go with and there is no real "right" or "wrong" answer. Or your answer could be that despite the story "forcing the reader to realize how awful doubt is" and wanting them to pick a side, there really is no way to know which answer is the right one - which is like agnosticism. It's not about doubt or indecisiveness for some, it's [[TakeAThirdOption deciding that there is no way for you to know]] which choice is true, and accepting that.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** Pi crying as [[spoiler:he's being taken to civilization after washing up on shore, because Richard Parker left before he could say thank you and goodbye]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* EpilepticTrees: With how Pi's story is told, this is inevitable.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* VisualEffectsOfAwesome: The film adaptation features some truly incredible special effects sequences.

to:

* VisualEffectsOfAwesome: The film adaptation features For the film, RhythmAndHues developed some truly incredible special effects sequences. phenomenal animation and visual effects, which won them the Oscar for Best Visual Effects.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* AwardSnub: Actually an award ''speech'' snub: the visual effects team were planning to include a statement about the hard times many special effects companies are going through, even as their work is being used more than ever, but were cut off by the ''{{Jaws}}'' theme. This led to a hundreds-strong protest.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** There's also the part in the movie where Pi makes up the second version of the story, for the insurance people. He just looks so tired and broken. The entire time he tells the story, he stares straight ahead into space, talking with no emotion, as tears run down his face.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** In the book only, there's a scene where [[spoiler: Pi comes across another man in a lifeboat. Said man tries to kill and eat Pi despite having food of his own]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** The two French characters are brutal, [[spoiler:cannibalistic]] savages. [[spoiler:That is, if they were separate characters. In the alternate story they're hinted to be the same guy.]]

to:

** The two French characters are brutal, [[spoiler:cannibalistic]] savages. [[spoiler:That is, if they were separate characters. In the alternate story they're hinted to be the same guy. In the animal story the cook might have not even existed.]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


--> We're dying, Richard Parker...

to:

--> [[WhamLine We're dying, Richard Parker...]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** The two french characters are brutal, cannibalistic savages.

to:

** The two french French characters are brutal, cannibalistic savages.[[spoiler:cannibalistic]] savages. [[spoiler:That is, if they were separate characters. In the alternate story they're hinted to be the same guy.]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** The two french characters are brutal, cannibalistic savages.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* FridgeBrilliance: At first glance, the meerkats on the island sleeping on trees seem to be a clear example of SomewhereAMammalogistIsCrying, because those animals actually live in burrows. But from an evolutionary standpoint, it makes perfect sense: Imagine a bunch of meerkats by some means arriving on the island. Those who show their normal behavior of creating burrows quickly get [[spoiler: devoured by the island]], and only a few showing the abnormal behavior of climbing on trees survive. Those are the ancestors of the current meerkat population Pi encounters. That's how natural selection works! ([[spoiler: Of course, the point is moot if Pi just made everything up.]])

to:

* FridgeBrilliance: At first glance, the meerkats on the island sleeping on trees seem to be a clear example of SomewhereAMammalogistIsCrying, because those animals actually live in burrows. But from an evolutionary standpoint, it makes perfect sense: Imagine a bunch of meerkats by some means arriving on the island. Those who show their normal behavior of creating burrows quickly get [[spoiler: devoured by the island]], and only a few few, showing the abnormal behavior of climbing on trees trees, survive. Those are the ancestors of the current meerkat population Pi encounters. That's how natural selection works! ([[spoiler: Of course, the point is moot if Pi just made everything up.]])
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* FridgeBrilliance: At first glance, the meerkats on the island sleeping on trees seem to be a clear example of SomewhereAMammalogistIsCrying, because those animals actually live in burrows. But from an evolutionary standpoint, it makes perfect sense: Imagine a bunch of meerkats by some means arriving at the island. Those who show their normal behavior of creating burrows quickly get [[spoiler: devoured by the island]], and only a few showing the abnormal behavior of climbing on trees survive. Those are the ancestors of the current meerkat population Pi encounters. That's how natural selection works! ([[spoiler: Of course, the point is moot if Pi just made everything up.]])

to:

* FridgeBrilliance: At first glance, the meerkats on the island sleeping on trees seem to be a clear example of SomewhereAMammalogistIsCrying, because those animals actually live in burrows. But from an evolutionary standpoint, it makes perfect sense: Imagine a bunch of meerkats by some means arriving at on the island. Those who show their normal behavior of creating burrows quickly get [[spoiler: devoured by the island]], and only a few showing the abnormal behavior of climbing on trees survive. Those are the ancestors of the current meerkat population Pi encounters. That's how natural selection works! ([[spoiler: Of course, the point is moot if Pi just made everything up.]])
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* FridgeBrilliance: At first glance, the meerkats on the island sleeping on trees seem to be a clear example of SomewhereAMammalogistIsCrying, because those animals actually live in burrows. But from an evolutionary standpoint, it makes perfect sense: Imaging a bunch of meerkats by some means arriving at the island. Those who show their normal behavior of creating burrows quickly get [[spoiler: devoured by the island]], and only a few showing the abnormal behavior of climbing on trees survive. Those are the ancestors of the current meerkat population Pi encounters. That's how natural selection works!

to:

* FridgeBrilliance: At first glance, the meerkats on the island sleeping on trees seem to be a clear example of SomewhereAMammalogistIsCrying, because those animals actually live in burrows. But from an evolutionary standpoint, it makes perfect sense: Imaging Imagine a bunch of meerkats by some means arriving at the island. Those who show their normal behavior of creating burrows quickly get [[spoiler: devoured by the island]], and only a few showing the abnormal behavior of climbing on trees survive. Those are the ancestors of the current meerkat population Pi encounters. That's how natural selection works!works! ([[spoiler: Of course, the point is moot if Pi just made everything up.]])
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* FridgeBrilliance: At first glance, the meerkats on the island sleeping on trees seems to be a clear example of SomewhereAMammalogistIsCrying, because those animals actually live in burrows. But from an evolutionary standpoint, it makes perfect sense: Imaging a bunch of meerkats by some means arriving at the island. Those who show their normal behavior of creating burrows quickly get [[spoiler: devoured by the island]], and only a few showing the abnormal behavior of climbing on trees survive. Those are the ancestors of the current meerkat population Pi encounters. That's how natural selection works!

to:

* FridgeBrilliance: At first glance, the meerkats on the island sleeping on trees seems seem to be a clear example of SomewhereAMammalogistIsCrying, because those animals actually live in burrows. But from an evolutionary standpoint, it makes perfect sense: Imaging a bunch of meerkats by some means arriving at the island. Those who show their normal behavior of creating burrows quickly get [[spoiler: devoured by the island]], and only a few showing the abnormal behavior of climbing on trees survive. Those are the ancestors of the current meerkat population Pi encounters. That's how natural selection works!
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* At first glance, the meerkats on the island sleeping on trees seems to be a clear example of SomewhereAMammalogistIsCrying, because those animals actually live in burrows. But from an evolutionary standpoint, it makes perfect sense: Imaging a bunch of meerkats by some means arriving at the island. Those who show their normal behavior of creating burrows quickly get [[spoiler: devoured by the island]], and only a few showing the abnormal behavior of climbing on trees survive. Those are the ancestors of the current meerkat population Pi encounters. That's how natural selection works!

to:

* FridgeBrilliance: At first glance, the meerkats on the island sleeping on trees seems to be a clear example of SomewhereAMammalogistIsCrying, because those animals actually live in burrows. But from an evolutionary standpoint, it makes perfect sense: Imaging a bunch of meerkats by some means arriving at the island. Those who show their normal behavior of creating burrows quickly get [[spoiler: devoured by the island]], and only a few showing the abnormal behavior of climbing on trees survive. Those are the ancestors of the current meerkat population Pi encounters. That's how natural selection works!
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* At first glance, the meerkats on the island sleeping on trees seems to be a clear example of SomewhereAMammalogistIsCrying, because those animals actually live in burrows. But from an evolutionary standpoint, it makes perfect sense: Imaging a bunch of meerkats by some means arriving at the island. Those who show their normal behavior of creating burrows quickly get [[spoiler: devoured by the island]], and only a few showing the abnormal behavior of climbing on trees survive. Those are the ancestors of the current meerkat population Pi encounters. That's how natural selection works!
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* CompleteMonster: [[spoiler:The chef in the alternate version of the story. Even by the circumstances of the situation, he comes off as especially barbaric in comparison to his fellow survivors]].

to:

* CompleteMonster: [[spoiler:The chef in the alternate version of the story. Even by the circumstances of the situation, he comes off as especially barbaric in comparison to his fellow survivors]].survivors. And he is meant to represent the hyena.]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** In the book, Pi described the hyena as this, as an abomination. In the movie, the hyena behaves like any animal, and is quite cute.

to:

** In the book, Pi described the hyena as this, as an abomination. In the movie, the hyena behaves like any animal, and is quite cute.cute [[GrotesqueCute in an unsettling way]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* TearJerker: When the ever optimistic and resourceful Pi finally loses hope.
--> We're dying, Richard Parker...
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
No context example pulled to discussion


* TearJerker: 'Can you feel the rain?'
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* TearJerker: 'Can you feel the rain?'

Top