Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Deleted line(s) 14,15 (click to see context) :
* TearJerker:
-->"Gotta wonder, though. What kind of bastard must I have been, that nobody was there to claim me? I mean, I'm... I'm not the most charming guy in the world, so I've been told, but... nobody?"
-->"Gotta wonder, though. What kind of bastard must I have been, that nobody was there to claim me? I mean, I'm... I'm not the most charming guy in the world, so I've been told, but... nobody?"
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
** The whole premise of the movie is pretty hilarious by itself, by anyone who was read or watched ''Manga/OnePunchMan'', as both Hancock and Saitama has similar backgrounds, albeit Saitama [[spoiler:got his powers by training really hard for three years, compared with Hancock, who is immortal]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 9 (click to see context) from:
* HilariousInHindsight: [[BarackObama Ray bandies the word "change" in his Allheart pitch, in a 2008 movie with a black dude as superhero.]]
to:
* HilariousInHindsight: [[BarackObama [[UsefulNotes/BarackObama Ray bandies the word "change" in his Allheart pitch, in a 2008 movie with a black dude as superhero.]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Moving.
Deleted line(s) 16 (click to see context) :
* WritersCannotDoMath : Hancock was released in 2008. The movie he and Mary were supposed to see "eighty years ago" was ''Frankenstein''. The Universal version was released [[Film/{{Frankenstein 1931}} in 1931]], and the previous version in 1910. So either Hancock is TwentyMinutesIntoTheFuture, the dialogue is rounding off the number of years they've been apart, the cinema had been playing the movie for a while, or no one bothered to look up the release date. Or, perhaps, TheyJustDidntCare.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 16 (click to see context) from:
* WritersCannotDoMath : Hancock was released in 2008. The movie he and Mary were supposed to see "eighty years ago" was ''Film/Frankenstein''. The Hammer verson was released in 1931, and the previous version in 1910. So either Hancock is TwentyMinutesIntoTheFuture, the dialogue is rounding off the number of years they've been apart, the cinema had been playing the movie for a while, or no one bothered to look up the release date. Or, perhaps, TheyJustDidntCare.
to:
* WritersCannotDoMath : Hancock was released in 2008. The movie he and Mary were supposed to see "eighty years ago" was ''Film/Frankenstein''. ''Frankenstein''. The Hammer verson Universal version was released [[Film/{{Frankenstein 1931}} in 1931, 1931]], and the previous version in 1910. So either Hancock is TwentyMinutesIntoTheFuture, the dialogue is rounding off the number of years they've been apart, the cinema had been playing the movie for a while, or no one bothered to look up the release date. Or, perhaps, TheyJustDidntCare.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 15 (click to see context) from:
* TheyWastedAPerfectlyGoodPlot: Some critics claimed that the first half of the movie was the best part and that the rest of the film wasted the potential of that plot.
to:
* TheyWastedAPerfectlyGoodPlot: Some critics claimed that the first half of the movie was the best part and that the rest of the film wasted the potential of that plot. Others claim the second half could have been a groundbreaking superhero drama if developed fully rather than wasting the first half of the movie being funny. Possibly they're both right, and the movie just generally suffers from trying to be two different movies at the same time.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 16 (click to see context) from:
* * WritersCannotDoMath : Hancock was released in 2008. The movie he and Mary were supposed to see "eighty years ago" was ''Film/Frankenstein''. The Hammer verson was released in 1931, and the previous version in 1910. So either Hancock is TwentyMinutesIntoTheFuture, the dialogue is rounding off the number of years they've been apart, the cinema had been playing the movie for a while, or no one bothered to look up the release date. Or, perhaps, TheyJustDidntCare.
to:
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* * WritersCannotDoMath : Hancock was released in 2008. The movie he and Mary were supposed to see "eighty years ago" was ''Film/Frankenstein''. The Hammer verson was released in 1931, and the previous version in 1910. So either Hancock is TwentyMinutesIntoTheFuture, the dialogue is rounding off the number of years they've been apart, the cinema had been playing the movie for a while, or no one bothered to look up the release date. Or, perhaps, TheyJustDidntCare.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 15,16 (click to see context) from:
* TheyWastedAPerfectlyGoodPlot: Many viewers think this about how the movie evolves. Critics even claim that the first half of the movie was the best part, as we're introduced to some lazy bum with superpowers.
** Considering the entire latter half of it relies on ContrivedCoincidence this is pretty reasonable. [[spoiler: in addition to Hancock and Mary being ancient beings comparable to gods or angels that become weaker when they're close]].
** Considering the entire latter half of it relies on ContrivedCoincidence this is pretty reasonable. [[spoiler: in addition to Hancock and Mary being ancient beings comparable to gods or angels that become weaker when they're close]].
to:
* TheyWastedAPerfectlyGoodPlot: Many viewers think this about how the movie evolves. Critics even claim Some critics claimed that the first half of the movie was the best part, as we're introduced to some lazy bum with superpowers.
** Considering the entire latter half of it relies on ContrivedCoincidence this is pretty reasonable. [[spoiler: in addition to Hancockpart and Mary being ancient beings comparable to gods or angels that become weaker when they're close]].the rest of the film wasted the potential of that plot.
** Considering the entire latter half of it relies on ContrivedCoincidence this is pretty reasonable. [[spoiler: in addition to Hancock
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 11 (click to see context) from:
** And dear God, [[AssShove he does]].
to:
** And dear God, [[AssShove he it does]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 14 (click to see context) from:
->"Gotta wonder, though. What kind of bastard must I have been, that nobody was there to claim me? I mean, I'm... I'm not the most charming guy in the world, so I've been told, but... nobody?"
to:
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Justifying edit.
Deleted line(s) 17 (click to see context) :
** On the other hand, if the movie was just two hours of Hancock screwing around being a dick with superpowers, [[CompletelyMissingThePoint what's the point of the movie]]?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
** On the other hand, if the movie was just two hours of Hancock screwing around being a dick with superpowers, [[CompletelyMissingThePoint what's the point of the movie]]?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
A Worldwide Punomenon cleanup
Changed line(s) 2 (click to see context) from:
** Ray gets his CMOA on as well [[spoiler: when Hancock is down and a trigger pull away from getting his brains spread over the floor, who shows up with the axe to [[AWorldwidePunomenon disarm]] the bad guy.]]
to:
** Ray gets his CMOA on as well [[spoiler: when Hancock is down and a trigger pull away from getting his brains spread over the floor, who shows up with the axe to [[AWorldwidePunomenon [[IncrediblyLamePun disarm]] the bad guy.]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 4 (click to see context) from:
* CrowningMomentOfFunny: When Hancock follows up on his threat [[LiteralAssKicking to shove a guy's head up his friend's ass.]] It gets even funnier when the SanfordAndSon theme song kicks in.
to:
* CrowningMomentOfFunny: When Hancock follows up on his threat [[LiteralAssKicking [[AssShove to shove a guy's head up his friend's ass.]] It gets even funnier when the SanfordAndSon theme song kicks in.
Changed line(s) 11 (click to see context) from:
** And dear God, [[LiteralAssKicking he does]].
to:
** And dear God, [[LiteralAssKicking [[AssShove he does]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 9 (click to see context) from:
* HilariousInHindsight: [[BarackObama Ray bandies the word "change" in his Allheart pitch, in a movie with a black dude for a superhero.]]
to:
* HilariousInHindsight: [[BarackObama Ray bandies the word "change" in his Allheart pitch, in a 2008 movie with a black dude for a as superhero.]]
Changed line(s) 16 (click to see context) from:
** Considering the entire latter half of it relies on ContrivedCoincidence this is pretty reasonable. [[spoiler: in addition to Hancock and Mary being ancient beings comparable to gods or angels, and become weaker when they're close]].
to:
** Considering the entire latter half of it relies on ContrivedCoincidence this is pretty reasonable. [[spoiler: in addition to Hancock and Mary being ancient beings comparable to gods or angels, and angels that become weaker when they're close]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 16 (click to see context) from:
** Considering the entire latter half of it relies on ContrivedCoincidence this is pretty reasonable. [[spoiler: in addition to Hancock and the woman being ancient beings comparable to gods or angels, and become weaker when they're close]].
to:
** Considering the entire latter half of it relies on ContrivedCoincidence this is pretty reasonable. [[spoiler: in addition to Hancock and the woman Mary being ancient beings comparable to gods or angels, and become weaker when they're close]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 15,16 (click to see context) from:
* TheyWastedAPerfectlyGoodPlot: Many viewers think this about how the movie evolves.
** Considering the entire latter half of it relies on ContrivedCoincidence this is pretty reasonable.
** Considering the entire latter half of it relies on ContrivedCoincidence this is pretty reasonable.
to:
* TheyWastedAPerfectlyGoodPlot: Many viewers think this about how the movie evolves.
evolves. Critics even claim that the first half of the movie was the best part, as we're introduced to some lazy bum with superpowers.
** Considering the entire latter half of it relies on ContrivedCoincidence this is pretty reasonable. [[spoiler: in addition to Hancock and the woman being ancient beings comparable to gods or angels, and become weaker when they're close]].
** Considering the entire latter half of it relies on ContrivedCoincidence this is pretty reasonable. [[spoiler: in addition to Hancock and the woman being ancient beings comparable to gods or angels, and become weaker when they're close]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
natter
Deleted line(s) 5,6 (click to see context) :
** YourMileageMayVary as others saw it as RapeAsComedy, {{Squick}}, DudeNotFunny, or NightmareFuel.
*** To be fair he does keep warning people. Proving that GoodIsNotNice.
*** To be fair he does keep warning people. Proving that GoodIsNotNice.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* HilariousInHindsight: [[BarackObama Ray bandies the word "change" in his Allheart pitch, in a movie with a black dude for a superhero.]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Love It Or Hate It is now In-Universe only.
Deleted line(s) 11 (click to see context) :
* LoveItOrHateIt: The revelation that [[spoiler: Mary also has superpowers]] pissed ''a lot'' of people off.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
This is you mileage may vary. Just because it disagrees with you doesn\'t make it Natter.
Changed line(s) 10 (click to see context) from:
** [[spoiler: "Look up."]]
to:
** [[spoiler: "Look up."]]up,"]] provided one can overlook the gravity of the [[spoiler:defacement]] of something that visible and significant.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
CMOH is not about having \'valid counterpoints\' it\'s natter.
Changed line(s) 10 (click to see context) from:
** [[spoiler: "Look up,"]] provided one can overlook the gravity of the [[spoiler:defacement]] of something that visible and significant.
to:
** [[spoiler: "Look up,"]] provided one can overlook the gravity of the [[spoiler:defacement]] of something that visible and significant.up."]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
It may be valid, but the wording is too personal.
Changed line(s) 10 (click to see context) from:
** [[spoiler: "Look up."]] Although, for some people, the reaction was more like "Gee, thanks for [[spoiler:defacing the Moon]] for everyone else, Hancock."
to:
** [[spoiler: "Look up."]] Although, for some people, up,"]] provided one can overlook the reaction was more like "Gee, thanks for [[spoiler:defacing gravity of the Moon]] for everyone else, Hancock."[[spoiler:defacement]] of something that visible and significant.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
This is YMMV and it\'s a valid counterpoint
Changed line(s) 10 (click to see context) from:
** [[spoiler: "Look up."]]
to:
** [[spoiler: "Look up."]]"]] Although, for some people, the reaction was more like "Gee, thanks for [[spoiler:defacing the Moon]] for everyone else, Hancock."
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Natter.
Changed line(s) 10 (click to see context) from:
** [[spoiler: "Look up."]] Although, for some people, the reaction was more like "Gee, thanks for [[spoiler:defacing the Moon]] for everyone else, Hancock."
to:
** [[spoiler: "Look up."]] Although, for some people, the reaction was more like "Gee, thanks for [[spoiler:defacing the Moon]] for everyone else, Hancock.""]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 10 (click to see context) from:
** [[spoiler: "Look up."]]
to:
** [[spoiler: "Look up."]]"]] Although, for some people, the reaction was more like "Gee, thanks for [[spoiler:defacing the Moon]] for everyone else, Hancock."
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 15 (click to see context) from:
* TearJerker: ->"Gotta wonder, though. What kind of bastard must I have been, that nobody was there to claim me? I mean, I'm... I'm not the most charming guy in the world, so I've been told, but... nobody?"
to:
* TearJerker: TearJerker:
->"Gotta wonder, though. What kind of bastard must I have been, that nobody was there to claim me? I mean, I'm... I'm not the most charming guy in the world, so I've been told, but... nobody?"
->"Gotta wonder, though. What kind of bastard must I have been, that nobody was there to claim me? I mean, I'm... I'm not the most charming guy in the world, so I've been told, but... nobody?"
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 15,16 (click to see context) from:
* TearJerker:
->"Gotta wonder, though. What kind of bastard must I have been, that nobody was there to claim me? I mean, I'm... I'm not the most charming guy in the world, so I've been told, but... nobody?"
->"Gotta wonder, though. What kind of bastard must I have been, that nobody was there to claim me? I mean, I'm... I'm not the most charming guy in the world, so I've been told, but... nobody?"
to:
* TearJerker:
TearJerker: ->"Gotta wonder, though. What kind of bastard must I have been, that nobody was there to claim me? I mean, I'm... I'm not the most charming guy in the world, so I've been told, but... nobody?"
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
*TearJerker:
->"Gotta wonder, though. What kind of bastard must I have been, that nobody was there to claim me? I mean, I'm... I'm not the most charming guy in the world, so I've been told, but... nobody?"
->"Gotta wonder, though. What kind of bastard must I have been, that nobody was there to claim me? I mean, I'm... I'm not the most charming guy in the world, so I've been told, but... nobody?"