Follow TV Tropes

Following

History YMMV / GKChesterton

Go To

OR

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Critical Research Failure is a disambiguation page


* CriticalResearchFailure: Invoked intentionally. In the first ''Literature/FatherBrown'' story "The Blue Cross", Flambeau tries to convince Father Brown that he is a fellow Catholic priest, but then in conversation tries to argue for moral relativism. This is a running theme for Creator/GKChesterton: other Father Brown stories have him catching impersonators out by ignorance of Anglican High Church/Low Church distinctions, or attacking reason as a supposed fellow Catholic priest. Also, ''Literature/TheManWhoWasThursday'' has an anarchist disguised as a bishop similarly give himself away by attacking reason, along with another impersonating a colonel acting in the manner of a comically stereotyped BloodKnight.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
moved from main page

Added DiffLines:

* CrazyIsCool: Gabriel Gale helps the police solve crimes committed by madmen due to being just crazy enough to understand the madmen and just sane enough to convey his understanding to the police.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Names The Same is no longer a trope


* OneTruePairing: Chesterton once wrote an essay regarding a hypothetical marriage between Don Juan of Austria (no relation to the famous lover [[NamesTheSame of the same name]]) and Mary Queen of Scots. His focus was not particularly on the "bohemian" details of their romance but on the fittingness of such a pairing and the historical-political implications across time.

to:

* OneTruePairing: Chesterton once wrote an essay regarding a hypothetical marriage between Don Juan of Austria (no relation to the famous lover [[NamesTheSame of the same name]]) name) and Mary Queen of Scots. His focus was not particularly on the "bohemian" details of their romance but on the fittingness of such a pairing and the historical-political implications across time.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Updating Link


* HilariousInHindsight: In ''The Everlasting Man'', Chesterton describes Thor of Myth/NorseMythology as more a superhero than a real god, decades before Stan Lee and Jack Kirby would turn ComicBook/{{Thor}} into an actual comic-book superhero.

to:

* HilariousInHindsight: In ''The Everlasting Man'', Chesterton describes Thor of Myth/NorseMythology as more a superhero than a real god, decades before Stan Lee Creator/StanLee and Jack Kirby Creator/JackKirby would turn ComicBook/{{Thor}} [[ComicBook/TheMightyThor Thor]] into an actual comic-book superhero.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* CriticalResearchFailure: Invoked intentionally. In the first ''Literature/FatherBrown'' story "The Blue Cross", Flambeau tries to convince Father Brown that he is a fellow Catholic priest, but then in conversation tries to argue for moral relativism. This is a running theme for Creator/GKChesterton: other Father Brown stories have him catching impersonators out by ignorance of Anglican High Church/Low Church distinctions, or attacking reason as a supposed fellow Catholic priest. Also, Literature/TheManWhoWasThursday has an anarchist disguised as a bishop similarly give himself away by attacking reason, along with another impersonating a colonel acting in the manner of a comically stereotyped BloodKnight.
* HilariousInHindsight: In "The Everlasting Man", Chesterton describes Thor of Myth/NorseMythology as more a superhero than a real god, decades before Stan Lee and Jack Kirby would turn ComicBook/{{Thor}} into an actual comic-book superhero.

to:

* CriticalResearchFailure: Invoked intentionally. In the first ''Literature/FatherBrown'' story "The Blue Cross", Flambeau tries to convince Father Brown that he is a fellow Catholic priest, but then in conversation tries to argue for moral relativism. This is a running theme for Creator/GKChesterton: other Father Brown stories have him catching impersonators out by ignorance of Anglican High Church/Low Church distinctions, or attacking reason as a supposed fellow Catholic priest. Also, Literature/TheManWhoWasThursday ''Literature/TheManWhoWasThursday'' has an anarchist disguised as a bishop similarly give himself away by attacking reason, along with another impersonating a colonel acting in the manner of a comically stereotyped BloodKnight.
* HilariousInHindsight: In "The ''The Everlasting Man", Man'', Chesterton describes Thor of Myth/NorseMythology as more a superhero than a real god, decades before Stan Lee and Jack Kirby would turn ComicBook/{{Thor}} into an actual comic-book superhero.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* CreatorWorship: The American Chesterton Society’s view of him is all but ''hagiographic''. Taken UpToEleven with the movement-- which is even gaining some traction among Catholic church leadership-- to have him officially ''[[PatronSaint canonized]]'' for his writing, which would make it ''literally'' hagiographic. They’re a VocalMinority, though.

to:

* CreatorWorship: The American There are Catholic readers of Chesterton, like the Society of Gilbert Keith Chesterton Society’s view of him is all but ''hagiographic''. Taken UpToEleven with the movement-- which is even gaining some traction among Catholic church leadership-- for example, that hold Chesterton in so high a regard that they are attempting to have him officially ''[[PatronSaint canonized]]'' launch a Cause for his writing, which would make it ''literally'' hagiographic. They’re a VocalMinority, though.canonization.



* ValuesDissonance: Chesterton's attitudes on race, gender and nationalities were actually moderate for the early twentieth century, but some (particularly in regards to the Jews) will often strike a sour note for modern readers in the midst of his most enjoyable works. His religious views will strike the reader as either refreshingly forthright or offensively aggressive. His opposition to progressivism, including essentially reactionary approaches to socialist welfare programs (such as government-mandated health insurance), science, and women's suffrage may irritate modern progressives, while his radical disdain for individualism, ''[[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Realpolitik Realpolitik]]'', nationalist expansionism, and capitalism may provoke modern conservatives (except the aforementioned American Chesterton Society).

to:

* ValuesDissonance: Chesterton's attitudes on race, gender and nationalities were actually moderate for the early twentieth century, but some (particularly in regards to the Jews) will often strike a sour note for modern readers in the midst of his most enjoyable works. His religious views will strike the reader as either refreshingly forthright or offensively aggressive. His opposition to progressivism, including essentially reactionary approaches to socialist welfare programs (such as government-mandated health insurance), science, and women's suffrage may irritate modern progressives, while his radical disdain for individualism, ''[[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Realpolitik Realpolitik]]'', nationalist expansionism, and capitalism may provoke modern conservatives (except the aforementioned American Chesterton Society).Society of Gilbert Keith Chesterton).
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* CriticalResearchFailure: In the first ''Literature/FatherBrown'' story "The Blue Cross", Flambeau tries to convince Father Brown that he is a fellow Catholic priest, but then in conversation tries to argue for moral relativism. This is a running theme for Creator/GKChesterton: other Father Brown stories have him catching impersonators out by ignorance of Anglican High Church/Low Church distinctions, or attacking reason as a supposed fellow Catholic priest. Also, Literature/TheManWhoWasThursday has an anarchist disguised as a bishop similarly give himself away by attacking reason, along with another impersonating a colonel acting in the manner of a comically stereotyped BloodKnight.

to:

* CriticalResearchFailure: Invoked intentionally. In the first ''Literature/FatherBrown'' story "The Blue Cross", Flambeau tries to convince Father Brown that he is a fellow Catholic priest, but then in conversation tries to argue for moral relativism. This is a running theme for Creator/GKChesterton: other Father Brown stories have him catching impersonators out by ignorance of Anglican High Church/Low Church distinctions, or attacking reason as a supposed fellow Catholic priest. Also, Literature/TheManWhoWasThursday has an anarchist disguised as a bishop similarly give himself away by attacking reason, along with another impersonating a colonel acting in the manner of a comically stereotyped BloodKnight.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* CriticalResearchFailure: In the first ''Literature/FatherBrown'' story "The Blue Cross", Flambeau tries to convince Father Brown that he is a fellow Catholic priest, but then in conversation tries to argue for moral relativism. This is a running theme for Creator/GKChesterton: other Father Brown stories have him catching impersonators out by ignorance of Anglican High Church/Low Church distinctions, or attacking reason as a supposed fellow Catholic priest. Also, Literature/TheManWhoWasThursday has an anarchist disguised as a bishop similarly give himself away by attacking reason, along with another impersonating a colonel acting in the manner of a comically stereotyped BloodKnight.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ValuesDissonance: Chesterton's attitudes on race, gender and nationalities were actually moderate for the early twentieth century, but some (particularly in regards to the Jews) will often strike a sour note for modern readers in the midst of his most enjoyable works. This is mainly accidental, being connected less with racial theories (which he despised) than with a distrust of internationalism and big combines in general. His religious views, on the other hand, were entirely conscious, and will strike the reader as either refreshingly forthright or offensively aggressive. His opposition to progressivism, including essentially reactionary approaches to socialist welfare programs (such as government-mandated health insurance), science, and women's suffrage may irritate modern progressives, while his radical disdain for individualism, ''[[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Realpolitik Realpolitik]]'', nationalist expansionism, and capitalism may provoke modern conservatives (except the aforementioned American Chesterton Society).

to:

* ValuesDissonance: Chesterton's attitudes on race, gender and nationalities were actually moderate for the early twentieth century, but some (particularly in regards to the Jews) will often strike a sour note for modern readers in the midst of his most enjoyable works. This is mainly accidental, being connected less with racial theories (which he despised) than with a distrust of internationalism and big combines in general. His religious views, on the other hand, were entirely conscious, and views will strike the reader as either refreshingly forthright or offensively aggressive. His opposition to progressivism, including essentially reactionary approaches to socialist welfare programs (such as government-mandated health insurance), science, and women's suffrage may irritate modern progressives, while his radical disdain for individualism, ''[[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Realpolitik Realpolitik]]'', nationalist expansionism, and capitalism may provoke modern conservatives (except the aforementioned American Chesterton Society).
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Chesterton actually defended the Jews against the growing antisemitism in the West, in fact he was one of the few people who thought the Nazis were bad ''before'' WWII (which he didn’t live to see). Some of his reputation as an anti-Semite comes from confusion with his cousin, A K Chesterton, who was a fascist political activist and one of the most extreme Nazi-style conspiratorial anti-Semites among the British inter-war far right.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* HilariousInHindsight: In "The Everlasting Man", Chesterton describes Thor of UsefulNotes/NorseMythology as more a superhero than a real god, decades before Stan Lee and Jack Kirby would turn ComicBook/{{Thor}} into an actual comic-book superhero.

to:

* HilariousInHindsight: In "The Everlasting Man", Chesterton describes Thor of UsefulNotes/NorseMythology Myth/NorseMythology as more a superhero than a real god, decades before Stan Lee and Jack Kirby would turn ComicBook/{{Thor}} into an actual comic-book superhero.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* HilariousInHindsight: In "The Everlasting Man", Chesterton describes Thor of UsefulNotes/NorseMythology as more a superhero than a real god, decades before Stan Lee and Jack Kirby would turn ComicBook/{{Thor}} into an actual comic-book superhero.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Chesterton actually defended the Jews against the growing antisemitism in the West, in fact he was one of the few people who thought the Nazis were bad ''before'' WWII. Some of his reputation as an anti-Semite comes from confusion with his cousin, A K Chesterton, who was a fascist political activist and one of the most extreme Nazi-style conspiratorial anti-Semites among the British inter-war far right.

to:

** Chesterton actually defended the Jews against the growing antisemitism in the West, in fact he was one of the few people who thought the Nazis were bad ''before'' WWII.WWII (which he didn’t live to see). Some of his reputation as an anti-Semite comes from confusion with his cousin, A K Chesterton, who was a fascist political activist and one of the most extreme Nazi-style conspiratorial anti-Semites among the British inter-war far right.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* CreatorWorship: The American Chesterton Society’s view of him is all but ''hagiographic''.[[note]]And now that they've taken up the cause for his sainthood, it's become ''literally'' hagiographic[[/note]] They’re a VocalMinority, though.

to:

* CreatorWorship: The American Chesterton Society’s view of him is all but ''hagiographic''.[[note]]And now that they've taken up Taken UpToEleven with the cause movement-- which is even gaining some traction among Catholic church leadership-- to have him officially ''[[PatronSaint canonized]]'' for his sainthood, it's become writing, which would make it ''literally'' hagiographic[[/note]] hagiographic. They’re a VocalMinority, though.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* CreatorWorship: The American Chesterton Society’s view of him is all but ''hagiographic''. They’re a VocalMinority, though.

to:

* CreatorWorship: The American Chesterton Society’s view of him is all but ''hagiographic''. [[note]]And now that they've taken up the cause for his sainthood, it's become ''literally'' hagiographic[[/note]] They’re a VocalMinority, though.

Added: 1040

Changed: 987

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ValuesDissonance: Chesterton's attitudes on race, gender and nationalities were actually moderate for the early twentieth century, but some (particularly in regards to the Jews) will often strike a sour note for modern readers in the midst of his most enjoyable works. This is mainly accidental, being connected less with racial theories (which he despised) than with a distrust of internationalism and big combines in general. His religious views, on the other hand, were entirely conscious, and will strike the reader as either refreshingly forthright or offensively aggressive. His opposition to progressivism, including essentially reactionary approaches to socialist welfare programs (such as government-mandated health insurance), science, and women's suffrage may irritate modern progressives, while his radical disdain for individualism, ''[[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Realpolitik Realpolitik]]'', nationalist expansionism, and capitalism may provoke modern conservatives.

to:

* CreatorWorship: The American Chesterton Society’s view of him is all but ''hagiographic''. They’re a VocalMinority, though.
* ValuesDissonance: Chesterton's attitudes on race, gender and nationalities were actually moderate for the early twentieth century, but some (particularly in regards to the Jews) will often strike a sour note for modern readers in the midst of his most enjoyable works. This is mainly accidental, being connected less with racial theories (which he despised) than with a distrust of internationalism and big combines in general. His religious views, on the other hand, were entirely conscious, and will strike the reader as either refreshingly forthright or offensively aggressive. His opposition to progressivism, including essentially reactionary approaches to socialist welfare programs (such as government-mandated health insurance), science, and women's suffrage may irritate modern progressives, while his radical disdain for individualism, ''[[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Realpolitik Realpolitik]]'', nationalist expansionism, and capitalism may provoke modern conservatives.conservatives (except the aforementioned American Chesterton Society).
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ValuesDissonance: Chesterton's racial and national attitudes were actually very moderate for the early twentieth century, but some (particularly in regards to the Jews) will often strike a sour note for modern readers in the midst of his most enjoyable works. This is mainly accidental, being connected less with racial theories (which he despised) than with a distrust of internationalism and big combines in general. His religious views, on the other hand, were entirely conscious, and will strike the reader as either refreshingly forthright or offensively aggressive. His opposition to progressivism, including essentially reactionary approaches to socialist welfare programs (such as government-mandated health insurance), science, and women's suffrage may irritate modern progressives, while his radical disdain for individualism, ''[[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Realpolitik Realpolitik]]'', nationalist expansionism, and capitalism may provoke modern conservatives.

to:

* ValuesDissonance: Chesterton's racial and national attitudes on race, gender and nationalities were actually very moderate for the early twentieth century, but some (particularly in regards to the Jews) will often strike a sour note for modern readers in the midst of his most enjoyable works. This is mainly accidental, being connected less with racial theories (which he despised) than with a distrust of internationalism and big combines in general. His religious views, on the other hand, were entirely conscious, and will strike the reader as either refreshingly forthright or offensively aggressive. His opposition to progressivism, including essentially reactionary approaches to socialist welfare programs (such as government-mandated health insurance), science, and women's suffrage may irritate modern progressives, while his radical disdain for individualism, ''[[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Realpolitik Realpolitik]]'', nationalist expansionism, and capitalism may provoke modern conservatives.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* OneTruePairing: Chesterton once wrote an essay regarding Don Juan of Austria (no relation to the famous lover [[NamesTheSame of the same name]]) and Mary Queen of Scots. His focus was not particularly on the "bohemian" details of their romance but on the fittingness of such a pairing and the historical-political implications across time.

to:

* OneTruePairing: Chesterton once wrote an essay regarding a hypothetical marriage between Don Juan of Austria (no relation to the famous lover [[NamesTheSame of the same name]]) and Mary Queen of Scots. His focus was not particularly on the "bohemian" details of their romance but on the fittingness of such a pairing and the historical-political implications across time.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
YMMV sinkhole


* ValuesDissonance: Chesterton's racial and national attitudes were actually very moderate for the early twentieth century, but some (particularly in regards to the Jews) will often strike a sour note for modern readers in the midst of his most enjoyable works. This is mainly accidental, being connected less with racial theories (which he despised) than with a distrust of internationalism and big combines in general. His religious views, on the other hand, were entirely conscious, and will strike the reader as either refreshingly forthright or offensively aggressive, [[YourMileageMayVary according to taste]]. His opposition to progressivism, including essentially reactionary approaches to socialist welfare programs (such as government-mandated health insurance), science, and women's suffrage may irritate modern progressives, while his radical disdain for individualism, ''[[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Realpolitik Realpolitik]]'', nationalist expansionism, and capitalism may provoke modern conservatives.

to:

* ValuesDissonance: Chesterton's racial and national attitudes were actually very moderate for the early twentieth century, but some (particularly in regards to the Jews) will often strike a sour note for modern readers in the midst of his most enjoyable works. This is mainly accidental, being connected less with racial theories (which he despised) than with a distrust of internationalism and big combines in general. His religious views, on the other hand, were entirely conscious, and will strike the reader as either refreshingly forthright or offensively aggressive, [[YourMileageMayVary according to taste]].aggressive. His opposition to progressivism, including essentially reactionary approaches to socialist welfare programs (such as government-mandated health insurance), science, and women's suffrage may irritate modern progressives, while his radical disdain for individualism, ''[[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Realpolitik Realpolitik]]'', nationalist expansionism, and capitalism may provoke modern conservatives.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Chesterton actually defended the Jews against the growing antisemitism in the West, in fact he was one of the few people who thought the Nazis were bad ''before'' WWII. Some of his reputation as an anti-Semite comes from confusion with his cousin, A K Chesterton, who was a fascist political activist and one of the most extreme Nazi-style conspiratorial anti-Semites among the British inter-war far right.

to:

** Chesterton actually defended the Jews against the growing antisemitism in the West, in fact he was one of the few people who thought the Nazis were bad ''before'' WWII. Some of his reputation as an anti-Semite comes from confusion with his cousin, A K Chesterton, who was a fascist political activist and one of the most extreme Nazi-style conspiratorial anti-Semites among the British inter-war far right.right.
* OneTruePairing: Chesterton once wrote an essay regarding Don Juan of Austria (no relation to the famous lover [[NamesTheSame of the same name]]) and Mary Queen of Scots. His focus was not particularly on the "bohemian" details of their romance but on the fittingness of such a pairing and the historical-political implications across time.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None





** Chesterton actually defended the Jews against the growing antisemitism in the West, in fact he was one of the few people who thought the Nazis were bad ''before'' WWII.

to:

** Chesterton actually defended the Jews against the growing antisemitism in the West, in fact he was one of the few people who thought the Nazis were bad ''before'' WWII. Some of his reputation as an anti-Semite comes from confusion with his cousin, A K Chesterton, who was a fascist political activist and one of the most extreme Nazi-style conspiratorial anti-Semites among the British inter-war far right.

Top