Follow TV Tropes

Following

History YMMV / Enough

Go To

OR

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* TheyCopiedItSoItSucks: You can't help but notice a more than passing resemblance between this movie and 1991's ''Film/SleepingWithTheEnemy'', which many regard as a superior film. [[note]] Even though upon its original release, this was [[VindicatedByHistory not the case and was only regarded as an "average" film at best]].[[/note]]

to:

* TheyCopiedItSoItSucks: You can't help but notice a more than passing resemblance between this movie and 1991's ''Film/SleepingWithTheEnemy'', which many regard as a superior film, especially because the portrayal of DomesticAbuse is generally agreed to be far more realistic in that film. [[note]] Even though upon its original release, this was [[VindicatedByHistory not the case and was only regarded as an "average" film at best]].[[/note]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* BrokenBase: Is the movie a relatable and accurate portrayal of [[DomesticAbuse]] that shows a true (even if not perfect) empowerment of women against abusive and entitled men? Or is it just another Hollywood message movie that relies too much on cliches to get the message across? People often have a field day with this, especially when you consider the [[MisaimedFandom]] of it.

to:

* BrokenBase: Is the movie a relatable and accurate portrayal of [[DomesticAbuse]] DomesticAbuse that shows a true (even if not perfect) empowerment of women against abusive and entitled men? Or is it just another Hollywood message movie that relies too much on cliches to get the message across? People often have a field day with this, especially when you consider the [[MisaimedFandom]] MisaimedFandom of it.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* MisaimedFandom: Chances are anybody who has been in or even close to domestic violence situations will praise and idealize this film to the point of ignoring potential flaws. This is in spite of the film making some reasonably questionable choices, such as completely skipping over their marriage and putting the entire story from Slim's perspective, making Mitch a Hollywood psycho with no human context in his behavior,

to:

* MisaimedFandom: Chances are anybody ''anybody'' who has been in or even close to domestic violence situations will praise and idealize this film to the point of ignoring any potential flaws. This is in spite of the film making some reasonably questionable choices, such as completely skipping over their marriage The movie clearly demonstrates that an abused housewife breaking into her husband's new residence and putting planning to give him a taste of his own medicine before killing him with premeditated lethal force wouldn't do her any legal or moral favors. Yet many people who relate and sympathize with domestic violence victims thought it was ''absolutely cool'' to see her in action, which defeats the entire story from Slim's perspective, making purpose of Slim not having the heart to finish Mitch off. Not to mention that the movie is also treated as if it's very accurate to real life, when it really relies on a lot of classic Hollywood psycho with no human context in his behavior, cliches and tropes for the most part.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

*BrokenBase: Is the movie a relatable and accurate portrayal of [[DomesticAbuse]] that shows a true (even if not perfect) empowerment of women against abusive and entitled men? Or is it just another Hollywood message movie that relies too much on cliches to get the message across? People often have a field day with this, especially when you consider the [[MisaimedFandom]] of it.
* MisaimedFandom: Chances are anybody who has been in or even close to domestic violence situations will praise and idealize this film to the point of ignoring potential flaws. This is in spite of the film making some reasonably questionable choices, such as completely skipping over their marriage and putting the entire story from Slim's perspective, making Mitch a Hollywood psycho with no human context in his behavior,
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ValuesResonance: While the movie doesn't really explore Mitch's personality, the arrogant and entitled way he thinks and behaves has certainly become more in line with what is often on social media platforms in the late 2010s and especially going into the 2020s.

to:

* ValuesResonance: While the movie doesn't really explore Mitch's personality, the persistent and arrogant and entitled way he thinks and behaves has certainly become more in line with what is can often seen on social media platforms in the late 2010s and especially going into the 2020s.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* ValuesResonance: While the movie doesn't really explore Mitch's personality, the arrogant and entitled way he thinks and behaves has certainly become more in line with what is often on social media platforms in the late 2010s and especially going into the 2020s.

Added: 624

Changed: 202

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* TheyWastedAPerfectlyGoodCharacter: Out of the many criticisms the film received, one of the ''biggest'' complaints was that the film never even once bothers to try to humanize Mitch's possessive and dominant personalities or his particularly stubborn depiction of abusive behavior, not even a ''little bit''. This resulted in many viewers seeing his character simply as a very bland and uninteresting psycho villain in a depiction of domestic violence, with little understanding of the character.

to:

* TheyWastedAPerfectlyGoodCharacter: Out of the many criticisms the film received, one of the ''biggest'' complaints was that the film never even once bothers to try to humanize Mitch's possessive and dominant personalities or his particularly stubborn depiction of abusive behavior, not even a ''little bit''. This resulted in many viewers seeing his character simply as a very bland and uninteresting psycho villain in a depiction of domestic violence, with little understanding of the character. It certainly doesn't help that they just [[TheyWastedAPerfectlyGoodPlot went from the marriage almost instantly straight to the abuse timeline rather than showing more context that Mitch was a wacko]].
* TheyWastedAPerfectlyGoodPlot: As mentioned above, the movie seems to focus ''far'' more on the "kill or be killed" and female empowerment themes, as well as turning it into an half-action thriller, at the expense of much characterization and the effects that [[DomesticAbuse domestic violence]] has on women and people in general, not to mention that the supporting characters are simply there to move the plot forward and [[WhatHappenedToTheMouse don't do much else in the story]]. This is considered a fairly common reason why the film is a good candidate for being considered a [[LifetimeMovieOfTheWeek Lifetime film]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* TheyWastedAPerfectlyGoodCharacter: Out of the many criticisms the film received, one of the ''biggest'' complaints was that the film never even once bothers to try to humanize Mitch's possessive and dominant personalities or his particularly stubborn depiction of abusive behavior, not even a ''little bit''. This resulted in many viewers seeing his character simply as a very bland and uninteresting psycho villain in a depiction of domestic violence, with little understanding of the character.

Added: 159

Changed: 2

Removed: 156

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Renamed one trope.


** Even though she clearly did not deserve the abuse or infidelity that Mitch subjected her to, some fans believe that Slim ignored all the warning signs about him (his [[AmbitionIsEvil driven personality,]] the fact that, although he most likely than not paid him off handsomely, he ''ordered'' a complete stranger out of his home just so he and Slim could have it, the fact that he wouldn't let her hold Gracie after she was born, etc.) was because she was a GoldDigger and also left Joe due to him having more money than he does.

to:

** Even though she clearly did not deserve the abuse or infidelity that Mitch subjected her to, some fans believe that Slim ignored all the warning signs about him (his [[AmbitionIsEvil driven personality,]] personality]], the fact that, although he most likely than not paid him off handsomely, he ''ordered'' a complete stranger out of his home just so he and Slim could have it, the fact that he wouldn't let her hold Gracie after she was born, etc.) was because she was a GoldDigger and also left Joe due to him having more money than he does.



* QuestionableCasting: Music/JenniferLopez as a poor, down-on-her-luck waitress? Creator/BillyCampbell as a wife-beater? Creator/NoahWyle as his evil wingman?



* WTHCastingAgency: Music/JenniferLopez as a poor, down-on-her-luck waitress? Creator/BillyCampbell as a wife-beater? Creator/NoahWyle as his evil wingman?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** Mitch. An insecure man who legitimately wants the best for his family and wants to make his marriage work, despite prioritizing his own needs and desires over his family and being abusive and controlling? Or a self-centered psycho who could care less about the best for his family and is more concerned about the best for himself and has no problem mistreating them for his own advantage whenever he feels like it, and only wants them for self-benefit? The movie doesn't make it clear at all, but Mitch's behavior at times seem to lean towards the second interpretation.


* AcceptableProfessionalTargets:
** Waitresses, who are said to be dumb and only in the job because they have no other skills. Though it is part of a conversation between Mitch and Robbie, who are both misogynists so it's likely their perspective only, as Slim is shown to be very capable and resourceful.
** Law enforcement in general are seen as being [[PoliceAreUseless useless]], [[DirtyCop corrupt]] or [[BadCopIncompetentCop incompetent.]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* VindicatedByHistory: Upon its release, the film received mostly negative reviews. However, in recent years, it has received a bit of a reappraisal, with many now dubbing it an underrated thriller.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* AcceptableProfessionalTargets:
** Waitresses, who are said to be dumb and only in the job because they have no other skills. Though it is part of a conversation between Mitch and Robbie, who are both misogynists so it's likely their perspective only, as Slim is shown to be very capable and resourceful.
** Law enforcement in general are seen as being [[PoliceAreUseless useless]], [[DirtyCop corrupt]] or [[BadCopIncompetentCop incompetent.]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* AcceptableProfessionalTargets:
** Waitresses, who are said to be dumb and only in the job because they have no other skills. Though it is part of a conversation between Mitch and Robbie, who are both misogynists so it's likely their perspective only, as Slim is shown to be very capable and resourceful.
** Law enforcement in general are seen as being [[PoliceAreUseless useless,]] [[DirtyCop corrupt]] or [[BadCopIncompetentCop incompetent.]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
What An Idiot is now classified as Flame Bait.


* WhatAnIdiot: Many instances throughout the film:
** '''You'd Expect:''' Slim and Gracie to go into a shelter where they would be protected just so her daughter would not be "tainted".
** '''Instead:''' They go into a motel that anyone could enter.

Added: 197

Changed: 202

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* WhatAnIdiot: Many instances throughout the film, but for starters, there's Slim's decision for her and Gracie to go into a motel that anyone could enter instead of a shelter where they would be protected just so her daughter would not be "tainted".

to:

* WhatAnIdiot: Many instances throughout the film, but for starters, there's Slim's decision for her film:
** '''You'd Expect:''' Slim
and Gracie to go into a motel that anyone could enter instead of a shelter where they would be protected just so her daughter would not be "tainted"."tainted".
** '''Instead:''' They go into a motel that anyone could enter.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Although it's apparently intended to be serious, as Roger Ebert noted, Mitch is a completely absurd, {{Flanderized}} caricature of an abusive husband; not just a hybridization of Germaine Greer's worst nightmare, and Franchise/{{Godzilla}} in human form, he's also, for the purposes of the plot, practically omnipotent. The scene where he rampages through the house of Slim's terrified parents is particularly amusing. Mitch himself may not necessarily be in it ForTheEvulz (he's generally shown to be angry), but that's no reason for us in the audience not to be.

to:

** Although it's apparently intended to be serious, as Roger Ebert Creator/RogerEbert noted, Mitch is a completely absurd, {{Flanderized}} caricature of an abusive husband; not just a hybridization of Germaine Greer's worst nightmare, and Franchise/{{Godzilla}} in human form, he's also, for the purposes of the plot, practically omnipotent. The scene where he rampages through the house of Slim's terrified parents is particularly amusing. Mitch himself may not necessarily be in it ForTheEvulz (he's generally shown to be angry), but that's no reason for us in the audience not to be.



** Jennifer Lopez and Juliette Lewis' joint-catchphrase: "Piece of cake, piece of pie". This is repeated numerous times throughout the film. Towards the end, they even abbreviate it to the non-sequitur "Cake, pie".

to:

** Jennifer Lopez Creator/JenniferLopez and Juliette Lewis' Creator/JulietteLewis' joint-catchphrase: "Piece of cake, piece of pie". This is repeated numerous times throughout the film. Towards the end, they even abbreviate it to the non-sequitur "Cake, pie".



* WTHCastingAgency: Music/JenniferLopez as a poor, down-on-her-luck waitress? [[Film/TheRocketeer Billy Campbell]] as a wife-beater? [[Series/{{ER}} Noah Wyle]] as his evil wingman?

to:

* WTHCastingAgency: Music/JenniferLopez as a poor, down-on-her-luck waitress? [[Film/TheRocketeer Billy Campbell]] Creator/BillyCampbell as a wife-beater? [[Series/{{ER}} Noah Wyle]] Creator/NoahWyle as his evil wingman?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* {{Narm}} Factor Nine, Captain!:

to:

* {{Narm}} {{Narm}}: Factor Nine, Captain!: Captain!



** Jennifer Lopez and Juliette Lewis' joint-catchphrase. "Piece of cake" "Piece of Pie". Repeated numerous times throughout the film, towards the end they even abbreviate it to the non-sequitur "Cake" "Pie".

to:

** Jennifer Lopez and Juliette Lewis' joint-catchphrase. joint-catchphrase: "Piece of cake" "Piece cake, piece of Pie". Repeated pie". This is repeated numerous times throughout the film, towards film. Towards the end end, they even abbreviate it to the non-sequitur "Cake" "Pie"."Cake, pie".
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* FamilyUnfriendlyAesop: "[[{{Tagline}} Self defense is not murder]]"... huh... it ''[[BrokenAesop is]]'' if it's premeditated (including breaking and entering and FramingTheGuiltyParty). The law is very clear on that.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Waitresses, who are said to be dumb and only in the job because they have no other skills. Though it is part of a conversation between Mitch and Robbie, who are both misogynists so its likely their perspective only, as Slim is shown to be very capable and resourceful.

to:

** Waitresses, who are said to be dumb and only in the job because they have no other skills. Though it is part of a conversation between Mitch and Robbie, who are both misogynists so its it's likely their perspective only, as Slim is shown to be very capable and resourceful.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Waitresses, who are said to be dumb and only in the job because they have no other skills.

to:

** Waitresses, who are said to be dumb and only in the job because they have no other skills. Though it is part of a conversation between Mitch and Robbie, who are both misogynists so its likely their perspective only, as Slim is shown to be very capable and resourceful.

Top