Follow TV Tropes

Following

History YMMV / BenandArthur

Go To

OR

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* HilariousInHindsight: Most comparisons between this film and ''TheRoom'' (which was written and apparently shot before this film, but released afterwards) tend to refer to their mutual incompetence and anviliciousness, but the two films have a surprising amount in common:

to:

* HilariousInHindsight: Most comparisons between this film and ''TheRoom'' ''Film/TheRoom'' (which was written and apparently shot before this film, but released afterwards) tend to refer to their mutual incompetence and anviliciousness, but the two films have a surprising amount in common:



** The tagline for the film is "Only the power of love can defeat a holy soldier on a mission." In the film, however, [[spoiler:the ''opposite'' happens: Said "holy soldier" actually defeats the ostensibly loving protagonists by killing them. Such success as accomplished by Victor would render the tagline false.]] With a dose of [[FridgeLogic Fridge Logic]], however, one could reinterpret the tagline and the events in the film to imply that the two protagonists ''lacked'' the love that was necessary to stop Victor, meaning that Ben and Arthur weren't really in love to begin with. This would give the impression that homosexuals form relationships out of sheer interest ([[MoneyDearBoy sharing the rent]], having a regular sexual partner, proving some point about the viability of a homosexual relationship, etc.) and are simply incapable (or even uninterested) in committing to steady, trusting relationships based on love.

to:

** The tagline for the film is "Only the power of love can defeat a holy soldier on a mission." In the film, however, [[spoiler:the ''opposite'' happens: Said "holy soldier" actually defeats the ostensibly loving protagonists by killing them. Such success as accomplished by Victor would render the tagline false.]] With a dose of [[FridgeLogic Fridge Logic]], however, one could reinterpret the tagline and the events in the film to imply that the two protagonists ''lacked'' the love that was necessary to stop Victor, meaning that Ben and Arthur weren't really in love to begin with. This would give the impression that homosexuals form relationships out of sheer interest ([[MoneyDearBoy sharing the rent]], having a regular sexual partner, proving some point about the viability of a homosexual relationship, etc.) and are simply incapable (or even uninterested) in committing to steady, trusting relationships based on love.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* CriticalResearchFailure: With the option to marry Arthur in Hawaii now gone, Ben mentions to Tammy that he and Arthur can marry in Vermont instead, as a means to dismiss Tammy's claim that "men can't get married in the United States". The film was released in 2002. Vermont allowed same-sex civil unions in 2000; as [[WebVideo/ObscurusLupa Obscurus Lupa]] noted, same-sex marriage was not possible in Vermont until 2009.

to:

* CriticalResearchFailure: With the option to marry Arthur in Hawaii now gone, Ben mentions to Tammy that he and Arthur can marry in Vermont instead, as a means to dismiss Tammy's claim that "men can't get married in the United States". The film was released in 2002. Vermont allowed same-sex civil unions in 2000; 2000, while the film was released in 2002; as [[WebVideo/ObscurusLupa Obscurus Lupa]] noted, same-sex marriage was not possible in Vermont until 2009.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* CriticalResearchFailure: Ben mentioned that, with the option to marry Arthur in Hawaii now gone, the two can marry in Vermont instead, as a means to dismiss Tammy's claim that "men can't get married in the United States". The film was released in 2002. Vermont allowed same-sex civil unions in 2000; as [[WebVideo/ObscurusLupa Obscurus Lupa]] noted, same-sex marriage was not possible in Vermont until 2009.

to:

* CriticalResearchFailure: Ben mentioned that, with With the option to marry Arthur in Hawaii now gone, the two Ben mentions to Tammy that he and Arthur can marry in Vermont instead, as a means to dismiss Tammy's claim that "men can't get married in the United States". The film was released in 2002. Vermont allowed same-sex civil unions in 2000; as [[WebVideo/ObscurusLupa Obscurus Lupa]] noted, same-sex marriage was not possible in Vermont until 2009.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* CriticalResearchFailure: Ben mentioned that, with the option to marry Arthur in Hawaii now gone, the two can marry in Vermont instead. The film was released in 2002. Vermont allowed same-sex civil unions in 2000; as [[WebVideo/ObscurusLupa Obscurus Lupa]] noted, same-sex marriage was not possible in Vermont until 2009.

to:

* CriticalResearchFailure: Ben mentioned that, with the option to marry Arthur in Hawaii now gone, the two can marry in Vermont instead.instead, as a means to dismiss Tammy's claim that "men can't get married in the United States". The film was released in 2002. Vermont allowed same-sex civil unions in 2000; as [[WebVideo/ObscurusLupa Obscurus Lupa]] noted, same-sex marriage was not possible in Vermont until 2009.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* CriticalResearchFailure: Ben mentioned that, with the option to marry Arthur in Hawaii now gone, the two can marry in Vermont instead. The film was released in 2002. Vermont allowed same-sex civil unions in 2000; as [[WebVideo/ObscurusLupa Obscurus Lupa]] noted, same-sex marriage was not possible in Vermont until 2009.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** After an argument, Ben punches Arthur, knocking the latter down. In the following scene, Ben tends to Arthur's wounds and gives the following gem: "That'll teach you to not say stupid things." An already bad comment is made worse by the following: Considering how irritating Arthur has been up to this point, we actually ''cheer'' when Ben throws the punch. This places the audience in an awkward position of tacitly condoning domestic violence, which sadly presides in many hetero- and homosexual relationships and is ([[ValuesDissonance usually]]) ''condemned''.

to:

** After an argument, Ben punches Arthur, knocking the latter down. In the following scene, Ben tends to Arthur's wounds and gives the following gem: "That'll teach you to not say stupid things." An already bad comment is made worse by the following: Considering how irritating Arthur has been up to this point, we actually ''cheer'' when Ben throws the punch. This places the audience in an awkward position of tacitly condoning ''condoning'' domestic violence, which sadly presides in many hetero- and homosexual relationships and is ([[ValuesDissonance usually]]) ''condemned''.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** The tagline for the film is "Only the power of love can defeat a holy soldier on a mission." In the film, however, [[spoiler:the ''opposite'' happens: Said "holy soldier" actually defeats the ostensibly loving protagonists by killing them. Such success as accomplished by Victor would render the tagline false.]] With a dose of [[FridgeLogic Fridge Logic]], however, one could reinterpret the tagline and the events in the film to imply that the two protagonists ''lacked'' the love that was necessary to [[spoiler:stop Victor]], meaning that Ben and Arthur weren't really in love to begin with. This would give the impression that homosexuals form relationships out of sheer interest ([[MoneyDearBoy sharing the rent]], having a regular sexual partner, proving some point about the viability of a homosexual relationship, etc.) and are simply incapable (or even uninterested) in committing to steady, trusting relationships based on love.

to:

** The tagline for the film is "Only the power of love can defeat a holy soldier on a mission." In the film, however, [[spoiler:the ''opposite'' happens: Said "holy soldier" actually defeats the ostensibly loving protagonists by killing them. Such success as accomplished by Victor would render the tagline false.]] With a dose of [[FridgeLogic Fridge Logic]], however, one could reinterpret the tagline and the events in the film to imply that the two protagonists ''lacked'' the love that was necessary to [[spoiler:stop Victor]], stop Victor, meaning that Ben and Arthur weren't really in love to begin with. This would give the impression that homosexuals form relationships out of sheer interest ([[MoneyDearBoy sharing the rent]], having a regular sexual partner, proving some point about the viability of a homosexual relationship, etc.) and are simply incapable (or even uninterested) in committing to steady, trusting relationships based on love.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* MakesJustAsMuchSenseInContext: Why oh why is it important to see Arthur ''vacuum his carpet'' after Victor visits and admonishes him?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


**

to:

** The tagline for the film is "Only the power of love can defeat a holy soldier on a mission." In the film, however, [[spoiler:the ''opposite'' happens: Said "holy soldier" actually defeats the ostensibly loving protagonists by killing them. Such success as accomplished by Victor would render the tagline false.]] With a dose of [[FridgeLogic Fridge Logic]], however, one could reinterpret the tagline and the events in the film to imply that the two protagonists ''lacked'' the love that was necessary to [[spoiler:stop Victor]], meaning that Ben and Arthur weren't really in love to begin with. This would give the impression that homosexuals form relationships out of sheer interest ([[MoneyDearBoy sharing the rent]], having a regular sexual partner, proving some point about the viability of a homosexual relationship, etc.) and are simply incapable (or even uninterested) in committing to steady, trusting relationships based on love.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** After an argument, Ben punches Arthur, knocking the latter down. In the following scene, Ben tends to Arthur's wounds and gives the following gem: "That'll teach you to not say stupid things." An already bad comment is made worse by the following: Considering how irritating Arthur has been up to this point, we actually ''cheer'' when Ben throws the punch This places the audience in an awkward position of tacitly condoning domestic violence, which sadly presides in many hetero- and homosexual relationships and is ([[ValuesDissonance usually]]) ''condemned''.

to:

** After an argument, Ben punches Arthur, knocking the latter down. In the following scene, Ben tends to Arthur's wounds and gives the following gem: "That'll teach you to not say stupid things." An already bad comment is made worse by the following: Considering how irritating Arthur has been up to this point, we actually ''cheer'' when Ben throws the punch punch. This places the audience in an awkward position of tacitly condoning domestic violence, which sadly presides in many hetero- and homosexual relationships and is ([[ValuesDissonance usually]]) ''condemned''.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* MakesJustAsMuchSenseinContext: Why oh why is it important to see Arthur ''vacuum his carpet'' after Victor visits and admonishes him?

to:

* MakesJustAsMuchSenseinContext: MakesJustAsMuchSenseInContext: Why oh why is it important to see Arthur ''vacuum his carpet'' after Victor visits and admonishes him?



Added: 135

Changed: 132

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* MakesJustAsMuchSenseinContext: Why oh why is it important to see Arthur ''vacuum his carpet'' after Victor visits and admonishes him?



* BigLippedAlligatorMoment: Why oh why is it important to see Arthur ''vacuum his carpet'' after Victor visits and admonishes him?

to:

* BigLippedAlligatorMoment: Why oh why is it important to see Arthur ''vacuum his carpet'' after Victor visits and admonishes him?




to:

**
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Padding: The vacuuming scene after Victor visits Arthur.

to:

* Padding: The vacuuming scene BigLippedAlligatorMoment: Why oh why is it important to see Arthur ''vacuum his carpet'' after Victor visits Arthur.and admonishes him?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** After an argument, Ben punches Arthur, knocking the latter down. In the following scene, Ben tends to Arthur's wounds and gives the following gem: "That'll teach you to not say stupid things." An already bad comment is made worse by the following: Considering how irritating Arthur has been up to this point, we actually ''cheer'' when Ben throws the punch This places the audience in an awkward position of tacitly condoning domestic violence, which is ([[ValuesDissonance usually]]) ''condemned'' yet is sadly present in many hetero- and homosexual relationships.

to:

** After an argument, Ben punches Arthur, knocking the latter down. In the following scene, Ben tends to Arthur's wounds and gives the following gem: "That'll teach you to not say stupid things." An already bad comment is made worse by the following: Considering how irritating Arthur has been up to this point, we actually ''cheer'' when Ben throws the punch This places the audience in an awkward position of tacitly condoning domestic violence, which sadly presides in many hetero- and homosexual relationships and is ([[ValuesDissonance usually]]) ''condemned'' yet is sadly present in many hetero- and homosexual relationships.''condemned''.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** After an argument, Ben punches Arthur, knocking the latter down. In the following scene, Ben tends to Arthur's wounds and gives the following gem: "That'll teach you to not say stupid things." An already bad comment is made worse by the following: Considering how irritating Arthur has been up to this point, we actually ''cheer'' when Ben throws the punch, thus placing us the audience in an awkward position of tacitly condoning domestic violence, an unfortunate behavior in both hetero- and homosexual relationships that must ''stop''.

to:

** After an argument, Ben punches Arthur, knocking the latter down. In the following scene, Ben tends to Arthur's wounds and gives the following gem: "That'll teach you to not say stupid things." An already bad comment is made worse by the following: Considering how irritating Arthur has been up to this point, we actually ''cheer'' when Ben throws the punch, thus placing us punch This places the audience in an awkward position of tacitly condoning domestic violence, an unfortunate behavior which is ([[ValuesDissonance usually]]) ''condemned'' yet is sadly present in both many hetero- and homosexual relationships that must ''stop''.relationships.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** After an argument, Ben punches Arthur, knocking the latter down. In the following scene, Ben tends to Arthur's wounds and gives the following gem: "That'll teach you to not say stupid things." An already bad comment is made worse by the following: Considering how irritating Arthur has been up to this point, we actually ''cheer'' when Ben throws the punch, thus placing us the audience in an awkward position of tacitly condoning domestic violence, an unfortunate behavior in both hetero- and homosexual relationships that must ''stop''.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None




Added DiffLines:

* Padding: The vacuuming scene after Victor visits Arthur.

Changed: 77

Removed: 344

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
not ymmv


* CluelessAesop: Good message. Absolutely ''no'' idea how to deliver it well.

to:

* CluelessAesop: Good message. Absolutely ''no'' idea how to deliver it well.



* MrFanservice: Ben; despite never actually appearing shirtless [[CoversAlwaysLie as the DVD cover implies]], his outfits show off actor Jamie Brett Gabel's body pretty well. Arthur also wears some very revealing outfits and has a rear-nude scene, though whether you'd actually ''want'' to see Sam Mraovich naked is a different matter entirely.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** According to Sam Mraovich, the attorney is supposed to be a lesbian. While no doubt an attempt to give homosexual women some token representation in the film, the fact that she's the only character who shows any real sympathy for Ben and Arthur's situation ends up giving the implication that heterosexual people are fundamentally unable to empathise with homosexuals.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Both films take place in one of the two largest cities of California (Los Angeles in this film, San Francisco in ''The Room'').

to:

** Both films take place in one of the two largest cities of California (Los Angeles in this film, San Francisco in ''The Room'').Room''), with the primary setting in each film being the apartment of its male lead.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

*** Actually, it's more like there's basically three types of people in this world: homosexual, psychotically homophobic, and (very rarely) non-psychotically homophobic.

Added: 130

Changed: 192

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Both films take place in one of the two largest cities of California (Los Angeles in this film, San Francisco in ''The Room'').



** A wedding that ultimately never occurs is an important plot point in both films.

to:

** A wedding that ultimately never occurs is an important plot point in both films.films; in ''The Room'' the wedding never actually happens, while in this film the wedding '''does''' technically happen, but isn't recognised by the state of California.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* InformedAttractiveness: Averted by both Ben and Arthur. Ben actually is a very good-looking guy, and while Sam Mraovich seems to think he's more attractive than he really is, the dialogue is fortunately too busy being Anvilicious to pass comment on Arthur's looks.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* CluelessAesop: Good message. Absolutely ''no'' idea how to deliver it well.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* MrFanservice: Ben. Arthur is ''supposed'' to be this as well, but the reality could hardly be more different.

to:

* MrFanservice: Ben. Ben; despite never actually appearing shirtless [[CoversAlwaysLie as the DVD cover implies]], his outfits show off actor Jamie Brett Gabel's body pretty well. Arthur also wears some very revealing outfits and has a rear-nude scene, though whether you'd actually ''want'' to see Sam Mraovich naked is ''supposed'' to be this as well, but the reality could hardly be more different.a different matter entirely.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* {{Squick}}: Arthur's bathtub baptism, mostly because Victor thinks they should be performed with the recipient "naked in Jesus's eyes."

to:

* {{Squick}}: Arthur's bathtub baptism, mostly because Victor thinks they should be performed with the recipient "naked in Jesus's eyes.""
* UnfortunateImplications: Where to '''begin'''?
** All Christians are apparently violent homophobes who either actively seek to kill homosexuals, or at least are happy to condone it.
** Furthermore, it's seemingly acceptable to kill such people, and even ''burn them alive''. Contrast this with the way that the death of [[spoiler:the lawyer]] is depicted as a horrible thing, even if it doesn't get followed up on very well.
** There are only three female characters in the film; Mildred, who comes across as rather unpleasant, Tammy, who is a complete whackjob, and Ben and Arthur's attorney, who [[spoiler:gets StuffedIntoTheFridge and then is never mentioned again]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* InformedAttractiveness: Averted by both Ben and Arthur. Ben actually is a very good-looking guy, and while Sam Mraovich seems to think he's more attractive than he really is, the dialogue is fortunately too busy being Anvilicious to pass comment on Arthur's looks.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* HilariousInHindsight: Most comparisons between this film and ''TheRoom'' (which was written and apparently shot before this film, but released afterwards) tend to refer to their mutual incompetence and anviliciousness, but the two films have a surprising amount in common:
** Both films have terrible leading actor-writer-directors, who are fond of showing off their bodies much moreso than most audience members are fond of seeing them.
** Both films depict everyone bar the leading guy and one other male character (Ben in this film, and Peter in ''The Room'') as being evil bastards.
** A wedding that ultimately never occurs is an important plot point in both films.
** Each film features a main character obtaining a pistol during a BigLippedAlligatorMoment, and the pistol in question is used to take someone's life at the end of the film.
** Both films have a DownerEnding, with [[spoiler:the saintly protagonist meeting his untimely demise at the hands of a gun]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* ParanoiaFuel: It's kinda impossible to not be paranoid with so many psychotically homophobic fucks.

Added: 137

Changed: 8

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* MrFanservice: Ben. Arthur is ''supposed'' to be this, but the reality could hardly be more different.

to:

* MrFanservice: Ben. Arthur is ''supposed'' to be this, this as well, but the reality could hardly be more different.different.
* {{Squick}}: Arthur's bathtub baptism, mostly because Victor thinks they should be performed with the recipient "naked in Jesus's eyes."

Top