Follow TV Tropes

Following

History YMMV / BackToTheFuturePartIII

Go To

OR

Added: 595

Changed: 15

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** The bar patrons scoff at Doc Brown's ramblings of the future, dismissing cars as "autowhatsits". In actuality, extremely primitive cars did already exist in 1885 which one of them, [[https://static01.nyt.com/images/2007/08/17/automobiles/600-oldest.jpg?year=2007&h=340&w=600&s=f037c51d1deb52512dce49faae1fc8874d220b8532cdcad9ff62241ea8fa98ee&k=ZQJBKqZ0VN the 1884 La Marquis]], is currently the record-holder for the oldest functional car. In fact, thirty years prior in the 1850s, [[https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dudgeon_(steam_automobile_company) a company existed that built self-propelled steam carriages]] that did not catch on with only two being built and only one still surviving. Steam-powered tractors, aka traction engines, were also in existence at the time and were essentially small steam locomotives that weren't bound by rails.

to:

** The In-universe, the bar patrons scoff at Doc Brown's ramblings of the future, dismissing cars as "autowhatsits". In actuality, extremely primitive cars did already exist in 1885 which one of them, [[https://static01.nyt.com/images/2007/08/17/automobiles/600-oldest.jpg?year=2007&h=340&w=600&s=f037c51d1deb52512dce49faae1fc8874d220b8532cdcad9ff62241ea8fa98ee&k=ZQJBKqZ0VN the 1884 La Marquis]], is currently the record-holder for the oldest functional car. In fact, thirty years prior in the 1850s, [[https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dudgeon_(steam_automobile_company) a company existed that built self-propelled steam carriages]] that did not catch on with only two being built and only one still surviving. Steam-powered tractors, aka traction engines, were also in existence at the time and were essentially small steam locomotives that weren't bound by rails.rails.
** The Colt salesman at the festival is [[ArtisticLicenseGunSafety surprisingly cavalier]] about having his finger on the trigger and gesturing with the barrel at people, including Marty. That said, the Colt Peacemaker he is holding is a single action revolver, meaning that as long as the hammer was down, a finger on the trigger wasn't any more dangerous than a finger not on the trigger. This was even fairly true of double-action revolvers of the time (which had been invented in 1851) as they had long, heavy trigger pulls. Also, modern gun safety practices weren't common until much later.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* MoralEventHorizon: The novelization had Buford Tannen, ancestor of Biff, shoots and kills Marshall Strickland in front of the lawman's son.

to:

* MoralEventHorizon: The novelization had Buford Tannen, ancestor of Biff, In a DeletedScene, Bufford shoots and kills Marshall Strickland in front of on the lawman's son.back and leaves him to die on his young son's arms. The creators later decided that it didn't feel right for Bufford to not die after this, and since they couldn't kill him before his descendants were born, they cut the scene and changed the dialogue referencing the murder of Strickland during Bufford's arrest.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** During the climax, Doc Brown has Marty specifically enter October 27, 1985, 11:00 am as the destination time. Given Doc's predilection for trains and remembering certain events down to the moment, and given his desire to destroy the time machine, did he remember the 1985 train schedule and have Marty set the time circuits in such a way that the [=DeLorean=] would be almost immediately destroyed upon their return to the future?

to:

** During the climax, Doc Brown has Marty specifically enter October 27, 1985, 11:00 am as the destination time. Given Doc's predilection for trains and remembering certain events down to the moment, and given his desire to destroy the time machine, did he remember the 1985 train schedule and have Marty set the time circuits in such a way that the [=DeLorean=] would be almost immediately destroyed upon their return to the future? On the other hand, given that Marty was only barely able to get out before the train hit, would he be willing to do something that, if something went wrong, could have gotten himself and Marty killed?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* SoOkayItsAverage: While the movie wasn't critically received, it is still an adequate adventure story and finale to the original trilogy.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** It makes perfect sense that 1955 Doc would think that the chip from Japan would be a piece of junk while Marty remarks that "all the best stuff is made in Japan". Prior to the mid-1970s, Japanese products were notorious for their shoddy quality and were essentially the "made in China" of their day. However, after that point, there was a massive restructuring of the Japanese manufacturing industry which is what caused a sudden leap forward in quality products. Which means that Marty would be too young to remember when Japan didn't make good products.

to:

** It makes perfect sense that 1955 Doc would think that the chip from Japan would be a piece of junk while Marty remarks that "all the best stuff is made in Japan". Prior to the mid-1970s, Japanese products were notorious for their shoddy quality and were essentially the "made in China" of their day. However, after that point, there was a massive restructuring of the Japanese manufacturing industry which is what caused a sudden leap forward in quality products. Which means that Marty would be too young to remember when Japan didn't make good products. Also, having grown up during World War II, Doc would likely harbor some anti-Japanese sentiments.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* SpecialEffectFailure: When Doc and Clara ride off on the Hoverboard, it’s very clear that they are greenscreened onto the background.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** The bar patrons scoff at Doc Brown's ramblings of the future, dismissing cars as "autowhatsits". In actuality, extremely primitive cars did already exist in 1885 which one of them, [[https://static01.nyt.com/images/2007/08/17/automobiles/600-oldest.jpg?year=2007&h=340&w=600&s=f037c51d1deb52512dce49faae1fc8874d220b8532cdcad9ff62241ea8fa98ee&k=ZQJBKqZ0VN the 1884 La Marquis]], is currently the record-holder for the oldest functional car. In fact, thirty years prior in the 1850s, [[https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dudgeon_(steam_automobile_company) a company existed that built self-propelled steam carriages]] that did not catch on with only two being built and only one still surviving. Stesm-powered tractors, aka traction engines, were also in existence at the time and were essentially small steam locomotives that weren't bound by rails.

to:

** The bar patrons scoff at Doc Brown's ramblings of the future, dismissing cars as "autowhatsits". In actuality, extremely primitive cars did already exist in 1885 which one of them, [[https://static01.nyt.com/images/2007/08/17/automobiles/600-oldest.jpg?year=2007&h=340&w=600&s=f037c51d1deb52512dce49faae1fc8874d220b8532cdcad9ff62241ea8fa98ee&k=ZQJBKqZ0VN the 1884 La Marquis]], is currently the record-holder for the oldest functional car. In fact, thirty years prior in the 1850s, [[https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dudgeon_(steam_automobile_company) a company existed that built self-propelled steam carriages]] that did not catch on with only two being built and only one still surviving. Stesm-powered Steam-powered tractors, aka traction engines, were also in existence at the time and were essentially small steam locomotives that weren't bound by rails.


* MoralEventHorizon: This trope caused a scene to be removed from the film. Originally, the movie was to have contained a scene where Buford Tannen, ancestor of Biff, shoots and kills Marshall Strickland in front of the lawman's son. According to screenwriter Bob Gale, the scene was removed because it was felt that after Buford is seen committing such a deed, [[KarmaHoudini it doesn't seem right that he not die]] (and he ''can't'' die, seeing as he will need to live long enough to extend the family line). While one would wonder why the filmmakers simply didn't add a throwaway line implying Buford already had children, they probably felt that unless Buford was actually raising the children and being a constant presence in their lives, they would instead have ended up being put into loving homes, and thus, far less likely to become bullies themselves in adulthood. Plus under that scenario, Marty would likely be the one to kill Buford, and having the film's teenage protagonist kill another person, no matter how evil that person was, would have been too dark for the mostly lighthearted time travel comedy. The scene made it into the novelization of the movie, however.

to:

* MoralEventHorizon: This trope caused a scene to be removed from the film. Originally, the movie was to have contained a scene where The novelization had Buford Tannen, ancestor of Biff, shoots and kills Marshall Strickland in front of the lawman's son. According to screenwriter Bob Gale, the scene was removed because it was felt that after Buford is seen committing such a deed, [[KarmaHoudini it doesn't seem right that he not die]] (and he ''can't'' die, seeing as he will need to live long enough to extend the family line). While one would wonder why the filmmakers simply didn't add a throwaway line implying Buford already had children, they probably felt that unless Buford was actually raising the children and being a constant presence in their lives, they would instead have ended up being put into loving homes, and thus, far less likely to become bullies themselves in adulthood. Plus under that scenario, Marty would likely be the one to kill Buford, and having the film's teenage protagonist kill another person, no matter how evil that person was, would have been too dark for the mostly lighthearted time travel comedy. The scene made it into the novelization of the movie, however.son.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* AccidentalAesop: While the main moral of the movie is "don't pick stupid fights out of wounded pride," the main conflict with Buford Tannen isn't exactly resolved through pacifism and being the bigger man. Buford is a temperamental maniac who kills for petty reasons, and Marty has to fight him to save Doc, which he does through underhanded means. The real messages of the movie seem to be "don't seek out conflict, but be prepared to defend yourself against a maniac" and "be smart in a fight because your opponent won't likely play fair."

to:

* AccidentalAesop: AlternateAesopInterpretation: While the main moral of the movie is "don't pick stupid fights out of wounded pride," pride", the main conflict with Buford Tannen isn't exactly resolved through pacifism and being the bigger man. Buford is a temperamental maniac who kills for petty reasons, and Marty has to fight him to save Doc, which he does through underhanded means. The real messages of the movie seem to be "don't seek out conflict, but be prepared to defend yourself against a maniac" and "be smart in a fight because your opponent won't likely play fair."
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:

Added DiffLines:

* AluminumChristmasTrees:
** Machines to make ice already existed in 1885; Doc's genius is that he was able to build a working prototype using ''podunk Hill Valley parts''.
** The [[HideousHangoverCure "Wake-up Juice"]] is an actual legit drink, the Bull Shot, a variant on the well-known Bloody Mary. The one made in the film is a combination of two versions (Bull Shot, Bull Shot #4) of the drink, consisting of one ounce of club soda, two ounces of beef broth, one ounce of tomato juice, one teaspoon of Worcestershire sauce, quarter of a teaspoon of lemon juice, three dashes of Tabasco-Habanero sauce, and some dried garlic.
** The word "dude" is actually used in a period correct way. In the 1800's it meant something along the lines of "city slicker". This meaning is preserved today in the term "dude ranch". The modern usage of the term didn't start until the 1960's.
** Black bears can be found in dry areas of California (and Utah, Arizona, New Mexico...), not just forested ones. In fact in 1885, even grizzlies were, so Marty should count himself lucky for running into a black bear only.
** The bar patrons scoff at Doc Brown's ramblings of the future, dismissing cars as "autowhatsits". In actuality, extremely primitive cars did already exist in 1885 which one of them, [[https://static01.nyt.com/images/2007/08/17/automobiles/600-oldest.jpg?year=2007&h=340&w=600&s=f037c51d1deb52512dce49faae1fc8874d220b8532cdcad9ff62241ea8fa98ee&k=ZQJBKqZ0VN the 1884 La Marquis]], is currently the record-holder for the oldest functional car. In fact, thirty years prior in the 1850s, [[https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dudgeon_(steam_automobile_company) a company existed that built self-propelled steam carriages]] that did not catch on with only two being built and only one still surviving. Stesm-powered tractors, aka traction engines, were also in existence at the time and were essentially small steam locomotives that weren't bound by rails.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** Marty says Doc's dynamite blast must have woken the dead. One year later, Christopher Lloyd would play Fester in ''Film/TheAddamsFamily'' which ends with the family playing a game called Wake the Dead.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** Marty getting laughed at after asking for ice water in 1885 makes sense: in the late 19th century, technology that could make ice was still incredibly rudimentary. Also, non-alcoholic water supplies were unreliable in the Old West since irrigation was less developed, and water-borne diseases like dysentery lacked medicines and were incredibly lethal.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Clara not believing Doc about being a time traveler makes a good deal of sense: aside from such a thing not being believable, the time travel genre was not yet a serious form of fiction in 1885. It wasn't until Creator/HGWells published ''Literature/TheTimeMachine'' in 1895 that going back and forth through time gained serious literary attention. To Clara, the concept of time travel would sound even more nonsensical than it does today.

to:

** Clara not believing Doc about being a time traveler makes a good deal of sense: aside from such a thing not being believable, the time travel genre was not yet a serious form of fiction in 1885. It wasn't until Creator/HGWells published ''Literature/TheTimeMachine'' in 1895 that going back and forth through time gained serious literary attention. To Clara, a woman born in the 19th century, the concept of time travel would sound even more nonsensical than it does today.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* AccidentalAesop: While the main moral of the movie is "don't pick stupid fights out of wounded pride," the main conflict with Buford Tannen isn't exactly resolved through pacifism and being the bigger man. Buford is a temperamental maniac who kills for petty reasons, and Marty has to fight him to save Doc, which he does through underhanded means. The real messages of the movie seem to be "don't seek out conflict, but be prepared to defend yourself against a maniac" and "be smart in a fight because your opponent won't likely play fair."
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Clara not believing Doc about being a time traveler makes a good deal of sense: aside from such a thing not being believable, the time yravel genre was not yet a serious form of fiction in 1885. It wasn't until Creator/HGWells published ''Literature/TheTimeMachine'' in 1895 that going back and forth through time gained serious literary attention. To Clara, the concept of time travel would sound even more nonsensical than it does today.

to:

** Clara not believing Doc about being a time traveler makes a good deal of sense: aside from such a thing not being believable, the time yravel travel genre was not yet a serious form of fiction in 1885. It wasn't until Creator/HGWells published ''Literature/TheTimeMachine'' in 1895 that going back and forth through time gained serious literary attention. To Clara, the concept of time travel would sound even more nonsensical than it does today.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** Clara not believing Doc about being a time traveler makes a good deal of sense: aside from such a thing not being believable, the time yravel genre was not yet a serious form of fiction in 1885. It wasn't until Creator/HGWells published ''Literature/TheTimeMachine'' in 1895 that going back and forth through time gained serious literary attention. To Clara, the concept of time travel would sound even more nonsensical than it does today.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Moved to Trivia


* AuthorsSavingThrow: The revelation that two of the [=McFly=] ancestors [[IdenticalGrandson looked exactly like Marty]] helps explain why George and Lorraine never thought it suspicious that Marty looked exactly like "Calvin Klein".
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:


* IdiotPlot:
** To a small degree. In the last 3rd of the film, Doc breaks up with Clara the night before he and Marty are supposed to go back to 1985. While it's understandable and explainable in that he'd be more worried about keeping the time-space continuum from falling apart, he forgets that in the time he and Marty come from, Clara had been dead for nearly 100 years. The fact that he ''saved'' her is the change in history they caused, so if he were to introduce Clara to the time machine and have Marty help him explain things to her the night before they go back, while she'd be understandably shocked, she'd most likely come to grips with everything and go back with them if asked since she loves him and loves things like science and Jules Verne (plus quickly accepts things when she realized Doc was telling the truth after hearing how heartbroken he was). There's absolutely ''no'' risk to the timeline for her to go missing and not still exist in the 1880s. The 1885 townsfolk would just assume she went missing and the timeline would mostly remain normal. Hell, she could even take a lot of her things with them if they move fast enough in the night.
** Also, the fact that 1955 Doc didn't pack another gallon of gas just in case Marty needed it for his trip back to the 1880s. While they both thought that it'd be a quick trip and Marty wouldn't rip the fuel line, the fact that 1955 Doc wouldn't be a bit more cautious after seeing how impractical the design of the Plutonium chamber was originally, as well as knowing how rough the terrain was in the desert parts of California 1885 (or even 1955), it might've been more practical of him to pack stuff like that and other things to repair the car if it were to become broken in some way.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* MoralEventHorizon: This trope caused a scene to be removed from the film. Originally, the movie was to have contained a scene where Buford Tannen, ancestor of Biff, shoots and kills Marshall Strickland in front of the lawman's son. According to screenwriter Bob Gale, the scene was removed because it was felt that after Buford is seen committing such a deed, [[KarmaHoudini it doesn't seem right that he not die]] (and he ''can't'' die, seeing as he will need to live long enough to extend the family line). While one would wonder why the filmmakers simply didn't add a throwaway line implying Buford already had children, they probably felt that unless Buford was actually raising the children and being a constant presence in their lives, they would instead have ended up being put into loving homes, and thus, far less likely to become bullies themselves in adulthood. Plus under that scenario, Marty would likely be the one to kill Buford, and having the film's teenage protagonist kill another person, no matter how evil, would have been too dark for the mostly lighthearted time travel comedy. The scene made it into the novelization of the movie, however.

to:

* MoralEventHorizon: This trope caused a scene to be removed from the film. Originally, the movie was to have contained a scene where Buford Tannen, ancestor of Biff, shoots and kills Marshall Strickland in front of the lawman's son. According to screenwriter Bob Gale, the scene was removed because it was felt that after Buford is seen committing such a deed, [[KarmaHoudini it doesn't seem right that he not die]] (and he ''can't'' die, seeing as he will need to live long enough to extend the family line). While one would wonder why the filmmakers simply didn't add a throwaway line implying Buford already had children, they probably felt that unless Buford was actually raising the children and being a constant presence in their lives, they would instead have ended up being put into loving homes, and thus, far less likely to become bullies themselves in adulthood. Plus under that scenario, Marty would likely be the one to kill Buford, and having the film's teenage protagonist kill another person, no matter how evil, evil that person was, would have been too dark for the mostly lighthearted time travel comedy. The scene made it into the novelization of the movie, however.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** To a small degree. In the last 3rd of the film, Doc breaks up with Clara the night before he and Marty are supposed to go back to 1985. While it's understandable and explainable in that he'd be more worried about keeping the time-space continuum from falling apart, he forgets that in the time he and Marty come from, Clara had been dead for nearly 100 years. The fact that he ''saved'' her is the change in history they caused, so if he were to introduce Clara to the time machine and have Marty help him explain things to her the night before they go back, while she'd be understandably shocked, she'd most likely come to grips with everything and go back with them if asked since she loves him and loves things like science and Jules Verne. There's absolutely ''no'' risk to the timeline for her to go missing and not still exist in the 1880s. The 1885 townsfolk would just assume she went missing and the timeline would mostly remain normal. Hell, she could even take a lot of her things with them if they move fast enough in the night.

to:

** To a small degree. In the last 3rd of the film, Doc breaks up with Clara the night before he and Marty are supposed to go back to 1985. While it's understandable and explainable in that he'd be more worried about keeping the time-space continuum from falling apart, he forgets that in the time he and Marty come from, Clara had been dead for nearly 100 years. The fact that he ''saved'' her is the change in history they caused, so if he were to introduce Clara to the time machine and have Marty help him explain things to her the night before they go back, while she'd be understandably shocked, she'd most likely come to grips with everything and go back with them if asked since she loves him and loves things like science and Jules Verne.Verne (plus quickly accepts things when she realized Doc was telling the truth after hearing how heartbroken he was). There's absolutely ''no'' risk to the timeline for her to go missing and not still exist in the 1880s. The 1885 townsfolk would just assume she went missing and the timeline would mostly remain normal. Hell, she could even take a lot of her things with them if they move fast enough in the night.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** To a small degree. In the last 3rd of the film, Doc breaks up with Clara the night before he and Marty are supposed to go back to 1985. While it's understandable and explainable in that he'd be more worried about keeping the time-space continuum from falling apart, he forgets that int he time he and Marty come from, Clara had been dead for nearly 100 years. The fact that he ''saved'' her is the change in history they caused, so if he were to introduce Clara to the time machine and have Marty help him explain things to her the night before they go back, while she'd be understandably shocked, she'd most likely come to grips with everything and go back with them if asked since she loves him and loves things like science and Jules Verne. There's absolutely ''no'' risk to the timeline for her to go missing and not still exist in the 1880s. The 1885 townsfolk would just assume she went missing and the timeline would mostly remain normal. Hell, she could even take a lot of her things with them if they move fast enough in the night.

to:

** To a small degree. In the last 3rd of the film, Doc breaks up with Clara the night before he and Marty are supposed to go back to 1985. While it's understandable and explainable in that he'd be more worried about keeping the time-space continuum from falling apart, he forgets that int he in the time he and Marty come from, Clara had been dead for nearly 100 years. The fact that he ''saved'' her is the change in history they caused, so if he were to introduce Clara to the time machine and have Marty help him explain things to her the night before they go back, while she'd be understandably shocked, she'd most likely come to grips with everything and go back with them if asked since she loves him and loves things like science and Jules Verne. There's absolutely ''no'' risk to the timeline for her to go missing and not still exist in the 1880s. The 1885 townsfolk would just assume she went missing and the timeline would mostly remain normal. Hell, she could even take a lot of her things with them if they move fast enough in the night.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* IdiotPlot:
** To a small degree. In the last 3rd of the film, Doc breaks up with Clara the night before he and Marty are supposed to go back to 1985. While it's understandable and explainable in that he'd be more worried about keeping the time-space continuum from falling apart, he forgets that int he time he and Marty come from, Clara had been dead for nearly 100 years. The fact that he ''saved'' her is the change in history they caused, so if he were to introduce Clara to the time machine and have Marty help him explain things to her the night before they go back, while she'd be understandably shocked, she'd most likely come to grips with everything and go back with them if asked since she loves him and loves things like science and Jules Verne. There's absolutely ''no'' risk to the timeline for her to go missing and not still exist in the 1880s. The 1885 townsfolk would just assume she went missing and the timeline would mostly remain normal. Hell, she could even take a lot of her things with them if they move fast enough in the night.
** Also, the fact that 1955 Doc didn't pack another gallon of gas just in case Marty needed it for his trip back to the 1880s. While they both thought that it'd be a quick trip and Marty wouldn't rip the fuel line, the fact that 1955 Doc wouldn't be a bit more cautious after seeing how impractical the design of the Plutonium chamber was originally, as well as knowing how rough the terrain was in the desert parts of California 1885 (or even 1955), it might've been more practical of him to pack stuff like that and other things to repair the car if it were to become broken in some way.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
According to Wikipedia


* AwardSnub: The only film in the series not to be nominated at the UsefulNotes/{{Academy Award}}s. It was one of the shortlisted films for Best Visual Effects along with ''Film/DickTracy'', ''Film/{{Ghost}}'' and ''Film/TotalRecall'', but due to Oscar voting rules at the time, only ''Total Recall'' received enough votes to advance to the final nomination, so there were no official nominees in that category and ''Total Recall'' received a special achievement award.

to:

* AwardSnub: The only film in the series not to be nominated at the UsefulNotes/{{Academy Award}}s. It was one of the shortlisted films for Best Visual Effects along with ''Film/DickTracy'', ''Film/{{Ghost}}'' ''Film/Ghost1990'' and ''Film/TotalRecall'', but due to Oscar voting rules at the time, only ''Total Recall'' received enough votes to advance to the final nomination, so there were no official nominees in that category and ''Total Recall'' received a special achievement award.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* TearDryer: Marty returns to 1985, but the [=DeLorean=] is destroyed and Doc is stuck in 1885. Marty and Jennifer return to the wreckage of the time machine and then Doc appears in a train time machine with Clara and his sons Jules and Verne.

to:

* TearDryer: Marty returns to 1985, but the [=DeLorean=] is destroyed and Doc is stuck in 1885. Marty and Jennifer return to the wreckage of the time machine and then Doc appears in a train time machine made from a steam train with Clara and his sons Jules and Verne.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Fits better under Unusually Un Interesting Sight, moved accordingly


** The Native Americans that Marty almost runs into seem to have almost zero reaction to an automobile (which hasn’t even been invented yet) appearing out of nowhere in front of them.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** The Native Americans that Marty almost runs into seem to have almost zero reaction to an automobile (which hasn’t even been invented yet) appearing out of nowhere in front of them.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* TearDryer: Marty returns to 1985, but the [=DeLorean=] is destroyed and Doc is stuck in 1885. Marty and Jennifer return to the wreckage of the time machine and then Doc appears in a train time machine with Clara and his sons Jules and Verne.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** The moment when Doc explains that his family came from Germany and changed their original surname, Von Braun, during UsefulNotes/WorldWarI. For one, it's a homage to the space architect Wernher von Braun (almost as if the two were distantly related...). Secondly, during and after [=WW1=] German Americans became increasingly ostracized because of Germany being an enemy to the USA. They were pressured into integrating and forfeiting their culture, so that many opted to anglicize their surname.

to:

** The moment when Doc explains that his family came from Germany and his father changed their the original surname, Von Braun, during UsefulNotes/WorldWarI. For one, it's a homage to the space architect Wernher von Braun (almost as if the two were distantly related...there was some distant relationship...). Secondly, during and after [=WW1=] German Americans became increasingly ostracized because of due to Germany being an enemy to the USA. They were pressured into integrating and forfeiting their culture, so that many opted to anglicize their surname.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* HarsherInHindsight: The [[Film/BackToTheFuture first film]] had Doc and Marty use lightning striking Hill Valley's clocktower to enable the [=DeLorean=] and Marty to get back to 1985; this lightning stopped the clocktower from functioning at all. The town used for the 1885 Hill Valley was destroyed by lightning in 1996.

to:

* HarsherInHindsight: The [[Film/BackToTheFuture first film]] had Doc and Marty use lightning striking Hill Valley's clocktower to enable the [=DeLorean=] and Marty to get back to 1985; this lightning stopped damaged the clocktower from clock, causing it to stop functioning at all.completely. The town used for the 1885 Hill Valley was destroyed by lightning in 1996.

Top