Follow TV Tropes

Following

History YMMV / AWrinkleInTime

Go To

OR

Changed: 19

Removed: 364



* CoversAlwaysLie: The DVD cover features the three main characters on a winged ''horse'' above a medieval-looking castle, neither of which remotely resembles anything that appears in the film. TheyJustDidntCare.

to:

* CoversAlwaysLie: The DVD cover features the three main characters on a winged ''horse'' above a medieval-looking castle, neither of which remotely resembles anything that appears in the film. TheyJustDidntCare.



* TheyJustDidntCare: TheMovie.
-->'''[[http://www.newsweek.com/2004/05/06/i-dare-you.html Newsweek interviewer]]:''' So you've seen the movie?
-->'''Madeleine L'Engle:''' I've glimpsed it.
-->'''Interviewer:''' And did it meet expectations?
-->'''L'Engle:''' Oh, yes. I expected it to be bad, and it is.
** To be fair, Kyle Secor does make a good Man With the Red Eyes.



Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* NeverTrustATrailer: Much of what you see in the trailer is not what's in the movie, with some shots even ripped from other films!

Added: 727

Changed: 130

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* HilariousInHindsight: Most modern readers will wonder if working with the Tesseract makes Meg's father [[Film/TheAvengers2012 Dr. Erik Selvig or Loki]].

to:

* HilariousInHindsight: HilariousInHindsight:
**
Most modern readers will wonder if working with the Tesseract makes Meg's father [[Film/TheAvengers2012 Dr. Erik Selvig or Loki]].


Added DiffLines:

* TearJerker: Meg has just recovered from her rough experience tessering through the Black Thing, and has been told that she has to go back. She briefly loses it, but quickly realizes that it has to be her -- nobody else can save Charles Wallace. She starts saying her goodbyes and gets to her father:
-->'''Meg''': I'm sorry.
-->'''Mr. Murry''': Sorry for what, [[AffectionateNickname Megatron]]?
-->'''Meg''': I tried to pretend it was your fault...I wanted it to be easy, I wanted you to do it all for me --
-->'''Mr. Murry''': But I ''wanted'' to do it for you. That's what every parent wants.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* HilariousInHindsight: Most modern readers will wonder if working with the Tesseract makes Meg's father [[Film/TheAvengers Dr. Erik Selvig or Loki]].

to:

* HilariousInHindsight: Most modern readers will wonder if working with the Tesseract makes Meg's father [[Film/TheAvengers [[Film/TheAvengers2012 Dr. Erik Selvig or Loki]].

Changed: 168

Removed: 333

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Yeah, no. If atheists can write convincing religious characters, Christian authors can write literature that isn\'t explicitly \"Christian literature.\" And the next example makes the point utterly moot anyway.


* GeniusBonus: Camazotz is [[ShoutOut also the name of]] [[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Camazotz a particularly terrifying Mayan bat god]].
** Not just that Camazotz is named for a Mayan bat god - the fact that L'Engle (writing what amounts to Christian literature) named the world after a ''pagan'' god.
** Ixchel, the planet of the angelic, sightless [[StarfishAliens Beasts]], is named, appropriately enough, for a Mayan jaguar god of medicine and [[{{Irony}} rainbows]].

to:

* GeniusBonus: Camazotz is [[ShoutOut also the name of]] [[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Camazotz a particularly terrifying Mayan bat god]].
** Not just that Camazotz is named for a Mayan bat god - the fact that L'Engle (writing what amounts to Christian literature) named the world after a ''pagan'' god.
**
god]]. Ixchel, the planet of the angelic, sightless [[StarfishAliens Beasts]], is named, appropriately enough, for a Mayan jaguar god of medicine and [[{{Irony}} rainbows]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Ixchel, the planet of the angelic, sightless [[StarfishAliens Beasts]], is named, appropriately enough, for a Mayan jaguar god of medicine.

to:

** Ixchel, the planet of the angelic, sightless [[StarfishAliens Beasts]], is named, appropriately enough, for a Mayan jaguar god of medicine.medicine and [[{{Irony}} rainbows]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** Ixchel, the planet of the angelic, sightless [[StarfishAliens Beasts]], is named, appropriately enough, for a Mayan jaguar god of medicine.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** Not just that Camazotz is named for a Mayan bat god - the fact that L'Engle (writing what amounts to Christian literature) named the world after a ''pagan'' god.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** Meg's father calls her [[Franchise/{{Transformers}} Megatron]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
The Mrs W\'s don\'t use a period at the end of their Mrs


* FridgeLogic: ''Wrinkle'' comes under scrutiny when the characters of ''Literature/WhenYouReachMe'' discuss it. Specifically, Miranda and Marcus discuss L'engle's portrayal of time travel. The three Mrs. W's promise Meg and the boys that they should be back "five minutes before you left." But as Marcus points out, if this is true then Meg should have seen herself returning, because Meg&co. landed in the garden, which in plain sight from wall, where they left. Marcus is arguing a StableTimeLoop is in effect, while Miranda (very defensive of her favorite author) maintains that the future hadn't happened yet, so of course they wouldn't be seen.
** FridgeBrilliance: There is a simpler explanation, which no one in ''When You Reach Me'' notices: Mrs. Whatsit says they'll be back five minutes before they left, unless "something goes terribly wrong." And something does indeed go terribly wrong.

to:

* FridgeLogic: ''Wrinkle'' comes under scrutiny when the characters of ''Literature/WhenYouReachMe'' discuss it. Specifically, Miranda and Marcus discuss L'engle's portrayal of time travel. The three Mrs. Mrs W's promise Meg and the boys that they should be back "five minutes before you left." But as Marcus points out, if this is true then Meg should have seen herself returning, because Meg&co. landed in the garden, which in plain sight from wall, where they left. Marcus is arguing a StableTimeLoop is in effect, while Miranda (very defensive of her favorite author) maintains that the future hadn't happened yet, so of course they wouldn't be seen.
** FridgeBrilliance: There is a simpler explanation, which no one in ''When You Reach Me'' notices: Mrs. Mrs Whatsit says they'll be back five minutes before they left, unless "something goes terribly wrong." And something does indeed go terribly wrong.

Changed: 219

Removed: 224

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* AreYouSureThisIsForKids: Scientists' reaction at the time of this book's first printing. They couldn't understand how something as advanced and theoretical as quantum physics and tesseracts could be accessible to children.




to:

* ViewersAreGeniuses: Scientists' reaction at the time of this book's first printing. They couldn't understand how something as advanced and theoretical as quantum physics and tesseracts could be accessible to children.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* FridgeLogic: ''Wrinkle'' comes under scrutiny when the characters of ''Literature/WhenYouReachMe'' discuss it. Specifically, Miranda and Marcus discuss L'engle's portrayal of tiem travel. The three Mrs. W's promise Meg and the boys that they should be back "five minutes before you left." But as Marcus points out, if this is true then Meg should have seen herself returning, because Meg&co. landed in the garden, which in plain sight from wall, where they left. Marcus is arguing a StableTimeLoop is in effect, while Miranda (very defensive of her favorite author) maintains that the future hadn't happened yet, so of course they wouldn't be seen.

to:

* FridgeLogic: ''Wrinkle'' comes under scrutiny when the characters of ''Literature/WhenYouReachMe'' discuss it. Specifically, Miranda and Marcus discuss L'engle's portrayal of tiem time travel. The three Mrs. W's promise Meg and the boys that they should be back "five minutes before you left." But as Marcus points out, if this is true then Meg should have seen herself returning, because Meg&co. landed in the garden, which in plain sight from wall, where they left. Marcus is arguing a StableTimeLoop is in effect, while Miranda (very defensive of her favorite author) maintains that the future hadn't happened yet, so of course they wouldn't be seen.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* FridgeLogic: ''Wrinkle'' comes under scrutiny when the characters of ''Literature/WhenYouReachMe'' discuss it. Specifically, the time travel in it. The three Mrs. W's promise Meg and the boys that they should be back "five minutes before you left." But as Marcus points out, if this is true then Meg should have seen herself returning, because Meg&co. landed in the garden, which in plain sight from wall, where they left. Marcus is arguing a StableTimeLoop is in effect, while Miranda (very defensive of her favorite author) maintains that the future hadn't happened yet, so of course they wouldn't be seen.
** FridgeBrilliance: There is a simpler explanation, which no one in ''Reach'' notices: Mrs. Whatsit says they'll be back five minutes before they left, unless "something goes terribly wrong." And something does indeed go terribly wrong.

to:

* FridgeLogic: ''Wrinkle'' comes under scrutiny when the characters of ''Literature/WhenYouReachMe'' discuss it. Specifically, the time travel in it.Miranda and Marcus discuss L'engle's portrayal of tiem travel. The three Mrs. W's promise Meg and the boys that they should be back "five minutes before you left." But as Marcus points out, if this is true then Meg should have seen herself returning, because Meg&co. landed in the garden, which in plain sight from wall, where they left. Marcus is arguing a StableTimeLoop is in effect, while Miranda (very defensive of her favorite author) maintains that the future hadn't happened yet, so of course they wouldn't be seen.
** FridgeBrilliance: There is a simpler explanation, which no one in ''Reach'' ''When You Reach Me'' notices: Mrs. Whatsit says they'll be back five minutes before they left, unless "something goes terribly wrong." And something does indeed go terribly wrong.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* FridgeLogic: ''Wrinkle'' comes under scrutiny when the characters of ''Literature/WhenYouReachMe'' discuss it. Specifically, the time travel in it. The three Mrs. W's promise Meg and the boys that they should be back "five minutes before you left." But as Marcus points out, if this is true then Meg should have seen herself returning, because Meg&co. landed in the garden, which in plain sight from wall, where they left. Marcus is arguing a StableTimeLoop is in effect, while Miranda (very defensive of her favorite author) maintains that the future hadn't happened yet, so of course they wouldn't be seen.
** FridgeBrilliance: There is a simpler explanation, which no one in ''Reach'' notices: Mrs. Whatsit says they'll be back five minutes before they left, unless "something goes terribly wrong." And something does indeed go terribly wrong.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* AreYouSureThisIsForKids: Scientists' reaction at the time of this book's first printing. They couldn't understand how something as advanced and theoretical as quantam physics and tesseracts could be accessible to children.

to:

* AreYouSureThisIsForKids: Scientists' reaction at the time of this book's first printing. They couldn't understand how something as advanced and theoretical as quantam quantum physics and tesseracts could be accessible to children.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* AreYouSureThisisForKids: Scientists' reaction at the time of this book's first printing. They couldn't understand how something as advanced and theoretical as quantam physics and tesseracts could be accessible to children.

to:

* AreYouSureThisisForKids: AreYouSureThisIsForKids: Scientists' reaction at the time of this book's first printing. They couldn't understand how something as advanced and theoretical as quantam physics and tesseracts could be accessible to children.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

!!The Book:
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* HilariousInHindsight: Most modern readers will wonder if working with the Tesseract makes Meg's father [[Film/TheAvengers Dr. Erik Selvig or Loki]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Adding Are You Sure This is For Kids

Added DiffLines:

* AreYouSureThisisForKids: Scientists' reaction at the time of this book's first printing. They couldn't understand how something as advanced and theoretical as quantam physics and tesseracts could be accessible to children.

Removed: 1533

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
These aren\'t YMMV. Moving.


* KarmaHoudini: IT gets away scot-free. Not so in the movie.
** Then again, the TV movie has [[spoiler:Meg free an ''entire planet'' from brain-washing by making one awkward, rambling speech.]] Talk about an AntiClimax.
** You sure IT's still okay? The book never specifies what happened to IT.
** Later books imply that IT and the other "forces of evil" out there have not ''escaped'' their karma per se; they will get what's coming to them as soon as one of the "good guys" gets around to gathering enough strength to fight them off. Which makes the entire climax of the book into something of a HopelessBossFight.
** It is intended to be rather real world, as if he was captured by a Earth nation run by a dictator, the battle between good and evil continues on after the story. In RealLife dictators sometimes get away and sometimes don't.
** In general, the plot of escape from the evil land or rescue someone from the evil land leaves the evil land and its evil rulers intact.
** The book used the phrase "IT's fatal mistake" to refer to the taunt that inspired Meg's winning strategy, and the text seemed to describe Meg and Charles Wallace being whisked out of there just ahead of an explosion. I don't think IT survived. No telling what that means for the people of Camazotz.
*** I always read "IT's fatal mistake" as a metaphor, indicating that IT clued Meg into the tactic. The text seemed to vividly indicate anger and the effects as Meg and Charles were tessered out through the Black Thing.
* LargeHam: IT in TheFilmOfTheBook.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* LargeHam: IT in TheFilmOfTheBook.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None



to:

** To be fair, Kyle Secor does make a good Man With the Red Eyes.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* AlternateCharacterInterpretation: A commentator on Mari Ness' [[http://www.tor.com/blogs/2011/12/there-is-such-a-thing-as-a-tesseract-a-wrinkle-in-time Madeleine L'Engle reread]] for ''Wrinkle'' argues that Meg's writing shows "far better portrayal of a profoundly gifted child than Charles Wallace was."

to:

* AlternateCharacterInterpretation: A commentator on Mari Ness' [[http://www.tor.com/blogs/2011/12/there-is-such-a-thing-as-a-tesseract-a-wrinkle-in-time Madeleine L'Engle reread]] for ''Wrinkle'' argues that Meg's writing character shows a "far better portrayal of a profoundly gifted child than Charles Wallace was."
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* AlternateCharacterInterpretation: A commentator on Mari Ness' [[http://www.tor.com/blogs/2011/12/there-is-such-a-thing-as-a-tesseract-a-wrinkle-in-time Madeleine L'Engle reread]] for ''Wrinkle'' argues that Meg's writing shows "far better portrayal of a profoundly gifted child than Charles Wallace was."
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* CoversAlwaysLie: The DVD cover features the three main characters on a winged ''horse'' above a medieval-looking castle, neither of which remotely resembles anything that appears in the film. TheyJustDidntCare.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

*** I always read "IT's fatal mistake" as a metaphor, indicating that IT clued Meg into the tactic. The text seemed to vividly indicate anger and the effects as Meg and Charles were tessered out through the Black Thing.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** The book used the phrase "IT's fatal mistake" to refer to the taunt that inspired Meg's winning strategy, and the text seemed to describe Meg and Charles Wallace being whisked out of there just ahead of an explosion. I don't think IT survived. No telling what that means for the people of Camazotz.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* FirstInstallmentWins: Ever heard of ''A Wind in the Door'', ''A Swiftly Tilting Planet'', or ''Many Waters''? None of them got Newbery medals.
** ''A Swiftly Tilting Planet'' did win the American Book Award in 1980.
* GeniusBonus: Camazotz is [[ShoutOut also the name of]] [[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Camazotz a particularly terrifying Mayan bat god]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* BigLippedAlligatorMoment: The stop on/in the two-dimensional planet.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Trope was redefined for In Universe use only.


* AdaptationDecay: The less said about [[TheFilmOfTheBook the 2003 made for TV adaptation]], the better.
** To be fair, the book, with its [[StarfishAlien Starfish Aliens]], [[JourneyToTheCenterOfTheMind Journeys To The Center Of The Mind]] as major plot points, and [[AFormYouAreComfortableWith Mrs. Which in general]], is basically unfilmable.
** Still, difficulty in filming certain scenes doesn't explain the rather odd changes to character's personalities and motivations. Making Mrs. Which into a raging xenophobe, turning Charles Wallace from a boy desperate to save his father to a boy easily distracted by shiny alien novelties...one could go on and on.

Top