History WebVideo / Uniquenameosaurus

* KickTheDog: He took the infamous literal example from ''Manga/ElfenLied'' and looped it over the music to ''VideoGame/SuperMarioBros''

* LaserGuidedKarma: A lot of these moments happened throughout the Game of Thrones rewrite, though the two major ones are [[spoiler:Bronn being killed by Brienne after he tried to call her out on killing him dishonorably]] and [[spoiler:Petyr being DevouredByTheHorde that, as Varys points out, is now mostly comprised of corpses made by the war he caused.]]

** Thanos has a completely reworked story for the rewrite of ''Film/AvengersEndgame'', though the major shift is his new motivation is what he says once he finds out about the multiverse. "The work wasn't done."

[[AwesomeMcCoolname Uniquenameosaurus]] is a Youtuber who primarily makes comedic anime analysis videos but occasionally covers other media or broader aspects of internet culture. His humor combines an [[RefugeInAudacity extreme willingness to violate social taboos]] with a [[NiceGuy sweetness]] that his fans find endearing, and his work tends to be packed with [[BreakingTheFourthWall meta-jokes]] and [[BaitAndSwitch subversive moments]]. He also has a tendency to dismiss subjectivity which is atypical of Youtube's anime community.

** The one spell that [[Franchise/HarryPotter Voldemort]] uses that solidifies him as a worse evil than Umbridge? "[[LaserGuidedKarma Obliviate]].", on Hermoine.

** Thanos has a completely reworked story for the rewrite of ''Film/AvengersEndgame'', though the major shift is his new motivation is what he says once he finds out about the multiverse. "The work wasn't done."
**

* TookALevelInBadass: Made a decision to pursue his dreams and start taking risks when he came back from hiatus. So far it's paid off.

* MoodWhiplash: Will often put [[DeadpanSnarker lighthearted quips]], [[BlackComedy pitch black humor]], and [[{{Tearjerker}} wistful sentimentality]] in the same video.

* {{Hypocrite}}: Defied, he makes a point of using legitimate streaming services to prevent accusations that his views on piracy are just an excuse to avoid paying for content.

* LargeHam: He has his moments.

* RefugeInAudacity: There doesn't seem to be anything he won't laugh at.
** UpToEleven: Reacting to [[MonsterClown Hisoka's]] apparent pedophilia as if it's an endearing quirk of his character.

* SarcasmMode: Frequently.
* TaremeEyes: Shown to have these during his face-reveal.

After this, his posting speed increased dramatically and he produced a run of successful videos, the most notable being [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uCYGWeSh378&t=101s "Why You SHOULD Pirate Anime"]], a polemic against the conventional wisdom which was controversial enough to receive [[ColbertBump response videos from community big shots]] like ''WebVideo/{{Digibro}}'' and ''WebVideo/MothersBasement''.

* KickTheDog: He took the infamous literal example from ''Anime/ElfenLied'' and looped it over the music to ''VideoGame/SuperMarioBros''

-->"Now I don't blame you for missing this, as it's an obscure video with 200 views. In fact you couldn't have seen it because it came out after your video. Some might say that the actual issue is with the confidence that you just declare 'Oh it just turned out to be an attempt to improve encoding', as if there wasn't even the ''slightest'' chance in the world that this could be wrong, when in fact the thing you're assumably sourcing here (since you don't give one) is Crunchyroll's press release ''after the controversy''. [[SarcasmMode Real reliable]], ''the word of the company in question!'' But you just claim it as fact when you should have said ''allegedly''. The thing is though, you ''always'' fucking do this. You're always so sure of yourself about ''everything''. Like, even I had my doubts about bringing up this video as evidence since it's so jargony and, hell, maybe I missed something between the lines - I know I'm not infalliable, I know I can be wrong. But you are so unbelievably ''arrogant'' that the thought that you could be wrong hasn't even crossed your mind. you're so happy to just assert that you're right and just dismiss anyone as a child or entitled or some other bullshit emotive argument that cannot be grounded. I'm sorry, I debated being civil like usual [[DeadpanSnarker but I'm naturally reckless at heart]] so I'm going to cut loose for once. The thing is none of that truly bothers me, but that arrogance is what lead you to do the thing that ''genuinely'' pissed me off. I've seen loads of detractors of mine in the past year, none of them have bothered me - even when throwing out the nastiest insults - I don't care, I just zone out. It's doesn't hurt my argument. When Crunchyroll employee Miles posted [a tweet calling me the 'dumbest anime youtuber'] I thought it was ''[[ActuallyPrettyFunny funny]]''. Literally the night of the piracy video I printed it out and stuck it next to my desk. People getting angry is, like, part of the process. I just want discourse and debate to continue. But you, ''you'', before you posted this video admitted on Twitter that you wanted to make a response but didn't want to 'give it any exposure', and when you came to actually make the video you didn't tell anyone where you where getting the arguments from. And on Twitter, when someone asked you if you were responding to me, you just said 'Not giving direct promotion, but it does address the videos arguments'. Oh, oh but wait a second, oh I'm sorry, you ''did'' direct viewers to the original argument. ''[[DeadpanSnarker In the fucking tags!]]'' But that's not the point. Look, look, you are ''not'' infalliable. I don't care how bad you think someone's idea is, there is always the ''chance'' you could be strawmanning or wrong or any number of other things. And to intentionally minimize how much of your audience gets to see - and let me put emphasis on this - ''both sides of the argument'' is downright disgusting. And I don't need you for views, I already gained a great understanding of the [Youtube algorithms] by the time I made that video. I already knew that eventually it would get a lot, and I knew yours would fail to get anywhere close because the majority of people who watched your video probably saw mine at some stage. So I don't think there was much harm done. But if 'You Should Pirate Anime' wasn't as successful as it was, people would - by your ''intention'' - be experiencing my argument ''from you alone'', with ''none of the evidence'' and ''none of the logic''. It was the principle that mattered. If I was anyone else, a video with a 98% approval rating well above my peers, that clearly brought something new and interesting and convincing to the table would have died without anyone seeing it and ''you'' would've gladly sat there and let it happen. No, no, you would've ''celebrated'' it. You're ''poison'' to the open market place of ideas."

->"Now I don't blame you for missing this, as it's an obscure video with 200 views. In fact you couldn't have seen it because it came out after your video. Some might say that the actual issue is with the confidence that you just declare 'Oh it just turned out to be an attempt to improve encoding', as if there wasn't even the ''slightest'' chance in the world that this could be wrong, when in fact the thing you're assumably sourcing here (since you don't give one) is Crunchyroll's press release ''after the controversy''. [[SarcasmMode Real reliable]], ''the word of the company in question!'' But you just claim it as fact when you should have said ''allegedly''. The thing is though, you ''always'' fucking do this. You're always so sure of yourself about ''everything''. Like, even I had my doubts about bringing up this video as evidence since it's so jargony and, hell, maybe I missed something between the lines - I know I'm not infalliable, I know I can be wrong. But you are so unbelievably ''arrogant'' that the thought that you could be wrong hasn't even crossed your mind. you're so happy to just assert that you're right and just dismiss anyone as a child or entitled or some other bullshit emotive argument that cannot be grounded. I'm sorry, I debated being civil like usual [[DeadpanSnarker but I'm naturally reckless at heart]] so I'm going to cut loose for once. The thing is none of that truly bothers me, but that arrogance is what lead you to do the thing that ''genuinely'' pissed me off. I've seen loads of detractors of mine in the past year, none of them have bothered me - even when throwing out the nastiest insults - I don't care, I just zone out. It's doesn't hurt my argument. When Crunchyroll employee Miles posted [a tweet calling me the 'dumbest anime youtuber'] I thought it was ''[[ActuallyPrettyFunny funny]]''. Literally the night of the piracy video I printed it out and stuck it next to my desk. People getting angry is, like, part of the process. I just want discourse and debate to continue. But you, ''you'', before you posted this video admitted on Twitter that you wanted to make a response but didn't want to 'give it any exposure', and when you came to actually make the video you didn't tell anyone where you where getting the arguments from. And on Twitter, when someone asked you if you were responding to me, you just said 'Not giving direct promotion, but it does address the videos arguments'. Oh, oh but wait a second, oh I'm sorry, you ''did'' direct viewers to the original argument. ''[[DeadpanSnarker In the fucking tags!]]'' But that's not the point. Look, look, you are ''not'' infalliable. I don't care how bad you think someone's idea is, there is always the ''chance'' you could be strawmanning or wrong or any number of other things. And to intentionally minimize how much of your audience gets to see - and let me put emphasis on this - ''both sides of the argument'' is downright disgusting. And I don't need you for views, I already gained a great understanding of the [Youtube algorithms] by the time I made that video. I already knew that eventually it would get a lot, and I knew yours would fail to get anywhere close because the majority of people who watched your video probably saw mine at some stage. So I don't think there was much harm done. But if 'You Should Pirate Anime' wasn't as successful as it was, people would - by your ''intention'' - be experiencing my argument ''from you alone'', with ''none of the evidence'' and ''none of the logic''. It was the principle that mattered. If I was anyone else, a video with a 98% approval rating well above my peers, that clearly brought something new and interesting and convincing to the table would have died without anyone seeing it and ''you'' would've gladly sat there and let it happen. No, no, you would've ''celebrated'' it. You're ''poison'' to the open market place of ideas."

->"Now I don't blame you for missing this, as it's an obscure video with 200 views. In fact you couldn't have seen it because it came out after your video. Some might say that the actual issue is with the confidence that you just declare 'Oh it just turned out to be an attempt to improve encoding', as if there wasn't even the ''slightest'' chance in the world that this could be wrong, when in fact the thing you're assumably sourcing here (since you don't give one) is Crunchyroll's press release ''after the controversy''. [[SarcasmMode Real reliable]], ''the word of the company in question!'' But you just claim it as fact when you should have said ''allegedly''. The thing is though, you ''always'' fucking do this. You're always so sure of yourself about ''everything''. Like, even I had my doubts about bringing up this video as evidence since it's so jargony and, hell, maybe I missed something between the lines - I know I'm not infalliable, I know I can be wrong. But you are so unbelievably ''arrogant'' that the thought that you could be wrong hasn't even crossed your mind. you're so happy to just assert that you're right and just dismiss anyone as a child or entitled or some other bullshit emotive argument that cannot be grounded. I'm sorry, I debated being civil like usual [[DeadpanSnarker but I'm naturally reckless at heart]] so I'm going to cut loose for once. The thing is none of that truly bothers me, but that arrogance is what lead you to do the thing that ''genuinely'' pissed me off. I've seen loads of detractors of mine in the past year, none of them have bothered me - even when throwing out the nastiest insults - I don't care, I just zone out. It's doesn't hurt my argument. When Crunchyroll employee Miles posted [a tweet calling me the 'dumbest anime youtuber'] I thought it was ''[[ActuallyPrettyFunny funny]]''. Literally the night of the piracy video I printed it out and stuck it next to my desk. People getting angry is, like, part of the process. I just want discourse and debate to continue. But you, ''you'', before you posted this video admitted on Twitter that you wanted to make a response but didn't want to 'give it any exposure', and when you came to actually make the video you didn't tell anyone where you where getting the arguments from. And on Twitter, when someone asked you if you were responding to me, you just said 'Not giving direct promotion, but it does address the videos arguments'. Oh, oh but wait a second, oh I'm sorry, you ''did'' direct viewers to the original argument. ''[[DeadpanSnarker In the fucking tags!]]'' But that's not the point. Look, look, you are ''not'' infalliable. I don't care how bad you think someone's idea is, there is always the ''chance'' you could be strawmanning or wrong or any number of other things. And to intentionally minimize how much of your audience gets to see - and let me put emphasis on this - ''both sides of the argument'' is downright disgusting. And I don't need you for views, I already gained a great understanding of the [Youtube algorithms] by the time I made that video. I already knew that eventually it would get a lot, and I knew yours would fail to get anywhere close because the majority of people who watched your video probably saw mine at some stage. So I don't think there was much harm done. But if 'You Should Pirate Anime' wasn't as successful as it was, people would - by your ''intention'' - be experiencing my argument ''from you alone'', with ''none of the evidence'' and ''none of the logic''. It was the principle that mattered. I was anyone else, a video with a 98% approval rating well above my peers, that clearly brought something new and interesting and convincing to the table would have died without anyone seeing it and ''you'' would've gladly sat there and let it happen. No, no, you would've ''celebrated'' it. You're ''poison'' to the open market place of ideas."

* BerserkButton: Stealing from artists.

->"Now I don't blame you for missing this, as it's an obscure video with 200 views. In fact you couldn't have seen it because it came out after your video. Some might say that the actual issue is with the confidence that you just declare 'Oh it just turned out to be an attempt to improve encoding', as if there wasn't even the ''slightest'' chance in the world that this could be wrong, when in fact the thing you're assumably sourcing here (since you don't give one) is Crunchyroll's press release ''after the controversy''. [[SarcasmMode Real reliable]], ''the word of the company in question!'' But you just claim it as fact when you should have said ''allegedly''. The thing is though, you ''always'' fucking do this. You're always so sure of yourself about ''everything''. Like, even I had my doubts about bringing up this video as evidence since it's so jargony and, hell, maybe I missed something between the lines - I know I'm not infalliable, I know I can be wrong. But you are so unbelievably ''arrogant'' that the thought that you could be wrong hasn't even crossed your mind. you're so happy to just assert that you're right and just dismiss anyone as a child or entitled or some other bullshit emotive argument that cannot be grounded. I'm sorry, I debated being civil like usual [[DeadpanSnarker but I'm naturally reckless at heart]] so I'm going to cut loose for once. The thing is none of that truly bothers me, but that arrogance is what lead you to do the thing that ''genuinely'' pissed me off. I've seen loads of detractors of mine in the past year, none of them have bothered me - even when throwing out the nastiest insults - I don't care, I just zone out. It's doesn't hurt my argument. When Crunchyroll employee Miles posted [a tweet calling me the 'dumbest anime youtuber'] I thought it was ''[[ActuallyPrettyFunny funny]]''. Literally the night of the piracy video I printed it out and stuck it next to my desk. People getting angry is, like, part of the process. I just discourse and debate to continue. But you, ''you'', before you posted this video admitted on Twitter that you wanted to make a response but didn't want to 'give it any exposure', and when you came to actually make the video you didn't tell anyone where you where getting the arguments from. And on Twitter, when someone asked you if you were responding to me, you just said 'Not giving direct promotion, but it does address the videos arguments'. Oh, oh but wait a second, oh I'm sorry, you ''did'' direct viewers to the original argument. ''[[DeadpanSnarker In the fucking tags!]]'' But that's not the point. Look, look, you are ''not'' infalliable. I don't care how bad you think someone's idea is, there is always the ''chance'' you could be strawmanning or wrong or any number of other things. And to intentionally minimize how much of your audience gets to see - and let me put emphasis on this - ''both sides of the argument'' is downright disgusting. And I don't need you for views, I already gained a great understanding of the [Youtube algorithms] by the time I made that video. I already knew that eventually it would get a lot, and I knew yours would fail to get anywhere close because the majority of people who watched your video probably saw mine at some stage. So I don't think there was much harm done. But if 'You Should Pirate Anime' wasn't as successful as it was, people would - by your ''intention'' - be experiencing my argument ''from you alone'', with ''none of the evidence'' and ''none of the logic''. It was the principle that mattered. I was anyone else, a video with a 98% approval rating well above my peers, that clearly brought something new and interesting and convincing to the table would have died without anyone seeing it and ''you'' would've gladly sat there and let it happen. No, no, you would've ''celebrated'' it. You're ''poison'' to the open market place of ideas."

->"Now I don't blame you for missing this, as it's an obscure video with 200 views. In fact you couldn't have seen it because it came out after your video. Some might say that the actual issue is with the confidence that you just declare 'Oh it just turned out to be an attempt to improve encoding', as if there wasn't even the ''slightest'' chance in the world that this could be wrong, when in fact the thing you're assumably sourcing here (since you don't give one) is Crunchyroll's press release ''after the controversy''. [[SarcasmMode Real reliable]], ''the word of the company in question!'' But you just claim it as fact when you should have said ''allegedly''. The thing is though, you ''always'' fucking do this. You're always so sure of yourself about ''everything''. Like, even I had my doubts about bringing up this video as evidence since it's so jargony and, hell, maybe I missed something between the lines - I know I'm not infalliable, I know I can be wrong. But you are so unbelievably ''arrogant'' that the thought that you could be wrong hasn't even crossed your mind. you're so happy to just assert that you're right and just dismiss anyone as a child or entitled or some other bullshit emotive argument that cannot be grounded. I'm sorry, I debated being civil like usual [DeadpanSnarker but I'm naturally reckless at heart]] so I'm going to cut loose for once. The thing is none of that truly bothers me, but that arrogance is what lead you to do the thing that ''genuinely'' pissed me off. I've seen loads of detractors of mine in the past year, none of them have bothered me - even when throwing out the nastiest insults - I don't care, I just zone out. It's doesn't hurt my argument. When Crunchyroll employee Miles posted [a tweet calling me the 'dumbest anime youtuber'] I thought it was ''[[ActuallyPrettyFunny funny]]''. Literally the night of the piracy video I printed it out and stuck it next to my desk. People getting angry is, like, part of the process. I just discourse and debate to continue. But you, ''you'', before you posted this video admitted on Twitter that you wanted to make a response but didn't want to 'give it any exposure', and when you came to actually make the video you didn't tell anyone where you where getting the arguments from. And on Twitter, when someone asked you if you were responding to me, you just said 'Not giving direct promotion, but it does address the videos arguments'. Oh, oh but wait a second, oh I'm sorry, you ''did'' direct viewers to the original argument. ''[[DeadpanSnarker In the fucking tags!'' But that's not the point. Look, look, you are ''not'' infalliable. I don't care how bad you think someone's idea is, there is always the ''chance'' you could be strawmanning or wrong or any number of other things. And to intentionally minimize how much of your audience gets to see - and let me put emphasis on this - ''both sides of the argument'' is downright disgusting. And I don't need you for views, I already gained a great understanding of the [Youtube algorithms] by the time I made that video. I already knew that eventually it would get a lot, and I knew yours would fail to get anywhere close because the majority of people who watched your video probably saw mine at some stage. So I don't think there was much harm done. But if 'You Should Pirate Anime' wasn't as successful as it was, people would - by your ''intention'' - be experiencing my argument ''from you alone'', with ''none of the evidence'' and ''none of the logic''. It was the principle that mattered. I was anyone else, a video with a 98% approval rating well above my peers, that clearly brought something new and interesting and convincing to the table would have died without anyone seeing it and ''you'' would've gladly sat there and let it happen. No, no, you would've ''celebrated'' it. You're ''poison'' to the open market place of ideas."

->"Now I don't blame you for missing this, as it's an obscure video with 200 views. In fact you couldn't have seen it because it came out after your video. Some might say that the actual issue is with the confidence that you just declare 'Oh it just turned out to be an attempt to improve encoding', as if there wasn't even the ''slightest'' chance in the world that this could be wrong, when in fact the thing you're assumably sourcing here (since you don't give one) is Crunchyroll's press release ''after the controversy''. [[SarcasmMode Real reliable]], ''the word of the company in question!'' But you just claim it as fact when you should have said ''allegedly''. The thing is though, you ''always'' fucking do this. You're always so sure of yourself about ''everything''. Like, even I had my doubts about bringing up this video as evidence since it's so jargony and, hell, maybe I missed something between the lines - I know I'm not infalliable, I know I can be wrong. But you are so unbelievably ''arrogant'' that the thought that you could be wrong hasn't even crossed your mind. you're so happy to just assert that you're right and just dismiss anyone as a child or entitled or some other bullshit emotive argument that cannot be grounded. I'm sorry, I debated being civil like usual [[DeadpanSnarker but I'm naturally reckless at heart]] so I'm going to cut loose for once. The thing is none of that truly bothers me, but that arrogance is what lead you to do the thing that ''genuinely'' pissed me off. I've seen loads of detractors of mine in the past year, none of them have bothered me - even when throwing out the nastiest insults - I don't care, I just zone out. It's doesn't hurt my argument. When Crunchyroll employee Miles posted [a tweet calling me the 'dumbest anime youtuber'] I thought it was ''[[ActuallyPrettyFunny funny]]''. Literally the night of the piracy video I printed it out and stuck it next to my desk. People getting angry is, like, part of the process. I just discourse and debate to continue. But you, ''you'', before you posted this video admitted on Twitter that you wanted to make a response but didn't want to 'give it any exposure', and when you came to actually make the video you didn't tell anyone where you where getting the arguments from. And on Twitter, when someone asked you if you were responding to me, you just said 'Not giving direct promotion, but it does address the videos arguments'. Oh, oh but wait a second, oh I'm sorry, you ''did'' direct viewers to the original argument. ''[[DeadpanSnarker In the fucking tags!'' But that's not the point. Look, look, you are ''not'' infalliable. I don't care how bad you think someone's idea is, there is always the ''chance'' you could be strawmanning or wrong or any number of other things. And to intentionally minimize how much of your audience gets to see - and let me put emphasis on this - ''both sides of the argument'' is downright disgusting. And I don't need you for views, I already gained a great understanding of the [Youtube algorithms] by the time I made that video. I already knew that eventually it would get a lot, and I knew yours would fail to get anywhere close because the majority of people who watched your video probably saw mine at some stage. So I don't think there was much harm done. But if 'You Should Pirate Anime' wasn't as successful as it was, people would - by your ''intention'' - be experiencing my argument ''from you alone'', with ''none of the evidence'' and ''none of the logic''. It was the principle that mattered. I was anyone else, a video with a 98% approval rating well above my peers, that clearly brought something new and interesting and convincing to the table would have died without anyone seeing it and ''you'' would've gladly sat there and let it happen. No, no, you would've ''celebrated'' it. You're ''poison'' to the open market place of ideas."

->''"Now, if you're new to me you might be ready for me to say "yep, everything is subjective" because that's like the commonly accepted belief; but if you know me, you know I talk like I believe there is an objective good."''

Despite starting a [[https://www.patreon.com/Uniquenameosaurus Patreon]] in July of 2017, Uniquenameosaurus [[StarvingArtist struggled to earn money]] from his (increasingly popular) videos and suffered financially. In May 2018 he [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lpN8ZjYaY1o posted a video]] describing his money problems and announcing a [[https://teespring.com/new-frogs-come-pre-lubed#pid=369&cid=6519&sid=front new line of (NSFW) merchandise]] based on one of his most popular jokes. This caused a spike in donors which he responded to by [[DontYouDarePityMe assuring fans]] that the shirts were covering his expenses, so it seems that his near-term future is secure.