Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* ArtificialStupidity: The FAQ section of "Davis Bon is Dead AGAIN!" covers the question of whether scammers are using chatbots to do their work. Mike believes that they currently aren't for precisely this reason: [=ChatGPT=] and its ilk try to be friendly to a fault, love producing lengthy answers even when that is inappropriate, and are easy to break if you try to give nonsense prompts; things that, on the contrary, scammers are far more flexible and human in response to.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
** "Davis Bon is Dead AGAIN!" features an email for a supposed Coca-Cola lottery that opens with the bizzare header of '[Message Came from Outside the Houston Police Department Mail System]'. Even Shrimp is confounded as to why exactly that is relevant.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
somehow i missed that the page is soft-split <.< (probably we should unsplit it but later)
Deleted line(s) 43 (click to see context) :
* DrosteImage: In "Do AI-Generated Image/Art Algorithms Plagiarise?", Atomic Shrimp depicts the uncertainty over whether his AI-generated "[[Anime/TheBraveFighterOfSunFighbird Is this a pigeon?]]"/"how is babby formed" crossover meme constitutes plagiarism by putting it in place of the butterfly on the original meme with the caption changed to "Is this a [plagiarism]?" (since, as a very clear "redraw" of the original scene, it's definitely a derivative work), and then putting ''that'' meme onto the original meme with the caption changed to "Is this a [Fair Use]?" (since the changed caption and addition of the baby ''could'' be sufficiently transformative to qualify)
Added DiffLines:
* DrosteImage: In "Do AI-Generated Image/Art Algorithms Plagiarise?", Atomic Shrimp depicts the uncertainty over whether his AI-generated "[[Anime/TheBraveFighterOfSunFighbird Is this a pigeon?]]"/"how is babby formed" crossover meme constitutes plagiarism by putting it in place of the butterfly on the original meme with the caption changed to "Is this a [plagiarism]?" (since, as a very clear "redraw" of the original scene, it's definitely a derivative work), and then putting ''that'' meme onto the original meme with the caption changed to "Is this a [Fair Use]?" (since the changed caption and addition of the baby ''could'' be sufficiently transformative to qualify)
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
on into
Changed line(s) 43 (click to see context) from:
* DrosteImage: In "Do AI-Generated Image/Art Algorithms Plagiarise?", Atomic Shrimp depicts the uncertainty over whether his AI-generated "[[Anime/TheBraveFighterOfSunFighbird Is this a pigeon?]]"/"how is babby formed" crossover meme constitutes plagiarism by putting it in place of the butterfly on the original meme with the caption changed to "Is this a [plagiarism]?" (since, as a very clear "redraw" of the original scene, it's definitely a derivative work), and then putting ''that'' meme on into the original meme with the caption changed to "Is this a [Fair Use]?" (since the changed caption and addition of the baby ''could'' be sufficiently transformative to qualify)
to:
* DrosteImage: In "Do AI-Generated Image/Art Algorithms Plagiarise?", Atomic Shrimp depicts the uncertainty over whether his AI-generated "[[Anime/TheBraveFighterOfSunFighbird Is this a pigeon?]]"/"how is babby formed" crossover meme constitutes plagiarism by putting it in place of the butterfly on the original meme with the caption changed to "Is this a [plagiarism]?" (since, as a very clear "redraw" of the original scene, it's definitely a derivative work), and then putting ''that'' meme on into onto the original meme with the caption changed to "Is this a [Fair Use]?" (since the changed caption and addition of the baby ''could'' be sufficiently transformative to qualify)
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* DrosteImage: In "Do AI-Generated Image/Art Algorithms Plagiarise?", Atomic Shrimp depicts the uncertainty over whether his AI-generated "[[Anime/TheBraveFighterOfSunFighbird Is this a pigeon?]]"/"how is babby formed" crossover meme constitutes plagiarism by putting it in place of the butterfly on the original meme with the caption changed to "Is this a [plagiarism]?" (since, as a very clear "redraw" of the original scene, it's definitely a derivative work), and then putting ''that'' meme on into the original meme with the caption changed to "Is this a [Fair Use]?" (since the changed caption and addition of the baby ''could'' be sufficiently transformative to qualify)
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 95 (click to see context) from:
* UnfortunateName: In "All Together Now - Scambaiting En Masse", he singles out a scammer for their alias being named "Mr. Dick Head".
to:
* UnfortunateName: UnfortunateName:
** In "The Surprising Return Of John Barosa", Muhammad Hassan's law firm is named "Mohammad H&Ass Chambers", seemingly the result of an awkward attempt to abbreviate "Hassan & Associates".
** In "All Together Now - Scambaiting En Masse", he singles out a scammer for their alias being named "Mr. Dick Head".
** In "The Surprising Return Of John Barosa", Muhammad Hassan's law firm is named "Mohammad H&Ass Chambers", seemingly the result of an awkward attempt to abbreviate "Hassan & Associates".
** In "All Together Now - Scambaiting En Masse", he singles out a scammer for their alias being named "Mr. Dick Head".
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* LackOfEmpathy: "Mr. Paul Steven" is incredibly clingy, to the point that his constant messages are actually starting to creep into Mike's life outside of scambaiting. When Mange Tout says that he bent his knees backwards and had to go to the knee hospital thanks to Steven's constant messaging, Steven appears to completely ignore the situation and ask when tomorrow he can get the gift cards. When Mange reaffirms that he can't go to the store tomorrow with his knees the way they are, Steven is the one to get upset at him for delaying it without giving it a date. He later keeps pestering Mange in his hospital bed, asking him still to confirm when he can get the card. It's not until long after the group mailbox has begun its decline that he shows anything slightly resembling sympathy.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 26 (click to see context) from:
** In "I'm Just Mad About SAFFRON", Mike discovers that the scammer has a front company that claims an address on 'Benson Hawking Drive' in Blackpool. There is a real 'Hawking Drive' in Blackpool which corresponds to an industrial estate, but he has no clue where the 'Benson' came from. In "OK, Why is Everything Johnson & Benson?", covering a range of scammers where everyone seemed to have either of those names, he jokes that 'Benson' is a dirty word in his culture and begs the scammers not to use it.
to:
** In "I'm Just Mad About SAFFRON", Mike discovers that the scammer has a front company that claims an address on 'Benson Hawking Drive' in Blackpool. There is a real 'Hawking Drive' in Blackpool which corresponds to on an industrial estate, which is a perfectly plausible location for a small medical supplier, but he has no clue where the 'Benson' came from. In "OK, Why is Everything Johnson & Benson?", covering a range of scammers where everyone seemed to have either of those names, he jokes that 'Benson' is a dirty word in his culture and begs the scammers not to use it.
