Follow TV Tropes

Following

History ValuesDissonance / Literature

Go To

OR

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* The classic mystery novel ''The Woman in White'' by Wilkie Collins, first published in 1859, centres on the dire and terrible Secret with a capital S that the evil baronet Sir Percival Glyde is going to great lengths to conceal. The nature of the Secret? [[spoiler: Turns out, his parents weren't married when he was born, so he is not the legitimate heir to the baronetcy or to his father's property.]] Granted, this does mean he's [[spoiler: committed some pretty serious fraud -- he falsified a marriage register to make a claim on a title that wasn't legally his --]] but still, a modern reader is likely to think "really? That's all?" and possibly even be sympathetic to him. This is probably why some recent adaptations add something extra to give the Secret a bit of spice; both the 1997 BBC adaptation and the Andrew Lloyd-Webber musical version add the detail that [[spoiler: he raped Anne Catherick when she was a child.]] Not the kind of plot point that usually crops up in Victorian novels.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** Naturally for Victorian literature, many acts of murder, extortion and conspiracy in Holmes' casebook were committed to cover up scandalous intimate liaisons which, if exposed publicly today, would be greeted with a resounding "So What?" from everyone except the paparazzi or a divorce attorney.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


*** Nobody is disputing that last part; the previous person just clarified the reasons why. They made dragons inseparable from their riders because they didn't want any rogue dragons going around eating people and depleting even more of them. And it's not like the riders get off easily, either: They have to spend their lives devoted to their dragons--they can't raise families, they only get out of being dragonriders if they die or get old enough to retire, and I'm pretty sure the colonists didn't realize losing your dragon leaves you a traumatized/insane/suicidal wreck.

to:

*** Nobody is disputing that last part; the part. The previous person just clarified the reasons why. why it exists. This is the theme of the books themselves--TheSlidingScaleOfIdealismVsCynicism. They made dragons inseparable from their riders because they didn't want any rogue dragons going around eating people and depleting even more of them. their numbers. And it's not like the riders get off easily, either: either. They have to spend their lives devoted to their dragons--they can't raise families, they are effectively permanent soldiers who only get out "get out" of being dragonriders if they die die, are crippled, or get old enough to retire, and I'm pretty sure the first colonists didn't realize that losing your dragon leaves you a traumatized/insane/suicidal wreck.wreck, with heavy emphasis on the suicide.

Added: 578

Changed: 2

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


*** Fire-lizards do, indeed, eat Thread, although they're usually content to let it drown in water first, if that'll save them the work of hunting it down. The danger Thread poses to them is minimal except to newborn hatchlings too hunger-crazed to avoid it, which is why the humans used dragonets as the dragons' template in the first place. And even if the humans ''did'' have no choice but to create protectors for themselves, why did they have to link dragons so closely to their riders that they'd '''have''' to commit suicide if they lost that connection? (Watch-weyrs don't.) Face it: they engineered a sentient race to suit ''their'' needs only, and didn't leave the dragons any option ''but'' to serve.

to:

*** Fire-lizards do, indeed, eat Thread, although they're usually content to let it drown in water first, if that'll save them the work of hunting it down. The danger Thread poses to them is minimal except to newborn hatchlings too hunger-crazed to avoid it, which is why the humans used dragonets as the dragons' template in the first place. And even if the humans ''did'' have no choice but to create protectors for themselves, why did they have to link dragons so closely to their riders that they'd '''have''' to commit suicide if they lost that connection? (Watch-weyrs (Watch-whers don't.) Face it: they engineered a sentient race to suit ''their'' needs only, and didn't leave the dragons any option ''but'' to serve.serve.
*** Nobody is disputing that last part; the previous person just clarified the reasons why. They made dragons inseparable from their riders because they didn't want any rogue dragons going around eating people and depleting even more of them. And it's not like the riders get off easily, either: They have to spend their lives devoted to their dragons--they can't raise families, they only get out of being dragonriders if they die or get old enough to retire, and I'm pretty sure the colonists didn't realize losing your dragon leaves you a traumatized/insane/suicidal wreck.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

*** Fire-lizards do, indeed, eat Thread, although they're usually content to let it drown in water first, if that'll save them the work of hunting it down. The danger Thread poses to them is minimal except to newborn hatchlings too hunger-crazed to avoid it, which is why the humans used dragonets as the dragons' template in the first place. And even if the humans ''did'' have no choice but to create protectors for themselves, why did they have to link dragons so closely to their riders that they'd '''have''' to commit suicide if they lost that connection? (Watch-weyrs don't.) Face it: they engineered a sentient race to suit ''their'' needs only, and didn't leave the dragons any option ''but'' to serve.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** The celebrated story ''The Rats in the Walls'' suffers terribly from this in it's unedited version, due to the protagonist's cat being named "Nigger-man" (the same as Lovecraft's own in fact). He keeps on referring to it, and it is incredibly distracting from the atmosphere of the story.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* In Kylie Chan's ''Hell to Heaven'' (the second book in the ''[[DarkHeavens Journey to Wudang]]'' series, a boy drugs and [[AttemptedRape attempts to rape]] Simone. Simone, the daughter of [[TheFourGods Xuan Wu]], uses her powers to kill him on impulse, and is convinced she is guilty of murder, or at least manslaughter. The Jade Emperor calls her to the Celestial Plane over the incident, where he '''commends''' her for her actions - in his eyes, she was protecting her virtue, and exercising her right as a princess to pass judgment on a criminal. This just makes Simone feel even ''worse'' about the act.

to:

* In Kylie Chan's ''Hell to Heaven'' (the second book in the ''[[DarkHeavens Journey to Wudang]]'' series, series), a boy drugs and [[AttemptedRape attempts to rape]] Simone. Simone, the daughter of [[TheFourGods Xuan Wu]], uses her powers to kill him on impulse, and is convinced she is guilty of murder, or at least manslaughter. The Jade Emperor calls her to the Celestial Plane over the incident, where he '''commends''' her for her actions - in his eyes, she was protecting her virtue, and exercising her right as a princess to pass judgment on a criminal. This just makes Simone feel even ''worse'' about the act.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* In Kylie Chan's ''Hell to Heaven'' (the second book in the ''[[DarkHeavens Journey to Wudang]]'' series, a boy drugs and [[AttemptedRape attempts to rape]] Simone. Simone, the daughter of [[TheFourGods Xuan Wu]] uses her powers to kill him on impulse, and is convinced she is guilty of murder, or at least manslaughter. The Jade Emperor calls her to the Celestial Plane over the incident, where he '''commends''' her for her actions - in his eyes, she was protecting her virtue, and exercising her right as a princess to pass judgment on a criminal. This just makes Simone feel even ''worse'' about the act.

to:

* In Kylie Chan's ''Hell to Heaven'' (the second book in the ''[[DarkHeavens Journey to Wudang]]'' series, a boy drugs and [[AttemptedRape attempts to rape]] Simone. Simone, the daughter of [[TheFourGods Xuan Wu]] Wu]], uses her powers to kill him on impulse, and is convinced she is guilty of murder, or at least manslaughter. The Jade Emperor calls her to the Celestial Plane over the incident, where he '''commends''' her for her actions - in his eyes, she was protecting her virtue, and exercising her right as a princess to pass judgment on a criminal. This just makes Simone feel even ''worse'' about the act.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* In Kylie Chan's ''Hell to Heaven'' (the second book in the ''[[DarkHeavens Journey to Wudang]]'' series, a boy drugs and [[AttemptedRape attempts to rape]] Simone. Simone, the daughter of [[TheFourGods Xuan Wu]] uses her powers to kill him on impulse, and is convinced she is guilty of murder, or at least manslaughter. The Jade Emperor calls her to the Celestial Plane over the incident, where he '''commends''' her for her actions - in his eyes, she was protecting her virtue, and exercising her right as a princess to pass judgment on a criminal. This just makes Simone feel even ''worse'' about the act.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


*** Actually, the troper says that Cao Cao was [i]more[/i] honorable and noble than Liu Bei. The joke here is that, despite how bad Cao Cao was, Liu Bei was even [b]WORSE[/b]. Just think about that for a bit.

to:

*** Actually, the troper says that Cao Cao was [i]more[/i] more honorable and noble than Liu Bei. The joke here is that, despite how bad Cao Cao was, Liu Bei was even [b]WORSE[/b].WORSE. Just think about that for a bit.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

*** Actually, the troper says that Cao Cao was [i]more[/i] honorable and noble than Liu Bei. The joke here is that, despite how bad Cao Cao was, Liu Bei was even [b]WORSE[/b]. Just think about that for a bit.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* In Beverly Cleary's ''Beezus And Ramona'', pre-school age Ramona is left to play in a sandbox in a public park with no supervision. Modern parents would be too terrified of her being scooped up by a pedo to do such a thing.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** ''Robur the Conqueror'' from the same author may be an even bigger offender, since its black character Frycollin is the ButtMonkey and a sum of just about every flaw imaginable - he's gluttonous, cowardly, stupid - with the only "redeeming" quality of "not speking like a nigger" (Verne also makes sure to [[WriterOnBoard tell the reader]] how loathsome "Black English" is).
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


*** Your argument has several horrible inaccuracies. Fire lizards had a HUGE amount of animosity towards Thread--they were shown to be burning it with firestone in ''Dragonsdawn''. If you're going on ''Dragonflight'' about the eating Thread thing, remember that Kylara the attention-whore is the one who said it. Secondly, the colonists were desperate--their technology was failing, they were cut off from Earth, and they couldn't count on making flamethrowers for even a fraction of their number without using up their preciously low metal resources. At least on a subconscious level, they knew what they were doing but '''they had no other choice.''' On the "saving their own asses" bit: Humans have this weird thing called "self-preservation" that kind of makes them not want to die. Like, I don't know... '''every other living being.'''

to:

*** Your argument has several horrible inaccuracies. Fire lizards had a HUGE amount of animosity towards Thread--they Thread--it wiped out their natural predators, sure, but it killed them just as easily. They were shown to be burning it with firestone in ''Dragonsdawn''.''Dragonsdawn'', and Menolly's fire lizards were hissing and screeching at it from the window in ''Dragonsong''. If you're going on ''Dragonflight'' about the eating Thread thing, remember that Kylara the attention-whore is the one who said it. Secondly, Also, the colonists were desperate--their technology was failing, they were cut off from Earth, and they couldn't count on making flamethrowers for even a fraction of their number without using up their preciously low metal resources. resources. At least on a subconscious level, level they knew what they were doing doing, but '''they ''they had no other choice.''' '' On the "saving their own asses" bit: Humans have this weird thing called "self-preservation" that kind of makes them not want to die. Like, I don't know... '''every other living being.'''
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


*** Your argument has several horrible inaccuracies. Fire lizards had a HUGE amount of antimosity towards Thread--they were shown to be burning it with firestone in ''Dragonsdawn''. If you're going on ''Dragonflight'' about the eating Thread thing, remember that Kylara the attention-whore is the one who said it. Secondly, the colonists were desperate--their technology was failing, they were cut off from Earth, and they couldn't count on making flamethrowers for even a fraction of their number without using up their preciously low metal resources. At least on a subconscious level, they knew what they were doing but '''they had no other choice.''' On the "saving their own asses" bit: Humans have this weird thing called "self-preservation" that kind of makes them not want to die. Like, I don't know... '''every other living being.'''

to:

*** Your argument has several horrible inaccuracies. Fire lizards had a HUGE amount of antimosity animosity towards Thread--they were shown to be burning it with firestone in ''Dragonsdawn''. If you're going on ''Dragonflight'' about the eating Thread thing, remember that Kylara the attention-whore is the one who said it. Secondly, the colonists were desperate--their technology was failing, they were cut off from Earth, and they couldn't count on making flamethrowers for even a fraction of their number without using up their preciously low metal resources. At least on a subconscious level, they knew what they were doing but '''they had no other choice.''' On the "saving their own asses" bit: Humans have this weird thing called "self-preservation" that kind of makes them not want to die. Like, I don't know... '''every other living being.'''
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

*** Your argument has several horrible inaccuracies. Fire lizards had a HUGE amount of antimosity towards Thread--they were shown to be burning it with firestone in ''Dragonsdawn''. If you're going on ''Dragonflight'' about the eating Thread thing, remember that Kylara the attention-whore is the one who said it. Secondly, the colonists were desperate--their technology was failing, they were cut off from Earth, and they couldn't count on making flamethrowers for even a fraction of their number without using up their preciously low metal resources. At least on a subconscious level, they knew what they were doing but '''they had no other choice.''' On the "saving their own asses" bit: Humans have this weird thing called "self-preservation" that kind of makes them not want to die. Like, I don't know... '''every other living being.'''
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

*** [[LossOfIdentity Maybe...]]

Added: 454

Changed: 107

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


*** That probably caused dissonance even when it was published as this kind of untruthful, dehumanizing portrayal of "the Hun", while viewed as necessary for wartime propaganda, rapidly went out favour after 1918.[[hottip:*:Not only was the sinking of lifeboats not on during World War 1, but the Prussian and German military no longer practiced whipping since 1808, having abolished corporal punishments decades before the British and US military did.]]



*** This is very much a YourMileageMayVary kind of situation. The claim of [[ILoveTheDead necrophilia]] only appears in some variants of the story, notably that recounted by the 12th-century Byzantine scholar Eustathius of Thessalonica; the Iliad is silent on exactly what happened. What we do know is that Achilles apparently fell in love with Penthesilea as she died of her wounds, was incensed by what he took to be the disrespectful behavior of another Greek warrior, Thersites (who is claimed in some variants to have [[{{Squick}} cut out Penthesilea's eyes from her dead body]] and killed him, thereafter giving Penthesilea's corpse a proper burial.

to:

*** This is very much a YourMileageMayVary kind of situation. The claim of [[ILoveTheDead necrophilia]] only appears in some variants of the story, notably that recounted by the 12th-century Byzantine scholar Eustathius of Thessalonica; the Iliad is silent on exactly what happened.happened[[hottip:*:because Penthesilea only came to Troy after the events it describes and so makes no appearance]]. What we do know is that Achilles apparently fell in love with Penthesilea as she died of her wounds, was incensed by what he took to be the disrespectful behavior of another Greek warrior, Thersites (who is claimed in some variants to have [[{{Squick}} cut out Penthesilea's eyes from her dead body]] and killed him, thereafter giving Penthesilea's corpse a proper burial.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


*** This is very much a YourMileageMayVary kind of situation. The claim of [[ILoveTheDead necrophila]] only appears in some variants of the story, notably that recounted by the 12th-century Byzantine scholar Eustathius of Thessalonica; the Iliad is silent on exactly what happened. What we do know is that Achilles apparently fell in love with Penthesilea as she died of her wounds, was incensed by what he took to be the disrespectful behavior of another Greek warrior, Thersites (who is claimed in some variants to have [[{{Squick}} cut out Penthesilea's eyes from her dead body]] and killed him, thereafter giving Penthesilea's corpse a proper burial.

to:

*** This is very much a YourMileageMayVary kind of situation. The claim of [[ILoveTheDead necrophila]] necrophilia]] only appears in some variants of the story, notably that recounted by the 12th-century Byzantine scholar Eustathius of Thessalonica; the Iliad is silent on exactly what happened. What we do know is that Achilles apparently fell in love with Penthesilea as she died of her wounds, was incensed by what he took to be the disrespectful behavior of another Greek warrior, Thersites (who is claimed in some variants to have [[{{Squick}} cut out Penthesilea's eyes from her dead body]] and killed him, thereafter giving Penthesilea's corpse a proper burial.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

*** And before that in the "non-canonic" ''Never Say Never Again'' with Sean Connery.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* In an instance of WhatDoYouMeanItsNotHeinous, Ben Elton's novel Meltdown features a character who attempted to be an actress but dropped out of her first production, ''Oedipus Rex'', because the director wanted to show her as Jocasta breastfeeding Oedipus. Elton portrays this as something equivalent to non-simulated incest and the woman's reaction ("You want me to get my tits out?!") as perfectly justified. While the idea would be provocative and unusual, and many actors might reasonably decline to do it, there are plenty of performers in legitimate theatre who have no problem with appearing nude and simulating sexual acts. For someone who claims to want to be active in the theatre community, therefore, the character comes across as prissy and provincial for being shocked at the mere idea.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** Additionally, there is a large dissonance between the modern definition of homosexuality and how it was seen by an Old Testament culture. It was not uncommon for defeated soldier to be anally raped by their attackers, so needless to say such actions would be portrayed in a negative light. And considering how patriarchal the society was, it was seen as incredibly demeaning for a male to "take the role of a woman" in sexual intercourse. The idea that someone could be solely attracted to the same sex did not arise until centuries later.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** Likewise where the hero's reward after completing a quest is boning the king's hot daughter.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Basically everything in [[DivineCommedy The Divine Commedy]]. Gay, protestants, jews are in hell, there is not much more of a value judgment than that.

to:

* Basically everything in [[DivineCommedy [[DivineComedy The Divine Commedy]].Comedy]]. Gay, protestants, jews are in hell, there is not much more of a value judgment than that.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** A stand-out instance is the tale of Sir Pelleas and the lady Ettard, whom he has fallen in love with. He proves himself in a joust and thus feels himself entitled to her love, even though she hates him (and it's implied she's not just {{Tsundere}}, she literally hates him). Pelleas refuses to leave her be, harries her, hangs around outside of her castle, and she is described as afraid of him. He's a [[StalkerWithACrush creepy]] guy. And the heroic Sir Gawain gets involved in a scheme to convince Ettard to love Pelleas, because women in those days had no right to decline a passing fair knight like Sir Pelleas, but he ends up bedding Ettard himself. Pelleas demands vengeance - against ''Ettard'' - and in the end the Lady of the Lake uses magic to make Ettard fall in love with Sir Pelleas. Then Sir Pelleas falls in love with the Lady of the Lake, leaves Ettard, and Ettard dies of sorrow. Pelleas gets to become a Knight of the Round Table. SoYeah.

to:

** A stand-out instance is the tale of Sir Pelleas and the lady Ettard, whom he has fallen in love with. He proves himself in a joust and thus feels himself entitled to her love, even though she hates him (and it's implied she's not just {{Tsundere}}, she literally hates him). Pelleas refuses to leave her be, harries her, hangs around outside of her castle, and she is described as afraid of him. He's a [[StalkerWithACrush creepy]] guy. And the heroic Sir Gawain gets involved in a scheme to convince Ettard to love Pelleas, because women in those days had no right to decline a passing fair knight like Sir Pelleas, but he ends up bedding Ettard himself. Pelleas demands vengeance - against ''Ettard'' - and in the end the Lady of the Lake uses magic to make Ettard fall in love with Sir Pelleas. Then Sir Pelleas falls in love with the Lady of the Lake, leaves Ettard, and Ettard dies of sorrow. Pelleas gets to become a Knight of the Round Table. SoYeah.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

*** I think the point is that the woman is afraid her past married to a black man will come up which will harm her social standing, as opposed to casting aspersions on black people.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ''TallTaleAmerica'' has a fair bit of this, but the most flagrant is probably the part that was meant to make it ''more'' morally acceptable. In the chapter on Pecos Bill, he no longer shoots his wife to keep her from starving to death. Instead he ''threatens'' her with this fate to teacher not to "disobey her lord and master" (a.k.a. her husband). Yeah ... that {{Aesop}} wouldn't really fly well these days.

to:

* ''TallTaleAmerica'' has a fair bit of this, but the most flagrant is probably the part that was meant to make it ''more'' morally acceptable. Bowlderise the original story. In the chapter on Pecos Bill, PecosBill, he no longer shoots his wife to keep her from starving to death. Instead he ''threatens'' her with this fate to teacher teach her not to "disobey her lord and master" (a.k.a. her husband). Yeah ... that {{Aesop}} wouldn't really fly well these days.

Added: 128

Changed: 152

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None



to:

* Basically everything in [[DivineCommedy The Divine Commedy]]. Gay, protestants, jews are in hell, there is not much more of a value judgment than that.
* [[TheBrothersGrimm Grimm's]] fairy tales, in , for example, [[http://www.pitt.edu/~dash/grimm110.html the jew in the thorns]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ''TallTaleAmerica'' has a fair bit of this, but the most flagrant is probably the part that was meant to make it ''more'' morally acceptable. In the chapter on Pecos Bill, he no longer shoots his wife to keep her from starving to death. Instead he puts her on the verge of starving to death and threatens to shoot her all to teach her a lesson about always obeying her husband (the narration even refers to Bill as her "lord and master").

to:

* ''TallTaleAmerica'' has a fair bit of this, but the most flagrant is probably the part that was meant to make it ''more'' morally acceptable. In the chapter on Pecos Bill, he no longer shoots his wife to keep her from starving to death. Instead he puts ''threatens'' her on the verge of starving with this fate to death teacher not to "disobey her lord and threatens to shoot master" (a.k.a. her all to teach her a lesson about always obeying her husband (the narration even refers to Bill as her "lord and master").husband). Yeah ... that {{Aesop}} wouldn't really fly well these days.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* ''TallTaleAmerica'' has a fair bit of this, but the most flagrant is probably the part that was meant to make it ''more'' morally acceptable. In the chapter on Pecos Bill, he no longer shoots his wife to keep her from starving to death. Instead he puts her on the verge of starving to death and threatens to shoot her all to teach her a lesson about always obeying her husband (the narration even refers to Bill as her "lord and master").

Top