Follow TV Tropes

Following

History UsefulNotes / Agnosticism

Go To

OR

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


Agnostic theism is more unusual, often representing a form of deep connection with Judaism and the early Church/Christianity. Some have argued that philosophers such as the [[{{UsefulNotes/Existentialism}} existentialist]] UsefulNotes/SorenKierkegaard qualify. Kierkegaard felt the existence of God was something which no one could rationally prove, and they had to make a "leap of faith." The same may be found in fideism, a view arguing that belief in God must rest upon faith alone, wholly independent of reason.

to:

Agnostic theism is more unusual, often representing a form of deep connection with Judaism and the early Church/Christianity. Some have argued that philosophers such as the [[{{UsefulNotes/Existentialism}} existentialist]] UsefulNotes/SorenKierkegaard Creator/SorenKierkegaard qualify. Kierkegaard felt the existence of God was something which no one could rationally prove, and they had to make a "leap of faith." The same may be found in fideism, a view arguing that belief in God must rest upon faith alone, wholly independent of reason.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


Agnostic theism is more unusual, often representing a form of deep connection with Judaism and the early Church/Christianity. Some have argued that philosophers such as the [[{{UsefulNotes/Existentialism}} existentialist]] Soren Kierkegaard qualify. Kierkegaard felt the existence of God was something which no one could rationally prove, and they had to make a "leap of faith." The same may be found in fideism, a view arguing that belief in God must rest upon faith alone, wholly independent of reason.

to:

Agnostic theism is more unusual, often representing a form of deep connection with Judaism and the early Church/Christianity. Some have argued that philosophers such as the [[{{UsefulNotes/Existentialism}} existentialist]] Soren Kierkegaard UsefulNotes/SorenKierkegaard qualify. Kierkegaard felt the existence of God was something which no one could rationally prove, and they had to make a "leap of faith." The same may be found in fideism, a view arguing that belief in God must rest upon faith alone, wholly independent of reason.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


Agnosticism is not mutually exclusive with atheism or theism since it is a question of if someone believes they can or cannot know a god exists. While agnostics generally agree with atheists on the subject of belief in God or gods, they disagree on the subject of disbelief: a common agnostic criticism of atheism is the scientific principle that "absence of proof does not constitute a disproof". Once again, this is only an issue for the gnostic/strong/positive/hard atheists, who are a minority. As noted on the UsefulNotes/{{atheism}} page, the term "agnostic" is often considered functionally interchangeable with "soft" atheism (although usually not by self-described agnostics themselves).

There are many different strands of agnostic thought, including the following :
* Belief that God is inherently "unknowable". Adherents to this type of agnosticism believe that one ''cannot'' know of God's existence, role, appearance or ethics (assuming that it might exist at all).
* Belief that God's existence is neither proven nor disproven. That is, that while God may be "knowable", we do not "know" yet either way.
* Agnostic atheism, where there is not enough evidence to know that a god exists, but it is not impossible that one does.
* Agnostic theism, where God probably exists based on the evidence at hand, but that it is not certain.

to:

Agnosticism is not mutually exclusive with atheism or theism since it is a question of if someone believes they can or cannot know a god exists. While agnostics generally agree with atheists on the subject of belief in God or gods, they disagree on the subject of disbelief: a common agnostic criticism of atheism is the scientific principle that "absence of proof does not constitute a disproof". Once again, However, this is only an issue for the gnostic/strong/positive/hard atheists, who are a minority. As noted on the UsefulNotes/{{atheism}} page, the term "agnostic" is often considered functionally interchangeable with "soft" atheism (although usually not by self-described agnostics themselves).

There are many different strands of agnostic thought, including the following :
following:
* Belief that God is inherently "unknowable". Adherents to this type of agnosticism believe that one ''cannot'' know of God's existence, role, appearance or ethics (assuming that it might exist at all).
all). Sometimes called hard/strong agnosticism.
* Belief that God's existence is neither proven nor disproven. That is, that while God may be "knowable", we do not "know" yet either way.
way. This is known as weak or soft agnosticism by some people.
* Agnostic atheism, where there is not enough evidence to know that a god exists, exists so adherents don't believe in any, but it is not impossible that one does.
* Agnostic theism, where God probably exists based on the evidence at hand, hand so adherents do believe in him, but that it is not certain.



Agnostics have on occasion been condemned by followers of various religions for their lack of belief (often being lumped in with atheists in the process). They have also been criticized by prominent agnostic atheist UsefulNotes/RichardDawkins for "fence sitting" -- i.e. not having the conviction to outright admit to being an atheist. Self-described agnostics Creator/CarlSagan and UsefulNotes/NeilDeGrasseTyson fall into this camp, admittedly calling themselves agnostics because they have to deal with politics where atheism is still a dirty word. It can also be a label used because "atheist" is defined by some as ''knowing'' gods do not exist.

Many agnostics find this accusation insulting, and parallels have been drawn between agnosticism and bisexuality, as bisexuals can also face discrimination from both ends of a spectrum on similar grounds. However, this view supposes that belief is a spectrum rather than binary, as if someone could only half believe. Additional factors that further muddle the issue is the psychological aspect of the person, as one might believe more '' strongly '' at one time, and not think much about one's particular faith at another, also, a country might be 90% Catholic, but have only ~17% actively going to church. Critics also point out that there is already a term for someone who does not actively believe in any deities: atheist.[[note]]Though this does depend on which definition of atheist you're using. For example, [[http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/atheism Merriam Webster]] defines atheism as a disbelief in god or a belief that there are no gods.[[/note]]

Agnostic theism is more unusual, representing a form of deep connection with Judaism and early Church/Christianity. Some have argued that philosophers such as the [[{{UsefulNotes/Existentialism}} existentialist]] Soren Kierkegaard qualify. Kierkegaard felt the existence of God was something which no one could rationally prove, and they had to make a "leap of faith." The same may be found in fideism, a view arguing that belief in God must rest upon faith alone, wholly independent of reason.

to:

Agnostics have on occasion been condemned by followers of various religions for their lack of belief (often being lumped in with atheists in the process). They have also been criticized by prominent agnostic atheist UsefulNotes/RichardDawkins for "fence sitting" -- i.e. not having the conviction to outright admit to being an atheist. Self-described agnostics Creator/CarlSagan and UsefulNotes/NeilDeGrasseTyson fall into this camp, admittedly calling themselves agnostics because they have to deal with politics where atheism is still a dirty word. It can also be a label used because "atheist" is defined by some as ''knowing'' gods do not exist.exist when a person is not that certain.

Many agnostics find this accusation insulting, and parallels have been drawn between agnosticism and bisexuality, as bisexuals can also face discrimination from both ends of a spectrum on similar grounds. However, this view supposes that belief is a spectrum rather than binary, as if someone could only half believe. Additional factors that further muddle the issue is the psychological aspect of the person, as one might believe more '' strongly '' at one time, and not think much about one's particular faith at another, also, another. Also, a country might be 90% Catholic, but have only ~17% actively going to church. Critics also point out that there is already a term for someone who does not actively believe in any deities: atheist.[[note]]Though this does depend on which definition of atheist you're using. For example, [[http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/atheism Merriam Webster]] defines atheism as a disbelief in god or a belief that there are no gods.[[/note]]

Agnostic theism is more unusual, often representing a form of deep connection with Judaism and the early Church/Christianity. Some have argued that philosophers such as the [[{{UsefulNotes/Existentialism}} existentialist]] Soren Kierkegaard qualify. Kierkegaard felt the existence of God was something which no one could rationally prove, and they had to make a "leap of faith." The same may be found in fideism, a view arguing that belief in God must rest upon faith alone, wholly independent of reason.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


Many agnostics find this accusation insulting, and parallels have been drawn between agnosticism and bisexuality, as bisexuals can also face discrimination from both ends of a spectrum on similar grounds. However, this view supposes that belief is a spectrum rather than binary, as if someone could only half believe. Additional factors that further muddle the issue is the psychological aspect of the person, as one might believe more '' strongly '' at one time, and not think much about one's particular faith at another, also, a country might be 90% Catholic, but have only ~17% actively going to church. Critics also point out that there is already a term for someone who does not actively believe in any deities: atheist.[[note]]Though this does depend on which definition of atheist you're using. For example, [[http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/atheism Merriam Webster]] defines atheism as a disbelief in god or a belief that there are no gods[[/note]]

to:

Many agnostics find this accusation insulting, and parallels have been drawn between agnosticism and bisexuality, as bisexuals can also face discrimination from both ends of a spectrum on similar grounds. However, this view supposes that belief is a spectrum rather than binary, as if someone could only half believe. Additional factors that further muddle the issue is the psychological aspect of the person, as one might believe more '' strongly '' at one time, and not think much about one's particular faith at another, also, a country might be 90% Catholic, but have only ~17% actively going to church. Critics also point out that there is already a term for someone who does not actively believe in any deities: atheist.[[note]]Though this does depend on which definition of atheist you're using. For example, [[http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/atheism Merriam Webster]] defines atheism as a disbelief in god or a belief that there are no gods[[/note]]
gods.[[/note]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


Agnostic theism is more unusual, representing a from of deep connection with Judaism and early Church/Christianity. Some have argued that philosophers such as the [[{{UsefulNotes/Existentialism}} existentialist]] Soren Kierkegaard qualify. Kierkegaard felt the existence of God was something which no one could rationally prove, and they had to make a "leap of faith." The same may be found in fideism, a view arguing that belief in God must rest upon faith alone, wholly independent of reason.

to:

Agnostic theism is more unusual, representing a from form of deep connection with Judaism and early Church/Christianity. Some have argued that philosophers such as the [[{{UsefulNotes/Existentialism}} existentialist]] Soren Kierkegaard qualify. Kierkegaard felt the existence of God was something which no one could rationally prove, and they had to make a "leap of faith." The same may be found in fideism, a view arguing that belief in God must rest upon faith alone, wholly independent of reason.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


Agnosticism is not mutually exclusive with atheism or theism since it is a question of if someone believes they can or cannot know a god exists. While agnostics generally agree with atheists on the subject of belief in God or gods, they disagree on the subject of disbelief: a common agnostic criticism of atheism is the scientific principle that "absence of proof does not constitute a disproof". Once again, this is only an issue for the gnostic/strong/positive/hard atheists, who are a minority.

to:

Agnosticism is not mutually exclusive with atheism or theism since it is a question of if someone believes they can or cannot know a god exists. While agnostics generally agree with atheists on the subject of belief in God or gods, they disagree on the subject of disbelief: a common agnostic criticism of atheism is the scientific principle that "absence of proof does not constitute a disproof". Once again, this is only an issue for the gnostic/strong/positive/hard atheists, who are a minority.
minority. As noted on the UsefulNotes/{{atheism}} page, the term "agnostic" is often considered functionally interchangeable with "soft" atheism (although usually not by self-described agnostics themselves).
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


Agnosticism is not mutually exclusive with atheism or theism since it is a question of if someone believes they can or cannot know a god exists. While agnostics generally agree with atheists on the subject of belief in God or gods, they disagree on the subject of disbelief: a common agnostic criticism of atheism is the scientific principle that "absence of proof does not constitute a disproof". Once again, this is only an issue for the minority of atheists who are gnostic/strong/positive/hard atheists, who are a minority.

to:

Agnosticism is not mutually exclusive with atheism or theism since it is a question of if someone believes they can or cannot know a god exists. While agnostics generally agree with atheists on the subject of belief in God or gods, they disagree on the subject of disbelief: a common agnostic criticism of atheism is the scientific principle that "absence of proof does not constitute a disproof". Once again, this is only an issue for the minority of atheists who are gnostic/strong/positive/hard atheists, who are a minority.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
expanded the article a bit


Many agnostics find this accusation insulting, and parallels have been drawn between agnosticism and bisexuality, as bisexuals can also face discrimination from both ends of a spectrum on similar grounds. However, this view supposes that belief is a spectrum rather than binary, as if someone could only half believe. Critics also point out that there is already a term for someone who does not actively believe in any deities: atheist.[[note]]Though this does depend on which definition of atheist you're using. For example, [[http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/atheism Merriam Webster]] defines atheism as a disbelief in god or a belief that there are no gods[[/note]]

Agnostic theism is more unusual, but some have argued philosophers such as the [[{{UsefulNotes/Existentialism}} existentialist]] Soren Kierkegaard qualify. Kierkegaard felt the existence of God was something which no one could rationally prove, and they had to make a "leap of faith." The same may be found in fideism, a view arguing that belief in God must rest upon faith alone, wholly independent of reason.

to:

Many agnostics find this accusation insulting, and parallels have been drawn between agnosticism and bisexuality, as bisexuals can also face discrimination from both ends of a spectrum on similar grounds. However, this view supposes that belief is a spectrum rather than binary, as if someone could only half believe. Additional factors that further muddle the issue is the psychological aspect of the person, as one might believe more '' strongly '' at one time, and not think much about one's particular faith at another, also, a country might be 90% Catholic, but have only ~17% actively going to church. Critics also point out that there is already a term for someone who does not actively believe in any deities: atheist.[[note]]Though this does depend on which definition of atheist you're using. For example, [[http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/atheism Merriam Webster]] defines atheism as a disbelief in god or a belief that there are no gods[[/note]]

Agnostic theism is more unusual, but some representing a from of deep connection with Judaism and early Church/Christianity. Some have argued that philosophers such as the [[{{UsefulNotes/Existentialism}} existentialist]] Soren Kierkegaard qualify. Kierkegaard felt the existence of God was something which no one could rationally prove, and they had to make a "leap of faith." The same may be found in fideism, a view arguing that belief in God must rest upon faith alone, wholly independent of reason.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


Many agnostics find this accusation insulting, and parallels have been drawn between agnosticism and bisexuality, as bisexuals can also face discrimination from both ends of a spectrum on similar grounds. However, this view supposes that belief is a spectrum rather than binary, as if someone could only half believe. Critics also point out that there is already a term for someone who does not actively believe in any deities: atheist.

to:

Many agnostics find this accusation insulting, and parallels have been drawn between agnosticism and bisexuality, as bisexuals can also face discrimination from both ends of a spectrum on similar grounds. However, this view supposes that belief is a spectrum rather than binary, as if someone could only half believe. Critics also point out that there is already a term for someone who does not actively believe in any deities: atheist.
atheist.[[note]]Though this does depend on which definition of atheist you're using. For example, [[http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/atheism Merriam Webster]] defines atheism as a disbelief in god or a belief that there are no gods[[/note]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
I wouldn\'t call it large, personally


"Agnosticism" is the view that the existence of any gods is unknown or unknowable. The term was coined by [[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thomas_Henry_Huxley Thomas Henry Huxley]] in 1869, though the concept has been [[http://www.uctaa.net/articles/meds/med13/med244.html kicking around for much longer]]. Agnostics usually appear under the category of "non-believers" along with atheists. Incidentally, there is a large degree of overlap with UsefulNotes/{{atheism}}.

to:

"Agnosticism" is the view that the existence of any gods is unknown or unknowable. The term was coined by [[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thomas_Henry_Huxley Thomas Henry Huxley]] in 1869, though the concept has been [[http://www.uctaa.net/articles/meds/med13/med244.html kicking around for much longer]]. Agnostics usually appear under the category of "non-believers" along with atheists. Incidentally, there is a large degree of overlap with UsefulNotes/{{atheism}}.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


Agnostic theism is more unusual, but some have argued philosophers such as the [[UsefulNotes/Existentialism existentialist]] Soren Kierkegaard qualify. Kierkegaard felt the existence of God was something which no one could rationally prove, and they had to make a "leap of faith." The same may be found in fideism, a view arguing that belief in God must rest upon faith alone, wholly independent of reason.

to:

Agnostic theism is more unusual, but some have argued philosophers such as the [[UsefulNotes/Existentialism [[{{UsefulNotes/Existentialism}} existentialist]] Soren Kierkegaard qualify. Kierkegaard felt the existence of God was something which no one could rationally prove, and they had to make a "leap of faith." The same may be found in fideism, a view arguing that belief in God must rest upon faith alone, wholly independent of reason.

Top