Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 2 (click to see context) from:
* ScrewedByTheLawyers: [[SubvertedTrope Subverted]] in regards to Creator/{{Lucasfilm}}. Warner/Chappell, a music company who holds the music rights jointly with Disney, tried to monetize the film for their own purposes due to leitmotives from ''Franchise/StarWars'' being used in it. However, Star Wars Theory had already made an agreement with Lucasfilm that the film could be made with no one profiting from it. Shortly after Warner/Chappell's claim, Lucasfilm stepped in and confirmed that the existing agreement would still stand.
to:
* ScrewedByTheLawyers: [[SubvertedTrope Subverted]] in regards to Creator/{{Lucasfilm}}. Warner/Chappell, a music company who holds the music rights jointly with Disney, Creator/{{Disney}}, tried to monetize the film for their own purposes due to leitmotives from ''Franchise/StarWars'' being used in it. However, Star Wars Theory had already made an agreement with Lucasfilm that the film could be made with no one profiting from it. Shortly after Warner/Chappell's claim, Lucasfilm stepped in and confirmed that the existing agreement would still stand.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 1 (click to see context) from:
* DevelopmentHell: Episode 1 came out in 2018. As of 2023, Episode 2 has only just entered pre-production.
to:
* DevelopmentHell: ExtremelyLengthyCreation: Episode 1 came out in 2018. As of 2023, Episode 2 has only just entered pre-production.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* DevelopmentHell: Episode 1 came out in 2018. As of 2023, Episode 2 has only just entered pre-production.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 1 (click to see context) from:
* ScrewedByTheLawyers: [[SubvertedTrope Subverted.]] Warner/Chappell, a music company who holds the music rights jointly with Disney, tried to monetize the film for their own purposes due to leitmotives from ''Franchise/StarWars'' being used in it. However, Star Wars Theory had already made an agreement with Creator/{{Lucasfilm}} that the film could be made with no one profiting from it. Shortly after Warner/Chappell’s claim, Lucasfilm stepped in and confirmed that the existing agreement would still stand.
to:
* ScrewedByTheLawyers: [[SubvertedTrope Subverted.]] Subverted]] in regards to Creator/{{Lucasfilm}}. Warner/Chappell, a music company who holds the music rights jointly with Disney, tried to monetize the film for their own purposes due to leitmotives from ''Franchise/StarWars'' being used in it. However, Star Wars Theory had already made an agreement with Creator/{{Lucasfilm}} Lucasfilm that the film could be made with no one profiting from it. Shortly after Warner/Chappell’s claim, Lucasfilm stepped in and confirmed that the existing agreement would still stand.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 1 (click to see context) from:
* ScrewedByTheLawyers: [[SubvertedTrope Subverted.]] Warner/Chappell, a music company who holds the music rights joinedly with Disney, tried to monetize the film for their own purposes due to leitmotives from ''Franchise/StarWars'' being used in it. However, Star Wars Theory had already made an agreement with Creator/{{Lucasfilm}} that the film could be made with no one profiting from it. Shortly after Warner/Chappell’s claim, Lucasfilm stepped in and confirmed that the existing agreement would still stand.
to:
* ScrewedByTheLawyers: [[SubvertedTrope Subverted.]] Warner/Chappell, a music company who holds the music rights joinedly jointly with Disney, tried to monetize the film for their own purposes due to leitmotives from ''Franchise/StarWars'' being used in it. However, Star Wars Theory had already made an agreement with Creator/{{Lucasfilm}} that the film could be made with no one profiting from it. Shortly after Warner/Chappell’s claim, Lucasfilm stepped in and confirmed that the existing agreement would still stand.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Changed line(s) 1 (click to see context) from:
* ScrewedByTheLawyers: [[SubvertedTrope Subverted.]] Warner/Chappell, a music company owned by Disney, tried to monetize the film for their own purposes due to leitmotives from ''Franchise/StarWars'' being used in it. However, Star Wars Theory had already made an agreement with Creator/{{Lucasfilm}} that the film could be made with no one profiting from it. Shortly after Warner/Chappell’s claim, Lucasfilm stepped in and confirmed that the existing agreement would still stand.
to:
* ScrewedByTheLawyers: [[SubvertedTrope Subverted.]] Warner/Chappell, a music company owned by who holds the music rights joinedly with Disney, tried to monetize the film for their own purposes due to leitmotives from ''Franchise/StarWars'' being used in it. However, Star Wars Theory had already made an agreement with Creator/{{Lucasfilm}} that the film could be made with no one profiting from it. Shortly after Warner/Chappell’s claim, Lucasfilm stepped in and confirmed that the existing agreement would still stand.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 1 (click to see context) from:
* ScrewedByTheLawyers: [[SubvertedTrope Subverted.]] Warner/Chappell, a music company owned by Disney, tried to monetize the film for their own purposes due to leitmotives from ''Franchise/StarWars'' being used in it. However, Star Wars Theory had already made an agreement with Lucasfilm that the film could be made with no one profiting from it. Shortly after Warner/Chappell’s claim, Lucasfilm stepped in and confirmed that the existing agreement would still stand.
to:
* ScrewedByTheLawyers: [[SubvertedTrope Subverted.]] Warner/Chappell, a music company owned by Disney, tried to monetize the film for their own purposes due to leitmotives from ''Franchise/StarWars'' being used in it. However, Star Wars Theory had already made an agreement with Lucasfilm Creator/{{Lucasfilm}} that the film could be made with no one profiting from it. Shortly after Warner/Chappell’s claim, Lucasfilm stepped in and confirmed that the existing agreement would still stand.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 1 (click to see context) from:
* ScrewedByTheLawyers: [[SubvertedTrope Subverted.]] Warner/Chappell, a music company owned by Disney, tried to monetize the film for their own purposes due to leitmotifs from ''Franchise/StarWars'' being used in it. However, Star Wars Theory had already made an agreement with Lucasfilm that the film could be made with no one profiting from it. Shortly after Warner/Chappell’s claim, Lucasfilm stepped in and confirmed that the existing agreement would still stand.
to:
* ScrewedByTheLawyers: [[SubvertedTrope Subverted.]] Warner/Chappell, a music company owned by Disney, tried to monetize the film for their own purposes due to leitmotifs leitmotives from ''Franchise/StarWars'' being used in it. However, Star Wars Theory had already made an agreement with Lucasfilm that the film could be made with no one profiting from it. Shortly after Warner/Chappell’s claim, Lucasfilm stepped in and confirmed that the existing agreement would still stand.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 1 (click to see context) from:
* ScrewedByTheLawyers: [[SubvertedTrope Subverted.]] Warner/Chappell, a music company owned by Disney, tried to monetize the film for their own purposes due to leitmotifs from Franchise/StarWars being used. However, Star Wars Theory had already made an agreement with Lucasfilm that the film could be made with no one profiting from it. Shortly after Warner/Chappell’s claim, Lucasfilm stepped in and confirmed that the existing agreement would still stand.
to:
* ScrewedByTheLawyers: [[SubvertedTrope Subverted.]] Warner/Chappell, a music company owned by Disney, tried to monetize the film for their own purposes due to leitmotifs from Franchise/StarWars ''Franchise/StarWars'' being used.used in it. However, Star Wars Theory had already made an agreement with Lucasfilm that the film could be made with no one profiting from it. Shortly after Warner/Chappell’s claim, Lucasfilm stepped in and confirmed that the existing agreement would still stand.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* ScrewedByTheLawyers: [[SubvertedTrope Subverted.]] Warner/Chappell, a music company owned by Disney, tried to monetize the film for their own purposes due to leitmotifs from Franchise/StarWars being used. However, Star Wars Theory had already made an agreement with Lucasfilm that the film could be made with no one profiting from it. Shortly after Warner/Chappell’s claim, Lucasfilm stepped in and confirmed that the existing agreement would still stand.
----
----
