Follow TV Tropes

Following

History Trivia / RedStormRising

Go To

OR

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** The Novel also points out several weakness in Russian logistics and military, which causes massive losses against a foe in equal-footing. As of 2022, none of these weaknesses pointed out were ever fixed "in real life"
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ReferencedBy: Former ''Series/TopGearUK'' host Creator/JeremyClarkson began reading a passage from ''Red Storm Rising'' while his cohosts were trying to recite from ''Literature/TheHitchhikersGuideToTheGalaxy'' for ''The Big Read.''

to:

* ReferencedBy: Former ''Series/TopGearUK'' host Creator/JeremyClarkson began reading a passage from ''Red Storm Rising'' while his cohosts were trying to recite from ''Literature/TheHitchhikersGuideToTheGalaxy'' in an "outtake" for ''The Big Read.''
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* ReferencedBy: Former ''Series/TopGearUK'' host Creator/JeremyClarkson began reading a passage from ''Red Storm Rising'' while his cohosts were trying to recite from ''Literature/TheHitchhikersGuideToTheGalaxy'' for ''The Big Read.''
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Accidentally Accurate has been renamed per TRS thread. Cut Word Cruft.


* AccidentallyAccurate: in a half-meta, half-InUniverse example that sits squarely astride the FourthWall. NATO intel in the book had evaluated Soviet [[ReportingNames Tu-22 "Blinder"]] bombers as being unable to carry missiles, which is disproven when a "Blinder" regiment raids [[HomeBase Stornoway airbase]] with a missile attack. As it turns out, RealLife Tu-22s ''could'' carry missiles, as the Iraqis proved in the UsefulNotes/IranIraqWar.
* IKnewIt - Several of Clancy's theories, such as high ammunition expenditure and attack helicopters being surprisingly vulnerable, were later proven correct during the various conflicts in the Middle East.
* TechMarchesOn: Several of Clancy's books set TwentyMinutesIntoTheFuture make use of proposed weapons systems that never went into production, or never existed in the first place.
** The most famous example is the "F-19 Frisbee stealth fighter". Clancy fell hook, line, and sinker for a fake description of the rumored stealth fighter's appearance and capabilities leaked by the Pentagon to conceal the real engineering principles behind the actual F-117 Nighthawk.

to:

* AccidentallyAccurate: in AccidentallyCorrectWriting: In a half-meta, half-InUniverse example that sits squarely astride the FourthWall. NATO intel in the book had evaluated Soviet [[ReportingNames Tu-22 "Blinder"]] bombers as being unable to carry missiles, which is disproven when a "Blinder" regiment raids [[HomeBase Stornoway airbase]] with a missile attack. As it turns out, RealLife Tu-22s ''could'' carry missiles, as the Iraqis proved in the UsefulNotes/IranIraqWar.
* IKnewIt - IKnewIt: Several of Clancy's theories, such as high ammunition expenditure and attack helicopters being surprisingly vulnerable, were later proven correct during the various conflicts in the Middle East.
* TechMarchesOn: Several of Clancy's books set TwentyMinutesIntoTheFuture make use of proposed weapons systems that never went into production, or never existed in the first place.
place:
** The most famous example is the "F-19 Frisbee stealth fighter". Clancy fell hook, line, and sinker for a fake description of the rumored stealth fighter's appearance and capabilities leaked by the Pentagon to conceal the real engineering principles behind the actual F-117 Nighthawk.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
aesthetic quibble

Added DiffLines:

----
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
moved from main page


* IKnewIt - Several of Clancy's theories, such as high ammunition expenditure and attack helicopters being surprisingly vulnerable, were later proven correct during the various conflicts in the Middle East.

to:

* IKnewIt - Several of Clancy's theories, such as high ammunition expenditure and attack helicopters being surprisingly vulnerable, were later proven correct during the various conflicts in the Middle East.East.
* TechMarchesOn: Several of Clancy's books set TwentyMinutesIntoTheFuture make use of proposed weapons systems that never went into production, or never existed in the first place.
** The most famous example is the "F-19 Frisbee stealth fighter". Clancy fell hook, line, and sinker for a fake description of the rumored stealth fighter's appearance and capabilities leaked by the Pentagon to conceal the real engineering principles behind the actual F-117 Nighthawk.
** NATO at the time had caught wind of a ZSU-30 antiaircraft gun, and had thought it to be a gatling-type antiaircraft gun, in which role it features in the novel. In actuality, the Soviet 30mm antiaircraft gun would be the [=9K22 Tunguska=]--not a rotary-cannon design at all.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* AccidentallyAccurate: in a half-meta, half-InUniverse example that sits squarely astride the FourthWall. NATO intel in the book had evaluated Soviet [[ReportingNames Tu-22 "Blinder"]] bombers as being unable to carry missiles, which is disproven when a "Blinder" regiment raids [[HomeBase Stornoway airbase]] with a missile attack. As it turns out, RealLife Tu-22s ''could'' carry missiles, as the Iraqis proved in the {{Iran-Iraq War}}.

to:

* AccidentallyAccurate: in a half-meta, half-InUniverse example that sits squarely astride the FourthWall. NATO intel in the book had evaluated Soviet [[ReportingNames Tu-22 "Blinder"]] bombers as being unable to carry missiles, which is disproven when a "Blinder" regiment raids [[HomeBase Stornoway airbase]] with a missile attack. As it turns out, RealLife Tu-22s ''could'' carry missiles, as the Iraqis proved in the {{Iran-Iraq War}}.UsefulNotes/IranIraqWar.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* AccidentallyAccurate: in a half-meta, half-InUniverse example that sits squarely astride the FourthWall. NATO intel in the book had evaluated Soviet [[ReportingNames Tu-22 "Blinder"]] bombers as being unable to carry missiles, which is disproven when a "Blinder" regiment raids [[HomeBase Stornoway airbase]] with a missile attack. As it turns out, RealLife Tu-22s ''could'' carry missiles, as the Iraqis proved in the {{Iran-Iraq War}}.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* IKnewIt - Several of Clancy's theories, such as high ammunition expenditure and attack helicopters being surprisingly vulnerable, were later proven correct during the various conflicts in the Middle East.

Top