Follow TV Tropes

Following

History Trivia / LegoDinoAttack

Go To

OR

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** The online ''Dino Attack'' game also refers to "captured" dinosaurs, meaning it is likely a holdover from an earlier prototype of the line (see below) or is a case of NonLethalKO[=/=]NeverSayDie.

Added: 1078

Changed: 4

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* EarlyDraftTieIn:
** The T-Rex's [[http://img3.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20100704171748/lego/images/1/15/T-rex.jpg description]] on the website seemingly describes it as a machine and not the real thing, sparking a lot of confusion over [[AmbiguousRobots whether the dinosaurs are actually robots]]. It seems that this is a remnant of the theme's original story plans [[http://www.reddit.com/r/lego/comments/2d7bp4/anyone_remember_this_beauty_from_2005_dino_attack/cjmxixx described by Mark Stafford]] where the dinosaurs were {{Murderous Malfunctioning Machine}}s instead of mutants.
** A small [[http://web.archive.org/web/20060206030353/http://www.lego.com/eng/dino/attack/productPage.aspx blurb]] for the online ''Dino Attack'' game refers to the Dino Attack team as "D.I.N.O Force team". The name "D.I.N.O. Force" was also used in [[https://www.eurobricks.com/forum/index.php?/forums/topic/846-dino-attack-new-theme/ a Toy Fair 2005 press release]], suggesting that it was a preliminary name for the team that never got used in other media once the theme was actually released.



* WriterConflictsWithCanon: [[http://www.reddit.com/r/lego/comments/2d7bp4/anyone_remember_this_beauty_from_2005_dino_attack/cjmxixx According to LEGO designer Mark Stafford]], the dinos in ''Dino Attack'' were robots and animatronics that went out of control and escaped from a theme park, which was essentially ''Film/{{Westworld}}'' [[JustForFun/XMeetsY Meets]] ''Film/JurassicPark''. This explanation was loosely hinted upon on the LEGO Dino Attack website, which [[http://img3.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20100704171748/lego/images/1/15/T-rex.jpg described the T-Rex]] as "the ultimate machine creature" and went out of its way to compare it to "the real thing". However, aside from that one instance, none of the toyline's marketing referred to the dinosaurs as robots. Instead, LEGO Shop At Home catalogs, magazines, the online game, and [[http://www.brickshelf.com/gallery/UHAUHA/7475/7475-002.jpg even the back of the sets' boxes]] consistently described the dinosaurs as mutants, which became the long-accepted canonical explanation among fans who dismissed the website's T-Rex description as merely metaphorical.

to:

* WriterConflictsWithCanon: [[http://www.reddit.com/r/lego/comments/2d7bp4/anyone_remember_this_beauty_from_2005_dino_attack/cjmxixx According to LEGO designer Mark Stafford]], the dinos in ''Dino Attack'' were robots and animatronics that went out of control and escaped from a theme park, which was essentially ''Film/{{Westworld}}'' [[JustForFun/XMeetsY Meets]] ''Film/JurassicPark''. This explanation was loosely hinted upon on the LEGO ''LEGO Dino Attack Attack'' website, which [[http://img3.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20100704171748/lego/images/1/15/T-rex.jpg described the T-Rex]] as "the ultimate machine creature" and went out of its way to compare it to "the real thing". However, aside from that one instance, none of the toyline's marketing referred to the dinosaurs as robots. Instead, LEGO Shop At Home catalogs, magazines, the online game, and [[http://www.brickshelf.com/gallery/UHAUHA/7475/7475-002.jpg even the back of the sets' boxes]] consistently described the dinosaurs as mutants, which became the long-accepted canonical explanation among fans who dismissed the website's T-Rex description as merely metaphorical.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Someone on Brickset pointed out that this example could use a direct link to the original Greg quote.


** According to [[WordOfGod Greg Farshtey]], the prototypes for the ''Dino Attack'' line did not revolve around ''fighting'' dinosaurs, but instead around ''capturing'' dinosaurs, much like ''Toys/LEGOAdventurers'' and even ''Dino 2010''. However, the focus group was reportedly displeased with the sets and wanted more action, resulting in the DarkerAndEdgier turn that the series took. [[Toys/LEGODino Makes you wonder how much the focus group can change in only seven years, doesn't it?]]
** As mentioned under NoExportForYou, ''Dino Attack'' was created solely for the North American market and was not intended to be released in any way in the European market, which would have received the ''Toys/LEGOVikings'' line instead. Fortunately, after an outcry from both sides of the Atlantic, ''Dino Attack'' was released in Europe (albeit as ''Dino 2010'') and North America also received the ''Vikings'' theme.

to:

** [[https://greg.thegreatarchives.com/2008-2010/page84#post3354-line20 According to [[WordOfGod Greg Farshtey]], the prototypes for the ''Dino Attack'' line did not revolve around ''fighting'' dinosaurs, but instead around ''capturing'' dinosaurs, much like ''Toys/LEGOAdventurers'' and even ''Dino 2010''. However, the focus group was reportedly displeased with the sets and wanted more action, resulting in the DarkerAndEdgier turn that the series took. [[Toys/LEGODino Makes you wonder how much the focus group can change in only seven years, doesn't it?]]
** As mentioned under NoExportForYou, ''Dino Attack'' was created solely for the North American market and was [[NoExportForYou not intended to be released in any way in the European market, market]], which would have received the ''Toys/LEGOVikings'' line instead. Fortunately, after an outcry from both sides of the Atlantic, ''Dino Attack'' was released in Europe (albeit as ''Dino 2010'') and North America also received the ''Vikings'' theme.

Added: 1118

Changed: 34

Removed: 1069

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* DevelopmentGag: Dr. Nicole Soscia, a character from [[https://web.archive.org/web/20060113050957/http://www.lego.com/eng/dino/attack/story2.aspx the online story]] for ''Dino Attack'', is named after one of The LEGO Group's ''LEGO Magazine'' writers (mentioned in [[http://www.maskofdestiny.com/story/other/Interview_Greg_Farshtey_95252.asp this interview]] with Greg Farshtey).
* FlipFlopOfGod: [[http://www.reddit.com/r/lego/comments/2d7bp4/anyone_remember_this_beauty_from_2005_dino_attack/cjmxixx According to LEGO designer Mark Stafford]], the dinos in ''Dino Attack'' were robots and animatronics that went out of control and escaped from a theme park, which was essentially ''Film/{{Westworld}}'' [[JustForFun/XMeetsY Meets]] ''Film/JurassicPark''. This explanation was loosely hinted upon on the LEGO Dino Attack website, which [[http://img3.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20100704171748/lego/images/1/15/T-rex.jpg described the T-Rex]] as "the ultimate machine creature" and went out of its way to explicitly say that it was not "the real thing". However, aside from that one instance, none of the toyline's marketing referred to the dinosaurs as robots. Instead, LEGO Shop@Home catalogs and [[http://www.brickshelf.com/gallery/UHAUHA/7475/7475-002.jpg even the back of the sets' boxes]] described the dinosaurs as mutants, which became the long-accepted explanation among fans who dismissed the website's T-Rex description as merely metaphorical.

to:

* DevelopmentGag: Dr. Nicole Soscia, a character from [[https://web.archive.org/web/20060113050957/http://www.lego.com/eng/dino/attack/story2.aspx the online story]] for ''Dino Attack'', is named after one of The LEGO Group's ''LEGO Magazine'' writers (mentioned in [[http://www.[[https://www.maskofdestiny.com/story/other/Interview_Greg_Farshtey_95252.asp com/news/interview-greg-farshtey this interview]] with Greg Farshtey).
* FlipFlopOfGod: [[http://www.reddit.com/r/lego/comments/2d7bp4/anyone_remember_this_beauty_from_2005_dino_attack/cjmxixx According to LEGO designer Mark Stafford]], the dinos in ''Dino Attack'' were robots and animatronics that went out of control and escaped from a theme park, which was essentially ''Film/{{Westworld}}'' [[JustForFun/XMeetsY Meets]] ''Film/JurassicPark''. This explanation was loosely hinted upon on the LEGO Dino Attack website, which [[http://img3.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20100704171748/lego/images/1/15/T-rex.jpg described the T-Rex]] as "the ultimate machine creature" and went out of its way to explicitly say that it was not "the real thing". However, aside from that one instance, none of the toyline's marketing referred to the dinosaurs as robots. Instead, LEGO Shop@Home catalogs and [[http://www.brickshelf.com/gallery/UHAUHA/7475/7475-002.jpg even the back of the sets' boxes]] described the dinosaurs as mutants, which became the long-accepted explanation among fans who dismissed the website's T-Rex description as merely metaphorical.
Farshtey).


Added DiffLines:

* WriterConflictsWithCanon: [[http://www.reddit.com/r/lego/comments/2d7bp4/anyone_remember_this_beauty_from_2005_dino_attack/cjmxixx According to LEGO designer Mark Stafford]], the dinos in ''Dino Attack'' were robots and animatronics that went out of control and escaped from a theme park, which was essentially ''Film/{{Westworld}}'' [[JustForFun/XMeetsY Meets]] ''Film/JurassicPark''. This explanation was loosely hinted upon on the LEGO Dino Attack website, which [[http://img3.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20100704171748/lego/images/1/15/T-rex.jpg described the T-Rex]] as "the ultimate machine creature" and went out of its way to compare it to "the real thing". However, aside from that one instance, none of the toyline's marketing referred to the dinosaurs as robots. Instead, LEGO Shop At Home catalogs, magazines, the online game, and [[http://www.brickshelf.com/gallery/UHAUHA/7475/7475-002.jpg even the back of the sets' boxes]] consistently described the dinosaurs as mutants, which became the long-accepted canonical explanation among fans who dismissed the website's T-Rex description as merely metaphorical.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Capitalization was fixed from Trivia.LEGO Dino Attack to Trivia.Lego Dino Attack. Null edit to update page.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* FlipFlopOfGod: [[http://www.reddit.com/r/lego/comments/2d7bp4/anyone_remember_this_beauty_from_2005_dino_attack/cjmxixx According to LEGO designer Mark Stafford]], the dinos in ''Dino Attack'' were robots and animatronics that went out of control and escaped from a theme park, which was essentially ''Film/{{Westworld}}'' [[XMeetsY Meets]] ''Film/JurassicPark''. This explanation was loosely hinted upon on the LEGO Dino Attack website, which [[http://img3.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20100704171748/lego/images/1/15/T-rex.jpg described the T-Rex]] as "the ultimate machine creature" and went out of its way to explicitly say that it was not "the real thing". However, aside from that one instance, none of the toyline's marketing referred to the dinosaurs as robots. Instead, LEGO Shop@Home catalogs and [[http://www.brickshelf.com/gallery/UHAUHA/7475/7475-002.jpg even the back of the sets' boxes]] described the dinosaurs as mutants, which became the long-accepted explanation among fans who dismissed the website's T-Rex description as merely metaphorical.

to:

* FlipFlopOfGod: [[http://www.reddit.com/r/lego/comments/2d7bp4/anyone_remember_this_beauty_from_2005_dino_attack/cjmxixx According to LEGO designer Mark Stafford]], the dinos in ''Dino Attack'' were robots and animatronics that went out of control and escaped from a theme park, which was essentially ''Film/{{Westworld}}'' [[XMeetsY [[JustForFun/XMeetsY Meets]] ''Film/JurassicPark''. This explanation was loosely hinted upon on the LEGO Dino Attack website, which [[http://img3.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20100704171748/lego/images/1/15/T-rex.jpg described the T-Rex]] as "the ultimate machine creature" and went out of its way to explicitly say that it was not "the real thing". However, aside from that one instance, none of the toyline's marketing referred to the dinosaurs as robots. Instead, LEGO Shop@Home catalogs and [[http://www.brickshelf.com/gallery/UHAUHA/7475/7475-002.jpg even the back of the sets' boxes]] described the dinosaurs as mutants, which became the long-accepted explanation among fans who dismissed the website's T-Rex description as merely metaphorical.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* DevelopmentGag: Dr. Nicole Soscia, a character from [[https://web.archive.org/web/20060113050957/http://www.lego.com/eng/dino/attack/story2.aspx the online story]] for ''Dino Attack'', is named after one of The LEGO Group's ''LEGO Magazine'' writers (mentioned in [[http://www.maskofdestiny.com/story/other/Interview_Greg_Farshtey_95252.asp this interview]] with Greg Farshtey).
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* FlipFlopOfGod: [[http://www.reddit.com/r/lego/comments/2d7bp4/anyone_remember_this_beauty_from_2005_dino_attack/cjmxixx According to LEGO designer Mark Stafford]], the dinos in ''Dino Attack'' were robots and animations that went out of control and escaped from a theme park, which was essentially ''Film/{{Westworld}}'' [[XMeetsY Meets]] ''Film/JurassicPark''. This explanation was loosely hinted upon on the LEGO Dino Attack website, which [[http://img3.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20100704171748/lego/images/1/15/T-rex.jpg described the T-Rex]] as "the ultimate machine creature" and went out of its way to explicitly say that it was not "the real thing". However, aside from that one instance, none of the toyline's marketing referred to the dinosaurs as robots. Instead, LEGO Shop@Home catalogs and [[http://www.brickshelf.com/gallery/UHAUHA/7475/7475-002.jpg even the back of the sets' boxes]] described the dinosaurs as mutants, which became the long-accepted explanation among fans who dismissed the website's T-Rex description as merely metaphorical.

to:

* FlipFlopOfGod: [[http://www.reddit.com/r/lego/comments/2d7bp4/anyone_remember_this_beauty_from_2005_dino_attack/cjmxixx According to LEGO designer Mark Stafford]], the dinos in ''Dino Attack'' were robots and animations animatronics that went out of control and escaped from a theme park, which was essentially ''Film/{{Westworld}}'' [[XMeetsY Meets]] ''Film/JurassicPark''. This explanation was loosely hinted upon on the LEGO Dino Attack website, which [[http://img3.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20100704171748/lego/images/1/15/T-rex.jpg described the T-Rex]] as "the ultimate machine creature" and went out of its way to explicitly say that it was not "the real thing". However, aside from that one instance, none of the toyline's marketing referred to the dinosaurs as robots. Instead, LEGO Shop@Home catalogs and [[http://www.brickshelf.com/gallery/UHAUHA/7475/7475-002.jpg even the back of the sets' boxes]] described the dinosaurs as mutants, which became the long-accepted explanation among fans who dismissed the website's T-Rex description as merely metaphorical.

Added: 1056

Changed: 628

Removed: 335

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
After finding that image of the Fire Hammer\'s box and pulling out a LEGO catalog from 2005, I think this goes beyond \"poor choice of words\" and into outright contradiction.


* FlipFlopOfGod: [[http://www.reddit.com/r/lego/comments/2d7bp4/anyone_remember_this_beauty_from_2005_dino_attack/cjmxixx According to LEGO designer Mark Stafford]], the dinos in ''Dino Attack'' were robots and animations that went out of control and escaped from a theme park, which was essentially ''Film/{{Westworld}}'' [[XMeetsY Meets]] ''Film/JurassicPark''. This explanation was loosely hinted upon on the LEGO Dino Attack website, which [[http://img3.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20100704171748/lego/images/1/15/T-rex.jpg described the T-Rex]] as "the ultimate machine creature" and went out of its way to explicitly say that it was not "the real thing". However, aside from that one instance, none of the toyline's marketing referred to the dinosaurs as robots. Instead, LEGO Shop@Home catalogs and [[http://www.brickshelf.com/gallery/UHAUHA/7475/7475-002.jpg even the back of the sets' boxes]] described the dinosaurs as mutants, which became the long-accepted explanation among fans who dismissed the website's T-Rex description as merely metaphorical.



* WordOfDante: Apparently, the larger dinosaurs being mutants that were created and genetically modified in a laboratory seems to be a case of this. Most fans accept this explanation and ''Roleplay/DinoAttackRPG'' ran with it, but [[http://www.reddit.com/r/lego/comments/2d7bp4/anyone_remember_this_beauty_from_2005_dino_attack/cjmxixx according to]] [[WordOfGod Mark Stafford]], they were intended to be robots. This may also stem from some poorly-chosen wording by LEGO's marketing team, which (aside from a few hints on the website which were largely misinterpreted as metaphorical) did not make it clear that they were robots.
* WordOfGod: [[http://www.reddit.com/r/lego/comments/2d7bp4/anyone_remember_this_beauty_from_2005_dino_attack/cjmxixx According to LEGO designer Mark Stafford]], the robotic dinos in ''Dino Attack'' went out of control and escaped from a theme park, which was essentially ''Film/{{Westworld}}'' [[XMeetsY Meets]] ''Film/JurassicPark''.

to:

* WordOfDante: Apparently, When the larger dinosaurs being FlipFlopOfGod favors the "mutants" explanation over the "robots" explanation, the mutants that were being created and genetically modified in a laboratory seems to be a case of this. Most this, since this is the commonly-accepted theory among fans accept this even though no official explanation and ''Roleplay/DinoAttackRPG'' ran with it, but [[http://www.reddit.com/r/lego/comments/2d7bp4/anyone_remember_this_beauty_from_2005_dino_attack/cjmxixx according to]] [[WordOfGod Mark Stafford]], they were intended to be robots. This may also stem from some poorly-chosen wording by LEGO's marketing team, which (aside from a few hints on was given for the website which were largely misinterpreted as metaphorical) did not make it clear that they were robots.
* WordOfGod: [[http://www.reddit.com/r/lego/comments/2d7bp4/anyone_remember_this_beauty_from_2005_dino_attack/cjmxixx According to LEGO designer Mark Stafford]], the robotic dinos in ''Dino Attack'' went out of control and escaped from a theme park, which was essentially ''Film/{{Westworld}}'' [[XMeetsY Meets]] ''Film/JurassicPark''.
mutants' origins.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* WordOfDante: Apparently, the larger dinosaurs being mutants seems to be a case of this. Most fans accept this explanation and ''Roleplay/DinoAttackRPG'' ran with it, but [[http://www.reddit.com/r/lego/comments/2d7bp4/anyone_remember_this_beauty_from_2005_dino_attack/cjmxixx according to]] [[WordOfGod Mark Stafford]], they were intended to be robots. This may also stem from some poorly-chosen wording by LEGO's marketing team, which (aside from a few hints on the website which were largely misinterpreted as metaphorical) did not make it clear that they were robots.

to:

* WordOfDante: Apparently, the larger dinosaurs being mutants that were created and genetically modified in a laboratory seems to be a case of this. Most fans accept this explanation and ''Roleplay/DinoAttackRPG'' ran with it, but [[http://www.reddit.com/r/lego/comments/2d7bp4/anyone_remember_this_beauty_from_2005_dino_attack/cjmxixx according to]] [[WordOfGod Mark Stafford]], they were intended to be robots. This may also stem from some poorly-chosen wording by LEGO's marketing team, which (aside from a few hints on the website which were largely misinterpreted as metaphorical) did not make it clear that they were robots.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* WordOfGod: [[http://www.reddit.com/r/lego/comments/2d7bp4/anyone_remember_this_beauty_from_2005_dino_attack/cjmxixx According to LEGO designer Mark Stafford]], the robotic dinos in ''Dino Attack'' went out of control and escaped from a theme park, which was essentially ''Film/{{Westworld}}'' [[XMeetsY Meets]] ''Film/JurassicPark''.

Added: 1482

Changed: 717

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* NoExportForYou: If you lived in Europe and wanted Dino Attack sets, or if you lived in America and wanted Dino 2010 sets, then you were out of luck because The LEGO Group had zero intention of selling either version of the line outside its intended continent.
* WhatCouldHaveBeen: According to [[WordOfGod Greg Farshtey]], the prototypes for the Dino Attack line did not revolve around ''fighting'' dinosaurs, but instead around ''capturing'' dinosaurs, much like LEGOAdventurers and even Dino 2010. However, the focus group was reportedly displeased with the sets and wanted more action, resulting in the DarkerAndEdgier turn that the series took. [[Toys/LEGODino Makes you wonder how much the focus group can change in only seven years, doesn't it?]]

to:

* NoExportForYou: If you lived in Europe and wanted Dino Attack ''Dino Attack'' sets, or if you lived in America and wanted Dino 2010 ''Dino 2010'' sets, then you were out of luck because The LEGO Group had zero intention of selling either version of the line outside its intended continent.
continent. However, this is a step-up from [[http://www.reddit.com/r/lego/comments/2d7bp4/anyone_remember_this_beauty_from_2005_dino_attack/cjmxixx LEGO's original intention]], which was to not release this line in any form in the European market.
* WhatCouldHaveBeen: WhatCouldHaveBeen:
**
According to [[WordOfGod Greg Farshtey]], the prototypes for the Dino Attack ''Dino Attack'' line did not revolve around ''fighting'' dinosaurs, but instead around ''capturing'' dinosaurs, much like LEGOAdventurers ''Toys/LEGOAdventurers'' and even Dino 2010.''Dino 2010''. However, the focus group was reportedly displeased with the sets and wanted more action, resulting in the DarkerAndEdgier turn that the series took. [[Toys/LEGODino Makes you wonder how much the focus group can change in only seven years, doesn't it?]]it?]]
** As mentioned under NoExportForYou, ''Dino Attack'' was created solely for the North American market and was not intended to be released in any way in the European market, which would have received the ''Toys/LEGOVikings'' line instead. Fortunately, after an outcry from both sides of the Atlantic, ''Dino Attack'' was released in Europe (albeit as ''Dino 2010'') and North America also received the ''Vikings'' theme.
* WordOfDante: Apparently, the larger dinosaurs being mutants seems to be a case of this. Most fans accept this explanation and ''Roleplay/DinoAttackRPG'' ran with it, but [[http://www.reddit.com/r/lego/comments/2d7bp4/anyone_remember_this_beauty_from_2005_dino_attack/cjmxixx according to]] [[WordOfGod Mark Stafford]], they were intended to be robots. This may also stem from some poorly-chosen wording by LEGO's marketing team, which (aside from a few hints on the website which were largely misinterpreted as metaphorical) did not make it clear that they were robots.

Added: 757

Changed: 496

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* WhatCouldHaveBeen: According to [[WordOfGod Greg Farshtey]], the prototypes for the Dino Attack line did not revolve around ''fighting'' dinosaurs, but instead around ''capturing'' dinosaurs, much like LEGOAdventurers and even Dino 2010. However, the focus group was reportedly displeased with the sets and wanted more action, resulting in the DarkerAndEdgier turn that the series took. [[Toys/LEGODino Makes you wonder how much the focus group can change in only seven years, doesn't it?]]

to:

----
* NoExportForYou: If you lived in Europe and wanted Dino Attack sets, or if you lived in America and wanted Dino 2010 sets, then you were out of luck because The LEGO Group had zero intention of selling either version of the line outside its intended continent.
* WhatCouldHaveBeen: According to [[WordOfGod Greg Farshtey]], the prototypes for the Dino Attack line did not revolve around ''fighting'' dinosaurs, but instead around ''capturing'' dinosaurs, much like LEGOAdventurers and even Dino 2010. However, the focus group was reportedly displeased with the sets and wanted more action, resulting in the DarkerAndEdgier turn that the series took. [[Toys/LEGODino Makes you wonder how much the focus group can change in only seven years, doesn't it?]]it?]]
----
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* WhatCouldHaveBeen: According to [[WordOfGod Greg Farshtey]], the prototypes for the Dino Attack line did not revolve around ''fighting'' dinosaurs, but instead around ''capturing'' dinosaurs, much like LEGOAdventurers and even Dino 2010. However, the focus group was reportedly displeased with the sets and wanted more action, resulting in the DarkerAndEdgier turn that the series took. [[LEGODino Makes you wonder how much the focus group can change in only seven years, doesn't it?]]

to:

* WhatCouldHaveBeen: According to [[WordOfGod Greg Farshtey]], the prototypes for the Dino Attack line did not revolve around ''fighting'' dinosaurs, but instead around ''capturing'' dinosaurs, much like LEGOAdventurers and even Dino 2010. However, the focus group was reportedly displeased with the sets and wanted more action, resulting in the DarkerAndEdgier turn that the series took. [[LEGODino [[Toys/LEGODino Makes you wonder how much the focus group can change in only seven years, doesn't it?]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* WhatCouldHaveBeen: According to [[WordOfGod Greg Farshtey]], the prototypes for the Dino Attack line did not revolve around ''fighting'' dinosaurs, but instead around ''capturing'' dinosaurs, much like LEGOAdventurers and even Dino 2010. However, the focus group was reportedly displeased with the sets and wanted more action, resulting in the DarkerAndEdgier turn that the series took. [[LEGODino Makes you wonder how much the focus group can change in only seven years, doesn't it?]]

Top