Follow TV Tropes

Following

History SoYouWantTo / MakeTheNarratorACharacter

Go To

OR

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


An important tonal decision to make is whether your narrator is ''aware'' s/he is telling the story. ''Literature/TheCatcherInTheRye'', for instance, is very specifically a novel-length monologue by Holden Caulfield, being told to you while you visit Holden in a mental institution. The titular ''Literature/JaneEyre'' takes it a step further by directly BreakingTheFourthWall to address the audience directly ("Reader, I married him" is how the final chapter starts). However, other first-person narratives are a sort of on-the-spot record of what's going on in the person's head, such as ''Literature/{{Twilight}}'' and ''Literature/ASongOfIceAndFire''. These novels present the thoughts of their narrators (Bella Swan for ''Twilight'', many characters for ''Ice and Fire'') ''as they have them'', not after the fact. Precisely how the author stole those thoughts out of the characters' heads is [[HandWave typically not addressed]].

to:

An important tonal decision to make is whether your narrator is ''aware'' s/he is telling the story. ''Literature/TheCatcherInTheRye'', for instance, is very specifically a novel-length monologue by Holden Caulfield, being told to you while you visit Holden in a mental institution. The titular ''Literature/JaneEyre'' takes it a step further by directly BreakingTheFourthWall to address the audience directly ("Reader, I married him" is how the final chapter starts). However, other first-person narratives are a sort of on-the-spot record of what's going on in the person's head, such as ''Literature/{{Twilight}}'' ''Literature/TheTwilightSaga'' and ''Literature/ASongOfIceAndFire''. These novels present the thoughts of their narrators (Bella Swan for ''Twilight'', many characters for ''Ice and Fire'') ''as they have them'', not after the fact. Precisely how the author stole those thoughts out of the characters' heads is [[HandWave typically not addressed]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
The Chick is now a disambig, dewicking


!! The Narrator is TheChick?!

to:

!! The Narrator is TheChick?!
the TeamPet?!
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Loads And Loads Of Characters is no longer a trope


An important tonal decision to make is whether your narrator is ''aware'' s/he is telling the story. ''Literature/TheCatcherInTheRye'', for instance, is very specifically a novel-length monologue by Holden Caulfield, being told to you while you visit Holden in a mental institution. The titular ''Literature/JaneEyre'' takes it a step further by directly BreakingTheFourthWall to address the audience directly ("Reader, I married him" is how the final chapter starts). However, other first-person narratives are a sort of on-the-spot record of what's going on in the person's head, such as ''Literature/{{Twilight}}'' and ''Literature/ASongOfIceAndFire''. These novels present the thoughts of their narrators (Bella Swan for ''Twilight'', LoadsAndLoadsOfCharacters for ''Ice and Fire'') ''as they have them'', not after the fact. Precisely how the author stole those thoughts out of the characters' heads is [[HandWave typically not addressed]].

to:

An important tonal decision to make is whether your narrator is ''aware'' s/he is telling the story. ''Literature/TheCatcherInTheRye'', for instance, is very specifically a novel-length monologue by Holden Caulfield, being told to you while you visit Holden in a mental institution. The titular ''Literature/JaneEyre'' takes it a step further by directly BreakingTheFourthWall to address the audience directly ("Reader, I married him" is how the final chapter starts). However, other first-person narratives are a sort of on-the-spot record of what's going on in the person's head, such as ''Literature/{{Twilight}}'' and ''Literature/ASongOfIceAndFire''. These novels present the thoughts of their narrators (Bella Swan for ''Twilight'', LoadsAndLoadsOfCharacters many characters for ''Ice and Fire'') ''as they have them'', not after the fact. Precisely how the author stole those thoughts out of the characters' heads is [[HandWave typically not addressed]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

!! The Narrator is the BigBad?!

Alternatively, having the antagonist as the narrator provides a PerspectiveFlip to understand how they view about the heroes and the world they live in, especially if their role of being the narrator is [[NarratorAllAlong not being revealed until the very end]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Apostrophe fixes — there\'s probably a better way to do what I did, but I don\'t know it.


* AndThatLittleGirlWasMe is best suited for a story in which there are a lot of flashbacks or an autobiography. Or a story with hints of the authors past or a lot of AuthorAvatar's.

to:

* AndThatLittleGirlWasMe is best suited for a story in which there are a lot of flashbacks or an autobiography. Or a story with hints of the authors author's past or a lot of AuthorAvatar's.[[AuthorAvatar Author Avatars]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


Having the main character being the narrator is typically done by having the hero tell the story in the first person or NarratingThePresent. However TheHero can be the narrator through LetMeTellYouAStory and [[AndThatLittleGirlWasMe that hero was me]]. Depending on the hero being BookDumb, BookSmart, GenreSavvy, or whatever else can make narration different. It can show how TheHero changes during the story, what lessons they learn, who they come across and how they are maturing throughout the story. This is something to consider.

to:

Having the main character being the narrator is typically done by having the hero tell the story in the first person or NarratingThePresent. However TheHero can be the narrator through LetMeTellYouAStory and [[AndThatLittleGirlWasMe that hero was me]]. Depending on the hero being BookDumb, BookSmart, Book Smart, GenreSavvy, or whatever else can make narration different. It can show how TheHero changes during the story, what lessons they learn, who they come across and how they are maturing throughout the story. This is something to consider.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Your Mileage May Vary is an index, not a trope. It should not be linked from any trope or work page for any reason.


This decision can alter the story, because when telling a tale "after the fact," we have time to work on the presentation. Whilst writing, we often go back to smooth the prose, and to make sure we have actually said what we are trying to say; an oral recitation can also involve this sort of VerbalBackspace. This is why AllFirstPersonNarratorsWriteLikeNovelists. There can also be poor recollection; ''Series/HowIMetYourMother'', whose lead character is narrating the story to his children some 20 years later, famously has an episode in which one of Ted's dates goes by "Blah Blah" simply because he can't remember her actual name anymore. It also allows the prospect of an UnreliableNarrator--someone who is either unwilling or unable to tell the whole truth--to rear its mysterious head. Doing this is difficult, since the narrator's lies need to be self-obvious, but can really add to the narrator's CharacterDevelopment; the lies we tell ourselves are potent indicators of our priorities and weak spots. ''HIMYM'' also tackled this, though largely in its [[YourMileageMayVary contentious]] finale ([[spoiler:in which the story of "How I Met Your Mother" actually turned out to be, "Why I Want To Get Back Together With My First Love"]]).

to:

This decision can alter the story, because when telling a tale "after the fact," we have time to work on the presentation. Whilst writing, we often go back to smooth the prose, and to make sure we have actually said what we are trying to say; an oral recitation can also involve this sort of VerbalBackspace. This is why AllFirstPersonNarratorsWriteLikeNovelists. There can also be poor recollection; ''Series/HowIMetYourMother'', whose lead character is narrating the story to his children some 20 years later, famously has an episode in which one of Ted's dates goes by "Blah Blah" simply because he can't remember her actual name anymore. It also allows the prospect of an UnreliableNarrator--someone who is either unwilling or unable to tell the whole truth--to rear its mysterious head. Doing this is difficult, since the narrator's lies need to be self-obvious, but can really add to the narrator's CharacterDevelopment; the lies we tell ourselves are potent indicators of our priorities and weak spots. ''HIMYM'' also tackled this, though largely in its [[YourMileageMayVary contentious]] contentious finale ([[spoiler:in which the story of "How I Met Your Mother" actually turned out to be, "Why I Want To Get Back Together With My First Love"]]).
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


An important tonal decision to make is whether your narrator is ''aware'' s/he is telling the story. ''Literature/TheCatcherInTheRye'', for instance, is very specifically a long, rambling monologue by Holden Caulfield, being told to you (The Reader) while he (Holden) is in a mental institution, and the titular ''Literature/JaneEyre'' even BreaksTheFourthWall by addressing the audience directly ("Reader, I married him" is but the most famous quotation). However, other first-person narratives go along as a sort of on-the-spot recording of what's going on in the person's head, using the (not-very-questioned) literary conceit that we can see into their thoughts ''because'' they are a narrator. ''Literature/{{Twilight}}'' and ''Literature/TheHungerGames'' both take this tack, amongst others.

The key element of this decision is that it can alter one's language use. When writing a story, we often go back to smooth the prose, and to make sure we have actually said what we are trying to say; an oral recitation, taking place after the fact, can also involve this sort of VerbalBackspace. It also allows the prospect of an UnreliableNarrator, someone who is either unwilling or unable to tell the whole truth, to rear its mysterious head. But from Katniss Everdeen, or Bella Swan, we assume that we are hearing the unvarnished truth, precisely because of the literary conceit of the narration. What Susanne Collins and Stephenie Meyer wrote is (supposed to be) the character's thoughts ''at the moment she has them'', with no time ''for'' VerbalBackspace or other self-censoring. Additionally, an "in-the-moment" narration requires a bit more WillingSuspensionOfDisbelief, since there's no FramingDevice whatsoever, though if it works it has a greater sense of urgency and propulsiveness. Finally, there is enormous room for a {{deconstruction}} of the entire trope, with your narrator becoming ''aware'' that readers are peeking in to his or her thoughts--though this is even more likely to toss readers off the Suspension Of Disbelief train.


to:

An important tonal decision to make is whether your narrator is ''aware'' s/he is telling the story. ''Literature/TheCatcherInTheRye'', for instance, is very specifically a long, rambling novel-length monologue by Holden Caulfield, being told to you (The Reader) while he (Holden) is you visit Holden in a mental institution, and the institution. The titular ''Literature/JaneEyre'' even BreaksTheFourthWall takes it a step further by addressing directly BreakingTheFourthWall to address the audience directly ("Reader, I married him" is but how the most famous quotation). final chapter starts). However, other first-person narratives go along as are a sort of on-the-spot recording record of what's going on in the person's head, using the (not-very-questioned) literary conceit that we can see into their thoughts ''because'' they are a narrator. such as ''Literature/{{Twilight}}'' and ''Literature/TheHungerGames'' both take this tack, amongst others.

The key element
''Literature/ASongOfIceAndFire''. These novels present the thoughts of this their narrators (Bella Swan for ''Twilight'', LoadsAndLoadsOfCharacters for ''Ice and Fire'') ''as they have them'', not after the fact. Precisely how the author stole those thoughts out of the characters' heads is [[HandWave typically not addressed]].

This
decision is that it can alter one's language use. When writing a the story, because when telling a tale "after the fact," we have time to work on the presentation. Whilst writing, we often go back to smooth the prose, and to make sure we have actually said what we are trying to say; an oral recitation, taking place after the fact, recitation can also involve this sort of VerbalBackspace. This is why AllFirstPersonNarratorsWriteLikeNovelists. There can also be poor recollection; ''Series/HowIMetYourMother'', whose lead character is narrating the story to his children some 20 years later, famously has an episode in which one of Ted's dates goes by "Blah Blah" simply because he can't remember her actual name anymore. It also allows the prospect of an UnreliableNarrator, someone UnreliableNarrator--someone who is either unwilling or unable to tell the whole truth, to truth--to rear its mysterious head. But head. Doing this is difficult, since the narrator's lies need to be self-obvious, but can really add to the narrator's CharacterDevelopment; the lies we tell ourselves are potent indicators of our priorities and weak spots. ''HIMYM'' also tackled this, though largely in its [[YourMileageMayVary contentious]] finale ([[spoiler:in which the story of "How I Met Your Mother" actually turned out to be, "Why I Want To Get Back Together With My First Love"]]).

Compare this with the technique used in "on the spot" narratives. While Holden can conceal certain things by simply skipping them (and, indeed, it's believed that he glosses over being molested as a child), when we hear
from Bella Swan or Katniss Everdeen, Everdeen or Bella Swan, Tyrion Lannister we assume that we they are hearing telling us the unvarnished truth, precisely because of the literary conceit of the narration. What Susanne Collins and Stephenie Meyer wrote is (supposed to be) the character's truth. After all, we're hearing their thoughts ''at the moment she has them'', with same time they are'': there's no time ''for'' VerbalBackspace or other self-censoring. Additionally, an This kind of "in-the-moment" narration requires a bit more WillingSuspensionOfDisbelief, since there's no FramingDevice whatsoever, though if it works it has a greater sense of urgency and propulsiveness. propulsiveness. (It's the only way to make a first-person death scene work, as anyone familiar with [[WhamEpisode The Red Wedding]] can tell you.) It gives you room for unflattering characterization, since our thoughts are not always kind--though, if the {{Hatedom}} for ''Twilight'' is any indication, your characters may find this held against them regardless. Finally, there is enormous room for a {{deconstruction}} of the entire trope, with your narrator becoming ''aware'' that readers are peeking in to his or her thoughts--though thoughts. However, this is even more likely to toss readers off the Suspension Of Disbelief train.

train, since they now have to accept their own ability to mind-read via book.

Added: 2696

Changed: 88

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None




to:

\n!!! How Is The Story Being Told?

An important tonal decision to make is whether your narrator is ''aware'' s/he is telling the story. ''Literature/TheCatcherInTheRye'', for instance, is very specifically a long, rambling monologue by Holden Caulfield, being told to you (The Reader) while he (Holden) is in a mental institution, and the titular ''Literature/JaneEyre'' even BreaksTheFourthWall by addressing the audience directly ("Reader, I married him" is but the most famous quotation). However, other first-person narratives go along as a sort of on-the-spot recording of what's going on in the person's head, using the (not-very-questioned) literary conceit that we can see into their thoughts ''because'' they are a narrator. ''Literature/{{Twilight}}'' and ''Literature/TheHungerGames'' both take this tack, amongst others.

The key element of this decision is that it can alter one's language use. When writing a story, we often go back to smooth the prose, and to make sure we have actually said what we are trying to say; an oral recitation, taking place after the fact, can also involve this sort of VerbalBackspace. It also allows the prospect of an UnreliableNarrator, someone who is either unwilling or unable to tell the whole truth, to rear its mysterious head. But from Katniss Everdeen, or Bella Swan, we assume that we are hearing the unvarnished truth, precisely because of the literary conceit of the narration. What Susanne Collins and Stephenie Meyer wrote is (supposed to be) the character's thoughts ''at the moment she has them'', with no time ''for'' VerbalBackspace or other self-censoring. Additionally, an "in-the-moment" narration requires a bit more WillingSuspensionOfDisbelief, since there's no FramingDevice whatsoever, though if it works it has a greater sense of urgency and propulsiveness. Finally, there is enormous room for a {{deconstruction}} of the entire trope, with your narrator becoming ''aware'' that readers are peeking in to his or her thoughts--though this is even more likely to toss readers off the Suspension Of Disbelief train.




Having a member of the main cast narrating the story may be difficult for some. Since most literature is written in third-person from a seemingly omnipresent narrator or told from first person from the main character's point of view, having a character that's not the main character may seem like a strange idea to some. To do this the following options may work:
* ChangingPOV

to:

Having a member of the main cast narrating the story may be difficult for some. Since most literature is written in third-person from a seemingly omnipresent narrator narrator, or told from first person in first-person from the main character's point of view, having a character narrator that's not the main character may seem like a strange idea to some. To do this the following options may work:
* ChangingPOVSwitchingPOV




to:

* FirstPersonPeripheralNarrator

The biggest reason to do this is to add a sense of mystery to the main character. Human beings (mind readers aside) cannot tell what other people are thinking; instead, we learn to extrapolate based on their actions. If a person eats food, we assume they are hungry; if they drive a car, we assume they are trying to go somewhere or leave somewhere; if they kiss us, we assume they are attracted to us. But all these assumptions could be false. We have no idea what a person's motives truly are. And, by not giving readers narratorial insight into said person's head, you can retain the mystery and leave plenty of room for speculation.

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

The Narrator character is not only the narrator of the story being told, but can appear as a character in the story. However, it's the creator's decision to make the narrator a part of the cast or not. Whether or not the narrator in your story will be apart of the main cast, here's an article about how to make the narrator an interesting and likeable character.

!! The Narrator is the Story Teller

This is the guy in charge of telling your story. Whether this character is some kind of AuthorAvatar or another character completely, this job is important! Make sure your narrator tells the story the way you want it, in a way that brings the reader in the story and makes the reader want to know more. The narrator is usually reliable, but having TheWatson for the narrator can help the reader think about the situation in the story really think deeply, even telling the reader what they might've overlooked. An UnreliableNarrator can make readers confused, but can be fun to play around with if you do it right. The [[PosthumousNarration Posthumous Narrator]] can be a character in the story, but depending on who is is, it can either work out or sink...

Choose what kind of narration you want carefully. Make sure the narrator brings out the story you have.

* TheWatson is the kind of narrator equivalent to the reader, asking the kind of questions the reader should be asking. He's the basic storyteller.
* MrExposition is the kind of narrator who'll provide the reader with information sometimes up to the point of Infodump. AsYouKnow is a common trope for these kinds of narrators.
* [[PosthumousNarration Posthumous Narrator]] is a narrator that's going to die, dead or will die somewhere in the story. This can be a character in the cast, but their death will have to be explained and the story must lead up to their death, show their death or show them dying.
* AndThatLittleGirlWasMe is best suited for a story in which there are a lot of flashbacks or an autobiography. Or a story with hints of the authors past or a lot of AuthorAvatar's.
* InteractiveNarrator can be used in many many ways. This is the kind of narrator you can have fun with and play around with making him snarky or kind and concerned for his story's cast. They don't typically rest behind the FourthWall. They might end up really hating their job.



!! The Narrator is TheChick?!

Having a member of the main cast narrating the story may be difficult for some. Since most literature is written in third-person from a seemingly omnipresent narrator or told from first person from the main character's point of view, having a character that's not the main character may seem like a strange idea to some. To do this the following options may work:
* ChangingPOV
* TheAllConcealingI
* DelayedNarratorIntroduction

!! The Narrator is Me! I'm the Hero!

Having the main character being the narrator is typically done by having the hero tell the story in the first person or NarratingThePresent. However TheHero can be the narrator through LetMeTellYouAStory and [[AndThatLittleGirlWasMe that hero was me]]. Depending on the hero being BookDumb, BookSmart, GenreSavvy, or whatever else can make narration different. It can show how TheHero changes during the story, what lessons they learn, who they come across and how they are maturing throughout the story. This is something to consider.

!! The Narrator is the Omniscient Being We All Thought he was

Having the narrator telling the story in third person is typical for most works. But making the narrator an omniscient being who BreaksTheFourthWall and addresses the reader directly isn't. Having the narrator address the reader through comments at the end of each chapter, through normal narration, or being introduced at the beginning of the story can make the narrator seem alive, like a real person. This can be done creatively in manga or graphic novels, giving the narrator a face and body to call their own, having them appear in their own segments. Typically this is done by giving the narrator no real features, covering up their faces or hiding their identities. However giving the narrator an actual face and body can make the reader feel comfortable and make the narrator more relatable.
----

Top