Follow TV Tropes

Following

History Series / SiskelAndEbert

Go To

OR

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* EnforcedPlug: When the Internet began to take off, Siskel and Ebert naturally got their own website, which led to one of the two plugging it at the end of every episode. Unfortunately, this meant they had no time to get a little more debating in, which was the highlight of the 1986-1995 shows.

to:

* EnforcedPlug: When the Internet began to take off, Siskel and Ebert naturally got their own website, which led to one of the two plugging it at the end of every episode. Unfortunately, this meant they had no time to get a little more debating in, which was the highlight of the 1986-1995 shows.

Added: 177

Removed: 182

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
TRS wick cleanupMemetic Hand Gesture has been disambiguated


* CharacterTics: Famously, they awarded each movie they reviewed a Thumbs Up or Thumbs Down. Their thumbs were in fact ''trademarked'' to prevent other shows from copying them!



* MemeticHandGesture: Famously, they awarded each movie they reviewed a Thumbs Up or Thumbs Down. Their thumbs were in fact ''trademarked'' to prevent other shows from copying them!
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:


* OffModel:
** Invoked; a common complaint from Siskel about most non-Disney animated movies. He gave particular criticism to ''WesternAnimation/{{Balto}}'', calling it "sketchy".
** Ebert disliked how ''Film/CoolWorld'' looked, saying the animation moved too fast for the human mind to read the images. Siskel called the animation "farmed out".
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
This isn't circular reasoning; it's two people restating their points of view and not getting anywhere. Circular Reasoning is like saying "the Earth is flat because it is a circle. I know it is a circle because it is flat."


* CircularReasoning: Demonstrated in their review of ''Film/BackToTheFuturePartIII''. Siskel liked the film, while Ebert gave it a marginal thumbs down, since he felt the western tropes were old hat. Ebert argued that Siskel would feel differently if the film was ''only'' a western and not a ''Franchise/BackToTheFuture'' movie, while Siskel argued that it ''wasn't'' just a western (which is true, as the film played with a lot of those tropes). Repeat this back-and-forth a couple times.

to:

* %%* CircularReasoning: Demonstrated in their review of ''Film/BackToTheFuturePartIII''. Siskel liked the film, while Ebert gave it a marginal thumbs down, since he felt the western tropes were old hat. Ebert argued that Siskel would feel differently if the film was ''only'' a western and not a ''Franchise/BackToTheFuture'' movie, while Siskel argued that it ''wasn't'' just a western (which is true, as the film played with a lot of those tropes). Repeat this back-and-forth a couple times.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* InsaneTrollLogic: One particularly baffling Viewer's Thumb entry claimed that the only reason the duo gave ''Film/SpaceJam'' two thumbs up is because Michael Jordan is from Chicago, where the show was filmed.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* ThisIsGonnaSuck: In reviewing ''The Stepfather'', Ebert described the premise of the movie with obvious contempt and then declared that studio heads must have said, "Sounds good keep talking". Siskel audibly and painfully groaned, "Oh, God."
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Not only this, but they frequently called out the Oscars at times where they felt Creator/HarrisonFord was ignored for Academy attention for his action roles, which they mentioned more than once that he could do better than anyone else (aside from maybe Steve McQueen in decades past). ''The Fugitive'' was probably one of the more notable examples of them feeling he was snubbed.

to:

** Not only this, but they frequently called out the Oscars at times where they felt Creator/HarrisonFord was ignored for Academy attention for his action roles, which they mentioned more than once that he could do better than anyone else (aside from maybe Steve McQueen [=McQueen=] in decades past). ''The Fugitive'' was probably one of the more notable examples of them feeling he was snubbed.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
linking to correct page


** In their review of ''Film/HomeAlone 3'', Siskel said the theme song for the movie should be "Dumbbells Keep Falling On My Head".

to:

** In their review of ''Film/HomeAlone 3'', ''Film/HomeAlone3'', Siskel said the theme song for the movie should be "Dumbbells Keep Falling On My Head".
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:


* PromotionalConsideration: The sponsors varied, but two companies that often appeared in the "Promotional Consideration" slide were Nestle's Raisinets, sponsor of the [[TropeCoTropeOfTheWeek Video Pick of the Week segment]], and Jelly Belly Jelly Beans.

to:

* PromotionalConsideration: The sponsors varied, but two companies that often appeared in the "Promotional Consideration" slide were Nestle's Raisinets, sponsor of the [[TropeCoTropeOfTheWeek Video Pick of the Week segment]], segment, and Jelly Belly Jelly Beans.


** Averted, not on the show, but on Ebert's corresponding series of "Video Home Companion" books chronicling his reviews. Since [[SturgeonsLaw bad movies tend to be forgotten]] while good movies endure, movies with three to four stars tended to be retained from one volume to the next. Ebert himself acknowledged that this gave an illusion that he liked most of the movies that he reviewed.

to:

** Averted, not on the show, but on Ebert's corresponding series of "Video Home Companion" books chronicling his reviews. Since [[SturgeonsLaw bad movies tend to be forgotten]] forgotten while good movies endure, movies with three to four stars tended to be retained from one volume to the next. Ebert himself acknowledged that this gave an illusion that he liked most of the movies that he reviewed.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* EightDeadlyWords: Invoked: A common criticism if they dislike a movie- when reviewing ''The Big Squeeze'', Roger said he didn't care about the characters so he was bored.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


---> '''Roger:''' ''[=Stella=]'' is a movie with a lot of style, warmth, and heart. [...] This movie was inspired by the 1937 Creator/BarbaraStanwyck classic ''[=Stella=] [=Dallas=]'', and the film historian Leslie Halliwell said of that movie that movie audiences came to sneer and stayed to weep. The same thing happened this time.
--> '''Gene:''' I came to weep... and sneered.

to:

---> '''Roger:''' ''[=Stella=]'' is a movie with a lot of style, warmth, and heart. [...] This movie was inspired by the 1937 Creator/BarbaraStanwyck classic ''[=Stella=] [=Dallas=]'', and the film historian Leslie Halliwell said of that movie that movie audiences came to sneer and stayed to weep. The same thing happened this time.
-->
time.\\
'''Gene:''' I came to weep... and sneered.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Siskel gave a surprising thumbs up to ''Film/{{Armageddon}}''[[note]]Ebert's eventual pick for 1998's worst film[[/note]], saying the lightning fast editing and constant camera movement actually [[NarmCharm amused him after a while]].

to:

** Siskel gave a surprising thumbs up to ''Film/{{Armageddon}}''[[note]]Ebert's ''Film/Armageddon1998''[[note]]Ebert's eventual pick for 1998's worst film[[/note]], saying the lightning fast editing and constant camera movement actually [[NarmCharm amused him after a while]].

Added: 214

Changed: 25

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* DoWrongRight: They're not happy about the parody they suffered in the Godzilla movie, but it's just because the writers didn't do anything imaginative against them, like have the monster squash them or something.



** They both were parodied in ''Film/Godzilla1998'', with the characters Mayor Ebert and his sidekick Gene. They were not amused [[CrossesTheLineTwice because the filmmakers didn't have the audacity to have the two squished by Godzilla.]]

to:

** They both were parodied in ''Film/Godzilla1998'', with the characters Mayor Ebert and his sidekick Gene. They were not amused [[CrossesTheLineTwice [[DoWrongRight because the filmmakers didn't have the audacity to have the two squished by Godzilla.]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* NotDistractedByTheSexy: Siskel derided the sex scene in ''Film/{{Disclosure}}'', saying it was unrealistic for the boss to sleep with an employee on the first night:

to:

* NotDistractedByTheSexy: Siskel derided the sex scene in ''Film/{{Disclosure}}'', saying it was unrealistic for the boss to sleep with an employee on the first night:night:[[note]]Siskel must not have been paying attention, as the sex scene, and the fact that she's doing this on their first day working together, is in fact ''very'' plot-relevant[[/note]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Removed Unfortunate Implications pothole


* ColorCodedCharacters: Referenced (and criticized) in their review of ''WesternAnimation/ThePebbleAndThePenguin''. Ebert criticized the movie for color-coding its characters so that the villain had a dark complexion and the heroes had mostly white faces. He thought this sent [[UnfortunateImplications a negative subliminal message to kids.]]

to:

* ColorCodedCharacters: Referenced (and criticized) in their review of ''WesternAnimation/ThePebbleAndThePenguin''. Ebert criticized the movie for color-coding its characters so that the villain had a dark complexion and the heroes had mostly white faces. He thought this sent [[UnfortunateImplications a negative subliminal message to kids.]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Moving to Trivia.


* {{Corpsing}}:
** Ebert, when describing the plot of ''Film/ForeverYoung''.
** While it was customary for either Siskel or Ebert to remain silent while the other provided the initial summary and description of the movie they were reviewing, occasionally, they can be heard chuckling throughout. One of the biggest examples being when Siskel laughs multiple times through [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fCOf91smkXU Ebert's roasting]] of ''Film/LeonardPart6'' before it's his turn to speak.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** When reviewing ''Film/DoubleDragon'', Ebert said kids might enjoy it but nobody else:

to:

** When reviewing ''Film/DoubleDragon'', ''Film/DoubleDragon1994'', Ebert said kids might enjoy it but nobody else:
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


Ebert continued the show, first as ''Roger Ebert & the Movies'' with guest cohosts, and then as ''At the Movies with Ebert and Roeper'' with the addition of his ''Sun-Times'' colleague Creator/RichardRoeper. Ebert stopped appearing on the show in 2006 because he lost the ability to speak due to his cancer and Roeper continued with guests until the two were removed from the show by their distributor, Disney-ABC Domestic Television, in 2008. They were replaced by Ben Lyons (son of film critic Jeffery Lyons) and film critic and Creator/TurnerClassicMovies presenter Ben Mankiewicz (now part of Radio/TheYoungTurks' ''[[https://www.youtube.com/whattheflickshow What the Flick?!]]'') in a move to skew to younger audience. While most of the old fanbase of the show had no problem with Ben Mankiewicz, almost all of them (and Ebert himself) took issue with Ben Lyons' skill, ethics, and taste. The two Bens were fired from the show a little over a year later. The critics were replaced one final time with critic A.O. Scott (critic for the ''New York Times'') and Michael Phillips (of Siskel's ''Chicago Tribune''), choices Ebert expressed satisfaction with, despite no longer being associated with the show. However, these two hosts only lasted from August 2009 to March 2010, when Disney-ABC simply pulled the plug on the show, ending the ''Siskel & Ebert'' TV legacy for good.

to:

Ebert continued the show, first as ''Roger Ebert & the Movies'' with guest cohosts, and then as ''At the Movies with Ebert and Roeper'' with the addition of his ''Sun-Times'' colleague Creator/RichardRoeper. Ebert stopped appearing on the show in 2006 because he lost the ability to speak due to his cancer and Roeper continued with guests until the two were removed from the show by their distributor, Disney-ABC Domestic Television, in 2008. They were replaced by Ben Lyons (son of film critic Jeffery Lyons) and film critic and Creator/TurnerClassicMovies presenter Ben Mankiewicz (now part of Radio/TheYoungTurks' The Young Turks' ''[[https://www.youtube.com/whattheflickshow What the Flick?!]]'') in a move to skew to younger audience. While most of the old fanbase of the show had no problem with Ben Mankiewicz, almost all of them (and Ebert himself) took issue with Ben Lyons' skill, ethics, and taste. The two Bens were fired from the show a little over a year later. The critics were replaced one final time with critic A.O. Scott (critic for the ''New York Times'') and Michael Phillips (of Siskel's ''Chicago Tribune''), choices Ebert expressed satisfaction with, despite no longer being associated with the show. However, these two hosts only lasted from August 2009 to March 2010, when Disney-ABC simply pulled the plug on the show, ending the ''Siskel & Ebert'' TV legacy for good.

Changed: 21

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* LaterInstallmentWeirdness: Towards the end of the ''Roeper & guest'' era, the thumbs up/down rating was replaced by See It, Rent It, or Skip It, as Disney/ABC refused to pay the Siskel and Ebert estates for continued use of the "Two Thumbs Up" trademark.

to:

* LaterInstallmentWeirdness: Towards the end of the ''Roeper & guest'' era, the thumbs up/down rating was replaced by See It, Rent It, or Skip It, as Disney/ABC refused to pay Ebert and the Siskel and Ebert estates estate for continued use of the "Two Thumbs Up" trademark.

Changed: 110

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* LaterInstallmentWeirdness: Towards the end of the ''Roeper & guest'' era, the thumbs up/down rating was replaced by See It, Rent It, or Skip It.

to:

* LaterInstallmentWeirdness: Towards the end of the ''Roeper & guest'' era, the thumbs up/down rating was replaced by See It, Rent It, or Skip It.It, as Disney/ABC refused to pay the Siskel and Ebert estates for continued use of the "Two Thumbs Up" trademark.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** The music video for Music/MichaelJacksonsThriller was reviewed alongside the regular movie fare in January 1984. Thye panned the video, claiming it relied on stock special effects that weren't scary, minimizing the music or the [[MichaelJacksonsThrillerParody iconic dance sequence]].

to:

** The music video for Music/MichaelJacksonsThriller was reviewed alongside the regular movie fare in January 1984. Thye They panned the video, claiming it relied on stock special effects that weren't scary, minimizing the music or the [[MichaelJacksonsThrillerParody iconic dance sequence]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** The music video for Music/MichaelJacksonsThriller was reviewed alongside the regular movie fare in January 1984. Thye panned the video, claiming it relied on stock special effects that weren't scary, minimizing the music or the [[MichaelJacksonsThrillerParody iconic dance sequence]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Averted, not on the show, but on Ebert's corresponding series of "Video Home Companion" books chronicling his reviews. Since bad movies tend to be forgotten while good movies endure, movies with three to four stars tended to be retained from one volume to the next. Ebert himself acknowledged that this gave an illusion that he liked most of the movies that he reviewed.

to:

** Averted, not on the show, but on Ebert's corresponding series of "Video Home Companion" books chronicling his reviews. Since [[SturgeonsLaw bad movies tend to be forgotten forgotten]] while good movies endure, movies with three to four stars tended to be retained from one volume to the next. Ebert himself acknowledged that this gave an illusion that he liked most of the movies that he reviewed.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Averted, not on the show, but on Ebert's corresponding series of "Video Home Companion" series of books chronicling hs reviews. Since bad movies tend to be forgotten while good movies endure, movies with three to four stars tended to be retained from one volume to the next. Ebert himself acknowledged that this gave an illusion that he liked most of the movies that he reviewed.

to:

** Averted, not on the show, but on Ebert's corresponding series of "Video Home Companion" series of books chronicling hs his reviews. Since bad movies tend to be forgotten while good movies endure, movies with three to four stars tended to be retained from one volume to the next. Ebert himself acknowledged that this gave an illusion that he liked most of the movies that he reviewed.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** Averted, not on the show, but on Ebert's corresponding series of "Video Home Companion" series of books chronicling hs reviews. Since bad movies tend to be forgotten while good movies endure, movies with three to four stars tended to be retained from one volume to the next. Ebert himself acknowledged that this gave an illusion that he liked most of the movies that he reviewed.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** Richard Roeper referenced his thumbs down to ''Film/TheLordOfTheRingsTheFellowshipOfTheRing'' in his final episode in 2008. That's right: A call back to a review from ''seven years prior''.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** The second half of the 1998-1999 season is this, due to every episode containing a different guest host, due to Gene Siskel's sudden death. The 1999-2000 season also had this, but by then they had narrowed the stable a bit until they decided on Richard Roeper as his permanent co-host.

Added: 1796

Removed: 1802

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
TRS cleanup


* FormulaBreakingEpisode:
** As stated in the intro paragraphs, some episodes take a break from reviewing new movies and focus on a specific issue (colorization, "What's Wrong With Home Video", favorite villains, [[GuiltyPleasures guilty pleasures]], etc.).
** Sometimes a standard-format episode would have a segment briefly discussing a hot film-related topic along with the usual reviews; in late 1991 they discussed the controversy over Music/MichaelJackson's "Black or White" video -- specifically its violent, crotch-grabbing finale. They weren't so much bothered by that as the fact that they had no idea what was going on in the video.
** The tribute to Gene Siskel episode didn't feature any movie reviews at all, a rarity for the show.
** The duo never reviewed TV shows, but they made an exception with ''WesternAnimation/TheCritic'', due to its subject matter. They reviewed the first three episodes and gave it a marginal thumbs down. However, they sensed promise in the premise and felt the show should stay focused on satirizing movies. [[AdamWesting They eventually guest-voiced]] a second-season episode ("Siskel & Ebert & Jay & Alice") which parodied many film tropes to break the two apart and bring them together again.
** Similarly, the duo rarely reviewed made-for-TV movies but occasionally they made an exception, such as when they reviewed ''The Rat Pack''.
** Any episode where they focused on one director or actor, such as an episode all about Creator/RobertRedford. Similarly, any episode analyzing one movie, such as ''Film/ForrestGump'', ''Film/PulpFiction'', ''Film/ThePhantomMenace'', and ''Film/EyesWideShut''.
** The episode from 2000 when Roger interviewed Bill Clinton. No new movie reviews, just a discussion with a (now former) president about his favorite movies.



* SomethingCompletelyDifferent:
** As stated in the intro paragraphs, some episodes take a break from reviewing new movies and focus on a specific issue (colorization, "What's Wrong With Home Video", favorite villains, [[GuiltyPleasures guilty pleasures]], etc.).
** Sometimes a standard-format episode would have a segment briefly discussing a hot film-related topic along with the usual reviews; in late 1991 they discussed the controversy over Music/MichaelJackson's "Black or White" video -- specifically its violent, crotch-grabbing finale. They weren't so much bothered by that as the fact that they had no idea what was going on in the video.
** The tribute to Gene Siskel episode didn't feature any movie reviews at all, a rarity for the show.
** The duo never reviewed TV shows, but they made an exception with ''WesternAnimation/TheCritic'', due to its subject matter. They reviewed the first three episodes and gave it a marginal thumbs down. However, they sensed promise in the premise and felt the show should stay focused on satirizing movies. [[AdamWesting They eventually guest-voiced]] a second-season episode ("Siskel & Ebert & Jay & Alice") which parodied many film tropes to break the two apart and bring them together again.
** Similarly, the duo rarely reviewed made-for-TV movies but occasionally they made an exception, such as when they reviewed ''The Rat Pack''.
** Any episode where they focused on one director or actor, such as an episode all about Creator/RobertRedford. Similarly, any episode analyzing one movie, such as ''Film/ForrestGump'', ''Film/PulpFiction'', ''Film/ThePhantomMenace'', and ''Film/EyesWideShut''.
** The episode from 2000 when Roger interviewed Bill Clinton. No new movie reviews, just a discussion with a (now former) president about his favorite movies.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* BaitAndSwitch: Gene gave a thumbs down to ''WesternAnimation/MickeysChristmasCarol''- when it came time for Roger to give his take, he seemed to be aghast that Gene dared to dislike it... only to reveal he was disappointed in it as well.

Top